Difference between revisions of "User talk:Patriotic Gamer"

Revision as of 21:26, July 31, 2025

Welcome!

Hello, Patriotic Gamer, and welcome to Conservapedia!

I am a contributor named Liberaltears. I just want to say hello and offer any assistance you might need! Also, we have some guides which might help you get started and learn your way around if you need them.

• How to edit a website like Conservapedia - An intro on how to use Wiki code (which can be very useful if you haven't edited wikis before)
• Editor Quick Reference guide - A basic intro to how things work here
• Conservapedia's Manual of style - Extensive guide of good practices for writing and editing wiki pages

Please take a look at our rules when you get the chance. You also might want to look at the Guidelines of editing and collaborating here.

Useful links

• How to edit a wiki
• CP Commandments
• CP Guidelines
• Style Manual
• Editing Etiquette
• How to create and maintain high-quality articles
• Report Problems
• List of Templates

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me! Also we have a community portal where you can ask general questions, introduce yourself, or just comment. If you do post messages, please sign them by placing "~~~~" at the end of each one.
Thanks for joining our community, Patriotic Gamer! We look forward to working with you!
—LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Monday, 17:43, 24 May 2021 (EDT)

You were mistakenly blocked by the bot Minuteman; sorry about that! —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Monday, 17:43, 24 May 2021 (EDT)

And it happened again. Yeah, I apologize for that...you did nothing wrong, that's just a bot freaking out for no real reason. It shouldn't give you any more trouble. Again, sorry for the hassle! --DavidB4 ^(TALK) 19:59, 24 May 2021 (EDT)

Re: Earlier I had View source message and couldn't edit?

That is, in fact, what Conservapedia does - it restricts editing at night to editors who have night editing rights (indicated in the User rights log under the term "edit" for those who have those rights) to prevent trolls and vandals from coming here during that time to do damage and cause trouble here. Northwest (talk) 10:55, 26 May 2021 (EDT)

When I am done with the new article

Would you like to see all of the America First People that we currently have in congress? ChadUser (talk) 11:30, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

The Page is done.

The page is done now. Now I will make a page on current America First Incumbents running. ChadUser (talk) 13:23, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

Checkout the New Article

2022 America First Senator and Representatives Running for Re-Election

ChadUser (talk) 14:06, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

Has the person responded to the article that you shared? Also make sure to share the other one, thanks.ChadUser (talk) 14:15, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

Never forget those names, we don't have many fighters, and we need to know everyone who reliably puts America First. ChadUser (talk) 14:21, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

I need your help

Can you please help back me on my talk page? This user does not seem to understand the idea of an America First Agenda. ChadUser (talk) 18:58, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

When you have the time

When you have the time, do you think you could help me expand the Sweet Baby Inc article? There is so much information online right now that I get confused and have a hard time sorting it. Cazle (talk) 20:45, March 10, 2024 (EDT)

I'm not that familiar on the topic Patriotic Gamer (talk) 08:17, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

I thought your message in my user mailbox was from someone else. My mistake

I thought your message in my user mailbox was from someone else - namely RobSmith. That is why I reverted it. My mistake. I no longer read the messages of RobSmith to my mailbox and simply revert them.

Next, as far as RobSmith's clickbot claim concerning me, keep in mind that RobSmith frequently makes childish, false claims about me. You can confirm this with User: Aschlafly if you wish. User: DavidB4 will confirm this also. Wise King Solomon said, "The first to plead his case seems right, Until another comes and examines him." (Proverbs 18:17). Do your due diligence before you believe the claims of RobSmith.

In addition, RobSmith often engages in projection (Accusing others of things that he does). Ask User: Aschlafly if RobSmith used a clickbot to inflate the page views of his Russiagate article.

What a pile of hooey. The Atheism article only led the Homosexual agenda article by 10,000 page views a year ago, and the Homosexual agenda has NEVER led the Atheism article in 17 years. Yet in the past few months the Atheism article now leads the Homosexual agenda by nearly 90,000 page views.

I wish RobSmith would grow up. Most people outgrow their narcissism in their teenage years. It's sad that RobSmith hasn't and engages in narcissistic rivalry and narcissistic smear campaigns. Some people never grow up.

It's commonly known that RobSmith acts this way and that is why nobody is a member of his Team CP except for himself. On the other hand, the Conservapedia Civility Association which I endorsed has 9 members. Conservative (talk) 14:35, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

A gay bathhouse. Image uploaded by User:Conservative, June 8, 2008.

He seems to have a childish obsession with RobSmith, in addition to gay bath houses and flush toilets. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:58, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

And a point of order: User:Conservative just told another big old fat lie: he has NEVER read messages from me on his talk page. The only messages he reads are those flattering to his narcissistic ego. He doesn't understand Wise King Solomon's Proverb, "In the multitude of counsels, purposes are established." Proverbs 15:22. He's elevated ignorance to a conservative value. That's how he's led Conservapedia to such disasterous rankings. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!}

Oh, don't forget Proverbs 11:13 and 26:22 about talebearers when he called me a "useful idiot of an atheist website" and spammed malicious and slanderous ad hominems and personal attacks against me, a violation of Conservapedia rules. All because someone at Rationalwiki asked me if I thought User:Conservative was mentally ill. I answered I didn't know, cause I had very limited interaction at the time. He didn't want the word getting out that that was what was being said about him by users who did have extensive interaction with him, but were blocked from CP.

