User talk:Aschlafly

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RobSmith (Talk | contribs) at 04:05, June 16, 2025. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

None of this trolling garbage is encyclopedic

It is using the Conservapedia educational resource by a Conservapedia editor to make ad hominems against his personal enemies. RobSZelensky Must Go! 18:41, June 7, 2025 (EDT)

Neither is this:

See also: UN predicts half the teenagers in Africa will die of AIDS.

Andy, read his "International politics/relations" essays. They are nothing more than recycled Social Darwinism and survival of the fittest screeds, topics that Conservapedia, led by yourself & User:Conservative, built its reputation by refuting. Now he is hell bent on destroying that anti-Darwinist reputation solely motivated by a personal vendetta against me for calling him out as a know-nothing on the topic of international relations. RobSZelensky Must Go! 00:35, June 12, 2025 (EDT)

It is 7AM my time

Andy, I am being harassed and trolled again with specious, redundant arguments (see Conservapedia blockable offenses) preventing me from productive editing. [2] RobSZelensky Must Go! 09:50, June 9, 2025 (EDT)

"It's best to continually change one's view of the world based on the fact that it is continually changing." [1]
RobSmith's Main page talk was droning on and on about the "defeat of the West". And yet, China's many economic woes (Property crisis, high youth unemployment, deflation) and Russia's many economic woes (High inflation, slowing economy, labor shortages, brain drain, etc.) were absent on the page. In short, it did not reflect reality and was a distortion of reality.
RobSmith's monopolization of main page talk in terms of its control via illegitimate means and his talk, talk, talk on main page talk is not good for Conservapedia. Conservative (talk) 10:36, June 9, 2025 (EDT)
Talk talk talk? You began spamming the page before I woke up to hide the facts that
Not to mention a few other things, like trying to hide Trump's desire for a weak dollar to spur US exports.
This is a redundant pattern with Ken, spamming talk pages & email lists to obscure idiotic statements of his so no one has the patience to read through to the crux of the matter.RobSZelensky Must Go! 10:45, June 9, 2025 (EDT)

"Defeat of the West" - another lie and mischaracterization

I posted verbatim from HIS qualified source Emmanual Todd he recently posted to his algorithm page that he uses to promote his own contributions and suppress other editor's Google results. It's not my own words. RobSZelensky Must Go! 11:02, June 9, 2025 (EDT)

2028 election

President Trump has already declined to endorse J.D. Vance as his successor (at least right away) and expressed openness to endorse someone else. Meanwhile, Trump's public falling out with Elon Musk could be a deciding factor in his endorsement due to Vance's close ties to Musk and to Big Tech in general. With that in mind, I'm requesting permission to create a 2028 election page.--Geopolitician (talk) 12:50, June 10, 2025 (EDT)

You don't need to ask permission. Just go ahead and do it.
By the way, maybe this will be of some help: https://electionbettingodds.com/ Conservative (talk) 12:58, June 10, 2025 (EDT)
Nevermind. I will do it for you. See: 2028 United States presidential election. Conservative (talk) 13:01, June 10, 2025 (EDT)
Thanks!--Geopolitician (talk) 18:30, June 10, 2025 (EDT)
Your welcome. Conservative (talk) 10:08, June 11, 2025 (EDT)

Trump's war

If you want to shield readers and students from Trump's war, why don't you delete all this liberal fascist claptrap? RobSZelensky Must Go! 16:18, June 10, 2025 (EDT)

Yes, its not Trump's war. Putin violated Just War Theory when he invaded Ukraine in February of 2022. The war is Putin's war and Joe Biden's war. Trump is trying to cause a peaceful settlement. If Trump was elected in 2020, the war in Ukraine would have never happened. Conservative (talk) 19:54, June 11, 2025 (EDT)
Waging war against the Russian population cause rural Russians in cold climates don't have flush toilets is not justified by Just War Theory. Neither is the existence of gay bath houses or an AIDS epidemic, which is your only justification for war, in addition to divorce & alcoholism rates. You're a sick man.
Following your logic, replacing those economic developmental & societal maladies with LBGT rights is your justification for war. RobSZelensky Must Go! 22:10, June 11, 2025 (EDT)

He's spamming talk pages again

and refusing to engage in rational, civil discussion. [3]

