User talk:Aschlafly

Welcome to Aschlafly's talk page. Please place complaints about other users or other trolling content at Conservapedia:User complaints. If Andy is interested in hearing your complaint, he will respond there. Thank you.

Topic ban

Please impose a topic ban on User:Conservative's foreign policy and defense related contributions, at least through 2024 primary election season. His deliberate CP:Trolling, "employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions" occupies a minimum of 3 hours, and sometimes as much as 6-8 hours of my time DAILY, prohibiting me from making substantive contributions on election and foreign policy matters.

User:Conservative has stated on dozens of occasions, over many years, that he has no interest in politics, and has repeatedly violated his own pledges to cease contributing on those subjects. His contributions are solely and specifically intended to irritate and waste the time of other editors, a violation of CP Commandments and Guidelines.

I have no objection to him contributing on election matters, where he can spew his neocon racist content to his heart's content. Thank you. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 17:27, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Andy told you on your talk page: "...I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best. That includes you too. Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them). The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)"

Andy likes that I create essays (including political essays) - some of which have tens of thousands or thousands of page views. Conservative (talk) 17:43, December 28, 2023 (EST)

I have evidence that you are running a bot on some of your trolling Essays to rack up page views. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Disagreeing with you is not trolling. This is not RobSmithPedia. You are not infallible and you are not God. Conservative (talk) 17:52, December 28, 2023 (EST)

(ec) Note: You do not dispute the allegation that you are contributing "neocon racist content" to Conservapedia. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)

1. REDIRECT Template:Hide collapse

Let's examine this edit today User:Conservative calls "motivational": "The only way we can compete with the Eastern Bloc...". The "Eastern Bloc" was a political and military alliance that ceased to exist in 1991. The ideology of the "Eastern Bloc" - communism - was defeated by the Russian Orthodox Church in 1991, yet User:Conservative created another Russophobic cut n paste screed this morning based upon highly dubious, racist, and neocon sources with false, inflammatory, and exaggerated information.

One can only assume User:Conservative is "motivated" by the same racial fear and disdain for the "Slavic hordes" of Eastern Europe that his sources broadcast.RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 18:14, December 28, 2023 (EST)

1. REDIRECT Template:Hide collapse

Conservapedia Essay space should not be a platform for Liberal fascism, and that is all User:Conservative's Geopolitical Essays amount to, not based upon any knowledge or expertise in the area, but rather motivated by spite and a personal vendetta toward another editor. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 13:03, December 29, 2023 (EST)

Andy, Please instruct the trolling Admin to cease and desist. Thank you. [1] RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 15:33, February 27, 2024 (EST)

Can you explain this?

Can you explain what happened with User:BHathorn as far as his recent blocking spree and apparent vandalism of templates?

It seems puzzling given his past editing. He appears to be a longstanding good-faith editor. Maybe if you have the time to look at his past edits that will explain things.

I have a deadline to meet so I don't have time to investigate matters. But via email I did ask you to look into things. Conservative (talk) 07:54, January 4, 2024 (EST)

Please finish the unblocking of people. I did as much unblocking as I could do. Conservative (talk) 07:56, January 4, 2024 (EST)

I am guessing that his password was hacked. I will let you come up with the best solution to solve this issue. User: PeterKa blocked him for a year. I changed the block to 3 days so that gives you time to come up with a solution. I also gave User:BHathorn my Conservapedia email address on his talk page. Conservative (talk) 09:43, January 4, 2024 (EST)

P.S. The User: Conservative account password is unhackable. Rest assured that no hacker will ever hack it! The odds of the dead atheist movement resurrecting is likelier and that is nearly impossible! Conservative (talk) 10:01, January 4, 2024 (EST)

It appears as if there was a hacker who hacked into User:BHathorn's account. The hacker appears to be from a northern state in the USA. I am awaiting hearing a reply from User:BHathorn. Conservative (talk) 10:27, January 4, 2024 (EST)

I unblocked User:BHathorn. He was hacked and he changed his password. I confirmed that the new IP address was from the right editor. Conservative (talk) 10:51, January 4, 2024 (EST)

