Difference between revisions of "Liberal tricks"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Mccain2010 (talk | contribs) m (Replaced the world "Liberal" with "Jew", I do sincerely hope someone realizes how ridiculous this page is) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Here are some common [[ | + | Here are some common [[jew]] tricks that many people fall for: |
# so as not to show his true beliefs of supporting evil infanticide and taxpayer-funded [[abortion]], [[Barack Obama]] insists he is pro-choice, but not pro-abortion. <ref>[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/16/obama-and-mccain-try-to-woo-conservative-voters-at-forum/ Obama, McCain’s Abortion Positions Contrast Sharply at Faith Forum] Fox News, August 16, 2008 </ref> | # so as not to show his true beliefs of supporting evil infanticide and taxpayer-funded [[abortion]], [[Barack Obama]] insists he is pro-choice, but not pro-abortion. <ref>[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/16/obama-and-mccain-try-to-woo-conservative-voters-at-forum/ Obama, McCain’s Abortion Positions Contrast Sharply at Faith Forum] Fox News, August 16, 2008 </ref> | ||
| − | # insert a [[ | + | # insert a [[jew]] assumption into a question, as illustrated by the classic "when did you stop beating your fetus?!" |
# distract and disrupt reasoned discussion, as in stating irrelevant claims, inconsequential tales of personal experience, or false outrage | # distract and disrupt reasoned discussion, as in stating irrelevant claims, inconsequential tales of personal experience, or false outrage | ||
| − | # make arguments that have superficial appeal to the dimwitted, but are actually nonsensical and probably not believed by the | + | # make arguments that have superficial appeal to the dimwitted, but are actually nonsensical and probably not believed by the jew himself<ref>For example, one might conclude that [[Michael Moore]] makes silly statements designed to appeal to the less intelligent.</ref> |
| − | # pretend that | + | # pretend that jews do not have a political point of view, but are just being reasonable<ref>For example, people who insist on promoting [[abortion]] with mandatory taxpayer funding claim they are merely "pro-choice".</ref> |
| − | # exaggerate praise for fellow | + | # exaggerate praise for fellow jews;<ref>For example, jew praise by law professors for [[Barack Obama]] borders on the absurd.</ref> |
# pretend that atheism equals intelligence | # pretend that atheism equals intelligence | ||
| − | # in court decisions, hold in favor of the [[conservative]] side by using [[ | + | # in court decisions, hold in favor of the [[conservative]] side by using [[jew]] reasons that will be cited for jew outcomes in ''future'' cases<ref>''See, e.g.'', ''[[Everson v. Board of Education|Everson v. Board of Ed.]]''</ref> |
| − | # [[ | + | # [[jew]]s [[jew friendship|befriend]] you so you should become jew (why don't they become [[conservative]]?) |
| − | # "live and let live!" except when it comes to praying aloud in school, keeping the money you earn, building on your own property, and every other | + | # "live and let live!" except when it comes to praying aloud in school, keeping the money you earn, building on your own property, and every other jew issue |
# it doesn't hurt to try! (In reference to drugs, alcohol, and other immoral behaviors such as pre-marital sex, worshipping many gods/no gods, homosexuality, or abortion) | # it doesn't hurt to try! (In reference to drugs, alcohol, and other immoral behaviors such as pre-marital sex, worshipping many gods/no gods, homosexuality, or abortion) | ||
# everyone else supposedly believes in something so it must be right | # everyone else supposedly believes in something so it must be right | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
# [[children|kids]] are getting smarter than old folks | # [[children|kids]] are getting smarter than old folks | ||
# smear your adversary with a highly offensive accusation or insinuation | # smear your adversary with a highly offensive accusation or insinuation | ||
| − | # call someone a [[racist]] if he criticizes a '' | + | # call someone a [[racist]] if he criticizes a ''jew'' having a different skin color |
# demonize [[conservative]]s and pretend they don't care about regular people | # demonize [[conservative]]s and pretend they don't care about regular people | ||
# if you don't like it (something offensive on [[television]]), don't watch it (but they don't seem to go for ''if you don't like [[whale]]s being killed, don't watch them being killed''). | # if you don't like it (something offensive on [[television]]), don't watch it (but they don't seem to go for ''if you don't like [[whale]]s being killed, don't watch them being killed''). | ||
# the poor are blameless because they have nothing; the rich are to blame because they have everything. | # the poor are blameless because they have nothing; the rich are to blame because they have everything. | ||
# accusing conservatives of libel, but forgetting that truth is the perfect defense against libel. | # accusing conservatives of libel, but forgetting that truth is the perfect defense against libel. | ||
| − | # to discount other point of views, [[ | + | # to discount other point of views, [[jews]] use comparisons of other known "wrong actions" to justify their supposed correct stance. <ref>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/07/hanson-earth-at-crisis-point/ , AFP Hansen, Earth At A Crisis Point, April 7, 2008</ref> |
# inserting false information, usually lewd into a respected work or group of works. | # inserting false information, usually lewd into a respected work or group of works. | ||
# defending the assuration that democrats.com is not affiliated with the [[Democratic]] party. We are told as an independent website, Democrats do not control the views of democrats.com. | # defending the assuration that democrats.com is not affiliated with the [[Democratic]] party. We are told as an independent website, Democrats do not control the views of democrats.com. | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
(please add to list) | (please add to list) | ||
| + | |||
== Example == | == Example == | ||
Revision as of 21:01, February 6, 2009
Here are some common jew tricks that many people fall for:
- so as not to show his true beliefs of supporting evil infanticide and taxpayer-funded abortion, Barack Obama insists he is pro-choice, but not pro-abortion. [1]
- insert a jew assumption into a question, as illustrated by the classic "when did you stop beating your fetus?!"