I encourage Andy to look at my essay at: Essay: 21st century Christianity and sexual normalcy in the world. Africa will be far more influential than Russia
In addition, I encourage him to look at my rebuttals to your complaints on the essay's talk page.
Also, great power status is built on population size, economic power and military power. Russia has a demographic crisis (falling population and one of the lowest fertility rates in the world that is accompanied by labor shortages), a struggling economy with high inflation that is slowing down and potentially facing stagflation[4] and a military power that is corrupt, has many weaknesses and is making very, very slow territorial gains in Ukraine despite facing a country with a much smaller population size (See: Russian military). Conservative (talk) 19:26, June 11, 2025 (EDT)
"rebuttals to your complaints" - there are none of "my complaints".
I merely posted a link from Dr. Fauci's NIH without comment (which you never addressed) and you went on another of your world-famous spam sprees of thousands of bytes with off-topic liberal claptrap from Google trends.
Elswhere, you posted BS about Russia not being a "Christian" nation because of the AIDS epidemic - a dubious claim. Here you've posted thousands of bytes about Google search results while never addressing the underlying NIH & UN claim.
If Google has a monopoly on truth, God help us all. RobSZelensky Must Go! 19:38, June 11, 2025 (EDT)

off topic spam 1

RobSmith, Andy is aware of various negative trends relative to Russia and that Trump said that Putin has "gone absolutely CRAZY". Conservative (talk) 19:51, June 11, 2025 (EDT)
Seesh, you never cease to amaze with your ignorance of ongoing events. Trump's claim of Putin going crazy revealed Trump was uninformed about the assassination attempt on Putin by NATO and that Trump is not in control of the US intelligence community. See Talk:Main_Page#Zelenksy_made_Trump_look_like_a_fool. RobSZelensky Must Go! 20:04, June 11, 2025 (EDT)
User:Conservative: When did you become such an ardent advocate and promoter of Google shadow banning? Google shadowing banning of terms related to Russia has been in place for more than 10 years, about the same time Google started shadow banning Conservapedia to limit our traffic. RobSZelensky Must Go! 21:48, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

Now he wants to edit war in his warmongering hysteria

[5] and spams more liberal claptrap about falling oil prices when indeed they are rising. RobSZelensky Must Go! 23:33, June 11, 2025 (EDT)

Elite warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers

Politico: DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "Elite warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers...It's up to us, the people, to speak up and demand an end to this madness".

User:Conservative will not stop his anti-Trump trolling and doing the biding of anti-Trump warmongers. RobSZelensky Must Go! 10:53, June 12, 2025 (EDT)

He will not stop his anti-Trump warmongering.

Do you believe Israeli's military has done much better in Iran than Russia's military has done in Ukraine?

Have you noticed that Israeli's military has done much better in Iran than Russia's military has done in Ukraine?

Take a look at: Russian war advances slower than WWI despite Ukraine being a flat open land. Russia's economy is a big mess

Also, this is still one of my favorite military related videos: Why the IDF is the world’s most effective military | War on Tape | Daily Mail. Conservative (talk) 12:28, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

He's spamming user talk pages again

[6] RobSZelensky Must Go! 12:42, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

User:Conservative is like Lindsey Graham: he thinks war and killing is a game. RobSZelensky Must Go! 15:32, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

User:Conservative simply doesn't understand, nor has any interest in, issues surrounding modern war. For example, a rush to use AI drone technology to make decisions to kill people. Instead, he goes on and on about gay bath houses and flush toilets as cause under Just War Theory to fund wars. Worse, he spams this senseless and divisive rhetoric to disinterested user talk pages to create divisiveness in the Conservapedia community.

Spamming usertalk pages is intimidating to editors who do not want to get involved in his personal problems. This can be seen by their lack of response, and their editing dropping off after these spam attacks until the smoke has cleared. They don't want to "take sides" in the silly fights he provokes.

I have tried for many many years to have rational and intelligent discussions with User:Conservative, but it is a hopeless task. RobSZelensky Must Go! 17:51, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

User:Conservative repeatedly, hundreds & hundreds of times spams this line, and even in the most inappropriate places:

Russia is a declining power and it will only get weaker with time. Russia has a declining population, very low church attendance; an AIDS epidemic, a high level of alcoholism, crumbling infrastructure and 20% of Russia doesn't have indoor plumbing.

That, is Social Darwinism. Read it. Read the line. Then read the Conservapedia Social Darwinism article.