Re: Thank you

Not a problem. Unfortunately, I was in bed asleep at the time that hacker/vandal managed to seize control of BHathorn's account to go on that vandalism/blocking spree so I didn't get to catch it as it happened, but I did manage to unblock the accounts that had not already been unblocked (including your own) after getting blocked during the vandalism spree. As to the templates that got vandalized (via the vandal putting up that fake message at the top of the page in such a way as to block access to the editing tools as well as the view of the templates themselves), I think those edits should be oversighted to prevent their being shown in the editing history (if I were able to do oversighting myself on those edits, I would, but I don't have Oversight user rights). Northwest (talk) 02:25, January 5, 2024 (EST)

Tremendous work, Northwest, thank you! Oversighting is a great idea for this at a convenient time.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 02:55, January 5, 2024 (EST)

RINO Of The Year, 2023

Hello Mr. Schlafly,

I am wondering if I could declare Lindsey Graham RINO of the Year. I created the page late this year and there has not been much discussion. However, Lindsey Graham was suggested as being a good pick for RINO of the Year. I hope you had a wonderful Christmas and New Year!

Thank you!--TheNewRight (talk) 23:08, January 5, 2024 (EST)

Yes, terrific choice for the winner of this ignominious award! Please post!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 23:59, January 5, 2024 (EST)

TheNewRight, I've checked your contribution history. Since the article's creation on Monday, you have made zero effort to reach out to other editors and make sure they at least knew about the article's existence. That's why there hasn't been much discussion. Until now, nobody except you knew about the article's existence.

Now that I myself know about of the article's existence, I will be making my own contributions to the article sometime this weekend. In the meantime, I strongly suggest you start promoting the article on the main talk page so other editors have an opportunity to contribute as well.--Geopolitician (talk) 01:34, January 6, 2024 (EST)

A question.

Is there a reason Sodomy doesn't simply redirect to Sodom? Cazle (talk) 17:09, January 11, 2024 (EST)

Fixed.

User: Cazle, thank for the input. In the future, don't be reticent to take the initiative and fix Conservapedia shortcomings yourself. Conservative (talk) 17:28, January 11, 2024 (EST)

I couldn't, I don't have the necessary permissions. Cazle (talk) 17:33, January 11, 2024 (EST)

Thank you. Cazle (talk) 17:34, January 11, 2024 (EST)

Please give the hacked user account SkipCaptcha ‎permission

Andy, please give the User:BHathorn2 account SkipCaptcha ‎permission.

I appreciate you giving the User:BHathorn this permission, but I actually wanted it for the User:BHathorn2 account. Conservative (talk) 02:35, January 12, 2024 (EST)

I did this correctly as requested, thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 02:57, January 12, 2024 (EST)

I got my new glasses, but I need to get them fixed. I am awaiting to getting this issue fixed. Bear with me in the meantime! Conservative (talk) 03:02, January 12, 2024 (EST)

Please give this user picture upload rights. I gave him some coaching on the licensing/posting issue

Please give NishantXavier picture upload rights. I gave him some coaching on the licensing/posting issue.

In addition, I will look at some of the pictures he posts to make sure he is doing things right.

Also, I gave him various sources of public domain pictures and Creative Commons type pictures on his user talk pages so he should be able to find lot of pictures. Conservative (talk) 22:25, January 15, 2024 (EST)

Moving article "Achievement related articles" to Essay space

I created a number of very constructive and useful articles and the articles can be seen at:

• Essay: Achievement related articles

Andy, User:Conservative is being deceptive right here: I am the editor who had to move this "article" into Essay space. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 07:45, January 21, 2024 (EST)

User:Conservative seems to approve of my improvements. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 07:50, January 21, 2024 (EST)

I did it because there is a war on meritocracy and achievement by liberals and leftists.

Now RobSmith has gone on a temper tantrum and is vandalizing these articles.

I think I need your assistance.