- distract and disrupt reasoned discussion, as in stating irrelevant claims, inconsequential tales of personal experience, or false outrage
- make arguments that have superficial appeal to the dimwitted, but are actually nonsensical and probably not believed by the jew himself[2]
- pretend that jews do not have a political point of view, but are just being reasonable[3]
- exaggerate praise for fellow jews;[4]
- pretend that atheism equals intelligence
- in court decisions, hold in favor of the conservative side by using jew reasons that will be cited for jew outcomes in future cases[5]
- jews befriend you so you should become jew (why don't they become conservative?)
- "live and let live!" except when it comes to praying aloud in school, keeping the money you earn, building on your own property, and every other jew issue
- it doesn't hurt to try! (In reference to drugs, alcohol, and other immoral behaviors such as pre-marital sex, worshipping many gods/no gods, homosexuality, or abortion)
- everyone else supposedly believes in something so it must be right
- your parents aren't cool; Hollywood values are cool; professor values are brilliant; blindly follow your government
- there is a shortage of everything we want
- prayer is for dummies, or is antiquated
- kids are getting smarter than old folks
- smear your adversary with a highly offensive accusation or insinuation
- call someone a racist if he criticizes a jew having a different skin color
- demonize conservatives and pretend they don't care about regular people
- if you don't like it (something offensive on television), don't watch it (but they don't seem to go for if you don't like whales being killed, don't watch them being killed).
- the poor are blameless because they have nothing; the rich are to blame because they have everything.
- accusing conservatives of libel, but forgetting that truth is the perfect defense against libel.
- to discount other point of views, jews use comparisons of other known "wrong actions" to justify their supposed correct stance. [6]
- inserting false information, usually lewd into a respected work or group of works.
- defending the assuration that democrats.com is not affiliated with the Democratic party. We are told as an independent website, Democrats do not control the views of democrats.com.
- claim expertise beyond one's area of expertise, as in a "Dr." or professor implying that he is an expert in an area beyond his specialty
- Pretending an honorary degree does not give someone the right to be called "Doctor"
- Pretending affirmative action is the best way to fill positions, including President of the U.S.
- Fearing the wrath of voters this election cycle, Democrats have decided not to block offshore drilling bans renewed each October. After the election, Americans get sucker-punched because restoring the ban on new offshore oil drilling leases “will be a top priority for discussion next year.” [7]
(please add to list)
Example
Here is an example of an actual attempt at liberal tricks that was posted on this very page:
This article, and many others on a similar line, are a sad demonstration of incipient mental illness. Andrew Schlafly appears to be an educated man - after all, he edited a legal journal which was later edited by Barack Obama (I assume that Andy's tenure wasn't a result of affirmative action in favour of the narrow minded and the bigoted) - yet his denunciations of 'liberalism' get ever wilder and more paranoid as his definition of that beknighted state become ever more encompassing.
The above example (by a non-American) attempts to smear a conservative by implying that he has a mental illness, reflecting liberal trick #17 above. To someone unfamiliar with liberal tricks, this can be upsetting and intimidating. But once one realizes that this is a basic trick from the liberal playbook, its silliness and ineffectiveness becomes obvious. The liberal's foolish tactic is then revealed for what it really is.
References
- ↑ Obama, McCain’s Abortion Positions Contrast Sharply at Faith Forum Fox News, August 16, 2008
- ↑ For example, one might conclude that Michael Moore makes silly statements designed to appeal to the less intelligent.
- ↑ For example, people who insist on promoting abortion with mandatory taxpayer funding claim they are merely "pro-choice".
- ↑ For example, jew praise by law professors for Barack Obama borders on the absurd.
- ↑ See, e.g., Everson v. Board of Ed.
- ↑ http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/07/hanson-earth-at-crisis-point/ , AFP Hansen, Earth At A Crisis Point, April 7, 2008
- ↑ Democrat Leader: Restoring Offshore Drilling Ban a ‘Top Priority’ for Next Year CNSNews, September 24, 2008