Liberalism and pornography

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LT (Talk | contribs) at 16:20, February 15, 2021. It may differ significantly from current revision.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Pornography is considered harmful, addictive, and linked to sex trafficking.[1][2]

History of legality

The United States Supreme Court when liberal California RINO Earl Warren was Chief Justice was known for its consistent liberal rulings, typically with Warren joined by Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, Abe Fortas, and William Brennan in creating a majority that would always decide a case no matter what the other four justices thought.

Memoirs v. Massachusetts

For a more detailed treatment, see Memoirs v. Massachusetts.

In the Supreme Court ruling for Memoirs v. Massachusetts, Justices Brennan, Fortas, Brennan, Black, Douglas, and Stewart made up the majority opinion that expanded the legality of pornographic "literature", protecting them unless they had "no literary value".[3] The three dissents came from Justices Byron White, Tom Clark, and John Harlan II.

References

  1. Let’s Talk About Porn. Is It As Harmless As Society Says It Is?. Fight The New Drug. Retrieved February 15, 2021.
  2. Westen, John-Henry (January 28, 2015). Want to Stop Sex Trafficking? Look to America’s Porn Addiction. Huffington Post. Retrieved February 15, 2021.
  3. Memoirs v. Massachusetts 1966. encyclopedia.com. Retrieved February 15, 2021.