Biden/Harris attack on civil liberties

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
See also: Obamunism

Glenn Greenwald observed:

Veterans of intelligence community scandals (clockwise from lower left): Judge Boasberg, Mary McCord (DOJ), Eric Ciaramella, Alexander Vindman, Michael Atkinson, John Carlin.
"Involvement of the intelligence community in the domestic activities of U.S. citizens is one of the most dangerous breaches of civil liberties and democratic order the U.S. Government can perpetrate. It was after World War II when the CIA, the NSA and other security state agencies that wield immense and unlimited powers in the dark were created in the name of fighting the Cold War. Legal and institutional prohibitions on wielding that massive machinery against the American public were central to the always-dubious claim that this security behemoth that operates completely in the dark was compatible with democracy. As the ACLU noted, “in its 1947 charter, the CIA was prohibited from spying against Americans, in part because President Truman was afraid that the agency would engage in political abuse.”[1]

CNET reported the following back in 2008:

“Months before the Oklahoma City bombing took place, Biden introduced another bill called the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995. It previewed the 2001 Patriot Act by allowing secret evidence to be used in prosecutions, expanding the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and wiretap laws, creating a new federal crime of ‘terrorism’ that could be invoked based on political beliefs, permitting the U.S. military to be used in civilian law enforcement, and allowing permanent detention of non-U.S. citizens without judicial review. The Center for National Security Studies said the bill would erode ‘constitutional and statutory due process protections’ and would ‘authorize the Justice Department to pick and choose crimes to investigate and prosecute based on political beliefs and associations.’[2]

Even Jacobin magazine noted, "The danger is real that the January 6 Capitol attack will be used as an excuse to severely curtail our civil liberties."[3] Among the junta's first actions was to execute a warrant on former New York Mayor Rudy Guiliani who led challenges to the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.[4] The ACLU argued that the Democrats' new Domestic Terrorism bill to target their political enemies would harm minority communities.[5]

Healthcare professionals demonstrating against Biden vaccine mandates.[6]

Free speech

Biden did not condemn Big Tech censoring and silencing President Trump's social media accounts or conservatives' pages. He also actively took part in censorship by banning comments on the White House YouTube channel after receiving an overwhelming backlash of dislikes.[7] The junta DNI alleged constitutionally protected First Amendment free speech rights promote violence in a report entitled, Domestic Violent Extremism Poses Heightened Threat in 2021:

"Newer sociopolitical developments—such as narratives of fraud in the recent general election, the emboldening impact of the violent breach of the US Capitol, conditions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and conspiracy theories promoting violence—will almost certainly spur some DVEs [domestic violent extremists] to try to engage in violence this year."[8]

The junta DOJ Anti-Trust Division was taken over quickly by Big Tech cronies and stooges.[9] Junta wingman Merrick Garland appointed Susan Davies as head of the Anti-Trust Division. Davies spent much of the last decade working on behalf of major corporate mergers and conglomerates and defending Facebook from antitrust enforcement.[10]

As polls showed trust in the mainstream media hitting all-time historic lows,[11] Instagram programed accounts forcing them to follow Joe Biden.[12] The White House official Youtube channel showed Biden's early speeches with more than 5 times thumbs down than positive responses.[13] Research showed that 70% of all Biden Twitter followers were fake accounts.[14]

Collusion with social media to suppress basic human rights

Chief propagandist Jen Psaki admitted the junta was working with Facebook to target individual users and suppress their First Amendment rights.[15] The junta requested cell phone service providers to censor private text messages,[16] Psaki articulated the regime's position that advocates banning social media users from all platforms if a user gets banned from one.[17] Psaki's articulation of Biden regime policy essentially makes Big Tech social media platforms "state actors."[18] Journalist Glenn Greenwald tweeted,

Soviet era censorship poster: "Don't talk!"
"The Biden administration is telling Facebook which posts it regards as "problematic" so that Facebook can remove them. This is the union of corporate and state power -- one of the classic hallmarks of fascism -- that the people who spent 5 years babbling about fascism support. If you don't find it deeply disturbing that the White House is "flagging" internet content that they deem "problematic" to their Facebook allies for removal, then you are definitionally an authoritarian. No other information is needed about you to know that."[19]

Psaki articulated from the White House briefing room the Biden regime's collusion with private corporations to violate Americans' First Amendment rights:

"We are in regular touch with these social media platforms, and those engagements typically happen through members of our senior staff....We’ve increased disinformation research and tracking within the Surgeon General’s office. We’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread’s important to take faster action against harmful posts. As you all know, information travels quite quickly on social media platforms; sometimes it’s not accurate. And Facebook needs to move more quickly to remove harmful, violative posts — posts that will be within their policies for removal often remain up for days. That’s too long. The information spreads too quickly.

Finally, we have proposed they promote quality information sources in their feed algorithm. Facebook has repeatedly shown that they have the levers to promote quality information. We’ve seen them effectively do this in their algorithm over low-quality information and they’ve chosen not to use it in this case. And that’s certainly an area that would have an impact.[20]

Social media and law enforcement

See also: Political profiling

The Biden junta is working with social media platforms such as Facebook to identify white male conservatives as "domestic extremists". The social media platforms assess postings that they consider to be as being "anti-government", "anti-authority", or "white supremacist" and pass along their assessment to the FBI or Homeland Security. The Joint Terrorism Task Force takes their private sector partner's assessment at face value. Any criticism of the junta can be interpreted as "extreme". This program is based upon the Patriot Act efforts to combat Islamic extremism with the slogan, "If you see something, say something," only now targeting American citizens, particularly white male conservatives.[21] All the resources of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act are now being employed, not just against the Trump campaign, the Trump administration, or President Trump, but against Trump voters and supporters.

