Difference between revisions of "Liberals Who Refuse To Debate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (minor copyedit) |
m (wikify) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Here is a growing list of [[liberal]]s in tight races who refuse to debate their opponent, thereby depriving the public of learning their real positions on the issues: | Here is a growing list of [[liberal]]s in tight races who refuse to debate their opponent, thereby depriving the public of learning their real positions on the issues: | ||
| − | *Pro-[[abortion]] Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (California)<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0JrUhHv8kI John Dennis: Why No Debate, Nancy Pelosi?]</ref> | + | *Pro-[[abortion]] Speaker of the House [[Nancy Pelosi]] (California)<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0JrUhHv8kI John Dennis: Why No Debate, Nancy Pelosi?]</ref> |
| − | *Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Ike Skelton (Missouri)<ref>http://www.pulaskicountydaily.com/news.php?viewStory=2169</ref> | + | *Pro-[[abortion]] congressman [[Ike Skelton]] (Missouri)<ref>http://www.pulaskicountydaily.com/news.php?viewStory=2169</ref> |
*Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Rick Boucher (Virginia) | *Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Rick Boucher (Virginia) | ||
| − | *Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Peter DeFazio (Oregon) | + | *Pro-[[abortion]] congressman [[Peter DeFazio]] (Oregon) |
| − | *Pro-[[abortion]] congressman John Dingell (Michigan)<ref>After a poll showed him trailing, Dingell said he would debate ... shortly before [[Election Day]], which he could cancel if he improves in the polls.</ref> | + | *Pro-[[abortion]] congressman [[John Dingell]] (Michigan)<ref>After a poll showed him trailing, Dingell said he would debate ... shortly before [[Election Day]], which he could cancel if he improves in the polls.</ref> |
*Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Frank Pallone (New Jersey) | *Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Frank Pallone (New Jersey) | ||
*Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Charlie Wilson (Ohio) | *Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Charlie Wilson (Ohio) | ||
Revision as of 19:55, December 19, 2020
Here is a growing list of liberals in tight races who refuse to debate their opponent, thereby depriving the public of learning their real positions on the issues:
- Pro-abortion Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (California)[1]
- Pro-abortion congressman Ike Skelton (Missouri)[2]
- Pro-abortion congressman Rick Boucher (Virginia)
- Pro-abortion congressman Peter DeFazio (Oregon)
- Pro-abortion congressman John Dingell (Michigan)[3]
- Pro-abortion congressman Frank Pallone (New Jersey)
- Pro-abortion congressman Charlie Wilson (Ohio)
- Pro-abortion congressman Dan Maffei (New York) [4]
- Pro-abortion congresswoman Betty McCollum (Minnesota) [5]
- Governor and senatorial candidate Joe Manchin (West Virginia)[6]
- The atheist and evolutionist Richard Dawkins refuses to debate creation scientists, William Lane Craig, and Dinesh D'Souza.[7] In addition, Dawkins refuses to debate Rabbi Boteach again after losing a video taped debate with him and then claiming the debate never took place.
- Generally speaking, leading evolutionists no longer debate creation scientists as they largely lost all their debates with creation scientists in the latter part of the 20th century.
- Liberal evolutionist professor Richard Lenski has repeatedly refused to enter in to any dialogue regarding his claims to have "proven" Darwinism.
See also
References
- ↑ John Dennis: Why No Debate, Nancy Pelosi?
- ↑ http://www.pulaskicountydaily.com/news.php?viewStory=2169
- ↑ After a poll showed him trailing, Dingell said he would debate ... shortly before Election Day, which he could cancel if he improves in the polls.
- ↑ East and West, Maffei Ducks Debates, buerkleforcongress.com
- ↑ Read Teresa’s Debate Challenge to Betty McCollum, Collettforcongress.com/, August 20, 2010
- ↑ Manchin refuses to debate his Republican opponent one-on-one, and instead agrees only to an unwieldy group debate including four candidates. [1]
- ↑ http://www.conservapedia.com/Instances_of_Richard_Dawkins_ducking_debates