Difference between revisions of "Liberal charity"
m |
(Gates and Buffett's view of charity deserve criticism; I don't think they've built many hospitals either, and much of Gates' "charity" has gone toward liberal approaches to education) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Liberal charity''' is an [[oxymoron]] because liberals give to charity at much lower rates than conservatives. Instead, liberals attempt to replace charity with government power and control. | + | '''Liberal charity''' is an [[oxymoron]] because liberals give to charity at much lower rates than conservatives.<ref>[http://www.arthurbrooks.net/whoreallycares/excerpt.html Arthur Brooks, "Who Really Cares?"]</ref><ref>[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123258358706104403.html Conservatives Have Answered Obama's Call], Wall Street Journal</ref> Instead, liberals attempt to replace charity with government power and control. |
| − | Several liberal belief systems are particularly uncharitable. | + | Several liberal belief systems are particularly uncharitable. Nearly all hospitals are built by religious foundations, governments and people, and few [[Homosexual]] charitable organizations exists to deal with anything other than promoting the [[Homosexual agenda]]. [[Feminist]]s are also notoriously uncharitable. |
| − | Several liberal-promoted charities, such as Susan G. Komen, even send donated funds to anti-life groups like [[Planned Parenthood]] affiliates that promote [[ | + | Several liberal-promoted charities, such as Susan G. Komen, even send donated funds to anti-life groups like [[Planned Parenthood]] (founded by [[eugenicists]]) affiliates that promote [[abortion]], especially in predominately [[Black]] neighborhoods. |
| + | |||
| + | Note that there are some services for which government cannot replace private charity, in a free society. Blood donations are an example of something that government can never provide. But as liberals increase the size of government and squeeze charity out of culture, all forms of charity, including ones that government cannot provide, decline. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Liberalism}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == References == | ||
| + | {{Reflist}} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:52, April 9, 2010
Liberal charity is an oxymoron because liberals give to charity at much lower rates than conservatives.[1][2] Instead, liberals attempt to replace charity with government power and control.
Several liberal belief systems are particularly uncharitable. Nearly all hospitals are built by religious foundations, governments and people, and few Homosexual charitable organizations exists to deal with anything other than promoting the Homosexual agenda. Feminists are also notoriously uncharitable.
Several liberal-promoted charities, such as Susan G. Komen, even send donated funds to anti-life groups like Planned Parenthood (founded by eugenicists) affiliates that promote abortion, especially in predominately Black neighborhoods.
Note that there are some services for which government cannot replace private charity, in a free society. Blood donations are an example of something that government can never provide. But as liberals increase the size of government and squeeze charity out of culture, all forms of charity, including ones that government cannot provide, decline.
References
- ↑ Arthur Brooks, "Who Really Cares?"
- ↑ Conservatives Have Answered Obama's Call, Wall Street Journal
