Changes

In 2011, Forbes declared in an article entitled ''Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate'':

In 2011, Forbes declared in an article entitled ''Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate'':

A new batch of 5,000 emails among scientists central to the assertion that humans are causing a global warming crisis were anonymously released to the public yesterday, igniting a new firestorm of controversy nearly two years to the day after similar emails ignited the Climategate scandal.<ref>[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/11/23/climategate-2-0-new-e-mails-rock-the-global-warming-debate/ ''Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate''], Forbes, 2011<ref>}}

A new batch of 5,000 emails among scientists central to the assertion that humans are causing a global warming crisis were anonymously released to the public yesterday, igniting a new firestorm of controversy nearly two years to the day after similar emails ignited the Climategate scandal.

 

Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.<ref>[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/11/23/climategate-2-0-new-e-mails-rock-the-global-warming-debate/ ''Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate''], Forbes, 2011</ref>}}

==Videos==

==Videos==