Difference between revisions of "Government funding for anti-Christian values"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(mention Liberal charity)
(→‎Examples: clean up & uniformity)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
*In 2009, it was discovered that officials at the Federally funded [[National Endowment for the Arts]] were promoting projects that supported President [[Barack Obama|Barack Obama's]] legislative agenda.<ref>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/11/nea-reassigns-communications-director-following-uproar-obama-initiative/</ref>
 
*In 2009, it was discovered that officials at the Federally funded [[National Endowment for the Arts]] were promoting projects that supported President [[Barack Obama|Barack Obama's]] legislative agenda.<ref>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/11/nea-reassigns-communications-director-following-uproar-obama-initiative/</ref>
 
*In the 1980s it was discovered that funds from the NEA had been given to artist Andres Serrano for his photograph of a crucifix submerged in urine, leading to outrage among conservatives
 
*In the 1980s it was discovered that funds from the NEA had been given to artist Andres Serrano for his photograph of a crucifix submerged in urine, leading to outrage among conservatives
*In April of 2012, the government of the Australian state of Victoria will provide funding for the Global [[Atheist]] convention, which will include anti-Christian activists such as [[Richard Dawkins]].<ref>http://www.smh.com.au/national/government-funds-atheist-talkfest-20110514-1en8p.html</ref>
+
*In April 2012, the government of the Australian state of Victoria will provide funding for the Global [[Atheist]] convention, which will include anti-Christian activists such as [[Richard Dawkins]].<ref>http://www.smh.com.au/national/government-funds-atheist-talkfest-20110514-1en8p.html</ref>
 
*In [[Colorado]], two women's shelters lost their federal funding for having religious programs and bible readings. The regulations of Obama's HUD department required the removal of Christian elements from the shelters.<ref>http://www.theblaze.com/stories/co-womens-shelters-loses-federal-funding-over-mandatory-bible-studies/</ref> This is not surprising considering the low rates of [[Liberal charity]].
 
*In [[Colorado]], two women's shelters lost their federal funding for having religious programs and bible readings. The regulations of Obama's HUD department required the removal of Christian elements from the shelters.<ref>http://www.theblaze.com/stories/co-womens-shelters-loses-federal-funding-over-mandatory-bible-studies/</ref> This is not surprising considering the low rates of [[Liberal charity]].
 
*more to come
 
*more to come

Revision as of 07:03, June 27, 2016

Since liberals are usually the ones who push for a greater government role in public life, very often one will find government funding going towards projects that are atheistic or anti-Christian, in line with liberal beliefs.

Examples

  • In 2009, it was discovered that officials at the Federally funded National Endowment for the Arts were promoting projects that supported President Barack Obama's legislative agenda.[1]
  • In the 1980s it was discovered that funds from the NEA had been given to artist Andres Serrano for his photograph of a crucifix submerged in urine, leading to outrage among conservatives
  • In April 2012, the government of the Australian state of Victoria will provide funding for the Global Atheist convention, which will include anti-Christian activists such as Richard Dawkins.[2]
  • In Colorado, two women's shelters lost their federal funding for having religious programs and bible readings. The regulations of Obama's HUD department required the removal of Christian elements from the shelters.[3] This is not surprising considering the low rates of Liberal charity.
  • more to come

References

See also