Page history
Talk: Law of Large Numbers
March 20, 2012
March 19, 2012
March 18, 2012
no edit summary
+2
reply to Aschafly.
+681
→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution: He then passed the book out to his fellow scientists at work, and it opened their eyes to all the lies they had been
+532
→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution
+601
→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution: OK, fine: the other Darwinists who relied on random genetic drift (presumably to try to fit the evidence to Darwin's
+352
→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution
+181
→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution: Darwin and other founders of evolution were weak in mathematics and probability, and their
+520
March 17, 2012
March 15, 2012
no edit summary
+297
→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution
+758
→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution: edit
+79
→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution: re
+386
if it's so obvious that the Law of Large Numbers does not disprove the theory of random genetic drift -- which is central to the theory of evolution -- then it should be easy to explain
+299
→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution: edit to add statement
+83
add my explanation of why the counterexample is not really a good one
+2,765
→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution
+366
→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution: The Theory of Evolution, as it is commonly taught, does claim that some new species arose due to random fluctuations.
+120
Created page with "==The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution== You can't apply the Law of Large Numbers to a time series with a trend. That's just bad math, not a co..."
+243