"Social Darwinism states that the strongest or fittest should survive and flourish in society, while the weak and unfit should be allowed to die."

Then we have this (and several other entries):

Essay: The United States (the strongest and fittest) will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future.
while the weakest which will "only get weaker with time" with a declining population, very low church attendance; an AIDS epidemic, a high level of alcoholism, crumbling infrastructure and 20% of Russia doesn't have indoor plumbing."
Being "allowed to die" and funding a proxy war to kill them off because they are weak likewise are profoundly two different moral questions.

Personally, I have moral qualms about you asking User:Conservative, a guy who tries to justify war and killing over no indoor plumbing in the Arctic climate, to write on Christianity and the Bible. This is beyond foolhardy. RobSZelensky Must Go! 18:22, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

Ever since Moses murdered the Egyptian and hid his body in the sand and had second thoughts about, one of the main themes of the Bible is to teach us how to live together on this planet without killing each other. Given User:Conservative's habitual false pride and warmongering, I don't think God has given him the light to see and understand this basic teaching yet. RobSZelensky Must Go! 10:20, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

spamming a discussion on a profound moral question

Alarms are going off for most of Israel at the moment in real time. This doesn't look good for Netanyahu in relation to his domestic political opposition. Aftermath of Iranian strikes on in the Tel Aviv area (not good if you're running for re-election during a war that you threw the first punch).
IDF tweet, 6-13-25. "Game on". Looks "quite victorious". But war & killing degenerates into a big joke about gay bath houses & flush toilets by neocon RINOs and liberal trolls.
"For to all those who have, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from those who have nothing, even what they have will be taken away." (Matthew 25:29)
Israel is an ally of the USA and is quite victorious so far in the Israeli-Iran conflict. Iran and Russia maintain a close strategic partnership and Iran is getting its butt kicked by the Israelis! First Syria and now this! Russia is merely a regional power and no longer a great power. Conservative (talk) 21:40, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
It's a bit pre-mature to call Israel "victorious". This war you and Lindsey Graham want so bad has no end in sight. RobSZelensky Must Go! 21:59, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
Update: Iranian ballistic missiles reportedly on the way to Israeli nuclear facility in the Negev. [7]
His "quite victorious" comment is a manifestation of his inability to see the forest from the trees in war reporting and war propaganda.
Update: Information war has started: IDF, like the Kyiv regime, forbids citizens from uploading images and videos of missile strikes to avoid sharing damage assessment with the enemy.
This was evident yesterday already, when Israeli citizens reported 300 Iranian missiles launched and the IDF made the claim of only 100, with supposedly all shot down (except for those that hit the Ministry of Defense, financial district, etc). Today Iran says 150 hit their targets. Do the math. Deja vu. It's the Ghost of Kiev all over again. RobSZelensky Must Go! 23:28, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
Go back and reread Emmanuel Todd & Alastair Crooke's comments about denial of reality and wishful thinking.
The American public, like the German public in WWII, were kept in the dark by wartime censorship. It was quite a shock when the Red Army showed up on their doorstep one spring day in 1945 to have the taxpayers answer for the horrific crimes their government committed in the Ukrainian SSR.
‘UNPROVOKED’ attack on Iran by Israel ‘gross violation of UN charter’ — Russia’s UN rep - he is referring to Article 51. RobSZelensky Must Go! 23:55, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
Personal remark removed Conservative (talk) 01:12, June 14, 2025 (EDT)
If you want to become a serious student of foreign relations, you need to give up that simplemindedness. RobSZelensky Must Go! 15:36, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

digression on the editors' spam

"For to all those who have, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from those who have nothing, even what they have will be taken away." (Matthew 25:29)

Um, not to get into a theological discussion, but I don't believe the scripture from Matthew refers to material substance or wealth. In my understanding, it refers to those who partake or have the spirit of God (i.e. the Holy Spirit. See spirit with measure vs. spirit without measure or abundance of spirit). RobSZelensky Must Go! 22:12, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

Permission

Hello, I'm going to start a video game wiki. It's not about politics whatsoever but it will have no content license like this wiki. Would it be alright if I reuse some pages like Conservapedia:Copyrights and the site structure for the wiki I'm making? Thank you! Patriotic Gamer (talk) 12:46, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

PatriotGamer, Conservapedia has generous use rights. I don't see Andy having a problem with your request. I would just go ahead and do it.
Also, Andy is anti-video games. So if he is slow in getting back to you or doesn't get back to you, that is probably the reason why.Conservative (talk) 19:20, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
Is he? He allowed me to make some gaming articles here. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 13:41, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

Growing Hungarian audience

Got your email about Hungary.

