Difference between revisions of "User talk:RobSmith"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Reverts and "Protected")
(Reverts and "Protected")
Line 509: Line 509:
 
Conservapedia leans "conservative" or "right-wing", but it's still supposed to be a fairly neutral objective NPOV encyclopedia, and not a POV ''blog'' of hyper-trinitarians, JW-haters, and anti-Witness conspiracy theorists.  There are other websites for that nonsense.  NOT Conservapedia.  So... Yeah, to you, David,...Northwest.  The stuff that David added was what anti-Witness conspiracy theorists and "mainstream" biased church theologians PUT IN IN ANTI-JW BLOGS, videos, books, and private websites....not a supposedly objective encyclopedia article.   
 
Conservapedia leans "conservative" or "right-wing", but it's still supposed to be a fairly neutral objective NPOV encyclopedia, and not a POV ''blog'' of hyper-trinitarians, JW-haters, and anti-Witness conspiracy theorists.  There are other websites for that nonsense.  NOT Conservapedia.  So... Yeah, to you, David,...Northwest.  The stuff that David added was what anti-Witness conspiracy theorists and "mainstream" biased church theologians PUT IN IN ANTI-JW BLOGS, videos, books, and private websites....not a supposedly objective encyclopedia article.   
  
David's statement of "conflicting with the Bible's teachings" is a PURE POV OPINION, having nothing to do with neutral encyclopedic anything.  Because other people have the opposite view of what David put in...in that regard.  
+
:Nope, these are true things about JWs, they're just too uncomfortable to you. The tone of your words indicates that '''you're the one who's thin-skinned.''' [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 09:17, 22 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
David's statement of "conflicting with the Bible's teachings" is a PURE POV OPINION, having nothing to do with neutral encyclopedic anything.  Because other people have the opposite view of what David put in...in that regard.
 +
 
 +
:Uh, no, "conflicting with the Bible's teachings" is '''objective fact.''' The liberal world pretends that religious beliefs are a matter of opinion, but we don't. It is just as much a fact that the "New World Translation" is an inaccurate Bible that removes all references to Christ's divinity. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 09:17, 22 May 2021 (EDT)
  
 
It doesn't matter how many contributions and edits you, or Northwest, or David has made on this site.   
 
It doesn't matter how many contributions and edits you, or Northwest, or David has made on this site.   
Line 517: Line 521:
 
David put in ANTI-WITNESS hateful neurotic BLOG JUNK, not professional neutral material, in those walls of texts there.  And you and Northwest wrongly upheld that POV wording, tone, and nonsense.  Why exactly?  So then fix wording to make it more neutral and not what "conservapedia" itself thinks.  Regards...  [[User:Summa Verbius|Summa Verbius]] ([[User talk:Summa Verbius|talk]]) 00:08, 22 May 2021 (EDT)
 
David put in ANTI-WITNESS hateful neurotic BLOG JUNK, not professional neutral material, in those walls of texts there.  And you and Northwest wrongly upheld that POV wording, tone, and nonsense.  Why exactly?  So then fix wording to make it more neutral and not what "conservapedia" itself thinks.  Regards...  [[User:Summa Verbius|Summa Verbius]] ([[User talk:Summa Verbius|talk]]) 00:08, 22 May 2021 (EDT)
 
:Sorry. I was just quoting the guy who removed your comments from his talk page (assuming it's a he) and in no way should it be considered an expression of personal opinion. Again, sorry if there was any misunderstanding. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 00:44, 22 May 2021 (EDT)
 
:Sorry. I was just quoting the guy who removed your comments from his talk page (assuming it's a he) and in no way should it be considered an expression of personal opinion. Again, sorry if there was any misunderstanding. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 00:44, 22 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
 +
:The only thing I see in the JW article are things that are true but can make JWs uncomfortable. Of course, real JWs are not even supposed to read non-JW material. I see a JW material that just has a hard time accepting uncomfortable truths about his religion. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 09:17, 22 May 2021 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:17, May 22, 2021

Graph (1).png

February 3, 2020 - September 30, 2020 - 145,228 page impressions per day.

November 3, 2020 - Election day.

hypestat: 33K visitors and 206,000 page impressions per day.

November 23, 2020 - DDoS attack

December 29, 2020 - started keeping records in Slack. Country Alexa Rank United States #63,303

hypestat: 27.1K visitors and 67,786 page impressions per day.

January 2021 - Similiarweb data [1] United States #31,638

February 1, 2021 - throughout Capitol riot and impeachment. United States #33,508

February 3, 2021 - Rob's de-sysoping.

February 11, 2021

hypestat: 24.7K daily visitors Daily Pageviews 61,624.

February 13, 2021 - Last Google cache until March 25, 2021

February 15, 2021 United States #36,617

February 16, 2021

hypestat: 23.7K visitors and 56,793 page impressions per day.

February 17, 2021 United States #40,319

February 19, 2021 United States #45,529

February 23, 2021 United States #50,091

February 24, 2021 United States #58,914

February 28, 2021 United States #61,140

March 1, 2021 United States #72,355

March 2, 2021 United States #81,250

March 3, 2021 United States #87,177

March 4, 2021 United States #94,183

hypestat: 21.2K visitors and 52,997 page impressions per day

March 5, 2021

hypestat: 20.7K visitors and 51,764 page impressions per day

March 6, 2021 United States #99,248

March 7, 2021 United States #109,993

#158,631 In global internet traffic and engagement over the past 90 days

March 8, 2021 United States #120,617

March 30, 2021

hypestat: 20.7K visitors and 49,694 page impressions per day
2.4 Daily Pageviews per Visitor
2:27 Daily Time on Site
Traffic Sources Past 30 Days 24% Search

April 2, 2021

2.3 Daily Pageviews per Visitor
2:24 Daily Time on Site

April 4, 2021

2:14 Daily Time on Site

April 5, 2021 - RobSmith blocked until April 12, 2021

April 11, 2021

172,231 In global internet traffic and engagement over the past 90 days
2:12 Daily Time on Site
hypestat: 19.2K visitors and 44,221 page impressions per day
new lows

April 12, 2021

173,873 In global internet traffic and engagement over the past 90 days
2.2 Daily Pageviews per Visitor
news lows

April 13, 2021

175,407 In global internet traffic and engagement over the past 90 days
hypestat: 18.7K visitors and 41,214 page impressions per day
new lows

Restored - welcome back.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 22:14, 17 April 2021 (EDT)

Thank you. RobSFree Kyle! 15:49, 18 April 2021 (EDT)

April 23, 2021

130,885 In global internet traffic and engagement over the past 90 days
United States #34,760
6.3 Daily Pageviews per Visitor
7:08 Daily Time on Site
hypestate: 19.7K visitors and 120,290 page impressions per day.
Estimated value of Conservapedia.com is $976,213.61
near term highs
Karajou reinstated

April 24, 2021 United States #29,655

new near term high

May 2, 2021

hypestat: 17.7K visitors and 177,477 page impressions per day.
Monthly Visits (SEMrush): 169,321
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush): 124,005
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb): 366,059
Daily Unique Visitors: 17,748
daily visitors down 2,000

May 4, 2021

hypestat: 17.3K visitors and 258,821 page impressions per day.
loss of another 400 viewers.
Analysis: the trolls have the Alexa App - which gathers the information Alexa uses - installed on their browsers and leave open pages on their browser 24 hours a day while they do reconnaissance on which pages to target, in addition to their routine trolling. This distorts Time on site and Page views per visitor stats, with a direct impact on Alexa ranking stats.

Hey, Rob.

Where can I find the inactive template? --Yeschayoise the editor (talk) 20:40, 4 March 2021 (EST)

Copy paste it from here. [2] Incidentally, I reviewed both your stub about the Welsh guy and the WP article, and didn't see any "copying" from Wikipedia. RobSFree Kyle!
Unless of course you call reporting historical facts "copying". RobSFree Kyle! 21:03, 4 March 2021 (EST)

Another question.

Have you ever heard of everipedia? --Builder (talk) 21:11, 4 March 2021 (EST)

Sounds vaguely familiar. What is it? RobSFree Kyle! 21:13, 4 March 2021 (EST)
It’s similar to Wikipedia. It basically ported Wikipedia’s articles over. --Builder (talk) 21:14, 4 March 2021 (EST)
Sounds interesting They're ranked 26,000 globally and 8,000 domestically. [3] They eventually are concerned about their rank, competitiveness, and readership. RobSFree Kyle! 21:31, 4 March 2021 (EST)
Does this article look bad for a start? https://conservapedia.com/Battle_of_Stamford_Bridge
No. It doesn't look anymore copied from Wikipedia any more than Conservapedia copied the idea of a source of knowledge from Wikipedia. RobSFree Kyle! 22:02, 4 March 2021 (EST)
So much for quitting eh Rob?--Mercian12 (talk) 19:44, 12 March 2021 (EST)
I'm looking for a few doggie biscuits. RobSFree Kyle! 19:47, 12 March 2021 (EST)

Greetings RobS, how are you doing?

Hello, Rob. I'm back. Hope you've been well. Thanks for all your efforts and hard work in making Conservapedia the great place that it is. I wonder if you've seen the recent Gordon Cromwell Report on the Status of Global Christianity 2021? I'm praying and working for Global Christianity to reach 3 Billion Souls - wow, how pleasing that would be to the Lord Jesus - by 2030. Please work with me and may all Christians unite for Christendom's sake!

In Our Lord Jesus, Nishant X. God Bless.

Thank you. Good to see you. Hope you've been well. Did you know that 20% of all CP traffic right now is coming from India? Your timing of a comeback couldn't have been better. RobSFree Kyle! 23:57, 21 March 2021 (EDT)
Welcome back NishantXavier! —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Monday, 00:06, 22 March 2021 (EDT)

Great to know, Rob! India is going to rise to internet prominence in the next decade, with an estimated 1 billion internet users by 2025! https://www.analyticsinsight.net/india-estimated-to-reach-1-billion-internet-users-by-2025/ Thanks for all your great efforts in promoting Conservapedia! Together, we can reach the world, your country, the great USA, my country, my beloved India, for the Gospel, and the Conservative Cause!

I pray Our Lord Jesus will richly bless you and reward you for your good efforts in contributing to the Cause, in this life and the next. God Bless.

Edit: Thanks, LT. You're the reason I returned. Thanks for emailing me to remind me. Thanks for all your great work in promoting Conservapedia too!NishantXavierFor Christ the King 00:09, 22 March 2021 (EDT)

Hi Rob. Please see if you can contribute to this article: https://conservapedia.com/Debate:_Will_Christianity_reach_3_billion_adherents_by_2030 NishantXavierFor Christ the King 04:35, 26 March 2021 (EDT)

My update to the civility guideliness

Andy approved my addition to the civility portion of the Conservapedia guidelines.Conservative (talk) 11:33, 29 March 2021 (EDT)

This is the update I created: "For content disputes, be reasonable and make every effort to use an article's talk page to have a cordial and constructive dialogue. Stick to the facts in content disputes and back up your facts with a source or sources. If you are proposing alternative content in a content dispute, it must be sourced. Do not engage in personal attacks. Avoid bringing up irrelevant past disputes with editors and stick to the content dispute at hand. If you have a content dispute with another editor, do not immediately post to the other editor's personal talk page. The article talk pages is where the vast majority of discussion should take place. Avoid unnecessary content disputes by sourcing your article content."Conservative (talk) 11:34, 29 March 2021 (EDT)

RobS and Northwest content disputes involving historical matters

I see a lot of disputes between RobS and NorthWest involving historical disputes. Below I give some great rules of weighing historical evidence.

Recommendations related to historical claims made by this article and information related to historiography

"Fischer, David Hackett, Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought (New York: Harper Collins, 1970). In only approximately 300 pages, Fischer surveys an immense amount of background historical literature to point out a comprehensive variety of analytical errors that many, if not most, historians commit. Fischer points out specific examples of faulty or sloppy reasoning in the work of even the most prominent historians, making it a useful book for beginning students of history. While this book presumably did not make Fischer popular with many of his peers, it should be noted that his contributions as a historian have not been limited simply to criticizing the work of others; since 1976, he has published a number of well-received books on other historical topics."[4]

Fischer's 7 habits of sound historiography

Fischer's 7 rules for historians taken from Josh McDowell's book The New Evidence that Demands a Verdict:

(1) The burden of proof for a historical claim is always upon the one making the assertion.

(2) Historical evidence must be an answer to the question asked and not to any other question.

(3) "An historian must not merely provide good evidence, but the best evidence. And the best evidence, all other things being equal, is the evidence which is most nearly immediate to the event itself."

(4) Evidence must always be affirmative. Negative evidence is no evidence at all. In other words, Fischer is saying that an absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence.

(5) The meaning of any historical evidence is dependent upon the context from which it is obtained from.

(6) "An empirical statement must not be more precise than its evidence warrants."

(7) "All inferences from historical evidence are probabilistic."

Josh McDowell's Evidence that Demands a Verdict, page 674, 1999, Mark MCGarry, Texas Type and Book Works, Dallas, TX, ISBN 0-7852-4219-8)

Fischer's 6 principles of question framing for historical investigations

I hope this helps. Conservative (talk) 12:48, 31 March 2021 (EDT)

Black Lives Matter / Stacey Abrams / Noah Green

What was the idea of undoing my edits in the Black Lives Matter article, which I intended to clean up part of the article (including replacing liberal-preferred terms with more appropriate ones) and add info? Also regarding the edit you pointed out in the Stacey Abrams article, I didn't miss it because it was accurate and sourced and it didn't need to be dealt with. In the Noah Green article, I also replaced the New York Times and Mediaite links with one from TGP because per CP's guidelines, liberal news sources (such as the NYT and Mediaite) are not trustworthy due to their partisan bias and penchant for blatantly lying to suit the liberal narrative. Are you just trying to stir up trouble again because I'm actually trying to get articles cleaned up? Northwest (talk) 03:10, 3 April 2021 (EDT)

I just reviewed the CP Guidelines page you linked to, and nowhere on that page does the phrase "liberal news sources" appear, let alone your specific parenthetical inclusions. Nice try. RobSFree Kyle! 19:34, 4 April 2021 (EDT)

Re: Your recent post on my talk page

In case you didn't get the memo, Islam is not a "race", and making such a false accusation (as well as falsely accusing me of "trolling") is not only a case of you doing the trolling yourself (and trying to start yet another fight), but by making it about race when it has nothing to do with such (which only liberals do), you're displaying racism yourself. Tread lightly. Northwest (talk) 10:04, 4 April 2021 (EDT)

Full disclosure: here is the text of an email I just sent to Andy.
"I have just cause to be angry about User: Northwest's racist trolling. RobSmith edits under his real life identity. In an effort to find neutral language for the birther movement, I am the Admin who reverted Northwest's racist trolling and put in "said to be born in Honolulu" (as cited by Eugene Robinson of WaPo). I cleaned up Northwest's racist trolling in at least a half dozen articles with neutral compromise language. For those efforts, there now is a webpage on the internet calling me a racist and birther, for which I am neither. And Northwest does not edit under his true life identity.

Andy can't be involved in all aspects of CP day-to-day, but had I blocked Northwest for 5 years in 2017 for what on its face looks like subversive racist trolling, Conservapedia would still be in the 30,000 today rather than fighting to remain in top 90,000.

By Andy's actions, trusting and rewarding racists trolls while disciplining good-faith users who risked their own names and reputations, not to mention dedicating their valuable time and lives to the project, makes the notion of CP being a meritocracy a joke. Andy needs to wake up and smell the coffee.

I suggest you stop stalking pages I create edit or create, stop harassing other users, and stop making threats and allow Andy to complete his full review. RobSFree Kyle! 10:32, 4 April 2021 (EDT)

So basically, you lied to Andy and you're lying now on your own talk page (while still trying to make trouble, make false accusations, start fights, play the "victim" and project your own racism and trolling while making your imagined issue about race, even though it actually has nothing to do with race). All you're doing is still making yourself look bad in the process. Northwest (talk) 11:40, 4 April 2021 (EDT)
Why is it you sound more like a program than a thinking human being? Why are all responses programmed ("only liberals call people racists, therefore you are a liberal", "the NYT is liberal, therefore bad, wrong, and evil", etc). If you are not a sockpuppet of Karajou, you likely advanced your CP career by parroting him. Only Karajou is capable of human reason, emotion, and discussion. You are not. You sound like program whose only purpose is to harm the project and sow division. Conservapedia has suffered the likes of your kind in the past. It's nothing new. And don't threaten me. RobSFree Kyle! 11:49, 4 April 2021 (EDT)

I saw Karajou lost his admin.

Have you seen yet? --Yeschayi ~ Talk! (talk) 05:14, 21 April 2021 (EDT)

Not til now. Looks like a policy shift away from arbitrary blocking and enforcement of site policies. RobSFree Kyle! 05:17, 21 April 2021 (EDT)

Is his death date known?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Schweter --Yeschayi ~ Talk! (talk) 12:28, 21 April 2021 (EDT)

According to the German wiki, unknown. [5] If no body was recovered, he may have disappeared into the Soviet gulag or was executed on the spot after I945. The same fate happened to hundreds of thousands at that time. RobSFree Kyle! 12:46, 21 April 2021 (EDT)

Question.

Who can start Conservapedia projects? --Yeschayi ~ Talk! (talk) 17:49, 24 April 2021 (EDT)

Anybody, I guess. Unless a senior Admin tries to kill it. RobSFree Kyle! 17:51, 24 April 2021 (EDT)
I recently made a proposal for comment at the Community Portal and another Admin hit the SiteAdmin panic button, shut the site down, claimed it was an attempt by Rationalwiki to take over the site, and I got de-sysoped. So honestly, I don't know how to answer your question. RobSFree Kyle! 17:55, 24 April 2021 (EDT)

Hey RobS.

How are you. --Yeschayi ~ Talk! (talk) 16:21, 30 April 2021 (EDT)

I'm breathing and still have a pulse. But the deep state still has its knee on my neck. RobSFree Kyle! 16:30, 30 April 2021 (EDT)

Nice Edit!

I saw the edit to my contribution on the article Democratic Plantation regrading Sen. Tim Scott. I concur... Let us eat lettuce (talk) 21:17, 3 May 2021 (EDT)

Rob.

Are the images on this page able to be used on the person's article (if they have one)?

https://conservapedia.com/Gallery_of_British_Heroes --Yeschayi ~ Talk! (talk) 09:54, 8 May 2021 (EDT)

I don't see why not. We stopped paying rent to them a long time ago. RobSFree Kyle! 18:34, 8 May 2021 (EDT)

Re: Conservapedia Guidelines

Pointing out your abuses of power and your own incivility, false accusations (i.e. "violation of 90/10", which I did not do if you'd pay attention to my contributions page) and attacks on me is not "attacking" - and besides, as the guidelines themselves say, my user page, my castle. And incidentally, you yourself are guilty of incivility, bullying, ridiculing and attacking other users here (per your history), so you have no ground to stand on with your argument. Northwest (talk) 16:45, 10 May 2021 (EDT)

I need your opinion.

How is this article so far?

https://conservapedia.com/Joseph_D._Sayers --Yeschayi ~ Talk! (talk) 17:49, 12 May 2021 (EDT)

Well, it's interesting how he went from Birth to fighting in Civil War battles. Perhaps you need more subdivisions or retitle "Birth" as "Early life". RobSFree Kyle! 17:54, 12 May 2021 (EDT)

New Discussion - Friendly Notice

Hey RobSmith. I just wanted to let you know I started a discussion about new content (Maybe a new article for it) about content on Wikipedia. You can see the discussion here: Conservapedia:Community Portal#Discussion for a possible new Wikipedia Article. I am letting the active editors know about the discussion. Feel free to drop your opinion in it! --Elijahandskip (talk) 18:12, 14 May 2021 (EDT)

Thanks Rob

Hi Rob. Thanks so much.

Kudos to the great work you do.

Question. I noticed, sometimes, there is a block from editing any page, there appears only the 'view sources,' page stating, only administrators can edit.

I see it takes some time from the time I edit a page and seeing the edit while signed on, till it appears to the 'outside world.'

If/when I do have images, how does one upload it here, or how do I send them to you rather?

Thinking of a page dedicated to the issue of using civilians by anti-Anerican and anti-Israel forces. There are images from certain domains. Is there a way you can upload them, so that it is saved, conserved-on-conservapedia?


God bless.Telling (talk)

(1) We have a robot Minuteman who does temporary autoblocks when it detects unusual activity, such as adding or removing large blocks of text. It accidentally blocked you for about 5 minutes last night til I caught it. Sorry for the inconvenience. We can work around it.
(2) As to images, just place a link here on my talk page and I'll upload it. Please make sure it's not copyright material, like the Associated Press for example.
Thanks again, you're doing great work. I'm trying to cover all bases by creating Redirects. So far I have 2021 Gaza War and 2021 Hamas war. We'll probably do a 2021 Isreali-Palestinian conflict eventually as well. But we also need a title to emphasize that attacks are coming from Lebanon and Syria,as well. Any suggestions? RobSFree Kyle! 12:10, 19 May 2021 (EDT)
Sounds great.

Here are links to images re human shields: The BBC image, its URL source is: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/6166998.stm which contains several.

https://sderotmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/hamashumanshields.jpg

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4422/2704/1600/palestinianuseofhumanshields1.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_xlOQjfLk_ks/SWKuHzgvc9I/AAAAAAAAAC4/7MiTOUg3rWc/s1600-h/terrorchildren2.jpg

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WPgVvOHdsLQ/maxresdefault.jpg

https://www.hakolhayehudi.co.il/Uploads/pics/%D7%9E%D7%92%D7%9F_%D7%90%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%A9%D7%99.jpg

https://www.outlookindia.com/public/uploads/gallery/20040512/gaza_palestinian_militants_040512.jpg

https://avaazdo.s3.amazonaws.com/350db222d9c32f2bca8e1ebea01ae80d.png

https://static.educalingo.com/img/en/800/human-shield.jpg

https://www.israelhayom.co.il/sites/default/files/images/articles/2018/04/21/152433084061_b.jpg

https://ynet-images1.yit.co.il/PicServer5/2018/04/22/8485009/10030432_10030449_rumble.jpg

https://unwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Children-in-Hamas-Summer-Gamp.jpg

https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2014/08/fff-e1408151169183.jpg

https://img.mako.co.il/2011/04/12/166411.jpg

https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2017/12/Using-an-Ambulance-as-a-Shield-2.jpeg

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42337000/jpg/_42337228_women_afp.jpg

https://www.idf.il/media/27099/hamas-children.png

http://www.thetower.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/FeaturedImage_2018-08-23_155940_YouTube_Hamas_Human_Shields.jpg

https://blinchiki.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/human-shield-2.jpg

Telling (talk)

Heres most of them. Give me a few minutes, I'm still working on 2 or 3. One is too large to upload, so I'm going to try something another way. If it doesn't work, you may have to look for a smaller version. I'll put the link to the uploads on the talk page, too. RobSFree Kyle! 13:12, 19 May 2021 (EDT)
Please take your time. No rush.
There all done except the one that is too large. RobSFree Kyle! 14:20, 19 May 2021 (EDT)

On an unrelated matter, where would the following item go:

Joe Biden Leaves God Out of the National Day of Prayer. National Review. May 10, 2021. Joe Biden Leaves God Out of the National Day of Prayer


Blessings.Telling (talk)

In the Joe Biden article. I'd put it here for now Joseph_Biden#Unity, and depending how much information you have I can work on integrating it into the article later. Great catch, too! RobSFree Kyle! 14:20, 19 May 2021 (EDT)
You're right.


BTW the following are related published cartoons. Should they be uploaded?


http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/1/15638000/ngbbs47c9c30f04c8f.jpg


http://markhumphrys.com/Bitmaps/israel.11.jpg

http://image.cagle.com/152477/500/15247.png

https://images.hamodia.com/hamod-uploads/2014/07/ed-1024x736.jpg

https://www.rightsreporter.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/diritto-bellico-scudi-umani.jpg

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2014-07-16-Smith_C20140715HP.jpg

http://image.cagle.com/150976/500/150976.png

Telling (talk)

Generally, cartoons are copyright material, so we have to look at the terms of use from the original source. Look for wording such as "permission granted with proper attribution" or some such. RobSFree Kyle! 14:26, 19 May 2021 (EDT)
This one for example, we may be able to use with attribution to the photographer. if someone complains later, big deal, we'll take it down. We're not using it for commercial exploitation. RobSFree Kyle! 14:32, 19 May 2021 (EDT)

Yes. It is good that the sources of the files are posted here, in case for any complaints.

How do I use attributes (sizes) within the wiki page? (Width="" height="")? Telling (talk)

Here's the basic format: [[File:Paste image here.jpg|right|300px|thumb|add text here]]
I typically use 300px to 350px for images in the body of articles. You can change position from right to left. The 'thumb' allows for a box to add text, which can even hold footnotes to external links. RobSFree Kyle! 15:06, 19 May 2021 (EDT)
Great help. Thanks for already resizing the large one there...Telling (talk)
I added the new article to Template:Terrorism, which de-orphaned the page and created several inbound internal links. This will help in Google results. I'm looking to create more internal links to Guardian of Walls also. RobSFree Kyle! 15:21, 19 May 2021 (EDT)
Very smart.

BTW.

The following image, as quoted in this tweet about an Arab nurse (Yusuf Naim) resident of and working in Israel, who put in his Instagram simply "Palestinian nazi" https://mobile.twitter.com/tzvisuccot/status/1393641393264934914/photo/1 Main tweet: https://mobile.twitter.com/tzvisuccot/status/1393641393264934914

(Nevermind the irony. As Hitler would exterminate also the Arabs: Have no doubt Hitler would have wiped out Arabs after Jews, The Independent, 24 February 2007 eventually as another "inferior race" in his eyes)


Telling (talk)

This guy's a professional nurse? Those imgs can be uploaded, no problem. And if they get deleted from Twitter, we have a record here, then. RobSFree Kyle! 15:45, 19 May 2021 (EDT)
Arabs? Possibly. Muslims however, did serve in the SS. RobSFree Kyle! 15:49, 19 May 2021 (EDT)
Agreed. And an Arab author explained, Hitler's people tried to convince themselves the Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini isn't pure Arab in blood... || And the guy, Yusuf Naim is a nurse, he worked as such in the Israeli Hadassah hospital before being suspended over this. || I tried to insert this url of image https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E1dG7I-XMAAiEUm.jpg , it didn't work. Telling (talk)
Your tax dollars at work. As to the Arabs, the Nazis classified their Japanese allies as "Honorary Aryans" [6] The same could have been done to Arabs for service to the Reich. But now we're into coulda woulda shoulda historical writing. All we have are facts to deal with. RobSFree Kyle! 16:52, 19 May 2021 (EDT)
Hi Rob. If and when you have a chance for these two images to be uploaded, please. The second is from the BBC a few years back.

https://mida.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Web_F081218AA01.jpg

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/media/images/76535000/jpg/_76535336_shields.jpg

Thanks for everything.Telling (talk) 10:57, 20 May 2021 (EDT)

Done. RobSFree Kyle! 14:36, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
Rob the great one... one more here when you can - https://mfa.gov.il/MFA_Graphics/MFA%20Gallery/2011/Turkel/ambulance.jpg

Thanks. Telling (talk)

Done. RobSFree Kyle! 18:38, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
Ambulance.jpg

___


Great job. Here are three images. One related to human shields. The other two to genocidal call by Hamas.


Related to [7][8]

__

Related to [9]

__

Related to: [10]

Telling (talk) 23:10, 20 May 2021 (EDT)

Done. These people are sick. I hope you don't use the ceasefire to slowdown reporting, but rather to catch up. There is so much there readers need to see and hear. Even in New York, Los Angelas, and elsewhere. RobSFree Kyle! 23:40, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
You are do right. BTW, efardibg NY/LA... there is a parallel between the recent Islamic "protesters" appearing in one particular area in Manhattan violently and May 1, 2020 some Islamic "activists" taking advantage of BLM protests and carrying out an attack in LA, including graffiti of "palestine" on a synagogue. It was facilitated by a BLM operative Melina Abdullah (mostly raisd by her mother) who is a Farrakhan fan.. Why, if not intolerance was the particular Fairfax area even chosen?Telling (talk) 00:23, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
If you're too busy with events on the ground there in Israel, I can add content about it here in the U.S. and may elsewhere (London for example). Just create a subheading for it where you think it appropriate and I'll add it daily as news comes in. RobSFree Kyle! 00:27, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
Are you referring to something like a blog/column of updates on the main page? BTW I'm concerned about our country here in the US. But, it's just that it's so sensitive there and threat to survival and demonization are constant, at the same time. (True David VS Goliath, in many aspects) . And both countries are bound in shared values.|| Sorry to bother you with one more:

http://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/05/israel-pilot.jpg source

Telling (talk) 00:43, 21 May 2021 (EDT)

(ec)I mean separating violent protests and incidents outside Israel in the mainspace of the article. Rocket launches from Syria, for example, should probably go under their own subheading. As well as people eating in restaurants in NY and LA getting beat up.
I do have Main Page access for headlines. This site however, is somewhat anti-neocon so the headlines can't be made to look like somebody is trying to drag the U.S. into war. OTOH, stories about AOC and The Squad trying to sabotage U.S. commitments to allies or being sympathetic to terrorists certainly is newsworthy. When you find a headline like that that appeals to U.S. readers, you can feed it to me and I'll see what I can do with it to link the Guardian of Walls article from the Main Page. RobSFree Kyle! 00:50, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
Latest img is uploaded. Bottomline, from my perspective, Israel is at war with Iran right now. Hamas are just the frontline foot soldiers and proxies. And most Americans do not understand this, as Biden and Kerry seek to facilitate an iranian nuclear weapon. RobSFree Kyle! 00:59, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
Of course the main page should be about US 'direct' news. I actually joined this site when liberals tried to portrayed Ahmad Al Issa as some Trumpist-white-supremacist... BTW I'm for clarity, especially about bias in the media and that other site.. I am not advocating for any wars. For these decisions I leave for experts. . A little secret... I might be able to dig up some AOL email I sent at the time against invading Iraq. There is also a huge difference between an operation or operations and an invasion. And yes, the elephant in the room is the Islamic Republic of Iran. Weak Biden knows more than Sanders, but he is not the de-facto leader of the Dems... Radical leftists have grown stronger there (not that Omar/Tlaib are true progressives like AOC and Sanders, this pair's true agenda isn't entirely as the others in the group. Their joint appearances should not fool anyone.. The squad isn't made all of the same cloth. Though in reality, on the ground, as is, this gang is detrimental to our country for many aspects) though there is an internal struggle there. The 'conflict' in the middle east is about incitement to intolerance. Since the 1920s by the Mufti (who also assassinated the moderates) and still going on today http://palwatch.org school textbooks, plays/shows at a very young age or in mosque, which is why the April spike in attacks on Jews inside Israel who are known not to serve in the Israeli army shows the 'real' problem, beyond "issus". And of course dead kids pics are powerful in the campaign for this purpose. The element of forcefully spreading one particular religion should not be overlooked.. Further on, 'if' any attacks in the US occur they don't have to be related to 'Guardian of Walls'. Another parallel point, the race card being obsessively abused at every corner for political purposes here in God's great country is played so in the Haaretz phenomenon of the last decades (vs what it was historically they even give voice for rewriters of history), the paper's more popular outside Israel very much adopted by radical left internationally but most in Israel regard it as radical, fringe. Most Israelis have faith in God. || Here is a recent image: https://hannity.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/israel5-1.jpg

source Will embed/link the Hannity source in it|| Thanks and have a great weekend.Telling (talk) 10:04, 21 May 2021 (EDT)

Got it with my Snipping tool on Windows 10. RobSFree Kyle! 12:05, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
Great! I think you have an excellent understanding of the facts we are dealing with. Me personally, I have a deep abiding mistrust of American mainstream media, and I'm much impressed with the sources you have been using. These are the facts we can bring to readers and the American public. Feel free, please, to update The Squad, AOC, or any other members' articles with their comments and reactions to these gross and vile human rights violations we are witnessing daily, or how it was facilitated by the present regime occupying the White House with cash to terrorist organizations. Or expanding the role the Islamic Republic of Iran is playing in all this. Thanks again. RobSFree Kyle! 11:53, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
Summing up your words. True, concise and precise. There are many factors in media bias Telling (talk) 12:17, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
Question. How long is the delay from what is seen (edited matetial) internally by site users and external view - what is seen by all?Telling (talk) 12:51, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
I don't really know. I believe users accessing the site, like yourself or anybody else, see the current version. The question is how long before Google or others Index the site to appear in Search engine results, which I think is about 72 hours. RobSFree Kyle! 12:53, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
IOWs, when Google scans the site, they are looking at a 72 hour old version, I think. The site owner knows those details and hasn't shared them. RobSFree Kyle! 12:57, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
Interesting. But in case you haven't noticed it. Try viewing a page you or others just edited. Then sign off and view at it again. Spot the difference.Telling (talk)
As I noted earlier, Conservapedia famously has been the target of trolling attacks, so new users have to go through a probationary period to establish bona fides. Apparently the site owner is reviewing your edits, at which point you'll be granted more users rights, etc. (like SkipCaptcha is the bottom rung of the ladder). The problem is, he also has a fulltime job and his time can be limited. Just keep doing what your doing and there shouldn't be a problem (we've discussed the anti-neocon editorial stance already). My guess is that any alleged 'controversial' edits should be cleared in 72 hours. I'll bring this up in discussion with another Admin slated for this weekend. Let me know if something added does not appear in 72 hours. RobSFree Kyle! 13:21, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
I see. When you get a chance,, https://mfa.gov.il/MFA/ForeignPolicy/Terrorism/Photos/itic-humanshield2.jpg

source And thanks again for your awesome work.Telling (talk) 13:25, 21 May 2021 (EDT)

Here's the latest. Thanks for understanding. CP Admins are notorious for garbled communication and things can get fouled up. Everybody is preoccupied with their own pet projects. But I'm your advocate here and the wheels of bureaucracy grind slowly sometimes. If it's not inconvenient, you can provide to me diffs that show the lag time on edits appearing (I'm assuming nothing has been censored or removed). The time stamp on the diff could help. Thanks again. RobSFree Kyle! 13:33, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
Thanks so much. And I was curious to ask what's the story with the cat you have in your profile. This one https://mfa.gov.il/MFA/ForeignPolicy/Terrorism/Photos/itic-humanshield.jpg belongs also to the last source. It's in Arabic

'Announcement from the ("Palestinian") ministry of the interior to the residents of the Gaza Strip, telling them not to pay attention to IDF announcements about vacating their homes'.Telling (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2021 (EDT)

Here's the Arabic statement. As to the cat, it's been an ongoing game of cat n mouse with trolls from Rationalwiki for 15 years. It's just a message that I'm always here, always watching, vetting content, ready to pounce. Some of my fellow Admins think I'm paranoid and nuts, but I know who the trolls are and can identify them easily after 15 years on the job. RobSFree Kyle! 13:53, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
That site... I see. I presume CP had many hackers' attempts too in course of years, no doubts.|| This one is of the recent famous event in May 16. https://www.algemeiner.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2.jpg source Telling (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
This img has a better resolution than the one uploaded last night. We've experienced every kind of Crapflood and DDoS attack imaginable. Most of it can be traced to the RW network and Wikipedia Rogue Admin cabal. I wouldn't be surprised if we've come to the attention of the Chinese 50 cent Army lately. Right now, according to Alexa, visitors are spending one hour Time on Site without the actual number of unique visitors going up, which to me looks like a clickbot attack. RobSFree Kyle! 14:17, 21 May 2021 (EDT)

Message

I am sorry if I haven't responded. I just don't know that you have sent responses. I am not ignoring them. ChadUser (talk) 16:46, 21 May 2021 (EDT)

Reverts and "Protected"

So engaging in discussion is "harassing" to you? Isn't that was is recommended and the policy? Communication? And engagement? Even if blunt? You put silly stuff on on Northwest's talk page, after did what you did. You obviously have no credibility...so it's irrelevant at this point in a way. But I'm curious.... (And I know you'll probably just dodge and delete...like a rude juvenile no-answer evasive schmuck...as you've proven what type of person and editor you are already...) But I am curious....

Why exactly did you revert me before putting that protection on that JW article, when my reverts were the justified ones? It was obvious POV-PUSHING and opinion and blog bias that was put walls of text by "David" a few months ago. So what was the reason you rudely undid my (necessary) undo, before doing what you did?

Conservapedia leans "conservative" or "right-wing", but it's still supposed to be a fairly neutral objective NPOV encyclopedia, and not a POV blog of hyper-trinitarians, JW-haters, and anti-Witness conspiracy theorists. There are other websites for that nonsense. NOT Conservapedia. So... Yeah, to you, David,...Northwest. The stuff that David added was what anti-Witness conspiracy theorists and "mainstream" biased church theologians PUT IN IN ANTI-JW BLOGS, videos, books, and private websites....not a supposedly objective encyclopedia article.

Nope, these are true things about JWs, they're just too uncomfortable to you. The tone of your words indicates that you're the one who's thin-skinned. Shobson20 (talk) 09:17, 22 May 2021 (EDT)

David's statement of "conflicting with the Bible's teachings" is a PURE POV OPINION, having nothing to do with neutral encyclopedic anything. Because other people have the opposite view of what David put in...in that regard.

Uh, no, "conflicting with the Bible's teachings" is objective fact. The liberal world pretends that religious beliefs are a matter of opinion, but we don't. It is just as much a fact that the "New World Translation" is an inaccurate Bible that removes all references to Christ's divinity. Shobson20 (talk) 09:17, 22 May 2021 (EDT)

It doesn't matter how many contributions and edits you, or Northwest, or David has made on this site.

An editor on this thing may have hundreds of thousands of edits, hundreds of GAs, FAs, dozens of barnstars and a legion of friends-and-relations; DOESN'T MATTER....because, disruption is disruption, POV is POV, and tendentious malicious mendacious editing is tendentious malicious mendacious editing, no matter who does it.

David put in ANTI-WITNESS hateful neurotic BLOG JUNK, not professional neutral material, in those walls of texts there. And you and Northwest wrongly upheld that POV wording, tone, and nonsense. Why exactly? So then fix wording to make it more neutral and not what "conservapedia" itself thinks. Regards... Summa Verbius (talk) 00:08, 22 May 2021 (EDT)

Sorry. I was just quoting the guy who removed your comments from his talk page (assuming it's a he) and in no way should it be considered an expression of personal opinion. Again, sorry if there was any misunderstanding. RobSFree Kyle! 00:44, 22 May 2021 (EDT)
The only thing I see in the JW article are things that are true but can make JWs uncomfortable. Of course, real JWs are not even supposed to read non-JW material. I see a JW material that just has a hard time accepting uncomfortable truths about his religion. Shobson20 (talk) 09:17, 22 May 2021 (EDT)