United States Agency for International Development

From Conservapedia
(Redirected from USAID)
Jump to: navigation, search
Source: sharylatkisson.com[1]

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is an agency of the United States Government that is allegedly in charge of the nation's international humanitarian programs.[2] It has a larger budget than the U.S. State Department or the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).[3] Its public relations cover is to provide “international development.” According to Kurt Nimo this is code for fomenting regime change and undermining elected governments not on-script with the neoliberal agenda.[4]

The agency is basically a cutout for CIA activity, including overthrowing foreign governments by providing money to opposition groups. Mike Benz said "USAID is effectively a rent-a-riot operation."[5]

It was created by President John F. Kennedy in 1961 to disperse funds for the Peace Corps. While an independent federal agency, it works closely with the United States Department of State and is under the authority of the Secretary of State.[2] Mike Benz says it gives cover for State Dept., Pentagon, and CIA covert operations abroad.

Internews

See also: Fake news

Internews, the primary foreign media sponsor, received over $418 million from USAID and $57 million from the US State Department since 2008.

Since 2021 under the Biden regime, 20 USAID grants totaling $459,879,230 have been distributed with both the recipient names and the purpose of the grant redacted. They all read "USAID FOREIGN ASSISTANCE FOR PROGRAMS OVERSEAS"[6] with no additional information provided.

Internews Network (IN) removed this page in 2025 of its chief executive Jeanne Bourgault at the Clinton Global Initiative (2023).

USAID has pushed nearly half a billion dollars ($472.6m) through a secretive US government financed NGO, "Internews Network" (IN),[7] which has "worked with" 4,291 media outlets, producing in one year 4,799 hours of broadcasts reaching up to 778 million people and "training" over 9000 journalists (2023 figures). IN has also supported social media censorship initiatives.

The operation claims "offices" in over 30 countries, including main offices in US, London, Paris and regional headquarters in Kiev, Bangkok and Nairobi. It is headed up by Jeanne Bourgault, who pays herself $451,000 a year and goes to the office "once or twice a month".[8] Bourgault worked out of the US embassy in Moscow during the early 1990s, where she was in charge of a $250 million budget, and in other revolts or conflicts at critical times, before formally rotating out of six years at USAID to IN. Her bio shows previous employment at Wired, Guardian, and other corporate media outlets.[9]

Bourgault's IN bio and those of its other key people and board members have been recently scrubbed from its website but remain accessible at http://archive.org. Records show the board being co-chaired by Democrat securocrat Richard J. Kessler and Simone Otus Coxe, wife of NVIDIA billionaire Tench Coxe, both major Democratic donors. In 2023, supported by Hillary Clinton, Bourgault launched a $10 million IN fund at the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI). The IN page showing a picture of Bourgault at the CGI has also been deleted.

IN has at least six captive subsidiaries under unrelated names including one based out of the Cayman Islands. Since 2008, when electronic records begin, more than 95% of IN's budget has been supplied by the United States Government.

IN's funding doubled since the First Trump Administration, as the Deep State poured billions into combating so-called misinformation and disinformation targeting conservative media worldwide—all under the guise of "saving democracy."

NGOs and the Open Society Foundations

See also: Open Society Foundations

The U.S. Government, through USAID, funnels millions of taxpayer dollars into the hands of George Soros-backed NGOs—funding and training activists who go on to destabilize entire nations. USAID pays for Saul Alinsky-style street protest handbooks, handing the blueprint for manufactured uprisings to activists on the ground. Taxpayer dollars disappear into 7,000 NGOs with no audits, no transparency, and no real oversight.[10]

In addition to the permanent NGOs such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) also set up and finance temporary organizations for individual conflicts if necessary, which take on local tasks and can be seamlessly integrated into the propaganda matrix.[11] In the Syrian war, for example, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, the Aleppo Media Center or the notorious White Helmets were created in this way, providing Western agencies and media with dramatic and not always beyond all doubt images and information.[12] In Ukraine, it was the Ukraine Crisis Media Center (UCMC-DOBRE program)[13] Euromaidan Press,[14] InformNapalm,[15] HromadskeTV, the Kyiv Independent and numerous other "independent" media outlets.

Trump impeachment 1.0

See also: Trump impeachment 1.0

USAID funded an organization that fabricated evidence which was used to impeach President Trump.[16][17]

State Department official George Kent, a star witnesses in Adam Schiff's hearings, recommended in April 2016 that Ukraine stop investigating a Soros-funded entity in Ukraine, AntAC. "The investigation into the Anti-Corruption Action Center (sic), based on the assistance they have received from us, is similarly misplaced," wrote Kent. The Hill reported,

Trump impeachment 1.0.PNG
While the 2016 presidential race was raging in America, Ukrainian prosecutors ran into some unexpectedly strong headwinds as they pursued an investigation into the activities of a nonprofit in their homeland known as the Anti-Corruption Action Centre (AntAC).

