Difference between revisions of "United States Presidential Election, 2008"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Iowa Caucus)
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 
Former Governor [[Mitt Romney]], [[Massachusetts]]  
 
Former Governor [[Mitt Romney]], [[Massachusetts]]  
−
 
−
Former Senator [[Fred Thompson]], [[Tennessee]]
 
  
 
===Withdrawn Republican Party Candidates===
 
===Withdrawn Republican Party Candidates===
Line 50: Line 48:
  
 
Representative [[Tom Tancredo]], [[Colorado]] 6th, withdrew December 20, 2007.  He endorsed fmr. Governor [[Mitt Romney]] of [[Massachusetts]].   
 
Representative [[Tom Tancredo]], [[Colorado]] 6th, withdrew December 20, 2007.  He endorsed fmr. Governor [[Mitt Romney]] of [[Massachusetts]].   
 +
 +
Former Senator [[Fred Thompson]], [[Tennessee]]
  
 
Former Governor and HS Secretary [[Tommy Thompson]], withdrew August 12, 2007.  He endorsed fmr. Mayor [[Rudy Giuliani]] of [[New York]].
 
Former Governor and HS Secretary [[Tommy Thompson]], withdrew August 12, 2007.  He endorsed fmr. Mayor [[Rudy Giuliani]] of [[New York]].
Line 64: Line 64:
 
*Governor [[Mark Sanford]], [[South Carolina]]
 
*Governor [[Mark Sanford]], [[South Carolina]]
 
*Former Senator [[Rick Santorum]], [[Pennsylvania]]
 
*Former Senator [[Rick Santorum]], [[Pennsylvania]]
 +
 
== Democratic Strategy ==
 
== Democratic Strategy ==
 
As usual, the best strategy for Democrats is a hot topic for debate among members of that party and independent [[pundits]].  [[Daily Kos]] can occasionally provide arguments on the strategy that should be pursued by Democrats, although most posts there are simply rants against the Republicans or Democrats deemed insufficiently [[liberal]], which led [[Barack Obama]] to say in 2006 that he found the site "predictable."  A majority of Democrats are confident that the cratering popularity of [[President]] [[George W. Bush]] and particularly [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]] puts them in a highly favorable position for 2008, to the extent it may even be their race to lose.
 
As usual, the best strategy for Democrats is a hot topic for debate among members of that party and independent [[pundits]].  [[Daily Kos]] can occasionally provide arguments on the strategy that should be pursued by Democrats, although most posts there are simply rants against the Republicans or Democrats deemed insufficiently [[liberal]], which led [[Barack Obama]] to say in 2006 that he found the site "predictable."  A majority of Democrats are confident that the cratering popularity of [[President]] [[George W. Bush]] and particularly [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]] puts them in a highly favorable position for 2008, to the extent it may even be their race to lose.

Revision as of 23:58, January 22, 2008

The White House, the official home and workplace of the President of the United States of America.

The 2008 United States Presidential Election is scheduled for Tuesday, November 4, 2008.[1] The primary season for both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party officially began on January 3, 2008 with the Iowa Caucuses and will end on June 3, 2008.[2] The 2008 election cycle has seen a major shift to the primary election calendar, frontloading many primaries into early February.[3]

First election without incumbents since 1928

If eligible to, the President of the United States often runs for reelection. If the President does not run, the Vice-President of the United States will often run to replace the President after he leaves office. 2008 may mark the first time since the 1928 election in which there is neither an incumbent President nor an incumbent Vice-President running for his party's presidential nomination and thus not running in the Presidential election (unless former Vice President Al Gore runs.) In the United States presidential election of 1952, the race was between Republican candidate Dwight D. Eisenhower and Democratic candidate Adlai Stevenson. Vice President Alben Barkley sought but failed to win the Democratic nomination. Current Vice President Dick Cheney has repeatedly stated he will not run for President. "I will say just as hard as I possibly know how to say... If nominated, I will not run; if elected, I will not serve," Cheney said on Fox News Sunday.

