Difference between revisions of "User talk:RobSmith"

Revision as of 04:08, September 1, 2024

Various Conservapedia resource pages

Recent changes

Mass delete

Conservapedia - Google news

Template: Admin resources

Conservapedia has a rule that a person's talk page is their castle. Don't you have better things to do than mess around with someone's user page castle?

Conservapedia has a rule that a person's talk page is their castle. Don't you have more important things to do than mess around with someone's user page castle?

Focus on something more productive. Conservative (talk) 15:49, August 29, 2024 (EDT)

You are not free to engage in spam, trolling, or targeted harassment of other editors and Admin on the wiki or in email.

All your spamming belongs on your user talk page, and not in a redirect to another page. And you are not allowed to engage in ridicule or denigration of other editors on your user talk page, either.

You have been a persistent violator of Conservapedia's basic civility rules for more than a decade. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 16:13, August 29, 2024 (EDT)

Cease your trolling. You are responsible for disruption of Conservapedia's war & election reporting. Andy has promised a preliminary ruling by the weekend.

As to "something more productive", your massive disruption causing me to cease editing on the Trump-Russia and Biden-Ukraine series (an 8 year project), you left me time to focus on your harassment and the damage you have done to Conservapedia. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 16:36, August 29, 2024 (EDT)

"sanctions don't work and are completely ineffective" Really?

If boycotts are "futile," then please explain to me, jenius, why the ADL is so worried about BDS? —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 23:37, August 31, 2024 (EDT)

Sanctions against Germany & Japan only led to (or delayed) war. Same as Iraq. Sanctions against Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran remain to be seen.

Basically, politicians issue sanctions when they lack the political support from the public for all out war.

As to the ADL, I don't know; ask them. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 23:42, August 31, 2024 (EDT)

If you studied history, you would've known that the 1933 anti-Nazi boycott didn't go through all the way because the Zionazis saved the Nazis when Haavara facilitated an exportation of Nazi products to Palestine. Had the Zionist socialists not saved the Nazi socialists' skin in their backstabbing perfidy against German Jewry, the Holocaust might've been averted to some significant extent. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 23:48, August 31, 2024 (EDT)

coulda woulda shoulda. All I know is sanctions on Germany didn't prevent the Sudeten crisis or Molotov-Ribbentrop pact or Japan from attacking Pearl Harbor (see Operation Snow). RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 23:52, August 31, 2024 (EDT)

Well yeah, sanctions wouldn't have prevented Jesuit-controlled Bolshevik Stalinists from coming to the rescue of Jesuit-controlled Nazis. The Communazi Pact was merely an expansion of the 1932 precedent set in the Berlin transport strike. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 23:57, August 31, 2024 (EDT)

Here's where I think you're misreading the issue: You evidently think sanctions are an end in itself, like Cuban sanctions, that are used to blackmail a country to comply with another country's will. History has shown they don't work, and are only employed when the political leaders imposing sanctions lack the political consensus among their domestic constituencies for all-out war. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 00:00, September 1, 2024 (EDT)

Didn't boycotts work against South African apartheid? —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 00:04, September 1, 2024 (EDT)

In the long run, no. It was the Fall of the Wall and collapse of the Soviet Union that ended Apartheid, not boycotts or sanctions. South Africa was just one more Cold War conflict zone. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 00:08, September 1, 2024 (EDT)

(ec)When political leaders start talking about sanctions, it should be an eyeopener. It means that they want war NOW, but know the public won't go along. So the kick the can down the road, hoping it will provoke the target enough or buy time to build a public consensus for war.

To wit: John McCain and the Magnitsky Act. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 00:08, September 1, 2024 (EDT)

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 :::::Here's where I think you're misreading the issue: You evidently think sanctions are an end in itself, like Cuban sanctions, that are used to [[blackmail]] a country to comply with another country's will. History has shown they don't work, and are only employed when the political leaders imposing sanctions lack the political consensus among their domestic constituencies for all-out war. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 00:00, September 1, 2024 (EDT)
 ::::::Didn't boycotts work against South African apartheid? —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 00:04, September 1, 2024 (EDT)
+:::::::In the long run, no. It was the [[Fall of the Wall]] and collapse of the Soviet Union that ended Apartheid, not boycotts or sanctions. South Africa was just one more [[Cold War]] conflict zone. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 00:08, September 1, 2024 (EDT)
+:::::(ec)When political leaders start talking about sanctions, it should be an eyeopener. It means that ''they'' want [[war]] NOW, but know the public won't go along. So the kick the can down the road, hoping it will provoke the target enough or buy time to build a public consensus for war.
+:::::To wit: [[John McCain]] and the [[Magnitsky Act]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 00:08, September 1, 2024 (EDT)

Difference between revisions of "User talk:RobSmith"

Revision as of 04:08, September 1, 2024

Conservapedia has a rule that a person's talk page is their castle. Don't you have better things to do than mess around with someone's user page castle?

"sanctions don't work and are completely ineffective" Really?

Navigation menu

Search