Political prisoners

See also: Obama/Biden FISA abuse and Police state
Capitol Police (red arrow) hold the door open for a 69 year old peaceful protester.[22] Six months later the Biden Junta arrested the woman in a nationwide dragnet for alleged "white supremacists".[23]

Weeks after the seizure of power, Garland and Biden lifted President Trump's ban on harassment of political opponents and executed a warrant on former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani to seize electronic devices with names and cell phone number's of all Giuliani's contacts.[24] Giuliani led the challenges to Democrat election fraud after the 2020 presidential election.[25] Additionally, Giuliani had in his possession damning evidence related to the Biden family corruption scandals.[26] The seizure of Giuliani's electronic devices with cell phone numbers and email contacts opened the door for further FISA 702 abuse. Two weeks before the seizure it was discovered Mary McCord (DOJ), who succeeded John Carlin as head of the DOJ-NSD during the corrupt Obama administration and submitted the fraudulent Carter Page FISA warrant to the FISA Court, was hired by FISA Court chief judge James Boasberg as Amicus Curiae.[27][28]

Two days prior to the seizure of Giuliani's electronic devices, it was reported that the FISA Court determined Obama era FISA abuse was ongoing.[29] Edward Snowden described in detail how Obama FISA abuse worked to illegally surveil political opponents, elected officials, and judges for blackmail purposes and to interfere in elections.[30] The home of Victoria Toensing was also raided.[31] Toensing, the wife of former D.C. US Attorney Joe diGenova, represented Dmytro Firtash and also whistleblower William J. Campbell in the Uranium One bribery scandal.

Screenshot of the beating death of Rosanne Boyland by Capitol Police.[32]

Biden portrayed himself as a uniter of Republicans and Democrats. In contradiction to what he says, Biden has very little tolerance for people who oppose him. He called Trump supporters "Chumps",[33] "ugly folks",[34] "racists",[35] "virulent people" and "dregs of society".[36] He called Republicans senators Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley "Nazis".[37] Deputy chief of staff Jen O’Malley Dillon called Republican Senators "a bunch of f*****".[38] Peter Strzok's old boss, Frank Figliuzzi, called for the arrest and detention of Republican congressmen.[39]

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov informed the world that Russia is monitoring the illegal detention and human rights violations committed against nearly 450 dissidents who were arrested by the junta after they were invited into the United States Capitol building by U.S. Capitol Police on January 6, 2021.[40][41] Widespread human rights violations against the peaceful protesters by the junta have been reported,[42] including vicious and savage beatings by guards on protesters arrested for trespass and held in solitary confinement.[43] Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Dick Durbin,[44] Bob Casey and the ACLU spoke out about the junta's cruel and unusual treatment of the dissidents.[45] One dissident had his hands zip-tied first and was beaten by a D.C. jail officer. The victim was hospitalized with a shattered orbital floor, a broken eye socket, broken jaw, and broken nose. He may have a permanent loss of vision in his right eye.[46]

The junta attempted to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported President Trump as part of a grand conspiracy. The Biden DOJ attempted to coerce plea agreements from people who were employed with no criminal history, stable family and community relations, and arrested for trespass by asking the courts to deny bail because the junta needed time to investigate some vast conspiracy.[47] Many prisoners were held in isolation 23 hours a day. WUSA TV reported one peaceful protester was savagely beaten in custody, suffering a shattered eye socket, his jaw and nose broken, and may never see again.[48]

On August 27, 2021, Look Ahead America (LAA) and Citizens Against Political Persecution (CAPP) presented a joint letter to the United Nations Human Rights Committee to investigate and demand relief for the Biden junta's January 6 political prisoners.[49]

Disparate treatment

January 6 protesters were selectively targeted by the Biden junta for arrest and prosecution because of their political ideology and support for President Trump. That treatment of those arrested for January 6-related activity is far harsher than other protestors become obvious upon examination of other recent activity. In the summer of 2020, for example, rioters committed far more violence to Washington, D.C., tearing down statues, destroying businesses, and burning down buildings and churches in the name of BLM (Black Lives Matter). The D.C. government responded by christening “BLM” Plaza. No serious attempt was made to even identify the perpetrators of this violence. The few who were arrested received support from Kamala Harris and several top staffers, who encouraged their followers to contribute to a bail fund.

Similarly, thousands of violent anarchists attacked police and attendees of Donald Trump's inauguration on January 20, 2017. They destroyed property and burned police cars along the way. Only those engaged in violence were arrested, and prosecutors ended up dropping all charges for nearly all of them.

In September and October 2018, left-wing protestors stormed the Capitol and Senate Office buildings on numerous occasions to try to stop confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh as Supreme Court Associate Justice. These rioters intimidated Senators, occupied offices, and refused to leave unless arrested. While Capitol police made hundreds of arrests for “crowding, obstructing, or incommoding,” the Washington Post reported that the rioters “were processed off site and released.” In contrast, many of those arrested for January 6 activity have faced detention requests or unusually high monetary bonds ($100,000 and even $750,000), and prosecutors have been aggressively demanding revocation of conditions of bond for minor infractions in certain cases.