Battleground States

The United States has become so regionally polarized that even though the 2004 presidential election was close nationwide, only nine states had outcomes having less than 4% margin between the candidates:

State, margin of victory, party that won the state in 2004

  1. Wisconsin, 0.38% (Dem)
  2. Iowa, 0.67% (Repub)
  3. New Mexico, 0.79% (Repub)
  4. New Hampshire, 1.37% (Dem)
  5. Ohio, 2.11% (Repub)
  6. Pennsylvania, 2.50% (Dem)
  7. Nevada, 2.59% (Repub)
  8. Michigan, 3.42% (Dem)
  9. Minnesota, 3.48% (Dem)

Republican Strategy

File:Republican candidates.jpg
The Republican candidates; Mike Huckabee, Fred Thompson, Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, Ron Paul, John McCain and Duncan Hunter

Strategists believe that the Republican presidential nominee must win Wisconsin or Minnesota, and hold Iowa but that the outcome in New Mexico, which has only 5 electoral votes, is irrelevant. Minnesota's margin of victory for the Democrats in 2004 probably places it out of reach for Republicans in 2008.

The inescapable conclusion is that the Republican nominee must win Wisconsin and hold Iowa in order to win the general election.[Citation Needed]

Declared Republican Party Candidates

John H. Cox

Former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, New York City

Former Governor Mike Huckabee, Arkansas

UN Ambassador Alan Keyes

Senator John McCain, Arizona

Representative Ron Paul, Texas 14th

Former Governor Mitt Romney, Massachusetts

Withdrawn Republican Party Candidates

Senator Sam Brownback, Kansas, withdrew October 19, 2007, citing a lack of funding.[4] Brownback also had done poorly at key conservative milestones, such as the Value Voters Debate.[5] He endorsed Senator John McCain of Arizona.

Former Governor Jim Gilmore, Virginia, withdrew July 14, 2007

Representative Duncan Hunter, California 52nd, withdrew January 19, 2008

Representative Tom Tancredo, Colorado 6th, withdrew December 20, 2007. He endorsed fmr. Governor Mitt Romney of Massachusetts.

Former Senator Fred Thompson, Tennessee

Former Governor and HS Secretary Tommy Thompson, withdrew August 12, 2007. He endorsed fmr. Mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York.

Potential Republican Candidates Who Declined to Run

Democratic Strategy

As usual, the best strategy for Democrats is a hot topic for debate among members of that party and independent pundits. Daily Kos can occasionally provide arguments on the strategy that should be pursued by Democrats, although most posts there are simply rants against the Republicans or Democrats deemed insufficiently liberal, which led Barack Obama to say in 2006 that he found the site "predictable." A majority of Democrats are confident that the cratering popularity of President George W. Bush and particularly Operation Iraqi Freedom puts them in a highly favorable position for 2008, to the extent it may even be their race to lose.

However, evaluating the race in Electoral College terms forces caution upon the Democrats. Between the United States presidential election, 2000 and the United States Presidential election, 2004, only three states budged from one party to the other: New Mexico (from Democratic to Republican), Iowa (from Democratic to Republican) and New Hampshire (from Republican to Democratic). The American people would seem to be not only strongly divided, but in the vast majority of states, faithful over a period of years to their chosen parties. Not even the September 11, 2001 attacks could persuade the people of New York to vote Republican, for example, and it is highly unlikely that the depopulation of New Orleans will be considered a good reason for the majority of voters in Louisiana to become Democrats. The phrase Second Coming Republicans (or Democrats) takes on new meaning in light of the relative lack of party-switching in response to these events.

Had all three of the above swing states voted Democratic in 2000, and everything else remained the same, Al Gore would have become President in 2001, so this is the result Democrats should especially aim for. This does not necessarily mean they can let their guard down in the states that voted their way in both of the last two elections -- particularly if the Republicans nominate Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, or another candidate associated with one of those states.

Evaluating the race by historic analogy, the last Senator elected President and the last Northern Democrat elected President were the same person: John F. Kennedy, in the United States presidential election, 1960. If this pattern continues to hold true this cycle, the candidate best positioned this year was Bill Richardson, who was cast somewhat against type as a member of the National Rifle Association and also has the distinction of being from one of the three swing states cited above. In strong second place would probably be John Edwards, but it needs to be said that the Democrat who can carry Edwards' home state of North Carolina in a Presidential election probably hasn't been born yet. Lyndon B. Johnson was the last person to do so, just after writing off most of the South for the Democratic Party by passing the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Still, the Democrats, as pointed out above, feel for the most part that this is their race to lose and may "let it all hang out" in the belief that any of their first-tier candidates (though probably not Gravel or Kucinich) will handily defeat a generic Republican candidate.

