Difference between revisions of "Liberal Bible Translations"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Daniel1212 (talk | contribs) (→Examples of Liberal Translations: accuracy) |
(→Examples of Liberal Translations: rm NASB -- reasons given on talk page) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* [[Jerusalem Bible]] | * [[Jerusalem Bible]] | ||
* [[New Jerusalem Bible]] | * [[New Jerusalem Bible]] | ||
| − | |||
* [[Moffatt Bible]] | * [[Moffatt Bible]] | ||
* [[Goodspeed Bible]] | * [[Goodspeed Bible]] | ||
| − | * [[Revised Standard Version | + | * [[Revised Standard Version]]<ref>"Several unfortunate translations of key verses have tainted it with charges of liberalism and the fact that the copyright is owned by the National Council of Churches has reinforced the negative image."[http://www.scriptorium.org/articles/historyofthebible/hotb_0003.html]</ref> |
* [[Revised English Bible]] | * [[Revised English Bible]] | ||
* [[New American Bible]]<ref>This version is favored by liberal American Catholics, but is rejected by some conservative Catholics as too liberal, primarily for its insistence on gender inclusive language. It is used by the Vatican on its web site, while the Catechism of the Catholic Church uses the Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition (RSV-CE), a slightly modified version of the Revised Standard Version.</ref> | * [[New American Bible]]<ref>This version is favored by liberal American Catholics, but is rejected by some conservative Catholics as too liberal, primarily for its insistence on gender inclusive language. It is used by the Vatican on its web site, while the Catechism of the Catholic Church uses the Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition (RSV-CE), a slightly modified version of the Revised Standard Version.</ref> | ||
Revision as of 06:31, January 19, 2014
Liberal bible translations are attempts to distort Biblical text to support liberal ideals. These efforts are often funded better than straightforward translations, and typically benefit from more promotional and advertising funds. Invariably the publisher or translators deny that they have a liberal agenda or belief system.
Signs of a Liberal Translation
Here are some common signs of a liberal translation:
- Political correctness towards gender by using "gender inclusive" language[1]
- Downplaying the existence of Hell and God's judgment
- Downplaying the deity of Jesus
- Downplaying the power of the Holy Spirit
- Denying the prophecy of the virgin birth of Jesus
- Downplaying the prohibition on homosexuality
- Downplaying the differences between men and women
- Editorializing on passages to push a liberal point of view
- Adding content
Examples of Liberal Translations
- Today's New International Version[2]
- Amplified Bible
- Jerusalem Bible
- New Jerusalem Bible
- Moffatt Bible
- Goodspeed Bible
- Revised Standard Version[3]
- Revised English Bible
- New American Bible[4]
References
- ↑ Most modern English translations strive, in varying degrees, for some amount of gender inclusive language. A weak form is to change "brother" to "member of the church"; a strong form is to change "brother" to "brother or sister." The New International Version did not impose gender inclusive language, but its revisions and updates do; the Holman Christian Standard Bible was a recent rejection of the approach of gender inclusive language.
- ↑ This is a liberal revision of the popular and better New International Version.
- ↑ "Several unfortunate translations of key verses have tainted it with charges of liberalism and the fact that the copyright is owned by the National Council of Churches has reinforced the negative image."[1]
- ↑ This version is favored by liberal American Catholics, but is rejected by some conservative Catholics as too liberal, primarily for its insistence on gender inclusive language. It is used by the Vatican on its web site, while the Catechism of the Catholic Church uses the Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition (RSV-CE), a slightly modified version of the Revised Standard Version.