Page history
Talk: Immanuel Velikovsky
February 16, 2009
→Creationists
+80
ICR
+276
→Creationists
+254
→Creationists: Further comments after reading Stansfield's paper.
+2,867
→Creationists
+439
ICR says no support
+431
→Creationists
+352
→Creationists
+412
what creationists believe
+463
→Creationists
+320
→Creationists: Still going too far
+508
whu V is not accepted by any creationists
+582
→Creationists: Questioning reversion.
+862
zero support for V among creationists
+1,021
→Category:Jewish_People
+388
→Religious Creationists
+239
→Religious Creationists: Creationist views and category.
+576
→Category:Authors
m-125
→Category:Authors
+758
February 15, 2009
→Category:science fiction
+411
→Category:science fiction: Agreed, but back to front.
+322
→Category:Authors: Agree wotj sib=categorising
+334
→Category:Authors
+408
→Category:Authors
+250
→Category:Authors: add some
+384
→Category:Authors: actually 7 subcats
m+87
→Category:Authors: had the number wrong
m→Category:Authors: need more subcats
+109
→Category:Authors: reply
+369
→Category:Authors: suggestion, for what its worth
+406
→Category:Authors: not a useful category for V
+277
no edit summary
+852
Disagree with Science Fiction category.
+271
when are categories useful?
+340