Difference between revisions of "Talk:Joe Biden"

Revision as of 05:08, July 20, 2022 (view source) RobSmith (Talk | contribs) (→‎Saudi Arabia) ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:01, July 28, 2022 (view source) Knowstuff (Talk | contribs) (→‎Too much bias.: new section) Newer edit →
Line 237:		Line 237:
	Globalism is essentially committing suicide - it doesn't need Russia & China to destroy it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z+]]</sup> 01:08, July 20, 2022 (EDT)		Globalism is essentially committing suicide - it doesn't need Russia & China to destroy it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z+]]</sup> 01:08, July 20, 2022 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Too much bias. ==
		+
		+	Can someone rewrite the article to be more neutral? The article has many biased claims about Biden being racist among other things. [[User:Knowstuff|Knowstuff]] ([[User talk:Knowstuff|talk]]) 22:01, July 27, 2022 (EDT)

---

Revision as of 02:01, July 28, 2022

Banning?

I'm a little upset about all this banning on conservapedia articles. I started and wrote this entire article and am now not allowed to extend it and make it more informative because of all this banning. Chippeterson

No banning has taken place. Rather, the senior sysops have protected all pages for Presidential candidates, so that only sysops may edit them. We have done this for reasons of security. The Talk pages (like this one) remain unprotected--so that if you have a suggestion for extension of this or any article, use the corresponding Talk page.--TerryH^Talk 20:21, 25 August 2007 (EDT)

We need to change the word "proponent" to something like "strongly against." In the part of the article were it talks about Joe Biden's position on gun control. Chippeterson

Why would we need to do that?Samwell 21:23, 25 August 2007 (EDT)

Because it says "Biden is a strong proponent of 2nd-amendment rights. He was rated F by the National Rifle Association." "proponent" means that you support something. Joe Biden is against the right to bear arms. Chippeterson

Opponent should work then. Samwell 21:36, 25 August 2007 (EDT)

Thats a pretty big difference! Thanks for catching it, it has been corrected. Bohdan 00:29, 26 August 2007 (EDT)

Jill Biden not a professor

I just changed the word "professor" to "instructor" for Jill Biden, based on this list from her campus:

http://www.dtcc.edu/catalog/pdf/personnel.pdf

. Who does she think she is, Barack Obama? In any case, someone should probably archive that .pdf document before it gets removed from the web site. --AdmiralNelson 13:48, 23 August 2008 (EDT)

Is Biden REALLY an adjunct professor?

Not sure if he really is a professor. This may be just like Obama claiming to be a "professor." In any case, we should probably expand that section to clarify that the current title he uses, adjunct professor, is little more than a "Monopoly money" title given to non-tenure track hired guns who don't even have to have valid academic credentials or degrees to teach a class. Most adjunct professors that I know, except in technical and scientific fields where they actually have to know something concrete, are pretty awful. Those in education, the social sciences, humanities, criminal justice, and social work are particularly bad. Those teaching math, computer science, biology, chemistry, etc. tend to be pretty good. You can't fake chemistry, but you can fake "social work" and those other fields. --AdmiralNelson 13:58, 23 August 2008 (EDT)

I want to point out that most adjuncts are hired primarily to save money (they are cheaper than full-time faculty), rather than as good instructors. Some are good instructors, but the focus is, first and foremost, cheap labor. Nothing wrong with cheap labor, but it should be pointed out ESPECIALLY here. Yet another reason to be suspicious of Government funded education and educators. --AdmiralNelson 14:01, 23 August 2008 (EDT)

Fun With Names

Obama & Biden or is it Osama Bin Laden?-- jp 16:04, 23 August 2008 (EDT)

That's funny. Thanks for the humor.--Aschlafly 16:24, 23 August 2008 (EDT)

Are you kidding me..? It was juvenile and contrived at best. Jros83 13:18, 24 August 2008 (EDT)

Juvenile? That takes an AMAZING amount of brain power to scramble letters like that. Rkstiner 20:02, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

Plagiarist

He's a plagiarist because he plagiarised - inter alia - the speech of Neil Kinnock (re. his being the first Biden in X generations to attend university, etc etc). This is very well established (and documented on Conservapedia), and an equally well established blot on Biden's escutcheon. Why therefore are you deleting it? The man lied, full stop. Bugler 17:35, 23 August 2008 (EDT)

