Difference between revisions of "Talk:Charlie Hebdo"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Response to JoeyJ Regarding "Persnickety" Category Deletions)
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
I re-added the Conservative point-of-view to the [[Charlie Hebdo]] article after its deletion by liberal editor [[User:EJamesW]]. I read French and lived in France 4 years and speak fluent French. As I walked to the Paris Metro everyday for work, I would see the covers of [[Charlie Hebdo]], so I am very familiar this [[left wing]] [[atheist]] [[socialist]] [[French]] [[satirical]] weekly newspaper. Charlie Hebdo features generally vulgar [[cartoon]]s (often with stylized cartoon versions of [[homosexual]] acts on the cover), articles and [[profanity|profane]] jokes that "celebrate" [[freedom of speech]] for [[liberal values]] frequently via [[blasphemy]] towards any form of [[religion]], but especially [[Roman Catholic|Catholicism]] and [[Islam]].
+
I re-added the Conservative point-of-view to the [[Charlie Hebdo]] article after its deletion by liberal editor [[User:EJamesW]]. I read French and lived in France 4 years and speak fluent French. As I walked to the Paris Metro everyday for work, I would see the covers of [[Charlie Hebdo]], so I am very familiar this [[left wing]] [[atheist]] [[socialist]] [[French]] [[satirical]] weekly newspaper. Charlie Hebdo often features generally vulgar [[cartoon]]s (often with stylized cartoon versions of [[homosexual]] acts on the cover), articles and [[profanity|profane]] jokes that "celebrate" [[freedom of speech]] for [[liberal values]] frequently via [[blasphemy]] towards any form of [[religion]], but especially [[Roman Catholic|Catholicism]] and [[Islam]].
  
 
My liberal [[French]] co-workers, colleagues and boss in Paris would try to get me to read Charlie Hebdo, but it's crass "humor" was not interesting to me. See details on its' front covers:  
 
My liberal [[French]] co-workers, colleagues and boss in Paris would try to get me to read Charlie Hebdo, but it's crass "humor" was not interesting to me. See details on its' front covers:  
Line 6: Line 6:
 
* https://charlescarrollsociety.com/2015/01/08/charlie-hebdo-south-park-the-pure-cowardice-of-americas-legacy-media-charliehebdo-southpark
 
* https://charlescarrollsociety.com/2015/01/08/charlie-hebdo-south-park-the-pure-cowardice-of-americas-legacy-media-charliehebdo-southpark
  
−
[[Liberal]]s on Conservapedia, the [[liberal media elite]] [[mainstream media]] and [[Obama Administration]] / [[John Kerry]] [[State Department]] [[propaganda]] which will never link [[liberal]] [[gun control]] and it's [[gun free zone]]s (a.k.a. "free fire zones") with the greater ease which which [[Islam]]/[[Muslim]] [[Jihadism|Jihad]] [[terrorist]]s can operate in liberal bastions like [[New York City]], [[Chicago]], [[Los Angeles]], [[Boston]], and  [[Paris]]. Instead, "[[progressive]]s" / [[Nanny state]] [[protection]]ists will call for even greater gun control. Since [[AK-47]]'s were used by the Muslim terrorists, the "progressive [[police state]]" advocating  [[Obama]]-[[Eric Holder]]-[[Diane Feinstein]]-[[Chuck Schumer]]-[[Barbara Boxer]]-[[Michael Bloomberg]]-[[Jared Polis]]-[[Nancy Pelosi]]-[[Harry Reid]]-[[Hollywood values|Hollywood]] "[[cabal]]" will re-"[[List of celebrities against Second Amendment|Demand a Plan]]" for [[Universal background check]]s and to reinstate the [[Clinton Administration|Clinton era]] [[Dianne Feinstein|DiFi]]-inspired [[Assault Weapons Ban]] (this time without a sunset clause expiration date). At the same time [[RINO]]s including [[Fox News]], but not actual [[American]] [[conservative]]s or [[libertarian]]s, will demand to "over police", expand and increase the perpetual [[War on Terror]] - [[War on Drugs]] [[American]] [[Police state]] powers of mass [[surveillance]]. Neither of these two groups will ever mention the [[unalienable rights|unalienable]] [[Second Amendment]] [[mandate]] for universal "[[Constitutional carry]]" (both [[concealed carry]] and [[open carry]]) [[liberty]] among [[law]]-abiding [[American]] [[citizen]]s who can then better act as "[[sheep dogs]]" (see [[Oath Keepers]]) rather than "[[sheeple]]" (see Japanese [[World War II]] Admiral Yamamoto "[[A rifle behind every blade of grass]]" summary/synthesis 'quote').  
+
[[Hoplophobia|Hoplophobic]] [[Liberal]]s on Conservapedia, the [[liberal media elite]] [[mainstream media]] and [[Obama Administration]] / [[John Kerry]] [[State Department]] [[propaganda]] which will never link [[liberal]] [[gun control]] and it's [[gun free zone]]s (a.k.a. "free fire zones") with the greater ease which which [[Islam]]/[[Muslim]] [[Jihadism|Jihad]] [[terrorist]]s can operate in liberal bastions like [[New York City]], [[Chicago]], [[Los Angeles]], [[Boston]], and  [[Paris]]. Instead, "[[progressive]]s" / [[Nanny state]] [[protection]]ists will call for even greater gun control.  
 +
 
