Page history
Talk: Essay:Quantifying Order
July 11, 2010
at the risk of last wordism
+821
→Theology and science: atheists are going to drive inquiries into order out of science. Anti-God scientists are going to tend to censor scientific theories based on order
+247
An answer to Andy's latest rhetorical question
+721
June 29, 2010
→Quantum Mechanics and Free Will: I think more atheists deny QM than people of faith do, and unlike the theory of relativity, QM has produced immensely productive inventions
+317
Request for permission to include an edit
+636
November 23, 2009
We have a 90/10 rule and it is enforced to prevent all talk from impeding improvements. Please improve entries here, or move on.
+574
→Science and the Bible
+158
→Science and the Bible
+1,540
→Science and the Bible: Response, proper organization.
+1,174
→Science and the Bible
+2,009
The Bible is logic, as Douglas says. Logic yields insights. It did for Newton, for everyone's benefit.
+350
→Science and the Bible
+444
→Science and the Bible
+1,767
→Science and the Bible: Mark was a young boy who wrote about what he witnessed. Young boys are not out on dangerous boats in the middle of the night, so Mark didn't see the walking on water.
+876
→Science and the Bible: new section
+1,108
November 22, 2009
Undo revision 722972 by Stclaire (Talk)
-169
→Information theory?: agree
+169
→Information theory?: Not only does the theory of relativity fail to help anyone, but it affirmatively hurts lots of people by misleading them into a hurtful frame of mind.
+522
→Information theory?
+798
November 21, 2009
reply to Dan
+206
→Information theory?: The essence of advancing knowledge is an open mind that is constantly challenging existing theories. That's what we do here, and I hope you can accept that approach
+407
→Information theory?
+1,034
→Information theory?: Please improve as you think best. Information theory does deal with physical reality, as in communication errors.
+181
→Information theory?: new section
+352
November 16, 2009
Reply
+2,311
Commas are my friends.
m+1
no edit summary
+331
Ill get this formatting down one day :)
+8
no edit summary
+1,046
Correlation or causation?
+913
People who are taught and then believe relativity are less likely to read the Bible again, or as frequently. ... do you still support the promotion of relativity?
+363
Sig
m+51
no edit summary
+972
If empirically the promotion of relativity leads people away from the Bible, would you still support promoting relativity?
+383
Format fix
m+4
no edit summary
+949
no edit summary
+433
that's fine, but surely you'd agree that unproductive theories or beliefs should not squeeze out productive ones.
+622
My 2 cents
+512
Dan, I accept your challenge.
+549
Reply
+3,623
November 15, 2009
no edit summary
+227
If you find the math in relativity fun, great, but relativity is not going to help anyone. It never has. Pick up a Bible in between some equations.
+965
Reply about making GPB article.
+495
no edit summary
+222
Article suggestion
+284
no edit summary
+2,242
SIGN!! (beat my head against wall...)
m+53
Response - we can't extrapolate; maybe this's the wrong tack
+1,301
no edit summary
+2,571