Difference between revisions of "Liberal wordiness"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(our approach) |
JLauttamus (talk | contribs) (wordiness? come on ... this has to be parody) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{speedy}} | ||
| + | |||
Liberal wordiness is part of [[liberal deceit]] and is a pattern of using overly pompous and drawn out language to express simple points. The goal is to confound the reader in the hopes they will give benefit of doubt to the writer. | Liberal wordiness is part of [[liberal deceit]] and is a pattern of using overly pompous and drawn out language to express simple points. The goal is to confound the reader in the hopes they will give benefit of doubt to the writer. | ||
Revision as of 17:16, November 17, 2009
This article has been proposed for speedy deletion. The reason given is: It is obvious vandalism, parody, or inappropriate according to The Conservapedia Commandments.
Liberal wordiness is part of liberal deceit and is a pattern of using overly pompous and drawn out language to express simple points. The goal is to confound the reader in the hopes they will give benefit of doubt to the writer.
See, for example, the work of liberal academics, especially literary theorists, who use confusing language to make themselves look smart. Contrast this with conservative statesmen, who do their utmost to make their ideas understood by any and all.
Conservapedia
Due to the prevalence of endless liberal disputation, Conservapedia has adopted the 90/10 rule which undermines pointless wordiness by demanding content.