Difference between revisions of "Homosexual Historical Revisionism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(J Edgar Hoover)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[Image:Liberace.jpg|thumb|right|Valentino Liberace, another victim of homosexual historical revisionist conspiracies.]]
+
[[Image:Liberace.jpg|thumb|right|Valentino Liberace, a victim of homosexual historical revisionist conspiracies.]]
  
 
'''Homosexual Historical Revisionism''' is the practice by [[homosexuals]] of falsely claiming that famous people in the past were [[gay]]. Their purpose in this, presumably, is to argue that if admirable men of the past were homosexual, then homosexuality can't be bad.
 
'''Homosexual Historical Revisionism''' is the practice by [[homosexuals]] of falsely claiming that famous people in the past were [[gay]]. Their purpose in this, presumably, is to argue that if admirable men of the past were homosexual, then homosexuality can't be bad.

Revision as of 12:22, November 11, 2008

Valentino Liberace, a victim of homosexual historical revisionist conspiracies.

Homosexual Historical Revisionism is the practice by homosexuals of falsely claiming that famous people in the past were gay. Their purpose in this, presumably, is to argue that if admirable men of the past were homosexual, then homosexuality can't be bad.

This is like arguing that since we all admire Martin Luther King (who committed adultery), then adultery isn't bad.

Among the people they have claimed to be gay are Abraham Lincoln,[1] Freddie Mercury,[2] John Schlafly,[3] Father Michael Judge (FDNY Chaplain and 9/11 victim)[4], J. Edgar Hoover[5] and Liberace.[6]

British liberals are now making the outlandish claim that Robin Hood was gay.[7]

Gay activists, obviously trying to provoke Christians, claim the Apostle Paul was gay.[8]

Some scholars have even suggested that Jesus Christ might have been homosexual.[9]


References