While prosecutors seem intent on subjecting January 6 protesters to pretrial incarceration and maximum sentences, NPR reported that most of the Kavanaugh rioters were “charged… with disorderly conduct, crowding or obstructing paid fines of $35 or $50.”

Prosecutors are no doubt aware of the recent precedent involving cases of Capitol incursions, and the dismissed charges or light dispositions of those offenders. Yet, they targeted non-violent January 6 protestors – solely because of their political viewpoints.

Attorneys for the incarcerated protesters have strongly and cogently advocated for their clients’ release. Attorney Joseph E. McBride, who represents defendant and prisoner Richard McBride, stated in an open letter on LinkedIn:

“The ultra-harsh treatment that January-sixers are enduring at the hands of the U.S. Government is unprecedented and entirely out of line with the way that other Capitol Protestors have been treated in the

past. Make no mistake about it, this is not the first time that a group of protestors have breached the Capitol, nor is it the first time that acts of violence have taken place at the Capitol. This is however, the first time that a group of American citizens from one political party have been hunted down, rounded up, and thrown into prison absent any trial by the political party who is currently in power.”

Defendants’ attorneys were frustrated by a lack of access to their clients, and a lack of candor and potential violations of discovery laws as the government appears to be blocking the release of key information. Robert Morss was arrested in Pennsylvania upon issuance of an arrest warrant from Washington, D.C. As is his right, Morss requested discovery, which should have included many hours of surveillance footage from the Capitol. But, as reported in American Greatness, “…assistant U.S. Attorney Melissa Jackson hesitated when Judge Harvey asked to see the footage captured by the U.S. Capitol Police surveillance system cited as evidence in government charging documents. ’Why haven’t I seen the video?’ Harvey asked Jackson on Wednesday afternoon. She told the judge he could have access to the body-worn camera recordings and public source videos but that the USCP footage is under a protective order, which is common in most January 6 cases. .... The hearing is the latest example of how hard the USCP and Justice Department are fighting to keep more than 14,000 hours of surveillance video under wraps.” In this same article, reporter Julie Kelly notes even members of the press are joining forces with the attorney for another defendant, John Steven Anderson, to get the release of video being withheld by prosecutors in his case. Kelly writes:

“Defense lawyers and media companies are fighting for fuller access to videos used as evidence by the Justice Department. Cherry-picked clips produced by the government are released to the media to support the narrative that January 6 was an armed, violent insurrection perpetrated by domestic terrorists who supported Donald Trump. The Biden Justice Department, in other words, has full control over a massive trove of recordings that show exactly what happened on January 6…[John Steven] Anderson, 61, suffered a medical emergency on January 6 after he was sprayed with a chemical irritant by an unidentified assailant inside the building. (He has several pre-existing conditions including asthma and hearing loss.) Although Anderson was arrested for trespassing that day and released, he was again arrested in February on a slew of new charges including assaulting a police officer and stealing government property. His attorney, Marina Medvin, is asked the court to remove the “highly sensitive” designation on the brief clip which shows Anderson being sprayed and then begging for help. “This exculpatory video is of

paramount importance to the defense as it contradicts the government’s case and establishes Mr. Anderson’s defense to the serious felony accusations which the government has indicted,” Medvin wrote in a June filing.”

The U.S. government’s abusive behavior also greatly reduces the chances of obtaining a fair and impartial jury to try these cases, particularly in the Democrat stronghold of the D.C. area. Shockingly, the political left has from the inception referred to the January 6 rally as an “insurrection” and accused its participants of acting “seditiously,” both highly inflammatory terms which evoke visions of revolution, death, and violently overthrown government bodies. The public is being led to falsely believe protesters were armed, acting violently, and committing assault of police. Mainstream media accounts, parroting the FBI and Department of Justice's prosecutorial narrative, are designed to carry that false narrative to the world.

As of September 2021, no individuals thus far have been charged with any offense even close to such a despicable intent, and no individuals inside the Capitol were found to be wielding any sort of firearm, a presumably essential tool for a successful coup attempt. In truth, a very few have been charged with any sort of assault or weapons possession (mostly pepper spray), and no protester inside the Capitol was found with a firearm of any kind. In fact, evidence suggests the FBI actually embedded informants in the crowd to create an illusion of violence.34 Furthermore, non-lethal items (i.e. flag poles, walking sticks, etc.) have been routinely exaggerated and described as lethal as the basis for trumped up charges. This behavior, if true, is beyond outrageous. One can only conclude the intent for using such inflammatory and inaccurate phrasing is to bias the public and prejudice any potential juror.

Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi convened a politically motivated commission to “review” the events of January 6. In doing so, she purposely and systematically excluded any true representatives from the other side of the political aisle, and hand-picked witnesses to create the narrative which best suits her political purpose – to punish, intimidate, and suppress conservatives and their principles. The commission's biased approach and subsequent report will also result in tainting the jury pool for any defendant who chooses to exercise their constitutional right to trial.

The pattern of prosecutions, the government's obfuscation and deception, and its constant inundation of the public with a false narrative can only lead to the conclusion that these prosecutions are politically motivated, and the defendants have no chance for fairness and impartiality as they slog through the biased judicial D.C. machine.