I agree with Bugler. I don't think there is any doubt about Biden's plagiarism.--Aschlafly 17:37, 23 August 2008 (EDT)

Section Shuffle Suggestion

I would move the "Controversial comments" section down (or up, if there is major resistance). In its current place (between the Senate section and the Campaign sections), it looks very out of place. --DirkB 17:35, 25 August 2008 (EDT)

wikipedia controversey?

i just wanted to point out that the section on Joseph Biden was never removed, just relocated http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joe_Biden&diff=233713896&oldid=233713863 is the edit where it was moved... i didn't want to try editing the main page because I'm a new user and i didn't feel it was my place, but it's clear to see that since Biden never ran in 2004 they wouldn't place information like that in a 2004 section, but a general section relating to information such as his suggestion for Kerry to take on McCain as a running mate. oh, also i didn't know where else to post this, that's why i entered it in his talk page. if it's in the wrong place please let me know and i can move it --Qprime

See here for discussion concerning the "controversy" (and its headline on the main page.) --Jareddr 17:56, 25 August 2008 (EDT)

I agree with Qprime, it doesn't make a lot of sense to have section for Joe Biden entitled "2004 Presidential Campaign" when he didn't have a 2004 Presidential campaign. Chippeterson 25 August 2008

Sorry, but I have to side with Tom Blumer of NewsBusters. The section describes Biden's involvement in the general 2004 Presidential campaign and the fact that he definitely considered running (but changed his mind due to timing issues). He was notable enough for CNN to list him on the page I cited, so I think the section is justified. There is no reason to hide Biden's endorsement of McCain as Kerry's running mate at the end of the Senate section. --DirkB 18:49, 25 August 2008 (EDT)

i'm just saying 'presidential campaign' implies his own campaign, on the wikipedia page they moved it to a 'general presidential campaign' section, i found it 5 seconds after i went there by looking with Ctrl-F it's not really hidden. now i'm as much against wiki bias as anyone else here, but in this situation it looks like more of a misunderstanding than anything else.--Qprime

Controversial?

What is controversial about the comment regarding offshore drilling? Why is the word rape bolded? That is a completely appropriate use of the word as in "rape and pillage". ClarkeD 21:01, 25 August 2008 (EDT)

Grammar

(At Syracuse Law School, he had plagiarized a law review article in a class paper he wrote. Although he was permitted to retake the course after receiving an F.) The grammar of this sentence is incorrect. After reading the source, I changed it to: (He has admitted that in his first year at Syracuse Law School, he plagiarized a law review article; he was permitted to retake the course after receiving an F.)^[1] I don't mind if anyone wants to change the content, or come up with a better way to write the section, but please use proper grammar! --Hsmom 15:41, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

Archmere Tuition

Why does the current tuition at Archmere, where Biden attended over 40 years ago, need to be anything more than a footnote to this article? Do we know that the tuition today is similar (given inflation) to the tuition when he attended? No, in fact one could argue that, like with most Catholic schools, the tuition today is significantly higher today because more classes are taught by lay teachers. Do we know that Biden (or his family) even paid full tuition? No, in fact many families in Wilmington attend private school with significant tuition assistance. Without knowing the facts, we don't know whether this is the story of a rich boy going to an expensive private school because his parents could well afford it, or a not-so-rich boy given an opportunity to go to an affordable private school because of financial aid. I have no idea which is the real story, or if it's something different. Until we find enough information to put Archmere's current tuition in some kind of context related to Biden's attendance, I think it needs to remain a footnote. The fact that it is a private, Catholic, college-preparatory school should say enough. --Hsmom 15:58, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

Noting the tuition as it currently exists shows the standard of that school for today and leaves it to the reader to determine what may have held true in the past. Generally speaking, most schools keep comparable standards over time. If there was a scholarship, his website would proudly provide that information would they not? Or have you noticed a tendency towards them being modest for Joe's accomplishments? Leaving the summer job part without also including current tuition levels could make it sound as if he paid for it himself, which would appear to be unlikely, although we do not state one way or the other. Giving more complete information, while not stating what occurred, can allow the reader to draw his own conclusions on how viable this may have been. Learn together 16:53, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

There are two kinds of scholarship, merit-based and need-based. Merit-based scholarships would be the kind that would be proudly advertised. Need-based scholarships are usually kept more confidential, so as not to embarrass the student or their family, and so that fellow students do not know who is receiving need-based aid and who is not. In addition, teen-aged high school students are not always aware of the details of their parents' financial arrangements with the school. I would be very surprised if anyone in public office would bother to list on their web site the details of need-based aid they received 40 years previously for high school. College-prep high schools often offer substantial need-based aid in an effort to have a more socio-economically diverse student body. We have no idea what Biden was charged for tuition 40 years ago.

