Difference between revisions of "Scientific Illiteracy and Liberals"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(astrology and liberals) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Fictitious, disproved claims. | * Fictitious, disproved claims. | ||
* The denial of [[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]] | * The denial of [[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]] | ||
| + | * Over twice as many Democrats believe in [[astrology]] than Republicans (31% to 14%)<ref>[http://blog.beliefnet.com/astrologicalmusings/2009/12/more-democrats-believe-in-astr.html Beliefnet article on the Pew Forum study]</ref>. | ||
* When asked about the [[scientific method]], they cannot state the steps. | * When asked about the [[scientific method]], they cannot state the steps. | ||
Revision as of 01:47, August 21, 2010
There seems to be a high rate of scientific illiteracy among liberals.[1] This phenomenon will become evident whenever one speaks to a liberal.
Examples
- Use of ad hom attacks to hide their scientific illiteracy {"You clearly don't understand how science works.").
- Gratuitous amounts of spewing pseudoscience
- Fictitious, disproved claims.
- The denial of Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge
- Over twice as many Democrats believe in astrology than Republicans (31% to 14%)[2].
- When asked about the scientific method, they cannot state the steps.
Reflist
<references>