Difference between revisions of "Atheism and Miracles"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (found updated reference for Galaxie reference)
m (expanded reference.)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
*Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1986).  [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/miracles.html "The problem of miracles:  A historical and philosophical perspective"].  ''Gospel Perspectives'', David Wenham and Craig Blomberg (ed.)(Sheffield, England: JSOT press), volume VI, pp. 9-40.  Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.
 
*Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1986).  [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/miracles.html "The problem of miracles:  A historical and philosophical perspective"].  ''Gospel Perspectives'', David Wenham and Craig Blomberg (ed.)(Sheffield, England: JSOT press), volume VI, pp. 9-40.  Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.
 
*Hoffman, Paul K. (Spring 1999).  [http://www.galaxie.com/article/caj02-1-03 [Excerpt of] "A jurisprudential analysis of Hume’s ‘in principal’ argument against miracles"].  ''Christian Apologetics Journal'', vol. 2, no. 1.  Excerpt retrieved from Galaxie Software Electronic Publishing website on May 24, 2015.
 
*Hoffman, Paul K. (Spring 1999).  [http://www.galaxie.com/article/caj02-1-03 [Excerpt of] "A jurisprudential analysis of Hume’s ‘in principal’ argument against miracles"].  ''Christian Apologetics Journal'', vol. 2, no. 1.  Excerpt retrieved from Galaxie Software Electronic Publishing website on May 24, 2015.
−
*[http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth19.html Miracles and Modern Scientific Thought - Norman Geisler]
+
*Geisler, Dr. Norman (Feb 2010 or bef.). [http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth19.html "Miracles and modern scientific thought"].  Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.
 
*[http://books.google.com/books/about/Miracles.html?id=tH8di3qQDhEC Miracles - C.S. Lewis]
 
*[http://books.google.com/books/about/Miracles.html?id=tH8di3qQDhEC Miracles - C.S. Lewis]
 
*[http://www.tektonics.org/gk/hume01.html David Hume: A Critique - JP Holding]
 
*[http://www.tektonics.org/gk/hume01.html David Hume: A Critique - JP Holding]

Revision as of 10:18, May 24, 2015

C. S. Lewis, photographed in 1947.

In relation to atheism and miracles, modern scholars are divided on the issue of whether or not David Hume was an atheist.[1] With that caveat in mind, Hume is well known for arguing that it is always more probable that the testimony of a miracle is false than that the miracle occurred.[2] Christian apologists William Lane Craig, Norman Geisler, C.S. Lewis, JP Holding, and others have shown the inadequacy and unreasonableness of Hume's position regarding miracles.[3]

Impossibly high standards are often set for miracles to be accepted including requirements such as multiple doctor's testimonies from before and after a medical miracle may have occurred along with x-rays and other confidential medical information being made public. When such evidence is produced it is simply stated to be inadequate or fraudulent.

See also

Books relating to miracles

  • Miracles, C.S. Lewis, HarperCollins, NY, NY, 2001 (originally published by C.S. Lewis in 1947)
  • Megashift, James Rutz, Empowerment Press, Colorado Springs, 2005, ISBN: 0-9669158-2-8

External links

Notes

  1. ↑ Russell, Paul (Winter 2014). "Hume on religion". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy website, Edward N. Zalta (ed.) Retrieved on May 24, 2015.
  2. ↑ Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1998). "Creation, providence, and miracle". Philosophy of Religion, Brian Davies (ed.) (Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press), pp. 136-162. Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.
  3. ↑ Multiple references: