Owen Lattimore

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Owen Lattimore was U.S. political adviser to Chiang Kai-shek in 1941; after Pearl Harbor he became Deputy Director of the United States Office of War Information for Pacific Operations.[1] According a unanimous report of the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee (SISS), he was also "from some time beginning in the 1930's, a conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy."[2] He was Director of Research for the American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR), identified by SISS as "a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives,"[3] and editor of its flagship publication, Pacific Affairs. He managed to become Director of the Walter Hines Page School of International Relations at Johns Hopkins University (where he styled himself "Dr." Lattimore), though he had never earned even a Bachelor's Degree.

Early writings

In the years between 1928 and 1945 Owen Lattimore wrote eight books about Asia and China. In his first book, Desert Road to Turkestan (1928), Lattimore wrote, "I should be inclined to say that a very strong case can be made out for the Soviet position."[4] In a later book, Manchuria, Cradle of Conflict (1935), Lattimore writes, "Russia appears to be the only nation of the modern world that is 'young' enough to have 'men of destiny.' It creates its Lenin and its Stalin. . . . Russia, more than China and more than any nation of the West, is launched upon a career of growth"[5] Lattimore characterized China, which was to become the victim of this communist "growth," by such adjectives as "aggressive," and "expansionist." Lattimore depicted China as an aggressor in Manchuria, writing that the Soviet Union, China and Japan all had ambitions in Manchuria, but that the Soviet Union had more right there than China or Japan. In 1940, Lattimore characterized Soviet policy in Mongolia as "in the interests of the Mongol people as a whole."

In July of 1938 IPR obtained a grant of $90,000 (equivalent to about $1.5 million today) from the Rockefeller Foundation to perform a study of Asia. Lattimore wrote to IPR President Edward C. Carter, “I think you were pretty cagey to turn over so much of the China section of the inquiry to Asiaticus, Han-seng and Chi. They will bring out the absolutely essential radical aspects, but can be depended on to do it with the right touch."

"Asiaticus" was the pen name of the veteran Polish-born Comintern agent in Shanghai, Moses Wolf Grzyb, alias M. G. Shippe (or Schiffe), alias Hans (or Heinz) Muëller (or Moëller). Lattimore frequently published articles under this pseudonym in the IPR journal Pacific Affairs during his tenure as editor in 1934-41.[6] "Han-seng" was Chen Han-seng, a Soviet agent and member of Richard Sorge's Soviet spy ring.[7] "Chi" was Chi Chao-ting, a U.S.-educated Red Chinese spy who had infiltrated the Kuomintang.[8]

Lattimore went on to write "my hunch is that it will pay to keep behind the official Chinese Communist position," and "as for the USSR -- back their international policy in general, but without using their slogans, and above all without giving them or anybody else the impression of subservience."[9]

In the September 1938 issue of Pacific Affairs, Lattimore described the bloody Moscow purge trials as "a triumph for Democracy,"[10] concluding that this orgy of mass murder "sounds like democracy to me."[11] Lattimore argued that the Soviet Union had a valid claim to be called a democracy, but that Americans were reluctant to admit it, "even when democratic procedures are as plainly stated as they are in the Stalin Constitution."[12] Lattimore placed the three principals of Sun Yat-sen, Soviet collectivism and the New Deal as all akin to one another.

Lattimore recommended highly Challenge of Red China, written by Guenther Stein, a member of Richard Sorge's Soviet spy ring in Tokyo. Of Communist propagandist[13] Israel Epstein's Unfinished Revolution in China he wrote, "When he pleads his case the arguments pile up like a wedge." When Lattimore resigned as editor of Pacific Affairs, he was succeeded by Michael Greenberg, a Communist Party member. Lattimore then became a member of the editorial board of the notorious journal Amerasia, in the offices of which OSS agents would find hundreds of stolen US government documents, mostly pertaining to China, many labeled "Secret" or "Top Secret."

In 1934, in The Mongols of Manchuria, Lattimore had claimed that the people of Manchuria are not Chinese at all, but Mongolian, and suggested that Sinkiang, Mongolia and Manchuria might be made into a separate empire under Soviet influence. But in 1942, after Japan had taken Manchuria, Lattimore reversed himself. In a Foreign Policy Report dated September 1, 1942, titled Asia in a New World Order, Lattimore abandoned his old line that Manchuria was not Chinese but Mongolian, asserting that it was "95 per cent Chinese" and that it was a mistake, merely because the country was called Manchuria, to think that the people were not Chinese.

During the Nazi-Soviet pact, when the Soviet and Communist Party line was that the U.S. should not interfere in Hitler and Stalin's joint invasion and bloody division of Europe, because the Allies were no better than the Axis, Lattimore agreed. In June 1940, when the UK was fighting for its life virtually alone under the Nazi Blitz, he wrote in Political Affairs that the war was merely "between the established master races and the claimant master races," and was caused by "the wrongs done to China, Ethiopia, Spain, Czechoslovakia and Albania -- not by Japan and Italy and Germany alone, but by Britain and France and the United States as well." But after Hitler turned on Stalin and invaded Russia, the party line reversed course, demanding immediate U.S. intervention, and Lattimore again reversed himself, becoming fanatically pro-war, even joining the U.S. Office of War Information to propagandize for the Allies.

In 1942, when the Soviet and Communist Party line was to support the Chinese Nationalist government of Chiang Kai-shek and the Kuomintang, in order to keep the Japanese pinned down in China and unable to attack the Soviet Far East, Lattimore found Nationalist China to be "democratic," and Chiang a "genius." In a 1942 lecture at Claremont College, Lattimore said, "we have in Asia a statesman of real genius, in Chiang Kai-shek." In The Making of Modern China (written in 1942) he wrote, "China is a democratic country in the sense that the [KMT] Party and the government represent what the vast majority of the people want." But in 1943, when it became apparent that Japan was losing its foothold in China, the Party line reversed, labeling the KMT "fascist" and the Communist rebels "democratic." According to former Politburo member Louis Budenz:

In 1943, at a regular meeting of the political bureau, at which Mr. Browder was present, it was again officially reported that Mr. Lattimore, through Mr. Field, had received word from the apparatus that there was to be a change of line on Chiang Kai-shek. It was decided that the line was to attack Chiang Kai-shek; an article was discussed, to be put in one of the organs of the Institute of Pacific Relations, and it did so appear, by T. A. Bisson, declaring that Nationalist China was feudal China, and Red China was democratic China.

In Solution in Asia (1945), Lattimore wrote that the Communist Party had enacted "the most positive step yet taken in China by any party away from dictatorship and toward democracy." In The Situation in Asia (1949) he denounced "the Kuomintang, a party which owed nothing to elections or to representative forms of government," writing that Chiang Kai-shek was influenced by "Fascist" theories. He added:

In Asia the Soviet Union has a major power of attraction, backed by a history of development and a body of precedents. ... To all of these peoples ... the Russians and the Soviet Union have a great power of attraction. In their eyes—rather doubtfully in the eyes of the older generation, more and more clearly in the eyes of the younger generation—the Soviet Union stands for strategic security, economic prosperity, technological progress, miraculous medicine, free education, equality of opportunity, and democracy: a powerful combination.

Lattimore goes on to contrast "the trend toward increased personal liberty and economic prosperity" under Stalin with the West's "tardiness" in the "evolution of democratic processes." He implies that the Soviet Union is more democratic "in practice" than the U.S.:

The fact that the Soviet Union also stands for democracy is not to be overlooked ... The fact is that for most of the people in the world today what constitutes democracy in theory is more or less irrelevant. What moves people to act, to try to line up with one party or country and not with another, is the difference between what is more democratic and less democratic in practice.

From Moscow in 1960, Lattimore was taken on an extensive tour of the (Communist) Mongolian People's Republic, toward which he adopted a "completely uncritical attitude." By the late '60s, Lattimore openly affirmed the position that the United States was pursuing an imperialist strategy as against the progressive stance of the Soviet Union.[14]

Policy subversion

According to his Federal Bureau of Investigation file, Lattimore was suspected of engaging in espionage for a foreign power as early as 1927, while in Shanghai.[15] Lattimore had been hand picked by the Comintern "to change the thinking here in Washington and in America on the Communist activities in China and relations to the Soviet Union," testified former Communist Party USA Politburo member Louis Budenz. Lattimore was thought to be a man "who could put out propaganda and conceal the Communist activity, but still have it carry out the policy of the Communists," he said. "[T]he weight of his discussions was always along the lines of the Soviet policy," according to Budenz, but the language employed "was non-Soviet in character."[16] Alexander Barmine, former Charge d'Affairs at the Soviet Embassy in Athens, Greece, advised FBI agents that then-GRU (Soviet Military Intelligence) chief General Jan Berzin referred to Lattimore in his presence as one of the "most promising young men that the Soviet military intelligence had..."[17]

During the Nazi-Soviet pact, Lattimore was added to Roosevelt's Custodial Detention Index,[18] listed as "Nationalistic tendency—Communist."[19] Later the same year President Franklin Roosevelt appointed Lattimore U.S. adviser to Kuomintang Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek on the surreptitious and out-of-process recommendation of Lattimore's personal friend and patron at the White House,[20] Roosevelt adviser and NKVD agent Lauchlin Currie.[21] While serving in this capacity, according to Chinese military intelligence, Lattimore was sending coded messages to the Communist Chinese rebels.[22]

On November 25, 1941, twelve days before Pearl Harbor, Lattimore dispatched an anxious cable to Currie in the White House arguing against a proposed diplomatic understanding between the United States and Japan. When Congress later investigated the Pearl Harbor attack, U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull testified that he took a tough line with the Japanese because of this cable from Lattimore to Currie reporting on Chinese morale in the Kuomintang. This cable was the only documentary evidence Hull presented which influenced his decision to reverse himself and send the ultimatum to Japan.[23] The use of harsh, demanding language toward Japan only strengthened the position of the war party in Tokyo. Japanese Ambassador Nomura found it impossible to reach an agreement because the U.S. demands were extreme.[24]

Prof. Anthony Kubek has written that Lattimore, by this one act, designed to accomplish the Soviet objective of promoting war between the United States and Japan -- did more to promote the Sovietization of China than in any other act of his career. All Comintern designs for conquest of China hinged upon destroying Japan and the balance of power in the Pacific. [25]

Following Pearl Harbor, Lattimore became director of Pacific Operations for the Office of War Information. In 1942 he and Currie tried to get a commission in military intelligence for Frederick Vanderbilt Field. The following year, Lattimore instructed Joseph Barnes[26] to replace non-Communist Chinese of the OWI with Communists; OWI did so. On July 14 Thomas A. Bisson, in the Institute of Pacific Relations publication, Far Eastern Survey, referred to Maoist forces as the "democratic China." This disinformation was widely repeated among journalists and academics. In July and August 1943, the Chinese Communist forces -- in the midst of the war -- joined with the Japanese armies to inflict a serious defeat on the Kuomintang allies with the United States. [27]

At President Roosevelt's request, Lattimore accompanied US Vice-President Henry Wallace on a mission to China in 1944, for the US Office of War Information.[3]. During this visit, which overlapped the D-Day landings, Wallace and his delegation stopped over in Siberia and were given a tour of the Magadan concentration camp at Kolyma, which Nobel laureate Alexandr Solzhenitsyn dubbed the "pole of cold and cruelty."[28] "[T]he Soviet government sent upwards of one million prisoners to Magadan for servitude in the hard labor camps of the Kolyma..." writes Library of Congress historian David J. Nordlander. "Standing as the most notorious center of the Gulag, indeed as its 'capital,' Magadan became synonymous with the Great Terror."[29] According to ex-Communist Marvin Liebman, one of the camp's prisoners, Elinor Lipper (author of Eleven Years in Soviet Prison Camps), told him of an incident during Wallace's visit:

Suddenly, a woman ran from the ranks and threw herself at Wallace’s feet. She screamed in Russian how the prisoners were being treated, how they were dying, how they were innocent, as innocent as the snow at his feet. ‘Please,’ she sobbed, ‘please help us.’

She was taken away, of course, while Wallace’s translator told him that she was mentally ill and he could not understand what she was saying… I subsequently discovered that Wallace’s translator that day had been Owen Lattimore...[30]

In a travelogue for National Geographic, Lattimore described this Siberian gulag as a combination of the Hudson's Bay Company and the TVA, gushing about how strong and well-fed the inmates were and ascribing to camp commandant Feliks Nikishov “a trained and sensitive interest in art and music and also a deep sense of civic responsibility.”[31] Solzhenitsyn wrote in the Gulag Archipelago that the city of Magadan was founded as a Soviet Gulag, and would not have existed otherwise.[32] Commentator Cal Thomas wrote in 2007,

"While many Westerners recall Nazi-run death camps like Auschwitz and Buchenwald, few remember Soviet death camps named Kolyma and Magadan. True, Alexander Solzhenitsyn mentioned them in "The Gulag Archipelago" as did Varlam Sjalamov in "Tales from Kolyma," but as the late Swedish journalist Andres Kung wrote, "There are people who have still not heard of these communist extermination camps -- even though the communists preceded the Nazis in creating such camps and killed an even larger number of people in their camps."[33]

In 1944, Lattimore told Dr. Karl Wittfogel that the emperor of Japan should be removed and that as far as Korea was concerned "the best solution would be to let Russia take it over." (At a State Department conference later he would submit a ten-point program which included recognizing the Chinese Communist government, turning over Formosa and Hong Kong to them and stating that no aid should be sent Chiang's forces.)[34] The same year Lattimore, as Director of OWI Pacific Operations, co-wrote (with his wife) a pamphlet entitled "Our Chinese Ally," distributed to U.S. servicemen as War Department Education Manual EM-42. It instructed American and Allied forces in Asia that the Communist Chinese were "a party of compromise, and it is at least possible that after the war, instead of becoming a party of extremism, they will be found to be a party of moderation."[35]

The following year, Lattimore published Solution in Asia. As the publisher's blurb on the book jacket states:

He [Lattimore] shows that all the Asiatic people are more interested in actual democratic practices, such as the ones they can see in action across the Russian border, than they are in the fine theories of Anglo-Saxon democracies which come coupled with ruthless imperialism.... He inclines to support American newspapermen who report that the only real democracy in China is found in Communist areas.[36]

After the fall of China to the Communists in 1949, then-Senator John F. Kennedy would blame Lattimore (and his colleague John K. Fairbank) for this tragedy:

Mr. Speaker, over this weekend we have learned the extent of the disaster that has befallen China and the United States. The responsibility for the failure of our foreign policy in the Far East rests squarely with the [Truman] White House and the [Acheson] Department of State. The continued insistence that aid would not be forthcoming unless a coalition government with the Communists was formed, was a crippling blow to the National Government. So concerned were our diplomats and their advisers, the Lattimores and the Fairbanks, with the imperfection of the democratic system in China after twenty years of war, and the tales of corruption in high places, that they lost sight of our tremendous stake in a non-Communist China.[37]

Senate investigations

Lattimore was identified by U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member Louis Budenz corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the Amerasia case.

In a unanimous report, the McCarran Committee classified Lattimore as a "conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy". [38] Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction to KGB operative Lauchlin Currie for Haakon Chevalier, who was attempting to obtain a government job. (Chevalier would later try to recruit J. Robert Oppenheimer into the conspiracy to supply the Soviets with the secret of is the atomic bomb.) Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to Chiang Kai-shek. Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by Amerasia magazine of secret State Department documents. In December 1952, Lattimore was indicted for perjury.[39]

Lattimore was indicted for perjury in his testimony before the McCarran Committee, but Judge Luther Youngdahl dropped the charges against him in 1955 on "a purely technical finding, wholly unrelated to Lattimore's activities."[40]


Even on the left, many of the most knowledgeable observers agreed that Lattimore was a propagandist for Party line. The socialist[41] (and ex-Communist)[42] Granville Hicks, for example, was dismayed by the spectacle of liberals "rallying with such absolute assurance to Lattimore’s defense."[43] Lattimore “defends every item of Stalinist justice," wrote "unabashedly liberal partisan"[44] Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. When Lattimore wrote that the Stalin's Great Purge "sounds to me like democracy," Schlesinger commented that those words "sound to me like fellow-traveling."[45] Lattimore got his views adopted by "the entire body of respectable opinion—conservative as well as liberal—on the Far East," wrote self-described former communist[46] Irving Kristol. "His ingratiating pseudo-Marxist platitudes became the stock-in-trade of all the ‘experts’."[47] Lattimore "consistently and consciously undertook to do what the Soviet Union wanted done," wrote the former Communist fellow-traveler[48] Diana Trilling. Though perhaps not a Communist Party member, she wrote, he was "something far more dangerous"—an ostensibly independent 'idealist' "whose idealism just happened to coincide with Russian realism."[49] Sol Levitas, editor of the socialist[50] magazine The New Leader, wrote that Lattimore was worse than a spy—he was a "LitAg" (literary agitator) of the Kremlin who sought to harm American foreign policy by molding public opinion to favor a pro-Soviet course—and was therefore more valuable to Stalin than a thousand Communist Party members.[51] Far from being simply "a well-meaning liberal martyrized by McCarthy for telling unpalatable truths about Asia," wrote the socialist[52] Sidney Hook, Lattimore, "at the very least, was a devious and skillful follower of the Communist Party line on Asian affairs" who had more influence on American foreign policy in Asia than “all anti-Communists combined.”[53] As the American Committee for Cultural Freedom concluded in an article in The New Republic, "Lattimore was indeed a willing instrument of the Soviet conspiracy against the free world."[54]

Further reading

See also


  1. Harry G. Heiss, Owen Lattimore: A Register of His Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, 1998
  2. S. Rpt. 2050: Institute of Pacific Relations, 82d Cong., 2d sess., Serial 11574, Report of the Committee on the Judiciary Pursuant to S. Res. 366, 1952 (Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1952), pp. 214-218 (PDF pp. 222-226)
  3. Institute of Pacific Relations, report of the Senate Internal Security subcommittee, 1952, p. 223-225
  4. Desert Road to Turkestan by Owen Lattimore (Boston, 1928), pg. 247.
  5. Manchuria, Cradle of Conflict by Owen Lattimore (Rev. 1935), pg. 293.
  6. Robert P. Newman, Owen Lattimore and the "Loss" of China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992), ISBN 0-520-07388-6, p. 452
  7. Maochen Yu, "Chen Hansheng's Memoirs and Chinese Communist Espionage," Cold War International History Project Bulletin, 6-7 (Winter 1995/1996), p. 274; Cf. Chiang, Yung-chen (2001). Social Engineering and the Social Sciences in China, 1919-1949. Cambridge University Press. pp. 159–163. ISBN 9780521770149
  8. Lifu Chen, The Storm Clouds Clear Over China: The Memoir of Chen Li-fu, 1900-1993 (Hoover Press, 1994) ISBN 0817992723, p. 181; Arthur Herman, Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator (Simon and Schuster, 1999) ISBN 0684836254, p. 126)
  9. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, subcommittee on Internal Secutity, Report: Institute of Pacific Relations (1052), p. 119
  10. Subcommittee on S. Res. 231, Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate, 81st Cong., 2d sess., State Department Employee Loyalty Investigation: Hearings, Part II, Appendix (Washington: U.S. GPO, 1950), p. 1532 (PDF p. 36)
  11. Paul Hollander, Political Pilgrims: Western Intellectuals in Search of the Good Society, 4th Ed. (Transaction Publishers, 1998), ISBN 1560009543, p. 165
  12. Asia in a New World Order, by Owen Lattimore, Foreign Policy Report, September 1, 1942.
  13. Douglas Martin, "Israel Epstein, Prominent Chinese Communist, Dies at 90, New York Times, June 2, 2005. Defecting Soviet espionage courier Elizabeth Bentley testified that "Israel Epstein had been a member of the Russian Secret Police for many years in China." (Institute of Pacific Relations, Vol. 2, Hearings before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee to Investigate the Administration of the Internal Security Act and Other Internal Security Laws, 1951, p. 435)
  14. James Cotton, Asian Frontier Nationalism: Owen Lattimore and the American Policy Debate (Manchester University Press, 1989) ISBN 0719025850, pp. 159-160
  15. FBI Report, "Owen Lattimore, Internal Security - R, Espionage - R," September 8, 1949 (FBI file: Owen Lattimore, Section 1A), p. 1 (PDF p. 2)
  16. Testimony of Louis Francis Budenz, August 22, 1951. Institute of Pacific Relations, Hearings. Part 2, pp. 522-23.
  17. FBI Report, "Owen Lattimore, Internal Security - R, Espionage - R," September 8, 1949 (FBI File: Owen Lattimore, Part 1A), p. 2 (PDF p. 7)
  18. In September 1939, FDR ordered the compilation of a "Custodial Detention Index" (CDI) of “persons to be considered for custodial detention pending investigation in the event of a national emergency” among the German, Italian, Hungarian, Romanian and Bulgarian populations (Japanese-Americans were soon added to the roster; it was the CDI that provided the basis for Roosevelt's wartime internment of Japanese, Germans and Italians in the United States during World War II.) During the Hitler-Stalin pact, when the Soviet Union was a Nazi ally in the invasion of Poland, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Romania, the list was expanded to include Communists.
  19. Robert P. Newman, Owen Lattimore and the "Loss" of China (University of California Press, 1992) ISBN 0520073886, p. 52
  20. Lattimore wrote that when in Washington, he used Currie’s office (“I am in Washington about 4 days a week, and when there can always be reached at Lauchlin Currie's office, room 228, State Department Building; telephone National 1414, extension 90”), and that when Currie was out, Lattimore handled his mail: “Currie asked me to take care of his correspondence while he is away.” Subcommittee to Investigate the Administration of the Internal Security Act and Other Internal Security Laws, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, Institute of Pacific Relations, Hearings, Part 9 (Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1952), pp. 3199-3200 (PDF pp. 311-312)
  21. “I asked who had suggested to President Roosevelt the nomination of Mr. Lattimore. Mr. Currie replied that he, Currie, had.” (Subcommittee to Investigate the Administration of the Internal Security Act and Other Internal Security Laws, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, Testimony of Stanley K. Hornbeck, Institute of Pacific Relations, Hearings, Part 9 (Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1952), pp. 3209-10 (PDF pp. 321-322)
  22. M. Stanton Evans, Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies (New York: Crown Forum, 2007), ISBN 978-1-4000-8105-9
  23. Testimony of Cordell Hull, November 23, 1945. Pearl Harbor Attack, Part 2, 434-435 and Unnumbered Volume, pp. 36-37.
  24. Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, Carroll Quigley, Collier-Macmillan, 1966, pg. 741. ISBN 0-945001-10-X
  25. Communism at Pearl Harbor, How the Communists Helped to Bring on Pearl Harbor and Open up Asia to Communinization, Dr. Anthony Kubek, Dallas Texas, Teaching Publishing Company, 1959. Dr. Anthony Kubek was the Editor of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Senate Internal Security Subcommittee, Report on the Morgenthau Diaries. The records of the Morgenthau Diary Study, 1953-65 consist largely of copies of portions of memorandums, correspondence, transcripts of meetings, and other records preserved by Secretary Morgenthau in order to document his tenure. The original records are in the custody of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library in Hyde Park, NY. In 1965, the SISS issued a two volume committee print entitled Morgenthau Diary (China), Edited by Dr. Anthony Kubek, containing entries from the records at the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library selected to illustrate the implementation of Roosevelt administration policy in China. According to Dr. Kubek, the subcommittee wanted to produce a documentary history on the subject and "also indicate the serious problem of unauthorized, uncontrolled and often dangerous power exercised by non-elected officials," specifically Harry Dexter White. White was a major figure in Senator William Jenner's investigation of interlocking subversion in Government departments in 1953. The bipartisan investigation lasted for twelve years, and the Subcommittee's Report took another two years to write. [1] Dr. Anthony Kubek also is a recognized expert on the subject of U.S. Naval Intelligence's Operation Magic, the effort to crack Japanese diplomatic ciphers. [2]
  26. Tongue-Tied, Time magazine, Feb. 07, 1944.
  27. The Yalta Betrayal, Felix Wittmer, Claxton Printers, 1953, pg. 36.
  28. Aleksandr Isaevich Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago 1918-1956 (HarperCollins, 2002) ISBN 0060007761, p. 211
  29. David J. Nordlander, "Origins of a Gulag Capital: Magadan and Stalinist Control in the Early 1930s," Slavic Review, Vol. 57, No. 4 (Winter 1998), p. 791
  30. Marvin Liebman, Coming Out Conservative: An Autobiography (Chronicle Books, 1992) ISBN 0811800733, pp. 87-88
  31. Paul Johnson, The Survival of the Adversary Culture (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1988) ISBN 1560005548, p. 180
  32. Islands of Slavery, Time magazine, June 24, 1974.
  33. Monument to murder, By Cal Thomas, Washington Times, June 13, 2007.
  34. United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security Hearings, August 7 and October 1, 1951.
  35. Owen and Eleanor Lattimore, "Our Chinese Ally" (United States Armed Forces Institute, August 1944), p. 55
  36. Subcommittee on S. Res. 231, Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate, 81st Cong., 2d sess., State Department Employee Loyalty Investigation: Hearings, Part II, Appendix (Washington: U.S. GPO, 1950), p. 1661 (PDF p. 185)
  37. John F. Kennedy, A Compendium of Speeches, Statements, and Remarks Delivered During His Service in the Congress of the United States (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1964), pp. 41-42
  38. US Senate, 82nd Congress, 2nd Session, Committee on the Judiciary, Institute of Pacific Relations, Report No. 2050, p. 224.
  39. Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). McCarthy & His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning. Regnery Publishing Inc.. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.  McCarthy, Joseph (1953). Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.  McCarthy, Joseph (1952). McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2. )
  40. William F. Buckley, Jr. , "Why are the Liberals Whitewashing? Owen Lattimore in the Liberal Press," National Review, July 14, 1989
  41. Barry Maine, John Dos Passos (Routledge, 1997) ISBN 0415159350, p. 243
  42. Warren F. Broderick, "Granville Hicks: Champion of the Small Town," in Granville Hicks, Small Towm (Fordham University Press, 2004) ISBN 0823223574, p. xvii
  43. Ronald Radosh, "The Legacy of the Anti-Communist Liberal Intellectuals," Partisan Review, Vol. LXVII, No. 4 (2000)
  44. Douglas Martin, "Arthur Schlesinger, Historian of Power, Dies at 89," The New York Times, March 1, 2007
  45. Ronald Radosh, "Sidney Hook Was Right, Arthur Schlesinger Is Wrong," The New York Sun, December 16, 2002
  46. "Political writer Irving Kristol dies at 89" The Washington Times, September 19, 2009
  47. The Twentieth Century, Vol. 152, No. 909 (November 1952), p. 323
  48. Patricia Bosworth, "A Life of Significant Contention," The New York Times, December 29, 1996
  49. Diana Trilling, Partisan Review, Vol. 20 (1953) p. 27
  50. "The Press: The New Leader Steps Out," Time, May 1, 1950
  51. Sol Levitas, "Lattimore and the IPR," The New Leader, March 31, 1952
  52. Thomas J. Main, "Fearless Sidney Hook," Policy Review, No. 120
  53. Edward S. Shapiro, ed., Letters of Sidney Hook: Democracy, Communism, and the Cold War (M.E. Sharpe, 1995) ISBN 156324487X, p. 207
  54. Mary Sperling McAuliffe, Crisis on the Left: Cold War Politics and American Liberals, 1947-1954 (University of Massachusetts Press, 1978) ISBN 087023241X, p. 127

External links