Changes

Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 01:25, October 14, 2008

3,092 bytes removed , 01:25, October 14, 2008

m

Reverted edits by Danielknight (Talk); changed back to last version by JLauttamus

Line 1: Line 1:

The following is a growing list of examples of '''[[liberal bias]], [[deceit]], frivolous [[gossip]], and blatant errors on [[Wikipedia]]'''.

#The articles on both [[Saul Alinsky]] and his book, ''Rules for Radicals'' make no mention of his dedication to "the original radical—Lucifer."<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_Radicals</ref><ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saul_Alinsky</ref>

−

# The fact that [[Albert Pike]], an attorney, soldier, writer, and), prominent Freemason leader, Freemason revivor, anti-Christian, confederate military leader, was a Satanist, was removed from his biography page and is being suppressed. And on the page of the boko the Mr. Pike wrote, which is on Wikipedia (Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry), which contains sentences in which he praises Lucifer and calls him God, is not quoted on that page either.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Pike</ref>

+

#[[Augusto Pinochet]], who overthrew [[communism]] in [[Chile]] and then restored democracy before voluntarily giving up power himself, is called a "dictator" by [[Wikipedia]],<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinochet</ref> but [[Fidel Castro]], the communist dictator of [[Cuba]] for four decades, is instead called a "leader" or even a "president".<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidel_Castro</ref><ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fidel_Castro&oldid=235182888</ref>

−

# On the page on Abiogenesis, the [[Miller-Urey experiment]] (an experiment which was meant to gauge the possibility of life arising by chance from a mixture of chemicals assumed to exist on Earth billions of years ago), is referred to as "plausible" (under the Current Models section), and with no reference for this supposed fact despite the fact that it produced very little amino acids, and not close to all of the types needed to create a living organism, and were produced by artificial means which can't exist. This fact was pointed out to them in early September 2008 on their Abiogenesis talk page, but was removed, and still as of now there is no reference to verify this "plausibility". Hypocritically, Wikipedia's evolutionists and atheists will immediately revert or delete the claims made by creationists and conservative Christians if they have no reference to back up claims made by them which validate the Biblical record, expecially the Biblical record of Genesis.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis</ref>

−

# Despite the fact that any reference outside of Wikipedia on the Internet or written, can be used to verify Darwinian Evolution, the Big Bang, or a Earth that is billions of years old, references from creationist websites such as answersingenesis.org are not considered valid references as evidence verifying the historical accuracy of Genesis, nor are the claims of Christ allowable evidence despite his perfectly moral behavior. For example, on Charles Darwin's page in Wikipedia, Edward Blyth, who's theory Darwin pilfered and then tacked the idea of macroevolution onto, is dismissed as an insignificant footnote of Darwin's history even though, as answersingenesis.org shows <ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v26/i2/brainchild.asp</ref>, figured prominently in his work. In addition to that, references to Edward Blyth's own biography page, and their biography page on the evolutionist Loren Eisley, who wrote a book on the connection between Darwin, Blyth, and Alfred Wallace are not accepted. Not even the very extensive and scholarly Darwin Papers, which has been published on and remained on the Internet for many years now, which is thoroughly referenced, is acceptable to them.<ref>http://www.thedarwinpapers.com/oldsite/Number2/Darwin2Html.htm</ref>

−

# Genesis is referred to as a creation myth despite parts of it's history being thoroughly verified as historically accurate by both atheist and christian archeologists and scientists.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_myths</ref>.#[[Augusto Pinochet]], who overthrew [[communism]] in [[Chile]] and then restored democracy before voluntarily giving up power himself, is called a "dictator" by [[Wikipedia]],<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinochet</ref> but [[Fidel Castro]], the communist dictator of [[Cuba]] for four decades, is instead called a "leader" or even a "president".<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidel_Castro</ref><ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fidel_Castro&oldid=235182888</ref>

# The founder of the Weather Channel and 100's of other climatologists have been removed from the category "Global warming skeptics", which Wikipedia decided to delete.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Coleman_(news_weathercaster)&diff=232272809&oldid=227980118</ref><ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_August_7#Global_warming_and_ozone_hole_skeptics_categories</ref>

# Wikipedia's entry on [[Gardasil]], an [[HPV Vaccine]] promoted by [[liberals]] and Merck, is filled with falsehoods and omits key facts. As of Aug. 9, 2008, Wikipedia's entry claimed that cervical cancer was "the second leading cause of death from cancer in women world-wide"<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gardasil</ref> (which is nonsense), and that the "HPV types 16 and 18 '''cause''' about 70% of cervical cancer cases" (not even Merck claims that); the entry downplays how the vaccine loses its effectiveness in a few years, and only about 3% of teenage recipients are likely to be exposed to the strains of HPV that the vaccine targets - at a cost of about $13,000 per child to possibly protect her against a cancer that does not arise until 30 years in the future.<ref>See [[HPV Vaccine]]</ref>

Line 158: Line 155:

# Wikipedia's most controversial pages are guarded by liberal elite. Thereby, accuracy is replaced with ideology. <ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/08/opinion/main4241293.shtml Wikipropaganda On Global Warming] National Review, July 8, 2008</ref> The first one-hundred and sixty-eight words on Wikipedia's [[Global Warming]] page contains multiple conjectures, major errors and bias. ''"increase in the average measured [[temperature]] ... since the mid-twentieth century"'' that same paragraph "''solar variation combined with volcanoes ... and a small cooling effect from 1950 onward."'' Which is it, warmer or cooler from 1950? "''very likely due''" "''probably had''" or "''the overwhelming majority of scientists working on climate change agree with the [[IPCC]]'s main conclusions''"- unsubstantiated bias.

−

==References==

+

==References==

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,252

edits