Page history

Aschlafly

no edit summary

Progressingamerica

→‎Time limit in the resolving clause: Dillon v. Gloss

Aschlafly

Biden's declaration on his fourth-to-last day as president (January 17, 2025) that ERA is somehow part of the U.S. Constitution was widely rejected and even ridiculed.

Telling

Don Critchlow's quote

Aschlafly

copy-edit improvements

Aschlafly

→‎= Time limit in the resolving clause

Aschlafly

→‎Text: There was a seven-year time limit in the resolving clause, not the amendment itself, which Congress enacted. As this scholarly analysis demonstrates, the resolving clause of a constitutional amendment is fully effective, and thus the seven

Aschlafly

Repeated attempts by liberals to revive ERA have failed, including a 51-47 defeat in the U.S. Senate on April 27, 2023 (60 votes were needed).

Aschlafly

State level ERAs have been enacted in some states, most recently in Nevada in 2022 by state initiative. See Nevada ERA. These laws, however, are not enforced by federal courts.

Mr. Nationalist

→‎References: Added category.

Northwest

Undo revision 1831904 by EvilAndrew (talk) reverted vandalism edit

EvilAndrew

fixed details w/r/t Andrew

LT

no edit summary

LT

no edit summary

LT

no edit summary

Aschlafly

improved intro

Mr. Nationalist

no edit summary

Mr. Nationalist

no edit summary

Mr. Nationalist

→‎History

Aschlafly

better still

Aschlafly

more trimming of intro for conciseness

Aschlafly

copy-edit for conciseness

RobSmith

Reverted edits by Hfhff (talk) to last revision by DavidB4-bot

Hfhff

no edit summary

DavidB4-bot

Spelling, grammar, and general cleanup, typos fixed: Meanwhile → Meanwhile,, 67-21 → 67–21

Aschlafly

Meanwhile another state, North Dakota, came within one vote in its senate (after its House passed this resolution by a vote of 67-21) of declaring its prior passage of ERA to have expired when its deadline expired roughly 40 years ago.

Quidam65

→‎Impact on abortion and other issues

Aschlafly

On March 5, 2021, a district court judge for the District of Columbia held that recent ratifications by states (Nevada, Illinois, and Virginia) are after the ratification and deadline and thus invalid: these states "ratifications came after both the o

Aschlafly

It would require drafting women into the military just like men, and putting women in combat just like men, even though women suffer physical injuries at a much higher rate than men

Aschlafly

It was the subject of an historical miniseries in 2020 entitled Mrs. America, which won ten Emmy nominations.

Karajou

Reverted edits by Trumplovescock (talk) to last revision by Quidam65

(username removed)

a

Quidam65

no edit summary

Quidam65

→‎Impact on abortion and other issues

Quidam65

→‎History: add Virginia "passage"

Aschlafly

no edit summary

Aschlafly

include deadlines

Northwest

Some cleanup; info added

Northwest

Minor cleanup

Quidam65

→‎History

Quidam65

→‎History

Aschlafly

updated

1990'sguy

no edit summary

Quidam65

→‎State ratifications particularly doubtful today

Quidam65

→‎Impact on abortion and other issues

Aschlafly

improve references

Aschlafly

it would end women's shelters and other women-only facilities, such as women's prisons, by requiring all be coed

Aschlafly

→‎Impact on abortion and other issues: add many cases on abortion issue

Aschlafly

→‎History: State ratifications particularly doubtful today

1990'sguy

no edit summary