Declared Democratic Party Candidates

Senator Hillary Clinton, New York

Former Senator John Edwards, North Carolina

Former Senator Mike Gravel, Alaska

Representative Dennis Kucinich, Ohio 10th

Senator Barack Obama, Illinois

Possible Democratic Party Candidates

VP Al Gore, Tennessee

Withdrawn Democratic Party candidates

Senator Joseph Biden, Delaware [6] He withdrew after a disappointing finish in the Iowa Caucus.

Senator Chris Dodd, Connecticut [7] He withdrew after a disappointing finish in the Iowa Caucus

Governor Bill Richardson, New Mexico [8] He withdrew after twin fourth-place finishes (in Iowa and New Hampshire) that showed his credentials could not compete with his rivals’ star power.

Former Governor Tom Vilsack, Iowa

Potential Democratic Candidates Who Declined to Run

Third parties

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has been frequently mentioned as a possible independent candidate for the 2008 presidential election and fueled that speculation when he left the Republican Party in June 2007. If he runs, he could put in over one billion dollars of his own money into the race.

Former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, who was defeated for voting against the Iraq War and arrested on battery charges after striking a Capitol Hill police officer, is considering bid on the environmentalist Green Party ticket. [1]

Michael C. Smith is a Libertarian candidate.

Opinion polling

A big concern in the Hillary Clinton camp is whether or not she is electable. An Electability Poll in which the participants are asked in no certain order, a list of candidates from both parties, whether they would vote for candidate X or prefer someone else. Recent polling has revealed, of all major presidential candidates from both parties, Hillary Clinton is the only candidate to whom a majority of 52% would not vote for, or would prefer someone else. [9]

The poll results show majorities would consider voting for all other major presidential candidates or possible candidates:

Electability Poll
Who would you vote for, the
candidate or somebody else?
Candidate Results
Rudy Giuliani 64% - 36%
Fred Thompson 62% - 38%
Michael Bloomberg 61% - 39%
Barak Obama 60% - 40%
John Edwards 59% - 41%
John McCain 58% - 42%
Joseph Biden 57% - 43%
Bill Richardson 57% - 43%
Mike Huckabee 56% - 44%
Mitt Romney 54% - 46%
Hillary Clinton 48% - 52%

The poll also revealed that Hillary Clinton is the only candidate to whom more voters view her unfavorably than favorably. 39% say they recognize Clinton favorably, while a larger number of 42% say they recognize her unfavorably. By contrast, every other candidate has a net-positive favorable rating:

Favorability Poll
Do you view the candidate
favorably or unfavorably?
Candidate Results
Rudy Giuliani 43% - 17%
Barack Obama 36% - 21%
John McCain 33% - 28%
John Edwards 32% - 28%
Fred Thompson 25% - 12%
Mitt Romney 24% - 20%
Joseph Biden 21% - 20%
Michael Bloomberg 20% - 18%
Bill Richardson 19% - 15%
Mike Huckabee 16% - 12%
Hillary Clinton 39% - 42%

The poll has a margin of error of +/- 4%.

Primaries and Caucuses

Iowa Caucus

The first caucus was the Iowa Caucus, which happened both for the Democrats and Republicans on January 3, 2008. The Democratic winner of the Iowa caucus was Barrack Obama, who barely beat national frontrunner Hillary Clinton and former North Carolina Senator, John Edwards. The official results were:

candidates percentage
Barrack Obama 38%
John Edwards 30%
Hillary Clinton 29%
Bill Richardson 2%
Joseph Biden 1%

Other candidates such as, Chris Dodd, Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel did not gain a significant percentage. Because of the Iowa results, Barrack Obama was expected now to beat Hillary Clinton in the upcoming New Hampshire primary. Also, Joe Biden and Chris Dodd both withdrew from the race because of their low showings in the Iowa caucus.

On the Republican side, Mike Huckabee defeated Mitt Romney by an even closer margin. The results were:

Candidate percentage
Mike Huckabee 34%
Mitt Romney 25%
Fred Thompson 13%
John McCain 13%
Ron Paul 10%
Rudy Giuliani 3%

Candidates such as Duncan Hunter, Alan Keyes and John H. Cox didn't come out with a significant percentage. Romney's loss in Iowa set him back in the upcoming primary in New Hampshire. Huckabee's win however gave him surge in New Hampshire where he had before been very low in the polls.

See Also

Articles about the 2008 Presidential Election from previous "Breaking News"

References