 +
Since [[AK-47]]'s were used by the Muslim terrorists, the "progressive [[police state]]" advocating  [[Obama]]-[[Eric Holder]]-[[Diane Feinstein]]-[[Chuck Schumer]]-[[Barbara Boxer]]-[[Michael Bloomberg]]-[[Jared Polis]]-[[Nancy Pelosi]]-[[Harry Reid]]-[[Hollywood values|Hollywood]] "[[cabal]]" will re-"[[List of celebrities against Second Amendment|Demand a Plan]]" for [[Universal background check]]s and to reinstate the [[Clinton Administration|Clinton era]] [[Dianne Feinstein|DiFi]]-inspired [[Assault Weapons Ban]] (this time without a sunset clause expiration date).  
 +
 
 +
At the same time [[RINO]]s including [[Fox News]], but not actual [[American]] [[conservative]]s or [[libertarian]]s, will demand to "over police", expand and increase the perpetual [[War on Terror]] - [[War on Drugs]] [[American]] [[Police state]] powers of mass [[surveillance]]. Neither of these two groups will ever mention the [[unalienable rights|unalienable]] [[Second Amendment]] [[mandate]] for universal "[[Constitutional carry]]" (both [[concealed carry]] and [[open carry]]) [[liberty]] among [[law]]-abiding [[American]] [[citizen]]s who can then better act as "sheep dogs" (see [[Oath Keepers]]) rather than "sheeple" (see Japanese [[World War II]] Admiral Yamamoto "A rifle behind every blade of grass" summary/synthesis 'quote').  
  
 
[[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 18:59, 12 January 2015 (EST)
 
[[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 18:59, 12 January 2015 (EST)
  
 +
==Comments from Others==
  
 
Please make coherent comments! [[User:EJamesW|EJamesW]]
 
Please make coherent comments! [[User:EJamesW|EJamesW]]
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
Nice correction there [[User:Conservative]]. Adding the word "often" should clarify with the liberal editors. As I find the time, I will hopefully be greatly expanding my [[Essay:France Pays Dearly - Liberal Gun Control Laws and Gun Free Zones that Welcome Terrorists]] over the next few days and adding the "non opinion" / "non point of view" research and quotations to the main [[Charlie Hebdo]] article.
 +
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charlie_Hebdo&curid=133719&diff=1131465&oldid=1131464
 +
 +
[[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 19:21, 12 January 2015 (EST)
 +
 +
----
 +
==Response to JoeyJ Regarding "Persnickety" Category Deletions ==
 +
[[User:JoeyJ]] please see the advice of [[User:Conservative]] regarding his use of "persnickety" regarding this. I quote user:Conservative here: "My request to other editors, please do not be persnickety with TheAmericanRedoubt about the category tags. He promised to do better on the category tags and now sees how he has been overdoing it." Conservative 13:38, 14 January 2015 (EST)" See http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Community_Portal#Category_tag_compromise_and_TheAmericanRedoubt
 +
 +
[[User:JoeyJ]] please see above section I wrote on Charlie Hebdo. The magazine is most certainly both avowedly and well known in French society and among French [[conservative]]s for being both historically [[communist]] and still part of the French [[communism]] movement (by the way, which isn't considered bad in France since the French are ALREADY extremely [[socialist]] -- remember [[Francois Mitterrand]] the '''Socialist Party''' president?). Thus, Charlie Hebdo belongs either under [[:Category:Communism]] or [[:Category:Communists]]. Same goes to [[:Category:Socialism]]. 
 +
 +
They are a [[:Category:Liberal Magazines|liberal magazine]] that is part of the [[:Category:Liberalism|liberalism movement]].  [[:Category:Atheism]], most certainly both [[gun control|anti-self-defense]] (they call it "pro [[gun control]]", American conservatives call it "anti-self-defense")  and [[:Category:Anti Second Amendment|against the American Second Amendment]]. So they are most certainly a major voice for gun control in the [[gun free zone]] country of [[France]]. Thus they belong in the [[:Category:Gun control]]. Please don't push me to immediately write several paragraphs with footnotes on how they are part of gun control in France. It would pull me away from writing firearms articles. Thank you for your patience in this Categorization matter.
 +
[[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 15:25, 14 January 2015 (EST)
 +
 +
:Can you give a source that proves that this magazine is pro-gun control ? In addition if you already add the Category:Liberal magazines  the Category:Liberalism is unnecessary.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 07:16, 15 January 2015 (EST)
 +
::TAR is working on a personal project right now that is off wiki. Based on my communications with TAR, I believe he will return in the future after the project is completed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 11:08, 25 April 2015 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 15:10, April 25, 2015