As far as growing the Hungararian audience, please take a look at this Wikipedia article: Religion in Hungary.

If you look at the pie chart in the upper right portion of the article you will see a pie chart where 40% of the "What religion are you" issue is people not being willing to answer a survey. That's a very high unknown. Maybe Conservapedia could do a better job when it comes to researching this important issue and writing a better article.

One of the reasons this is an important issue is the low fertility rate of Hungary which is 1.52 births per woman (2022). A replacement level of births is 2.1 births per woman. And religious families that have conservative religion have a higher birth rate.

Maybe an article on Christian evangelism in Hungary might fill in the information gap that Wikipedia has. Conservative (talk) 18:47, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

Russia's strategic partner Iran vs. American ally Israel

Iran Russia.png

"Despite these differences in scale and sophistication, the outcomes have exposed similar weaknesses in Russian and Iranian air defense architecture—much of which is rooted in shared design principles and legacy platforms...Defense analysts in Moscow are reportedly acknowledging that Iranian systems—some modeled on or directly derived from Russian technologies—were unable to provide any sustained resistance even during the second day of Israeli airstrikes. One recurring assessment circulating in Russian defense circles states, “Absolutely powerless air defense, when what we see in the crosshairs is all we’ve got...

While Russia has repeatedly touted the effectiveness of systems like the S-400 in deterring Western aircraft and missiles, combat experience in Ukraine has shown otherwise. The persistent effectiveness of Ukrainian HIMARS strikes and drone attacks—some conducted with relatively low-cost platforms—has led to growing skepticism about Russia’s claim to field a fully layered and resilient air defense network."

Video: Putin abandons Iran as Israeli strikes threaten to cripple Iran and collapse its regime, Times Radio, 2025

For more information, please see: Excellent arguments that Russia is no longer a great power. Conservative (talk) 07:55, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

Andy, he's copy pasting this spam all over the wiki - a violation of Conservapedia Guidelines. RobSZelensky Must Go! 09:27, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
Personal remark removed See: Russia is too weak to save its strategic partner Iran. Once again, America's ally of Israel is triumphant. Conservative (talk) 11:30, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
RobSZelensky Must Go! 11:48, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
RobSmith's page linked above indicates: "Oops! Page unavailable." It looks like his link is as unreliable as Iranian/Russian air defenses! LOL. Conservative (talk) 11:52, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
Sorry [9] "In an interview with ABC News' Rachel Scott, Trump said he's open to Russian President Vladimir Putin serving as a mediator in the conflict" RobSZelensky Must Go! 11:53, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
Additionally, although unconfirmed, it appears Israel is using "stand off" targeting over Iraq (with German refuelers) and have not penetrated Iranian airspace. The explanation would be simple enough: under conditions of the sale, the Russian S-400 can only be used to defend inside Iranian airspace. While Israel has some success in hitting ground launchers, Iran switched some time ago to mobile missile defense launchers, which of course don't have the range as ground launchers. The reporting of "Israel has command over Iran skies" is fake news. RobSZelensky Must Go! 23:38, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
Update: Approx 30 USAF Tankers are now Airborne. This suggests round the clock bombing. Still think the US isn't involved? RobSZelensky Must Go! 23:46, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
So, there are two types of missile launchers, (1) missile defense launchers against incoming attacks, and (2) offensive long range ballistic missiles. Both can be mobile (mobile defensive launchers have limited range cause they also need radar & a power source which is a dead giveaway to their location). Long range mobile ballistic launchers engage in hit n run tactics. It should be noted that now it has been revealed that the United States had a ZERO success rate in locating Saddam's mobile Scuds during the months long operation in the 1991 Gulf War (round the clock bombing for the next week isn't likely to reduce Iran's long range missile capability). Yes, they can hit some above ground production sites, but most production has been moved below ground a long time ago.
Here, in real time, you see war propaganda played out; if Israel is having such success, why are they already screaming for help? RobSZelensky Must Go! 00:01, June 16, 2025 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&oldid=2133395"