Difference between revisions of "Respect for Marriage Act"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Wikilink added)
m
Line 2: Line 2:
 
The '''Respect for Marriage Act''' is an ironically-named, anti-family and unconstitutional act that would allow the [[United States Congress]] to further undermine [[traditional marriage]] (which had already been affected by the illegal ''[[Obergefell v. Hodges]]'' ruling of 2015 by the then-liberal dominated [[United States Supreme Court]]) by codifying [[same-sex "marriage"]] as "settled law" federally.  The [[Democrat]]-majority House of Representatives voted for this act on July 19, 2022.  All of the Democrats voted Yes for this act along with 47 [[RINO]] Republicans.  Surprisingly, [[Scott Perry]] and [[Kat Cammack]] voted for this act.<ref>https://www.yahoo.com/now/heres-47-republicans-voted-marriage-214200413.html</ref>
 
The '''Respect for Marriage Act''' is an ironically-named, anti-family and unconstitutional act that would allow the [[United States Congress]] to further undermine [[traditional marriage]] (which had already been affected by the illegal ''[[Obergefell v. Hodges]]'' ruling of 2015 by the then-liberal dominated [[United States Supreme Court]]) by codifying [[same-sex "marriage"]] as "settled law" federally.  The [[Democrat]]-majority House of Representatives voted for this act on July 19, 2022.  All of the Democrats voted Yes for this act along with 47 [[RINO]] Republicans.  Surprisingly, [[Scott Perry]] and [[Kat Cammack]] voted for this act.<ref>https://www.yahoo.com/now/heres-47-republicans-voted-marriage-214200413.html</ref>
  
−
Despite its name, the Respect for Marriage Act shows no respect for traditional marriage whatsoever by attempting to further give homosexuals [[special right|special "rights"]] in attempting to make same-sex "marriage" "legal", even though there is no "right" to same-sex "marriage" to be found anywhere in the Constitution, a fact conveniently ignored by liberals who support the Act and the ''Obergefell'' decision.
+
Despite its name, the Respect for Marriage Act shows no respect for traditional marriage whatsoever by attempting to further give homosexuals [[special rights|special "rights"]] in attempting to make same-sex "marriage" "legal", even though there is no "right" to same-sex "marriage" to be found anywhere in the Constitution, a fact conveniently ignored by liberals who support the Act and the ''Obergefell'' decision.
  
 
==The 47 Republicans who voted for the Respect for Marriage Act==
 
==The 47 Republicans who voted for the Respect for Marriage Act==

Revision as of 11:02, July 21, 2022

The Respect for Marriage Act is an ironically-named, anti-family and unconstitutional act that would allow the United States Congress to further undermine traditional marriage (which had already been affected by the illegal Obergefell v. Hodges ruling of 2015 by the then-liberal dominated United States Supreme Court) by codifying same-sex "marriage" as "settled law" federally. The Democrat-majority House of Representatives voted for this act on July 19, 2022. All of the Democrats voted Yes for this act along with 47 RINO Republicans. Surprisingly, Scott Perry and Kat Cammack voted for this act.[1]

Despite its name, the Respect for Marriage Act shows no respect for traditional marriage whatsoever by attempting to further give homosexuals special "rights" in attempting to make same-sex "marriage" "legal", even though there is no "right" to same-sex "marriage" to be found anywhere in the Constitution, a fact conveniently ignored by liberals who support the Act and the Obergefell decision.

The 47 Republicans who voted for the Respect for Marriage Act

References

  1. ↑ https://www.yahoo.com/now/heres-47-republicans-voted-marriage-214200413.html
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Respect_for_Marriage_Act&oldid=1874019"