| Line 19: |
Line 19: |
| | # Responding to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in "but I like it!" | | # Responding to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in "but I like it!" |
| | # Never admitting shame for [[liberal]] behavior, but often telling others they should be ashamed of themselves. | | # Never admitting shame for [[liberal]] behavior, but often telling others they should be ashamed of themselves. |
| − | # Frequent reliance on [[junk science]] such as [[Counterexamples to Evolution|evolution]], [[Counterexamples to Relativity|relativity]], [[global warming]] and much of [[cosmology]] and [[geology]] based on a [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|time frame]] which predates [[creation]], and [[circular reasoning]] as in demanding censorship of [[creation science]] and [[intelligent design]] while simultaneously citing the resulting silence as proof against it<ref>See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]].</ref> | + | # [[Circular reasoning]] as in demanding censorship of [[creation science]] and [[intelligent design]] in schools and scientific journals, while simultaneously citing the resulting lack of those views in schools and journals as proof against it!<ref>See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]].</ref> |
| − | # [[Americans]] should "move on" past the misconduct of [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Ted Kennedy]], but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about [[John McCain]] | + | # [[Americans]] should "move on" past the misconduct of [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Ted Kennedy]], but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about Republican candidates |
| − | # Highly implausible assumption like "if [[embryonic stem cell]] research will find the cure for paralysis, then would you support it?" (without any consideration of alternatives). | + | # Highly implausible assumptions in "if ... then" arguments, such as "if [[embryonic stem cell]] research will find the cure for paralysis, then would you support it?" (without any consideration of superior alternatives) |
| | # [[Barack Obama]] on [[Afghanistan]]: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees!<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21text-demdebate.html?sq=transcript&st=nyt&scp=2&pagewanted=print]</ref> | | # [[Barack Obama]] on [[Afghanistan]]: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees!<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21text-demdebate.html?sq=transcript&st=nyt&scp=2&pagewanted=print]</ref> |
| | # [[Free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth, and religion. | | # [[Free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth, and religion. |