Vaccine mandates

See also: Biden's vaccine mandate

Joe Biden announced, on September 9, 2021, his attempt to force the controversial COVID vaccine on 100 million Americans, despite the ineffectiveness of the vaccine to reduce the spread of COVID-19. As of October 2021, no Executive Order existed to carry out the mandate.[50] Joe Biden's vaccine mandate was no more than a press release.[51]

Misuse of FBI to target journalists and political opponents

In November 2021 the FBI raided the founder of Project Veritas, James O'Keefe's home looking for First Daughter Ashley Biden's diary. In the diary, Ashley Biden discusses having taken inappropriate showers with her father and becoming sexualized as a small child.

War on Parents

See also: War on parents

There are 13 federal statutes the Biden regime domestic terrorism task force uses to intimidate and silence parents from speaking out at local school board meetings to protest Marxist indoctrination, critical race theory, gender indoctrination, mask mandates, and the rape of their children and subsequent cover-up.[52] These statutes include mail threats, cyberstalking, anonymous telecommunications harassment, repeated phone calls, repeated harassing communication, false information and hoaxes, depriving a person of their civil rights and other statutes related to interstate extortion, injury to property, person, or reputation, kidnapping, and interference with a federally protected activity.[53]

DOJ/White House/NSBA collusion

Parents Defending Education, an advocacy organization, obtained emails through the Freedom of Information Act showing that National School Board Association (NSBA) and officials were in contact with White House staffers before the NSBA sent a letter to Biden requesting that federal law enforcement officials address unruly behavior, including threats, directed toward public education officials. One email explains that White House staffers “requested additional information on some of the specific threats.”[54] Garland told the House Judiciary Committee under oath that the NSBA's letter was the pretext for his instructions to Department of Justice-National Security Division, US Attorney's, and FBI five days later.

The NSBA retracted its letter two weeks later, however Garland refused to retract his instructions to federal prosecutors and investigators.

Loudoun County transgender rape case

Parrent arrested at Loudoun County, Virginia school board meeting after his daughter was raped in a public school transgender bathroom.

Scott Smith, a parent, was at a Loudoun County, Virginia school board meeting on June 22, 2021, because his daughter had been raped by a transgender boy in the girls’ bathroom on May 28, 2021, at Stone Bridge High School.[55] The school told Smith his daughter had been assaulted but didn't call police. Smith reported the assault to the Loudoun County Sheriff's Office (LCSO) and rape kit evidence collected. Prior to the June 22 meeting, When Smith showed up at the school to complain about what had happened, they accused him of lying and called the police.[56]

Moments before Smith's arrest Superintendent Scott Ziegler of the county's schools “said the school hadn’t had any incidents involving a transgender student in bathrooms and declared that ‘the predator transgender student or person simply does not exist.'” [57] An Antifa activist at the meeting claimed his daughter was lying. When an argument ensued, police grabbed his arm. When he pulled his arm away, he was assaulted and thrown to the ground, handcuffed, and removed from the room.[58] A damning email proved the board had been informed of the rape on the day the rape occurred.[59]

And while the far-left prosecutor's office, which would eventually try to throw the book at Smith over his arrest at the school board meeting, insisted they were taking the rape case seriously, the same boy was transferred to another school in the district. On October 6, 2021, the same boy was alleged to have committed another rape. A sheriff's office press release stated, "A teenager from Ashburn has been charged with sexual battery and abduction of a fellow student at Broad Run High School."[60]

The National School Board Association (NSBA) sent a letter to Joe Biden complaining about parents speaking out at school board meetings. The letter specifically cited the June 22, 2021 Loudoun County, Virginia incident as an example.[61] The NSBA letter states that parents’ protests and speeches at school board meetings “could be equivalent to a form of domestic terrorism.” Biden handed the letter to Garland. Garland issued a memo directing the FBI and numerous other federal and state agencies to take “measures designed to address the rise in criminal conduct directed toward school personnel,” a clear example of the politicization of the Department of Justice. A liberal advocacy group sent the Office of the President a letter; Merrick Garland dutifully turned that letter into DOJ policy.

Smith's case was used in Merrick Garland's October 2021 memo warning of “domestic terrorism” at school board meetings.[62] The memo's intent is to intimidate parents to not speak out at school board meetings against critical race theory.

Mar-a-Lago raid

See also: Two-tier system
U.S. Federal Magistrate Bruce E. Reinhart signed the Mar-a-Lago raid warrant.

FBI internal regulations bar the FBI from making any political indictments or public disclosures 90 days prior to a general election. Monday August 8, 2022, a day that will live in infamy, occurred 91 days prior to the 2022 Midterm elections. On that day, the Wray FBI raided President Donald Trump's home and seized boxes of materials.[63] Trump was said to be in possession of certain documents with dirt on the Deep State.[64] The warrant, signed by an associate of Jeffrey Epstein,[65] authorized the seizure of "Any government and/or presidential record created between January 20, 2017 and January 20, 2021."[66] President Trump, who has for many years been the target of corrupt FBI activities, suggested one purpose of the raid was to plant evidence.[67] FBI and DOJ operatives overstepped the separation of powers the following day by seizing Rep. Scott Perry's phone.[68]

A Wall Street Journal oped noted:

"Monday was a sad day for our democracy and a dark day for the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The search of Donald Trump’s Florida residence was a politically sensitive operation that would have tested the FBI’s reputation for fairness and impartiality in the best of circumstances. But the bureau’s behavior since Mr. Trump came onto the political scene has already left its reputation in tatters."[69]

President Trump held evidence of a politically weaponized U.S. intelligence and justice system. To include an extensive paper trail showing how the DC apparatus under the Obama-era intelligence system, Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS), Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Dept. of Justice (DOJ) and FBI coordinated with the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign to install her into office.[70]

FBI/Pfizer collusion

According to a Freedom of Information request response issued by the Department of Justice, it appears there are indeed communications between Pfizer and the FBI about Project Veritas. The request for communications, filed by Judicial Watch, was acknowledged but denied by the DOJ which cited an exemption over law enforcement proceedings. “The FBI has completed its search for records responsive to your request. The material you requested is located in an investigative file which is exempt from disclosure[.]”