I re-added the Conservative point-of-view to the Charlie Hebdo article after its deletion by liberal editor User:EJamesW. I read French and lived in France 4 years and speak fluent French. As I walked to the Paris Metro everyday for work, I would see the covers of Charlie Hebdo, so I am very familiar this left wing atheist socialist French satirical weekly newspaper. Charlie Hebdo often features generally vulgar cartoons (often with stylized cartoon versions of homosexual acts on the cover), articles and profane jokes that "celebrate" freedom of speech for liberal values frequently via blasphemy towards any form of religion, but especially Catholicism and Islam.

My liberal French co-workers, colleagues and boss in Paris would try to get me to read Charlie Hebdo, but it's crass "humor" was not interesting to me. See details on its' front covers:

Hoplophobic Liberals on Conservapedia, the liberal media elite mainstream media and Obama Administration / John Kerry State Department propaganda which will never link liberal gun control and it's gun free zones (a.k.a. "free fire zones") with the greater ease which which Islam/Muslim Jihad terrorists can operate in liberal bastions like New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, Boston, and Paris. Instead, "progressives" / Nanny state protectionists will call for even greater gun control.

Since AK-47's were used by the Muslim terrorists, the "progressive police state" advocating Obama-Eric Holder-Diane Feinstein-Chuck Schumer-Barbara Boxer-Michael Bloomberg-Jared Polis-Nancy Pelosi-Harry Reid-Hollywood "cabal" will re-"Demand a Plan" for Universal background checks and to reinstate the Clinton era DiFi-inspired Assault Weapons Ban (this time without a sunset clause expiration date).

At the same time RINOs including Fox News, but not actual American conservatives or libertarians, will demand to "over police", expand and increase the perpetual War on Terror - War on Drugs American Police state powers of mass surveillance. Neither of these two groups will ever mention the unalienable Second Amendment mandate for universal "Constitutional carry" (both concealed carry and open carry) liberty among law-abiding American citizens who can then better act as "sheep dogs" (see Oath Keepers) rather than "sheeple" (see Japanese World War II Admiral Yamamoto "A rifle behind every blade of grass" summary/synthesis 'quote').

TheAmericanRedoubt 18:59, 12 January 2015 (EST)

Comments from Others

Please make coherent comments! EJamesW

Nice correction there User:Conservative. Adding the word "often" should clarify with the liberal editors. As I find the time, I will hopefully be greatly expanding my Essay:France Pays Dearly - Liberal Gun Control Laws and Gun Free Zones that Welcome Terrorists over the next few days and adding the "non opinion" / "non point of view" research and quotations to the main Charlie Hebdo article. http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charlie_Hebdo&curid=133719&diff=1131465&oldid=1131464

TheAmericanRedoubt 19:21, 12 January 2015 (EST)

Response to JoeyJ Regarding "Persnickety" Category Deletions

User:JoeyJ please see the advice of User:Conservative regarding his use of "persnickety" regarding this. I quote user:Conservative here: "My request to other editors, please do not be persnickety with TheAmericanRedoubt about the category tags. He promised to do better on the category tags and now sees how he has been overdoing it." Conservative 13:38, 14 January 2015 (EST)" See http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Community_Portal#Category_tag_compromise_and_TheAmericanRedoubt

User:JoeyJ please see above section I wrote on Charlie Hebdo. The magazine is most certainly both avowedly and well known in French society and among French conservatives for being both historically communist and still part of the French communism movement (by the way, which isn't considered bad in France since the French are ALREADY extremely socialist -- remember Francois Mitterrand the Socialist Party president?). Thus, Charlie Hebdo belongs either under Category:Communism or Category:Communists. Same goes to Category:Socialism.

They are a liberal magazine that is part of the liberalism movement. Category:Atheism, most certainly both anti-self-defense (they call it "pro gun control", American conservatives call it "anti-self-defense") and against the American Second Amendment. So they are most certainly a major voice for gun control in the gun free zone country of France. Thus they belong in the Category:Gun control. Please don't push me to immediately write several paragraphs with footnotes on how they are part of gun control in France. It would pull me away from writing firearms articles. Thank you for your patience in this Categorization matter. TheAmericanRedoubt 15:25, 14 January 2015 (EST)

Can you give a source that proves that this magazine is pro-gun control ? In addition if you already add the Category:Liberal magazines the Category:Liberalism is unnecessary.--JoeyJ 07:16, 15 January 2015 (EST)
TAR is working on a personal project right now that is off wiki. Based on my communications with TAR, I believe he will return in the future after the project is completed. Conservative 11:08, 25 April 2015 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Charlie_Hebdo&oldid=1150093"