If you feel strongly that the tuition should be mentioned in the body of the article, do you feel we should also list the tuition of the University of Delaware, Syracuse University College of Law, and perhaps even Widener and Del Tech? --Hsmom 22:16, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

Biden has been touting his blue collar roots for over 2 decades - the crux of his plagarized speech in 2008. A financial needs scholarship would be the perfect addition to his story. We are not going to assume a sudden ongoing bashfulness on his part in that area. Further education when one is an adult doesn't carry the same meaning as childhood dependence. Trying to equate costs for college as an ongoing part of that story, or to water down the aspect of parents paying for a private school for their son, would not be a beneficial contribution to the article. Learn together 14:37, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

Furthermore, his "admitting" his plagarism ignores the fact he did so only after he was caught and had no other choice. One can not accidentally copy enmasse a work from another person and not have it be understood to be plagarism. Learn together 16:56, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

As I said above, I have no opinion as to the content of the plagiarism sentences. But one of them isn't even a proper sentence, and the other is poorly written. If you don't like my version, that's OK with me; it was just an attempt to correct the grammar, not to change the content. But could you pretty please fix it to be grammatically correct? Thanks. --Hsmom 22:16, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

I want to put this in the article

but don't know if I should or what section to put it in. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmRXH7RkCZQ. Chippeterson September 22 2008

It's a little... National Enquirey. HelpJazz 23:51, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

A conundrum...

This page is enormously successful at 600,000+ hits, however it is in sore need of revision, restructuring, and updating. Because of its success, we shouldn't go about revising it piecemeal. Any suggestions how to re-structure it? RobS^{Deep Six the Deep State!} 12:05, 4 March 2019 (EST)

Biden Grabass

From Louder with Crowder. PeterKa (talk) 06:58, 12 May 2019 (EDT)

It turns out that Biden cut his son a sweetheart $1.5 billion deal with the Bank of China back in 2013, according to the New York Post. Pull quote: That Hunter Biden had no experience in China, and little in private equity, didn’t dissuade the Chinese government from giving his company a business opportunity in place of established global financial brands. Biden is not just corrupt, but a man willing to put our national security up for sale. PeterKa (talk) 01:34, 13 May 2019 (EDT)

A confused man

A Biden interview on CNN may not have gone quite as planned. "Then when Cuomo shifted the topic to Russian election meddling in Europe and America, Biden bizarrely asserted that the Obama administration never let that happen. “You think that would happen on my watch, on Barack’s watch? You can’t answer that, but I promise you it wouldn’t have. And it didn’t,” he said."[1] Who was president in 2016? Somebody tell Biden quick. Why didn't Biden point out that Harris also opposes federally mandated busing? It's the obvious comeback. The interview went so badly that one of Biden's aides intervened to end it. PeterKa (talk) 22:56, 6 July 2019 (EDT)

I hope he did an advance directive. Somebody should read it and pull the plug. RobS^{Deep Six the Deep State!} 23:24, 6 July 2019 (EDT)

Here's is another "confused Biden" video: He describes how his dark-skinned swimming-pool companions reacted to his blonde leg hair. The sad part is that he told this story because he thinks it will help him with the black vote. PeterKa (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2019 (EST)

Money laundering at Paradigm

From this article, it sure sounds like Biden used Paradigm Global Advisors to monetize his chairmanship of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. When the Bidens took over the firm, they told executives not to worry about fuddy duddy nonsense like return on investment. Paradigm's investors "want to invest in Joe Biden." If we go by reported net worth, Joe has little to show for his years of hucksterism. In 2009, his net worth was a mere $30,000. The dirty money is apparently funneled through his sons. PeterKa (talk) 23:38, 2 August 2019 (EDT)

Put it in. RobS^{Deep Six the Deep State!} 00:41, 3 August 2019 (EDT)

Hunter and MBNA

Hunter was cashing in on his dad's political clout even before Joe became vice president. While his father was in the U.S. Senate revising bankruptcy law, Hunter had a six figure do-nothing job at credit card company MBNA.[2] Two years out of law school, he was executive vice president. PeterKa (talk) 08:11, 12 October 2019 (EDT)

