Difference between revisions of "Liberals Who Refuse To Debate"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added Richard Lenski as he refused to allow any debate regarding the validity of his work)
(see also)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
*Generally speaking, leading evolutionists no longer debate creation scientists [[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates|as they largely lost all their debates with creation scientists in the 1970s.]]   
 
*Generally speaking, leading evolutionists no longer debate creation scientists [[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates|as they largely lost all their debates with creation scientists in the 1970s.]]   
 
*[[Liberal]] [[evolutionist]] [[professor]] [[Richard Lenski]] has repeatedly refused to enter in to any dialogue regarding his claims to have "proven" [[Darwinism]].
 
*[[Liberal]] [[evolutionist]] [[professor]] [[Richard Lenski]] has repeatedly refused to enter in to any dialogue regarding his claims to have "proven" [[Darwinism]].
 +
 +
== See also ==
 +
 +
* [[Liberal obfuscation]]
 +
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
  
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 +
 +
{{liberalism}}
  
 
[[category:politics]]
 
[[category:politics]]
 
[[category:liberals]]
 
[[category:liberals]]

Revision as of 19:24, October 13, 2010

Here is a growing list of liberals in tight races who refuse to debate their opponent, thereby depriving the public of learning their real positions on the issues:

  • Pro-abortion congressman Rick Boucher (Virginia)
  • Pro-abortion congressman Peter DeFazio (Oregon)
  • Pro-abortion congressman John Dingell (Michigan)[1]
  • Pro-abortion congressman Frank Pallone (New Jersey)
  • Pro-abortion congressman Charlie Wilson (Ohio)
  • Governor and senatorial candidate Joe Manchin (West Virginia)[2]

See also

References

  1. After a poll showed him trailing, Dingell said he would debate ... shortly before Election Day, which he could cancel if he improves in the polls.
  2. Manchin refuses to debate his Republican opponent one-on-one, and instead agrees only to an unwieldy group debate including four candidates. [1]
  3. http://www.conservapedia.com/Instances_of_Richard_Dawkins_ducking_debates