Changes

#the [[Gospel of John]] is incredibly powerful and life-changing, and even more so when occasional [[liberal]] "[[Editorial Comments in the Gospel of John|asides]]" that were later inserted into it are recognized as not part of the original;<ref>''See'' [[Undiluted Gospel of John]].</ref>

#the [[Gospel of John]] is incredibly powerful and life-changing, and even more so when occasional [[liberal]] "[[Editorial Comments in the Gospel of John|asides]]" that were later inserted into it are recognized as not part of the original;<ref>''See'' [[Undiluted Gospel of John]].</ref>

#John 1:5 is an immensely powerful verse, but diluted in most translations with a past tense and weak negative "did not overcome": "That light shines in the darkness, yet the darkness did not overcome it,"<ref>This quotation is from the [[HCSB]]. The Greek uses the Aorist Indicative Active (simple past tense - literally, "not overcame"), despite using the Present Indicative Active for "shines". https://biblehub.com/john/1-5.htm#lexicon</ref> when a stronger rendition would be "That light shines in the darkness, and the darkness succumbed to it." This wonderful verse also facilitates a greater appreciation of the interplay between physical light and darkness.

#John 1:5 is an immensely powerful verse, but diluted in most translations with a past tense and weak negative "did not overcome": "That light shines in the darkness, yet the darkness did not overcome it,"<ref>This quotation is from the [[HCSB]]. The Greek uses the Aorist Indicative Active (simple past tense - literally, "not overcame"), despite using the Present Indicative Active for "shines". https://biblehub.com/john/1-5.htm#lexicon</ref> when a stronger rendition would be "That light shines in the darkness, and the darkness succumbed to it." This wonderful verse also facilitates a greater appreciation of the interplay between physical light and darkness.

#the innovative, mind-bending, and powerful use of the logic of [[infinity]] in [[the Gospels]], which [[liberal]] translators today downplay or hide;<ref>As an illustration from the [[Old Testament]], in 1599 the [[Geneva Bible]] correctly translated {{bibleref|Psalms|147|5}} as the "infinite" wisdom of [[God]], but most modern English translations fail to use "infinite" there.</ref> and

#the innovative, mind-bending, and powerful use of the logic of [[infinity]] in [[the Gospels]], which [[liberal]] translators today downplay or hide - e.g., "unsearchable riches of [[Christ]]" should be "infinite riches of Christ";<ref>{{Bibleref|Ephesians|3|8}} ([[ESV]]). As an illustration from the [[Old Testament]], in 1599 the [[Geneva Bible]] correctly translated {{bibleref|Psalms|147|5}} as the "infinite" wisdom of [[God]], but most modern English translations fail to use "infinite" there.</ref> and

#[[O’Sullivan’s First Law]]: any endeavor that is not actually [[conservative]] will inevitably be distorted and ruined by [[liberal]]s, including [[Bible]] translation by [[college]] professors.

#[[O’Sullivan’s First Law]]: any endeavor that is not actually [[conservative]] will inevitably be distorted and ruined by [[liberal]]s, including [[Bible]] translation by [[college]] professors.