I will call you today about this matter. Conservative (talk) 07:28, January 21, 2024 (EST)

The articles/Essay's are non-collaborative, and the editor refuses to discuss his contributions, despite the fact that the articles/Essays are all about collaboration and teamwork. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 07:31, January 21, 2024 (EST)

He is in fact building more algorithms aimed at suppressing other editor's contributions. Duplicity and maliciousness seem to be his two personal star personal accomplishments - while refusing offers to discuss and collaborate. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 07:38, January 21, 2024 (EST)

Andy, User:Conservative's maliciously motivated trolling is still occupying an inordinate amount of my time and ability to make mainspace contributions. I renew my request that User:Conservative be topic banned from foreign policy and defense related matters. Thank you. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 08:10, January 21, 2024 (EST)

I will accept User:Conservative's apology at anytime for, once again, casting aspersions upon my real-life name and reputation.

Andy, note: User:Conservative is not "adding content" or "creating content"; he is creating an internal algorithm of uplinks in his latest series "Essay: Achievement related articles" (click on anyone of these "related changes", and they are nothing but external uplinks - no content) to promote himself (and also suppress other editors' contributions).

In his Russophobic series, he has nothing but neocon and globalist uplinks. He did not promote conservativism or conservative ideals, rather was motivated by a personal feud with other editors (as is most of his series on Category:RationalWiki). RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 14:18, January 24, 2024 (EST)

Andy knows that I wrote a pro-isolationist, noninterventionist essay at Conservapedia which is at: [[Essay: Isolationalism is growing in the United States. Is this a good thing?|Isolationalism is growing in the United States. Is this a good thing?]].

You haven't written such an essay. I suggest you stop embarrassing yourself with your nonsensical labeling of me as a neocon. Nobody is buying what you are selling - including Andy.

"There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare." - Sun Tzu. Conservative (talk) 00:43, January 25, 2024 (EST)

All you've written is a bunch of contradictory nonsense - with uplinks to neocon & globalist sources. And by your own admission have no interest in the subject, only an intent to harass people you get into feuds with on the internet, harming CP's reputation as a viable source.

You do not create or add original content; you might occasionally cut n paste a quote from a source, and in the area of foreign affairs you do not have the requisite judgement to discern neocon and globalist sourcing. The idea that you somehow are qualified to write on "collaboration" and "teamwork" is a joke. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 01:35, January 25, 2024 (EST)

A person who often engages in logical fallacies such as yourself is in no position to accuse others of writing "contradictory nonsense".

[[User: SamHB]] said regarding your unreasonableness: "Now let me get to the point for real. Why do you continue engaging with this person?? ...You have better things to do than bang your head against the wall. - SamHB (talk) 11:49, July 28, 2023 (EDT)".

[[User: Karajou]] told you: "The "we" in your silly posting is just you. You are the one who needed to be civil, but refused to do so the past two years. You returned to this site expecting to take it from Andy, to run it your way, to have everyone follow your brand of rules, and all I'm seeing from this silly posting of yours...." - [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 08:09, October 1, 2023 (EDT)".

Now please feel free to engage in last wordism. Conservative (talk) 01:54, January 25, 2024 (EST)

Andy, as you can see, User:Conservative cannot address issues, he can only quote, verbatim, and carry, personal grudges for a long time. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 02:01, January 25, 2024 (EST)

If you spent half of the time improving your content writing skills that you engage in picking fights, malignant posting, paranoid accusations, axe-grinding, and envious brooding maybe your content would get more views.

Don't engage in "excusitis" and blame your content's low page views on someone "suppressing your content". Get off the mat and start training! In the next 30 days, I am going to be reading various books on grammar and writing.