Project Veritas previously published videos of a Pfizer scientist discussing the strength of natural COVID-19 antibodies versus the vaccine with an undercover reporter. Then in October 2021, Project Veritas obtained internal company documents from a whistleblower which showed admissions from Pfizer management that aborted fetal cell lines were used in the company's vaccine program, but that employees should just stick with Pfizer's narrative omitting any mention of aborted fetal cell lines.[71]

Collusion with Ukrainian gestapo

Investigative reporter Lee Fang reports that he Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) pressures Facebook to take down alleged Russian “disinformation” at the behest of Ukrainian intelligence, according to a senior Ukrainian official who corresponds regularly with the FBI. The same official said that Ukrainian authorities define “disinformation” broadly, flagging many social media accounts and posts that he suggested may simply contradict the Ukrainian government's narrative.[72]

“Once we have a trace or evidence of disinformation campaigns via Facebook or other resources that are from the U.S., we pass this information to the FBI, along with writing directly to Facebook,” said llia Vitiuk, head of the Department of Cyber Information Security in the Security Service of Ukraine.

"We asked FBI for support to help us with Meta, to help us with others, and sometimes we get good results with that,” noted Vitiuk. “We say, 'Okay, this was the person who was probably Russia's influence.'"

Vitiuk, in an interview, said that he is a proponent of free speech and understands concerns around social media censorship. But he also admitted that he and his colleagues take a deliberately expansive view of what counts as “Russian disinformation.”

“When people ask me, ‘How do you differentiate whether it is fake or true?’ Indeed, it is very difficult in such an informational flow,” said Vitiuk. “I say, ‘Everything that is against our country, consider it a fake, even if it's not.’ Right now, for our victory, it is important to have that kind of understanding, not to be fooled.”

Vitiuk, a senior official in Ukraine’s domestic intelligence agency, spoke to me this week at the RSA Convention in San Francisco, an annual gathering that brings together a collection of cyber security firms, law enforcement, and technology giants.

The FBI has elicited scrutiny of late for the influence it exercises over at Twitter, Facebook, and other social media platforms. A series of reports and congressional hearings delved into the agency’s role in shaping content moderation decisions related to the 2020 election.

Evidence of FBI pressure on social media companies comes at a time when those companies are already taking proactive steps to hunt down alleged foreign propaganda and fabricated materials. Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine began in Feb. 2022, social media companies have been on the alert for hack and leak operations, fake personas, and other online tricks that might be used by Moscow to sway public opinion around the conflict. But critics charge that in the drive to label and remove content planted by the Russian government, Facebook and other tech firms suppress independent reporting and dissenting views about the war.

Facebook applied limited sharing penalties and a "false information" label to links containing journalist Seymour Hersh's Substack story alleging NATO involvement in the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline, according to Michael Shellenberger, a writer who extensively covers social media censorship. After public outcry, Facebook modified the label to “partially false.”

It is unclear how much of social media companies’ heavy-handed approach to content moderation is a direct response to government goading.

But there is enough of a pattern of the FBI and other national security agencies leaning on tech companies to suggest that these tech firms may preemptively adopt censorious practices to avoid the disapproval of the federal government. In October, based on leaked documents from the Department of Homeland Security, reports surfaced on government plans to lean more heavily on social media platforms to take down “disinformation” related to “the nature of U.S. support to Ukraine.”

Emails revealed through the Twitter Files further show a number of FBI agents in regular correspondence with Twitter executives, pressing for the detection and removal of Russian content. In one exchange revealed by journalist Matt Taibbi, Elvis Chan, a special agent assigned to the San Francisco FBI field office, expressed frustration that Twitter officials had “not observed much recent activity from official propaganda actors on your platform.” Chan was part of the FBI team that had weekly meetings with Twitter to warn about Russian disinformation leading up to the 2020 election. Following repeated warnings from the FBI about a potential Russian influence operation, Twitter banned links to a New York Post story about the contents of the Hunter Biden laptop in the weeks before the election.

The extent to which U.S. military and intelligence shapes domestic social media conversations about the Ukraine-Russia war is still unclear. Researcher Jack Poulson revealed a presentation from U.S. Army Cyber Command shortly after the invasion began, in which Lt. Colonel David Beskow referenced work to defend NATO's "brand" across social media platforms.

During the RSA convention, Vitiuk spoke on a panel alongside Bryan Vorndran, the assistant director of the FBI's Cyber Division; Alex Kobzanets, an FBI agent with the bureau's San Francisco office; and Laura Galante from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

During the panel, Vitiuk thanked the Ukrainian government's many public and private sector allies in the United States, including Mandiant, Cisco, CrowdStrike, Clearview, Google,, and Starlink, among others.

The war effort has also taught the FBI new lessons in private-public partnerships, according to Kobzanets. "I don't know how many times we've called the CEOs here in San Francisco to drive to their office on a Sunday afternoon and really engage with our Ukrainian partners,” he said.

After rousing closing remarks from Vitiuk, several FBI agents in the audience, including Elvis Chan, stood for applause.