Why don't slap this into the Hunter Biden article and it can be developed from there. RobS^{De Plorabus Unum} 12:29, 12 October 2019 (EDT)

Timestamp

• Hillary Rodham Clinton‏‎ (664,268 views)
• Joseph Biden‏‎ (661,752 views)
• Obamagate timeline‏‎ (659,067 views) RobS^{De Plorabus Unum} 22:03, 7 March 2020 (EST)

• Obamagate timeline‏‎ (676,269 views)
• Hillary Rodham Clinton‏‎ (668,885 views)
• Joseph Biden‏‎ (668,618 views)

Biden still trails Hillary by 200 views, and can't seem to catch up for several weeks now. It'll be interesting to see at what point he finally catches her, cause that will mean people are finally pay attention to Biden and taking him seriously. This page probably needs a once-over cleanup to get ready for that time. RobS^{De Plorabus Unum} 00:47, 16 April 2020‎

• Obamagate timeline‏‎ (678,810 views)
• Joseph Biden‏‎ (671,006 views)
• Hillary Rodham Clinton‏‎ (669,460 views)

Biden's lept up 1,500 page views over Hillary in the last 4 days, the first time he's moved ahead of her since he announced his candidacy a year ago. Put another way, he's barely averaged 200 hits a day for the last six weeks, but is getting nearly 500 hits a day for the past five days. Time to refocus on the Biden page. RobS^{De Plorabus Unum} 05:53, 21 April 2020 (EDT)

Osama Bin Laden's diabolical plan

It takes a truly fiendish mind to imagine something this evil: "Usama bin Laden wanted to kill Obama so 'totally unprepared' Biden would be president, declassified docs show." PeterKa (talk) 02:28, 23 April 2020 (EDT)

Resemblance to Erich Honecker

For some reason I can't help but see the parrallels between Biden and Erich Honecker. [3] RobS^{Free Kyle!} 20:02, 19 January 2021 (EST)

What to address Biden during his "presidency"

It's probably been resolved by now that Sleepy Joe will act as the president and be inaugurated at noon today. Although I think none of us here agree that he actually won or should have won, he still is going to be the man in the white house. This brings up the topic of how to describe him on the first line of the article. I suggest that we change the first line to "Joseph Robinette “Joe” Biden, Jr. (born November 20, 1942, see: Biden's age), is the illegitimate President of the United States and was the Vice President of the United States and served as President Barack Obama's token segregationist." It may also be an option to not reference his presidency, because, after all, he was not legitimately elected. -Mark Adams(Discuss with me) 10:56, 20 January 2021 (EST)

Then that's exactly what we'll do. No matter what the Democrats, the liberal media and Big Tech claim, Biden is not and never will be the "president" (and never refer to him as such either, except to put "president" within quotation marks in reference to Biden - who, based on his advancing senility and his buffoonish behavior, is getting increasingly to be like a real-life version of The Simpsons character the Crazy Old Man).[4] Northwest (talk) 11:14, 20 January 2021 (EST)

It would probably be the best idea to lock this page for at least two days. Liberal vandals will be coming in hordes to vandalize anything about his "presidency".-Mark Adams(Discuss with me) 12:44, 20 January 2021 (EST)

How about Junta leader or Dear Leader? Wuth the abounding censorship, Dear Leader seems very appropriate. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 16:10, 20 January 2021 (EST)

Please review mission statement

Please see Conservapedia:Mission Statement.--Amorrow (talk) 15:20, 20 January 2021 (EST)

Infobox

Can some one edit the infobox (I tried but it didn't work) to note that he succeeded the legitimately elected President Donald Trump? --IScott (talk) 15:28, 20 January 2021 (EST)

I don't know if it will work with the current infobox. We may need to make an Infobox officeholder/dictator for this case. -Mark Adams(Discuss with me) 15:35, 20 January 2021 (EST)

I fear that we are running into fundamental aspects of being a reliable information source. If we cannot get the current POTUS right, then why should anyone visit the web site? Think of the impact on Mr. Schlafly's reputation as a New Jersey licensed attorney!--Amorrow (talk) 15:52, 20 January 2021 (EST)

