Difference between revisions of "Frank Zindler"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
==Frank Zindler Versus Dr. William Craig Debate==
 
==Frank Zindler Versus Dr. William Craig Debate==
 +
 +
See also: [[Frank Zindler Versus Dr. William Craig Debate]]
 +
 
The website [[TrueOrigin]] declares concerning the debate between atheist Frank Zindler and Christian philosopher Dr. [[William Lane Craig]]:
 
The website [[TrueOrigin]] declares concerning the debate between atheist Frank Zindler and Christian philosopher Dr. [[William Lane Craig]]:
 
{{cquote|Frank Zindler
 
{{cquote|Frank Zindler
  
 
A leading light in the American Atheists.  Isn’t it amazing how so many atheists love [[Theory of evolution|evolution]] and appear to be threatened by the massive scientific evidence for [[Creation Science|creation]]?  Zindler took the atheism side in an Atheism v. Christianity debate in front of 7,500 people at Willow Creek Community Church, USA.  His opponent, Dr William Lane Craig, tore his ignorant arguments to shreds so effectively that many atheists in the audience realised that Zindler had lost the debate.  It was presumably to this debate that John Snowden was alluding when he wrote that a representative of the American Atheists, whom he used to support, lost a public debate to a “fundamentalist” (Skeptic 18(3), 1998).<ref>http://www.trueorigin.org/noaig.asp</ref>}}
 
A leading light in the American Atheists.  Isn’t it amazing how so many atheists love [[Theory of evolution|evolution]] and appear to be threatened by the massive scientific evidence for [[Creation Science|creation]]?  Zindler took the atheism side in an Atheism v. Christianity debate in front of 7,500 people at Willow Creek Community Church, USA.  His opponent, Dr William Lane Craig, tore his ignorant arguments to shreds so effectively that many atheists in the audience realised that Zindler had lost the debate.  It was presumably to this debate that John Snowden was alluding when he wrote that a representative of the American Atheists, whom he used to support, lost a public debate to a “fundamentalist” (Skeptic 18(3), 1998).<ref>http://www.trueorigin.org/noaig.asp</ref>}}
 +
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
 
*[http://www.tektonics.org/uz/zindler02.html Frank Zindler: A Critique of, "The Real Bible: Who's Got it?", "The Twelve," and other claims] by [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[JP Holding]]
 
*[http://www.tektonics.org/uz/zindler02.html Frank Zindler: A Critique of, "The Real Bible: Who's Got it?", "The Twelve," and other claims] by [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[JP Holding]]

Revision as of 23:08, April 21, 2011

The website TrueOrigin wrote concerning the William Lane Craig vs. Frank Zindler debate: "Dr. William Lane Craig, tore his ignorant arguments to shreds so effectively that many atheists in the audience realised that Zindler had lost the debate. It was presumably to this debate that John Snowden was alluding when he wrote that a representative of the American Atheists, whom he used to support, lost a public debate to a “fundamentalist” (Skeptic 18(3), 1998)." [1]

(photo obtained from Flickr, see license agreement)

Frank Zindler is an American atheist and he is currently the editor of American Atheist Magazine and Director of American Atheist Press. In addition, Frank Zindler serves on the board of directors for the atheist group American Atheists plus served as an interim president of the organization.[1] As of January 2011, Frank Zindler serves on the board of the American Atheists organization.[2] As of January 2011, Ann Zindler, his wife, also serves on the American Atheists board of directors.[3]

Frank Zindler Versus Dr. William Craig Debate

See also: Frank Zindler Versus Dr. William Craig Debate

The website TrueOrigin declares concerning the debate between atheist Frank Zindler and Christian philosopher Dr. William Lane Craig:

“ Frank Zindler

A leading light in the American Atheists. Isn’t it amazing how so many atheists love evolution and appear to be threatened by the massive scientific evidence for creation? Zindler took the atheism side in an Atheism v. Christianity debate in front of 7,500 people at Willow Creek Community Church, USA. His opponent, Dr William Lane Craig, tore his ignorant arguments to shreds so effectively that many atheists in the audience realised that Zindler had lost the debate. It was presumably to this debate that John Snowden was alluding when he wrote that a representative of the American Atheists, whom he used to support, lost a public debate to a “fundamentalist” (Skeptic 18(3), 1998).[4]

”

External links

See also

v • d • e
Atheism
Atheism • Rebuttal • Morals • Academics • Quotes • Christianity • Debate • Evolution • Atheism and the suppression of science • Mass Murder • Communism • Atheist Shooters and Serial Killers • Mental and Physical Health • Miracles • Morality • Uncharitableness • Agnosticism • Deception • The Bible • The Problem of Evil • Agenda • Psychology • Population • Prison Statistics • Racism • Atheism and women • Brights Movement • Causes • Death Toll • Definitions • Evangelical atheist • Ex-atheists • Faith Freedom International • Godless: The Church of Liberalism‎ • Godless liberal • His Dark Materials • History • Liberalism • Militancy • New Atheism • Videos • Skeptics Annotated Bible • Strong atheism • The God Delusion • There Are No Atheists In Foxholes • Weak atheism 

Notes

  1. ↑ http://www.atheists.org/about/Board_of_Directors
  2. ↑ http://www.atheists.org/about/Board_of_Directors
  3. ↑ http://www.atheists.org/about/Board_of_Directors
  4. ↑ http://www.trueorigin.org/noaig.asp
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Frank_Zindler&oldid=862976"