"I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.'." - Mohammed Ali. Conservative (talk) 02:13, January 25, 2024 (EST)

More personal attacks. You came here to Andy/talk to accuse me of "vandalizing" a mainspace article you started that I moved to Essay space, which you apparently are quite happy with now. Is that teamwork? is that collaboration? Is that "picking fights, malignant posting, paranoid accusations, or axe-grinding"? RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 02:29, January 25, 2024 (EST)

Bottomline, and I think Andy will agree with me: malicious editing and motivations, and vendettas ARE NOT conservative values. And that's all I see in your contributions, as per your own words to me more than 10 years ago, beginning with your Atheism article and series, and virtually everything since. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 02:35, January 25, 2024 (EST)

As to trolling, User:Conservative has severely disrupted my ability since July 2023 to chronical daily war reports (which I had done for 18 months prior with 30 additions to Conservapedia proven right); without a topic ban on User:Conservative writing on foreign policy and defense related issues, I will be unable to make a commitment to chronical the impending conflicts with Iran and China. (And Conservapedia will be at the mercy of the MSM neocon garbage User:Conservative recycles). RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 22:10, January 28, 2024 (EST)

Something about something or other...

Content disputes/discussions belong on the relevant mainspace talk page(s), not here (See Organizational skills).

1. REDIRECT Template:Hide collapse

Phyllis Schlafly and her legacy the tradwives are gloriously winning! On behalf of all Christian traditionalists, I hereby declare total victory!

Why Gen Z Is Ditching The Girlboss For The Tradwife, The Federalist, 2024. See also: Traditional gender roles are making a comeback

The tradwives are winning! Another glorious victory by Phyllis Schlafly! First she defeated the Equal Rights Amendment and now this! As much as I hate to do it, on behalf of all Christian traditionalists, I hereby declare total victory!

For details, please see: Essay: Andy Schlafly, Phyllis Schlafly and the Amish. All they do is win against secular leftists (Rap song). Conservative (talk) 10:16, January 25, 2024 (EST)

Upload tag

The new BHathorn2 account needs the Upload tag restored. Thanks. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 19:04, January 28, 2024 (EST)

I see that you made the Conservapedia obesity article more trim!

In the recent changes log, I just saw this: "Obesity‎; 21:25 . . (-24)‎ . . ‎Aschlafly (Talk | contribs | block)‎ (trim, improve further) [rollback 7 edits]."

I got a good laugh out of this edit. You made the Conservapedia obesity article more trim!

Post USA Today and prominent atheists citing my Atheism and obesity article in the beginning of 2011, Conservapedia is known for covering the obesity issue.

It has become a big issue since then (Pardon the pun). In March of 2023, the World Obesity Federation (WOF) released a report stating that by 2035 over 4 billion people – more than half the world’s population – will be obese (see: https://www.uclahealth.org/news/worldwide-obesity-rise).Conservative (talk) 17:31, January 29, 2024 (EST)

Ha ha ha. I appreciate the humor! I'll add that amazing prediction that more than half the world will be obese in a decade.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 17:57, January 29, 2024 (EST)

I just added the material to the obesity article. Conservative (talk) 23:06, January 29, 2024 (EST)

Thank you!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 00:19, January 30, 2024 (EST)

Please ask a Personal remark removed admin to stop harassing me on my talk page because he craves my attention. I stopped reading his messages so its pointless.

User complaints and personal attacks/innuendo do not belong on this page (See Organizational skills, Teamwork skills, Leadership).

Moved to Conservapedia:User_complaints#Please ask a Personal remark removed admin to stop harassing me on my talk page because he craves my attention. I stopped reading his messages so its pointless.

Editor would like his picture uploading rights to be restored

User:BHathorn2 would like his picture uploading rights to be restored. He was able to upload pictures with his previous account. Conservative (talk) 00:39, February 17, 2024 (EST)

Done as requested. Thanks for asking.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 20:24, February 17, 2024 (EST)

OK. I will tell him. Conservative (talk) 20:45, February 17, 2024 (EST)

Who won this debate about future Russian oil production?

Please look at this essay: Essay: Russian oil: Lower future production/profits due to future higher extraction costs and other inefficiencies.

If you could be so kind, please give your opinion on who won this debate between User: RobSmith and User: Conservative:

• Essay: Russian oil: Lower future production/profits due to future higher extraction costs and other inefficiencies.

Thanks for all your contributions. Conservative (talk) 15:42, February 27, 2024 (EST)