I can see merit to that. I'm sure nobody here (aside from the vandals and parodists) would want to cause harm to Mr. Schlafly. This is his site, and I think we should let him have the final say as to what we display here. -Mark Adams(Discuss with me) 16:05, 20 January 2021 (EST)

I defer to Mr. Schlafly to make a final decision.--IScott (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2021 (EST)

Agreed. -Mark Adams(Discuss with me) 16:05, 20 January 2021 (EST)

The infobox photo

Is that photo really necessary?!? Biden is sort-of Mr. Schlafly's boss. Ya just gotta show the boss some respect no matter how much you hate his guts.--Amorrow (talk) 16:03, 20 January 2021 (EST)

As with above, I think we should defer to Mr. Schlafly on the decision. -Mark Adams(Discuss with me) 16:08, 20 January 2021 (EST)

This article could do with a different photograph, and a less biassed account of Joe Biden. The article on Donald Trump is very pro-Donald Trump, but admits he has been subject to a lot of criticism. Perhaps the logo that appears in the top left-hand corner of Conservapedia should be reworded as "Conservapedia - the anti-Democrat Party and pro-Republican Party Encyclopedia". CARDAMOM (talk) 15:54, 4 March 2021 (EST)

Okay, in unbiased, neutral terms, how should CP describe a racist, a crook, and a demented person as the Democrat party presidential nominee? Please give me one or two sentences of proposed language. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 16:03, 4 March 2021 (EST)

Ron Klain

Will Ron Klain be sanctioned, harassed, forced from his employment and possibly labeled a domestic terrorist for suggesting that elections are rigged? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 16:29, 20 January 2021 (EST)

Transgenderism vs gender confusiuon

For a parent trying to defend their child against transgender indoctrination and the danger of Joe Biden, labeling transgenderism as gender confusion in the Table of Contents does nothing for them. They will not read the content and simply pass over it, thinking there is no useful information for them in this article. It's a simple marketing principle, and has nothing to do with ideology. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 17:15, 13 March 2021 (EST)

This says it all

Politico: "@WhiteHouse's favorite reporters Presented by PhRMA. What more do you need to know? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 19:30, 6 May 2021 (EDT)

Biden rages to staff

I had pictured Biden as near comatose between public appearances. But now I wonder if they give him depressants so he doesn't do this in public: "Report: Biden Snapping and Losing It in Profanity Laced Tirades at Staff. PeterKa (talk) 03:32, 15 May 2021 (EDT)

Tara Reade has said that in her interviews. That back in 1994 he was known to be short-tempered and rude to staff. All this inevitably would come out. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 03:55, 15 May 2021 (EDT)

Not to mention his walking around nude in front of female Secret Service agents. He has no respect for underlings. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 03:56, 15 May 2021 (EDT)

P

I like this article but perhaps the information could be moved arpund to aplear more clean?

Particularly the beginning intro

That info feels like it should be further down

Biden is owned by the CCP. Why should that be hidden? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 13:32, June 18, 2021 (EDT)

I mean, c'mon. The CCP just released a bioweapon on the world. Why should any of that be buried? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 13:34, June 18, 2021 (EDT)

Organization of article's content

Can all the content, for the most part, just be placed in a chronological order? —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Wednesday, 20:16, August 24, 2021 (EDT)

Hold on. I'm making room to expand it right now....RobS^{Free Kyle!} 20:53, August 24, 2021 (EDT)

Awesome! —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Wednesday, 20:56, August 24, 2021 (EDT)

Okay. I'm glad you asked that this page will need a lot of discussion on what its overall aims are. It is a Portal page, as such the subpages from each top-level subheading are just as important as the content here itself. Meaning those pages need just about as much attention, in organization, structure, content, etc. as this page gets. This page is not for just dumping anecdotes cut from daily news headlines.

I was only able to retrieve about 6400 bytes of space, thus far. what did you have in mind? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 21:02, August 24, 2021 (EDT)

I was thinking about replacing the Dictator bio template with the old Officeholder template, re-ordering the sections so they're in chronological order, and dividing some blocks of text or adding more subsections if needed. With a very large article, it's important to make it easy and interesting to navigate so reading it doesn't become a drag. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Wednesday, 21:06, August 24, 2021 (EDT)

Make that 12,600 bytes. The Dictator plate stays until we see the results of the Arizona audit, some actions in a few state legislatures, and the outcome of a few lawsuits (another reason we need to get going on the 2022 Midterm elections._

Now, you will notice, this page serves a dual purpose right now, because of the extraordinary circumstances we are working under. It is not a typical bio page. We have pretty full biopages going back to about Nixon, with a spinoff of 'XXXXXXX Administration' page for each, i.e. separating the bio from the administration. Because this an ongoing event with regular traffic, we're building what, under a normal presidency, would be the "administration' page into the bio page. Biden's bio pretty much exists in the subpages, except for the Racism part and some of the Mental incapacity and Sexual abuse parts.