Rep. Henry Cuellar

Democrat Rep. Henry Cuellar represents Texas’ 28th Congressional District, which extends to the U.S.- Mexico border, had been very public and critical of how Joe Biden collapsed the U.S-Mexico border enforcement.[73][74] Cuellar's home and campaign office were the subject of an FBI raid on January 20, 2022.[75]

No Congressional oversight of intel community

See also: Deep State

Chief Procurator Merrick Garland announced they will not permit any investigation of members of the intel committee for leaks (i.e. compromises in national security). “Garland on Monday also met with news media executives about restricting the ability of leak hunters...A New York Times lawyer called the meeting positive.”[76] Rep. Adam Schiff (HPSCI) and Sen. Mark Warner (SSCI) have facilitated intelligence community corruption and abuses with illegal leaks. As a result, “leak hunters” in the DOJ are forbidden from exposing the corrupt legislative coordination. The legislative branch (intel committees), judicial branch (FISA court and federal courts) and executive branch (FBI, DOJ-NSD, DNI, DIA, CIA etc.) work together to continue allowing the intelligence apparatus to avoid any oversight.[77]


See also: Liberalism and racism
The Biden legacy.

Among the Biden junta's first official racist acts was the firing of the nation's African American Surgeon General[78] and issuance of xenophobic travel ban orders against South Africa.[79][80] In its first full month, February 2021, while unemployment fell among fell among white, Hispanic, Asian-American workers and overall to 6.2%, Blacks were the only group that saw a rise in unemployment to 9.9%.[81] Racist Democrat Sens. Tammy Duckworth and Mazie Hirono refused to vote for any white Biden appointee.[82]

In April 2021, Twitter allowed a racist insult against Republican Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina to "trend" on its website/platform following the GOP rebuttal to Biden's SOTU speech in which Scott debunked the liberal leftist agenda, accused Democrats of trying "to use our painful past to dishonestly shut down debates in the present" and stating, "America is not a racist country."[83] Following the speech, angry leftists flooded Twitter in attempts to label the Senator "Uncle Tim" and using other racist slurs. During the rebuttal Scott stated, "I have experienced the pain of discrimination... I get called "Uncle Tom" and the N-word — by 'progressives'! By liberals!"[84] The left traditionally uses the derogatory epithet and hurls it at conservatives who dare to walk off the Democrat plantation. This has long been a way for bigots to insult black people who are accused of being subservient to whites and used to send an intimidating message to others who might be thinking about leaving the plantation.[85] A plurality of voters said race relations had deteriorated in the first six month's after Bidens seizure of power.[86]

It took only 120 days under the leftist junta before Jews were being beaten in broad daylight in America.[87] In Los Angeles, Muslims in two vehicles, waving "Palestinian" flag, shouting "Allahu Akbar" chased a religious Jewish man.[88] The next day Arabs, attending a "pro-Palestine" rally in Los Angeles, stormed a restaurant, asked who is Jewish and began beating. [89] Notably arrested was an Arab man from Brooklyn, Waseem Awawdeh.[90][91] Waseem said, after being arrested, that he would do it again, to which Newsmax's Logan Ratick Tweeted: Because he grew up brainwashed to hate a specific group of people.[92] Days later, another Arab from NY was arrested in thst beating, Faisal Elezzi.[93]

War on the Christian church

An IRS official denied tax-exempt status to a Texas group that encourages church members to pray for state and national leaders regardless of their party affiliation because it benefits “the private interests of the [Republican] Party.” According to the Epoch Times the official wrote,

“You do not qualify as an organization described in IRS Section 501(c)(3). You engage in prohibited political campaign intervention,” wrote Stephen A. Martin, Director of the IRS Office of Exempt Organizations Rulings and Agreements in a May 18 [2021] letter (pdf)[94] to Christians Engaged, the Garland, Texas-based prayer group recognized by Texas officials as tax-exempt.

“You are also not operated exclusively for one or more exempt purposes within the meaning of Section 50l (c)(3), because you operate for a substantial non-exempt private purpose and for the private interests of the [Republican][95] party,” Martin said. [...]

Martin also noted that the group’s activities “educate believers on national issues that are central to their belief in the Bible as the inerrant Word of God,” Martin explained.

“Specifically, you educate Christians on what the Bible says in areas where they can be instrumental, including the areas of sanctity of life, the definition of marriage, biblical justice, freedom of speech, defense, and borders and immigration, U.S. and Israel relations,” he said.

The Bible teachings are typically affiliated with the [Republican] party and candidates. [Bolden added] This disqualifies you from exemption under lRS Section 50I(c)(3),” he said.[96]

War on girl's sports

Biden will allow children in schools to "change" their gender without their parents' permission. He will also allow gender-confused boys to play sport with girls, and use their bathrooms and their locker rooms. This was a listed priority on the Biden-Harris campaign website. He will reinstate the Obama-Biden guidance revoked by the Trump Administration, which will restore gender-confused students’ access to sports, bathrooms, and locker rooms in accordance with their claimed gender identity. The Biden LGBTQ+ policy would allow also biological males who identify as "females" to be granted access to female locker rooms, bathrooms and sports teams without even undergoing genital mutilation surgery or chemical castration hormone replacements.[97] An early Biden junta executive order destroyed girl's athletics and the hope of many young girls to win scholarships and competitions.[98]

Year-over-year increase in the Murder Rate in Democrat run cities during the 2020 U.S. Color Revolution.

