Talk:LGBTQ+

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I'm not terribly knowledgeable on the evolution or details of this monstrosity. As always, feel free to expand, update, or correct as needed. --David B (TALK) 23:58, 28 February 2019 (EST)

I might make a link to Facebooks Heinz 57 genders. I think we have it War on Science. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 00:41, 1 March 2019 (EST)
The things I miss out on by not using Facebook.... --David B (TALK) 02:27, 1 March 2019 (EST)
You know how the Internet basically invented furries? It's like that. Most Liberals (and people) are relatively sane when it comes to the topic of gender, but some of them really go off the deep end and think any perversion they can invent is its own gender.--LawfulLibertarian (talk) 00:48, 2 October 2019 (EDT)
LGBTQIAPK should not be confused with CMWLWWLLH. Of course, we all know what CMWLWWLLH stands for. Christian men who like women with long, luscious hair!Conservative (talk) 09:18, 17 October 2020 (EDT)
I think it's just a ruse to get us to accept Digital IDs. No way can you fit 72+ genders fit on a credit card size driver license. RobSGive Peace a chance 21:13, March 9, 2023 (EST)
This page should have been created as LGBT or LGBTQ+, or moved to one of those titles. The extraneous stuff included in this title either needs its own page or a subsection in an LGBT page. Thanks. RobSGive Peace a chance 00:31, March 13, 2023 (EDT)
There, I fixed it. Now, if somebody wants to go into the histories and merge the sections that were being edit warred over, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. RobSGive Peace a chance 18:26, March 21, 2023 (EDT)
Good change. Well done.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 18:35, March 21, 2023 (EDT)
With a little work, we can get it up to 30,000 views to join the Best Seller list. RobSGive Peace a chance 19:26, March 21, 2023 (EDT)