Template talk:Deep State

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

here's my nomination for inclusion: SSCI. RobSDeep Six the Deep State!

Adding now!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 22:21, 13 August 2019 (EDT)
Would A Republic Not an Empire, Pat Buchanan's book, fit? The title obviously is a rip-off or squeal to Phyllis Schlafly's book. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 13:52, 15 August 2019 (EDT)
These books (which don't have CP articles) might also be good to include: [1][2][3] --1990'sguy (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2019 (EDT)
I stumbled on this from Politico the other day, but haven't had time to vet it. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 14:47, 15 August 2019 (EDT)
Can we add John Bolton and Mike Pompeo to the list of "People?"--Geopolitician (talk) 17:58, 3 September 2019 (EDT)
I wouldn't add either. At worst, their only minor players because they are conservative on certain issues. We should reserve mentions on the template only for the worst and most important members. Also, I think Bolton has done a good job on issues such as unilateralism and international organizations. --1990'sguy (talk) 20:17, 3 September 2019 (EDT)
I don't consider either to be "minor players." They are front in center in the ongoing conspiracy to expand our involvement in the Middle East on behalf of the petrodollar scam. However, I can see where you're coming from in terms of the big picture. If I added them, then perhaps I would be a hypocrite to leave out every other post-9/11 SoS and NSC.--Geopolitician (talk) 20:32, 3 September 2019 (EDT)
Also, any specific reason why Acheson and Marshall are on the template? --Geopolitician (talk) 18:24, 3 September 2019 (EDT)
Acheson I'll reserve comment on for now, and we're still dealing with Marshall's "agrarian reformers" now. Although he is not mentioned by name, the globalist Marshall plan is cited here (MAGAnomics#Background) as the reason for the driving need for modern reform. Admittedly, there is much room for expansion on these themes. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 01:18, 4 September 2019 (EDT)
When you read those first two sentences,
The post-World War II Marshall Plan was set up to allow Europe and Asia to place tariffs on exported American industrial products. Those tariffs were used by the EU and Japan to rebuild their infrastructure after a devastating war. However, there was never a built in mechanism to end the tariffs,
now you can understand the context of Trump's statement, "I am the chosen one" to end the imbalance. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 01:24, 4 September 2019 (EDT)
Still, I don't believe that alone would warrant calling Marshall himself a deep stater. For him to qualify as such, there would have to be a clear link between him and an entity who had undue influence over the government. --Geopolitician (talk) 11:45, 4 September 2019 (EDT)
In my opinion, a much better argument in favor of labeling Marshall as a deep stater would be the fact that he was Secretary of State when China fell to communism. That alone was enough to convince Joe McCarthy that Marshall was a closet communist. I don't know much about Truman's pre-1945 China policy, so I can't comment on that. --Geopolitician (talk) 11:53, 4 September 2019 (EDT)
His "agrarian reformer" statement came from the CCP, its fraternal CPUSA. amd its parent CPSU. Although Eisenhower was his chief defender, before the decade was over Ike was alarmed by the growth of the military industrial complex. Marshall was the chief link between civilian and military at the time of the passage of the National Security Act of 1947.
Much ink has been spilled over Marshall, and while it's hard to say he was a fool, he certainly lent himself to be a useful idiot to his communist advisers in the case of China. But I don't mean to detract from any of his great accomplishments, either. Like Trump, every man has his flaws. Personally, I don't believe he was part of a conspiracy.
It's a very interesting question, How can a man of great intellect, compassion, and vision, also be so naive? If it were up to me, I'd leave him off the Template. For now, we need the links to show how dangerous communism is, whether foreign or domestic, and how even great leaders can be manipulated, deceived, and duped, with permanent damage to society, the planet, and their own reputation.
This recent article (2007) persuaded me the issue is not dead yet - examination of his competence and character. RobSDe Plorabus Unum 12:11, 4 September 2019 (EDT)