Gun rights

Biden plans to control people's right to own guns, for example, banning semi-automatic firearms.[99] He claims that his plan does not violate the Second Amendment.[100] Biden called a pro-Second Amendment and civilian worker in Detroit "full of sh*t" and threatened to fight him as a thug,[101][102]

The junta Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives believes it has the authority to confiscate, ban and register an entire class of firearms without consulting Congress. “The [Notice of Proposed Rule Making] proposes amending the definition of the term ‘rifle,’ as contained in 27 CFR §§ 478.11 and 479.11, to ‘clarify that the term “rifle” includes any weapon with a rifled barrel and equipped with an attached ‘stabilizing brace’ that has objective design features and characteristics that indicate that the firearm is designed to be fired from the shoulder, as indicated on ATF Worksheet 4999,” according to a fact sheet about the rule put out by SB Tactical. “This proposed rule would be the largest Executive Branch firearms ban/registration scheme in American history— forcing the registration or destruction of millions of privately-owned firearms,” SB Tactical's fact sheet continues. “[T]he proposed rule would ensure that 99% of the firearms already in circulation are suddenly unlawfully possessed.”[103]

A Time magazine survey found 570 leftwing terrorist incidents in 220 cities between May 24, 2020, and August 22, 2020.[104]

Leftist violence

See also: Leftwing violence under the Biden junta and Anti-Asian hate crime

Biden refused to denounce the terrorist Anarcho-Coummunist hate group Antifa during the first debate with President Donald Trump. He claimed they are "just an idea", not an organization. He pretends that FBI Bureau's director Chris Wray told lawmakers that Antifa is an "ideology", not a terrorist group, but the fact this is not what Wray said, Wray said: “any number of properly predicated investigations into what we would describe as violent anarchist extremists,” which included individuals who identity with Antifa.[105] It appears that Biden and Antifa have some relations, as when someone looks up the website, Biden's election campaign page will appear.[106]

Defund the Police

See also: Defund the Police

Biden flip-flops on defunding police. He changed his positions three times on defunding police.[107] On July 8, 2020, he agreed on defunding some levels of police.[108] In the first presidential debate, Biden accused police and falsely called them "systemic racists".[109] In a moment of candor on December 8, 2020, Biden confessed that the Defund the Police movement "beat the hell out of us."[110]

Targetting QAnon followers

Many Trump supporters were baited and duped by a Deep State misinformation campaign known as QAnon. The junta DOJ then in June 2021 issued a terrorist assessment:

“The FBI has warned lawmakers in Washington that QAnon followers may move from being “digital soldiers” to engaging in “real world violence.

We assess that some [domestic violent extremist] adherents of QAnon likely will begin to believe they can no longer ‘trust the plan’ referenced in QAnon posts and that they have an obligation to change from serving as ‘digital soldiers’ towards engaging in real world violence—including harming perceived members of the “cabal” such as Democrats and other political opposition—instead of continually awaiting Q’s promised actions which have not occurred.”[111]

1/6 Capitol protests

See also: 2021 Capitol protests

The federal government had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in several groups during the January 6, 2021 Capitol protests. A study by Revolver News of unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents found the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the so-called Capitol riot “conspiracy”.[112] Most of these unindicted co-conspirators are associated with the three alleged "militia groups" targeted by the federal government, Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters.

Home video surveillance of the Joint Terrorism Task Force attempted recruitment of an American citizen on December 9, 2020, based upon a Facebook posting.[113]

Thomas Caldwell is a 65-year-old from Virginia and an alleged member of the Oath Keepers, which the DOJ refers to as a “paramilitary” or “militia” group. A careful read of the indictment against Caldwell reveals that a certain “Person Two” was a key co-conspirator alongside Caldwell in nearly every dimension relevant to the charges in question. Person Two planned logistics with Caldwell days in advance of 1/6, stayed in the same hotel room for days together, and when Caldwell allegedly “stormed the barricades” into restricted areas outside the U.S. Capitol, Person Two is alleged to have “stormed the barricades” right beside him. In arguing defendant Caldwell should be denied bail, the DOJ cites Caldwell's “leadership role in planning the events of January 6” as including “finding lodging” for Person Three. They even explicitly refer to Person Three as “a third co-conspirator.” “Person Three” reserved and paid for various Oath Keeper hotel rooms. Indeed, the curious lack of indictments filed against the entire gamut of Persons referenced as playing leadership roles within the Oath Keepers on 1/6 raises red flags. This includes: Person 2, Person 3, Person 10, Person 14, Person 15, Person 16, Person 19 and Person 20, along with many co-conspirators listed only as “an individual.”

Among such individuals is the alleged administrator of the “Stop the Steal J6” Zello channel.[114] The DOJ point-blank says this Zello channel administrator “directed the group” as it was carrying out the alleged Capitol attack. If the group is carrying out a conspiracy as the defendants are charged with, this Zello channel administrator is directing the conspiracy in real-time. Yet the Zello administrator was not charged.

It appears that the individual who set up the Proud Boys’ communications infrastructure is being protected by the DOJ. The DOJ refers to this person only as “UCC-1” (UCC meaning an explicitly spelled out “unindicted co-conspirator”). UCC-1, as well as two additional unindicted co-conspirators referred to only as “Person-One” and “Person-Two” in the Proud Boys indictment, were all in Proud Boys “upper tier leadership,” and appear to have been the most prolific planners and incendiary advocates of “insurrection” in the run-up to and on the day of 1/6. The DOJ cites statements made almost exclusively by unindicted co-conspirators as statements that “revealed a plan to storm the Capitol and to let the crowd loose.”

