Page history
Conservapedia_talk: Blocking policy
August 24, 2021
January 18, 2013
August 16, 2011
→Proposed Actions: My opinions inserted with Max's proposals...with the caviet that mine are not set in stone.
+1,610
→Intro: blocking policy is intimately connected to editorial policy
+1,893
→5 year blocks
m+6
→Drop down lists: actually more a reply to Sid and Rob
+2,776
→Proposed Actions: long comment from Ed Poor
+1,700
August 6, 2011
August 5, 2011
July 29, 2011
July 28, 2011
July 19, 2011
→5 year blocks: fmt
m→5 year blocks: Sid makes good points
m+814
Archiving discussions older than 7 days
m-3,315
→5 year blocks
+1,013
→Parody: new section
+347
agreed. but that's not the case, is it?
-7
→5 year blocks
m+573
add
m+32
→5 year blocks
m+523
one comment
m-188
minor reword, update
+311
comments
+775
Infinite blocks are disfavored, for several reasons, including how some people move from being liberal to conservative -- more often than other liberals admit
+244
→5 year blocks: Not often. It can happen in some circumstances, but it's not routine.
+134
→5 year blocks: People get blocked for registering accounts here and never making an edit.
m+130
→Drop down lists
+478
clarify to encourage more group discussion
+39
ohhh okay
+516
→5 year blocks: But why?
m+423
Discussion on 5 year blocks
m+5,869
September 1, 2008
August 31, 2008
→Link to the Rules: new section
+310
delete irrelevant nonsense
-1,551
→"visitors who do not appear to support this project"
+581
Don't edit until you find the answers to your own questions
+253