Now I can answer in the affirmative. But it is a developmental disability, IMO. Unfortunately, his narcissism has overcome what he knows is his limitations and has become a character flaw with extremely vicious intents towards his perceived "enemies". RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 01:21, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

RobSmith, I don't consider you to be an enemy. On the other hand, given your childish behavior, as time has progressed, you can't blame me for ignoring you at various times and in various manners. Also, as far as our political views being somewhat divergent, as time has progressed the countries of Russia/China have declined. In addition, Trump has made some positive changes in the USA. So many of my predictions/projections have been right. I do wish DOGE had made more progress and the "big beautiful bill" was less big. God willing, due to necessity, the USA will make some budgetary reforms.

"The greatness of America lies not in being more enlightened than any other nation, but rather in her ability to repair her faults." - French historian and politician Alexis de Tocqueville Conservative (talk) 09:17, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

Okay, sorry I got caught in a conflict between you to. Would it be okay if debates and arguing are not on my talk page, though? Patriotic Gamer (talk) 14:42, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

I agree. I was just replying to your message. Conservative (talk) 18:51, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

Aw c'mon. User:Conservative's talk page is on permanent censorship and lockdown, and on my talk page it might look too biased. On a neutral editor's talk page I can tell you all about User:Conservative's mental illness and developmental disability. It shows in his conduct. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 19:35, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

Permission request to Andy regarding reuse of Conservapedia material

re: "Hello, I'm going to start a video game wiki. It's not about politics whatsoever but it will have no content license like this wiki. Would it be alright if I reuse some pages like Conservapedia:Copyrights and the site structure for the wiki I'm making? Thank you! Patriotic Gamer (talk) 12:46, June 13, 2025 (EDT)".

PatriotGamer, Conservapedia has generous use rights. I don't see Andy having a problem with your request. I would just go ahead and do it. I wrote some additional commentary on Andy's talk page. Conservative (talk) 10:07, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

Thank you! The site in question is Gamerpedia Patriotic Gamer (talk) 14:42, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

I used to work for Radio Shack and my District Manager was a very good salesman/manager. The workers at RadioShack used to play Doom. I also knew someone who owned Mortal Combat and sometimes I played matches against him. I still remember Scorpion's "Get over here!".

Recently, some Conservapedians were on Discord and wanted to talk about computer games. I am not very into computer games so I left the discussion early. I like board games such as chess better. Conservative (talk) 04:58, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

Conservapedia uses Discord? I can't stand that platform, but I'm not inherently against others who use it. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 08:47, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

People have different preferences. Like some people like chocolate ice cream cones and others like vanilla ice cream cones. Some people very much like the country of Russia and also like its allies of China, Iran and North Korea. Others like countries like the USA, Switzerland, Malta, the Philippines, Greece and Singapore as some of their favorite countries. Unlike some people, I don't get very psychologically distressed if people make various valid criticisms of the countries I like. Conservative (talk) 09:15, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

Right. Some people like intelligent, informed discussion. Some people like gay bath houses and flush toilets spam to support their interpretation of Just War Theory. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:35, June 16, 2025 (EDT)

Re: Connection speeds to Conservapedia

The connection speed problem with Conservapedia, which has become less of a problem than it used to be, is due to a cyber attack against Conservapedia. Conservative (talk) 22:35, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

Oh. Do you think its Russian or Iranian cyberattacks because of Conservapedia'a pro-Christian messages, or the US Deep State & intelligence community cause of Conservapedia's anti-LGBT & pro-Putin propaganda? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 22:56, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

We're pro-Putin? Anyway, I'm okay with user talk discussion, I just thought that arguing was counter-productive, but isn't politics often a bunch of arguing? I think it's an external attack. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 23:32, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

Mark the time: Monday he's running clickbots. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:31, June 16, 2025 (EDT)

Time stamp again: More Gateway Timeouts. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:35, June 16, 2025 (EDT)

? Patriotic Gamer (talk) 16:23, June 16, 2025 (EDT)

Oh, I'm just trying to keep track of the times User:Conservative is running clickbots with a timestamp in case other users have the same complaints. He doing more of them in shorter bursts now, rather than letting it run for an hour or more. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:31, June 16, 2025 (EDT)

Okay, no worries. If you want to do that, you're welcome to. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 16:53, June 16, 2025 (EDT)

Thanks. If you experience Gateway Timeouts, you might want to make a timestamp, too. The more data we have for analysis, the better. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 17:41, June 16, 2025 (EDT)

• Gateway Timeout (note: there were two other instances not recorded here since the last). RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 01:41, June 25, 2025 (EDT)
• Gateway Timeout, again at a time User:Conservative was active. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:35, June 30, 2025 (EDT)

So the timeouts are happening between like 10 or 5-day margins? Patriotic Gamer (talk) 14:14, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

I'd say every 3 or 4 days. There's probably about 4 times not recorded above since June 16. What is certain is User:Conservative was active at the time, usually making an edit 10 mins or so before or after the above time stamps.

It's just that I can't always get here quick enough to make a stamp, 14:25, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

• Three Gateway Timeouts in the past 3 hours today. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:14, July 18, 2025 (EDT)
• Series of Gateway Timeouts ove3r the past several minutes while User:Conservative is active. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 01:09, July 24, 2025 (EDT)
• Several Gateway Timeouts today while User:Conservative has been busy spamming in new content. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 20:11, July 29, 2025 (EDT)
• Timeouts for the past 3-4 mins. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 17:26, July 31, 2025 (EDT)