In December 2020 a former Green Beret and Republican congressional candidate was contacted by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF). The Green Beret released video surveillance of the FBI contacting him at his home and an audio recording made at a local restaurant of his actual meeting with the FBI. Federal agents attempted to recruit him to spy on patriots and everyday Americans. The lead was provided directly to the FBI by Facebaook.[115] The veteran was arrested in October 2021 for refusing to snitch for the FBI.[116]

2024 Presidential election interference

See also: 2024 Presidential election interference


  7. Biden White House Disables YouTube Comments After Thousands Dislike Inauguration Video
  33. Biden calls Trump supporters ‘chumps’ at Pennsylvania drive-in rally
  34. Biden Snaps, Calls Minnesota Trump Supporters 'Ugly Folks'
  35. Biden wants end to 'demonization,' but where's his apology for calling Trump and supporters racists?
  36. Joe Biden Calls Trump Supporters ‘Virulent People,’ The ‘Dregs Of Society’
  37. Joe Biden likens Ted Cruz to Nazi propagandist Goebbels for helping Trump spread ‘big lie’ about election fraud
  47. the_january_6_prosecutions_hit_a_speed_bump
  72. How The FBI Helps Ukrainian Intelligence Hunt ‘Disinformation’ On Social Media, Lee Fang, April 28, 2003.
  78. Multiple references:
  83. AILA SLISCO | Newsweek, Read the Full Text of Tim Scott's Republican Rebuttal of Joe Biden's Joint Address to Congress,, April 28, 2021
  84. CNN Politics, Read Republican Sen. Tim Scott's response to Biden's address to Congress,, Updated 10:51 PM ET, Wed April 28, 2021
  85. Debra Heine | AG News, Twitter Allows Racist Attacks Against Tim Scott to Trend For Nearly 11 Hours,, April 29, 2021
  88. LA Jewish man chased by 2 vehicles waving Palestinian flags: 'They were yelling Allahu akbar'. Jewish Los Angeles resident said he 'thought they were going to kill me' By Yael Halon | Fox News.
  89. Dillon Hosier (@DillonHosier) Tweeted: Moments ago: A group of "pro-Palestine" attacked a table of Persian Jews at Sushi Fumi in Los Angeles, just outside of #weho city. #westhollywood / #LA #Antisemitism masked as #FreePalestine [May 18, 2021] Yuna Leibzon (@YunaLeibzon) Tweeted: Shocking pictures from Los Angeles: A group of Arabs stop near a restaurant, ask who is inside a Jew and start beating a man vigorously before fleeing. [May 19, 2021]
  90. 'Jewish man beaten during wild NYC protests afraid to wear yarmulke.' By Reuven Fenton and Amanda Woods. May 21, 2021. Waseem Awawdeh has been hit with multiple charges, including a hate crime. In the attack, captured on video, Borgen was knocked to the ground by a group of five or six men who allegedly made anti-Semitic statements, punched, kicked, pepper-sprayed and struck him with crutches... "I tried to get away, and the next thing I knew, I was surrounded by a whole crowd of people who proceeded to kick me, punch me, beat me down," he recalled. "I felt a liquid being poured on my face and at first I thought I was getting urinated on, but it tuned out I was getting maced and pepper sprayed. My face was on fire. That pain was worse than the concussion and all this other stuff that followed."
  91. New York Police Charge Pro-Palestinian Protester With Hate Crime.' Waseem Awawdeh is accused of beating a Jewish man during protest near Times Square.' By Ben Chapman. Updated May 21, 2021. "Yesterday was an attack on this man simply because he is Jewish," Ms. Halberstam said. Jewish people were targeted in 63 hate crimes between Jan. 1 and May 16, up from 60 during the same time in 2020, according to the NYPD figures. Hate crimes against Jews accounted for the second-largest number of such crimes this year, after those targeting Asians..
  92. Logan Ratick (@Logan_Ratick) Tweeted: Because he grew up brainwashed to hate a specific group of people
  93. NYPD arrests suspect in beating of Jewish man in Times Square. May 24, 2021. Faisal Elezzi was arrested and charged in connection to the violent beatdown of a Jewish man near Times Square. The suspects spewed anti-Semitic statements while pepper spraying, punching and kicking Borgen, police have said. Police said the group also used crutches to beat the victim.
  95. The “D party” is a reference to the Republican Party, according to a novel “Legend” Martin provided at the top of his letter to the Texas Group. See original pdf.
  97. Hawley: Biden Plan to Force Schools to Let Transgenders Play Girls' Sports, Use Their Locker Rooms, 'Startling Revelation of Where His Mind is At'
  100. Joe Biden Told Voters the Second Amendment DOES NOT Protect an Individual Right
  101. Biden Tells Detroit Auto Plant Worker He's 'Full of Sh*t' on Gun Control
  105. Biden Says Antifa Is ‘An Idea, Not An Organization’ during Presidential Debate
  114. The Zello channel in question was populated by patriot/militia personalities who were variously monitoring and participating in 1/6 activities in real-time. Zello is an app that allows for walkie-talkie functionality on a cell phone. Because phones signals were “jammed” by law enforcement in the Capitol area, Zello’s walkie-talkie function was useful (and pre-planned) to stay in communication.

External links