Difference between revisions of "Liberal logic"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new point 1, shifted old point 1 to point 6 to preserve most rankings)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[Image:Monkey-typing.jpg|thumb|center|500px|<center>Please ignore this blog entry.</center>]]
 +
 
'''Liberal logic''' is an argument by a liberal that is deceptively attractive to some, but is actually nonsensical.  Here are some examples:
 
'''Liberal logic''' is an argument by a liberal that is deceptively attractive to some, but is actually nonsensical.  Here are some examples:
  

Revision as of 02:23, February 29, 2008

Please ignore this blog entry.

Liberal logic is an argument by a liberal that is deceptively attractive to some, but is actually nonsensical. Here are some examples:

  1. often a liberal responds to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in "I don't like him!"
  2. Barack Obama on Afghanistan: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees![1]
  3. criticize Christians for literal interpretations of Genesis, but then insist on even more literal interpretations when it suits the liberal ideology[2]
  4. no matter what happens in the weather, global warming caused it
  5. belief that a correlation and/or causation (e.g., between atheism and suicide) can be disproved by a counterexample (e.g., one atheist who remained sane)
  6. Americans should "move on" past the misconduct of Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy, but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about John McCain
  7. if [highly implausible assumption like "embryonic stem cell research will find the cure for paralysis"], then would you support it (without any consideration of alternatives)?
  8. personal experience dictates personal views, rather than rising above bad and/or unusual experiences and basing one's views on logic
  9. never admit shame for liberal behavior, but often tell others they should be ashamed of themselves
  10. free speech for anything and everything ... except the conservative truth, and religion.
  11. Hollywood promotion of abortion is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed
  12. insisting that an atheistic culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm
  13. carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, but choosing abortion rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk
  14. requesting increased spending by government to reduce poverty, which actually poverty is increased by the dependency
  15. insisting on "tolerance" for anything that is anti-Christian, while censorship for anything is Christian
  16. insisting that teaching abstinence does not reduce premarital sex
  17. denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime
  18. insisting that increasing taxes must increase government revenue, when often people just work less and revenues then decline
  19. Even though the Supreme Court overrules precedents every year by 5-4 votes, Roe v. Wade cannot be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, even though the very creation of that "secret opinion" was procured by liberal deceit.)[3]
  20. The pronoun "he" has been used to include men and women for centuries, but liberals find that illogical today

(add to list)

See also

References

  1. [1]
  2. For example, liberals often insist that the Bible literally prohibits judging anything.
  3. See Jeffrey Toobin's The Nine.