IOWs, this Portal right now focuses on the junta (what some mistakenly call the "administration"). And it is right on track, cause more people everyday question who is really running his so-called "administration". So it is not really laid out chronologically, but rather by policy priority topics. Is that confusing enough for you? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 21:17, August 24, 2021 (EDT)

Uh, I suppose so. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Wednesday, 21:21, August 24, 2021 (EDT)

Bio pages typically are set in concrete. This page will change many many times until the Deep State finally takes him out, Then it can become a bio page and the junta stuff spunoff into what ordinarily would be Administration pages. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 21:24, August 24, 2021 (EDT)

Let's put it to the voters and see what they think of legitimizing Biden and forgetting about a stolen election. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 21:34, August 24, 2021 (EDT)

There. I removed an additional 249,000 bytes of space for a net total of ~262,000 bytes. Feel free to add content, with the caveat that if people want to add a one-day news item or anecdote - WITH NO FOLLOW UP to an ongoing news story - do not be surprised if it is moved to a subpage fairly quickly. In fact, such trivial nonsense forgotten in 3 days ought to be placed within those subpages, which themselves need attention and would gain viewer hits with attention. This page is a Portal page for numerous subpages, all which deserve attention, organization and growth. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 03:04, August 29, 2021 (EDT)

Number of deaths

The number is easily morethan 100 higher - 40 from the 2020 summer BLM insurrection (U.S. Color Revolution) + 60 just yesterday in Kabul. A more accurate count will have to wait for the time being. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 07:31, August 27, 2021 (EDT)

Make that at least 210. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 23:10, August 27, 2021 (EDT)

Because I saw many left wing communities that hate him and call him a right winger.

Biden a rightwinger? No way. No how. Not now. Not ever. These alleged "left wing communities", what are they, kindergarten classes? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 22:10, August 31, 2021 (EDT)

The community in question was a communist subreddit called r/sh*tliberalssay, who frequently criticise joe Biden.

I dont like biden but I feel like we should change the photo in the infobox to something more unbiased. Something more like the photo in trumps infobox.

Don't you think the photo brings out his leadership skills, like decisiveness and commitment to principle? It's flattering. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 11:52, September 8, 2021 (EDT)

Biden breaks wind

Undoubtedly this occurred while Biden was representing the American people at the climate summit. However, this historic datapoint presents some analytical problems for proper interpretation. Does it suggest Biden is ready to be cut from the roster via the 25th Amendment, or should it be applauded as a traditional Irish nationalist paying his respects to UK bloodbloods? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 21:32, November 7, 2021 (EST)

It will be interesting to see how Hollywood screenwriters handle this scene, Rodney Dangerfield as Joe Biden. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 21:35, November 7, 2021 (EST)

Sniff away, Biden

PeterKa (talk) 13:17, June 17, 2022 (EDT)

Texas GOP declares Biden regime illegitimate

Texas Republicans Declare Biden Regime Illegitimate at State Convention in Houston

Northwest (talk) 06:50, June 21, 2022 (EDT)

Saudi Arabia

What an idiot joke this is - and exposes the sheer idiocy of Democrat national security and economic advisors. Saudi Arabia doesn't need to pump any more oil. It is buying Russian oil at a discount, preserving its own non-renewable assets, and using its transportation network a global hub for oil sales.

Additionally, Saudi Arabia is not using the SWIFT network to purchase the oil, and soon will join SPNS and probably BRICS+. This is the end of the petrodollar, de-dollarization, and ultimately globalism. RobS^Z+ 01:05, July 20, 2022 (EDT)

Globalism is essentially committing suicide - it doesn't need Russia & China to destroy it. RobS^Z+ 01:08, July 20, 2022 (EDT)

Too much bias.

Can someone rewrite the article to be more neutral? The article has many biased claims about Biden being racist among other things. Knowstuff (talk) 22:01, July 27, 2022 (EDT)