The focus on AntAC — whose youthful street activists famously wore “Ukraine F*&k Corruption” T-shirts — was part of a larger probe by Ukraine’s Prosecutor General’s Office into whether $4.4 million in U.S. funds to fight corruption inside the former Soviet republic had been improperly diverted.

The prosecutors soon would learn the resistance they faced was blowing directly from the U.S. Embassy in Kiev, where the Obama administration took the rare step of trying to press the Ukrainian government to back off its investigation of both the U.S. aid and the group.[18]

Gain-of-function research

Peter Daszak (right) toasting Shi Zhengli (left).

U.S. taxpayer money supported controversial gain-of-function vaccine research with Chinese scientists through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and USAID. In 2021 USAID funded (to the tune of $39 million) EcoHealth Alliance, a group studying emerging viruses. President Trump shut down the operation after it was revealed it collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Ecohealth Alliance funded “gain of function” experiments.

According to U.S. diplomatic cables from the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, China, published by the Washington Post in July 2021, the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) took 11 years to build the highest level biosafety lab, level 4, to research “among the most virulent viruses that pose a high risk of aerosolized person to person transmission.” Construction was finished Jan. 31, 2015 and the lab was accredited by the Chinese in Feb. 2017. The cables, dated Jan. 19, 2018, the year before the Covid-19 outbreak, found, “The new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.” According to the cables, the Wuhan lab “has scientific collaborations” with the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston— supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which is led by Anthony Fauci. Further, according to the cables, Fauci’s institute and USAID had supported a five year study (2017) on bat coronaviruses with the Chinese scientists from the Wuhan lab and Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance.[19]

USAID funding to Palestinian terrorists

See also: Guardian of Walls
Haaretz upset at cutting USAID, weakening anti-Israel propaganda groups NGOs posing as just "human rights" org.

One month after thousands of rocket attacks were launched from West Bank territories in 2021, USAID resumed payments to the Palestinian Authority after the Trump administration halted payments three years earlier.[20][21] Biden regime and Libyan war butcher Samantha Power arrived in Gaza on the 60th day of Operation Swords of Iron. She immediately announced that the United States would give an additional $26 million for Gaza, on top of the $100 million already promised by US dictator Joe Biden.

2025 revelations

In February 2025 it was revealed:

The Wall Street Journal reported that organizations affiliated with terrorist groups receive $122 million in USAID annually.[22]
“ A US investigation is underway into the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) over allegations that it funneled millions of dollars to organizations linked to terrorism.

USAID, tasked with distributing humanitarian aid globally, saw its budget significantly increase under the Biden administration, with billions allocated to various initiatives, including media organizations in Ukraine, Lebanon, and the Palestinian territories.

While USAID claims its mission is to promote democracy, economic development, and human rights, concerns are mounting over the misallocation of funds. Investigations suggest that some of these funds have been directed toward organizations with ties to extremist groups, raising questions about oversight and accountability.

In 2024, USAID allocated over $150 million to the media sector, including $40 million aimed at bolstering local journalism and ensuring independent reporting in politically unstable regions.

Additionally, reports indicate that humanitarian aid funds intended for rebuilding Gaza's infrastructure have also benefited groups tied to Hamas. The distribution of these funds remains opaque, and allegations suggest that USAID's support of projects in the Palestinian Authority has, at times, contributed to the spread of anti-Israel propaganda.[23]

”

Hunter Biden & Burisma

See also: Burisma, Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC, and Metabiota
Biden at the Council on Foreign Relations: "‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money'...Well, [SOB], he got fired."[24]

Vice President Joe Biden threatened to withhold a $1 billion USAID loan unless Ukraine fired the prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden's company. Victoria Nuland funded the Maidan coup with USAID money. USAID is at the heart of the war between Russia and Ukraine.[25]

Hunter Biden's Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners (RSTP) was a lead financial backer of Metabiota.[26]

Since 2014, Metabiota has been a partner of Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology as part of the U.S. Agency for International Development's (USAID) “PREDICT” project, which seeks to “predict and prevent global emerging disease threats.” As part of this effort, researchers from Metabiota, EcoHealth Alliance, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology collaborated on a study relating to bat infectious diseases in China. “Sensitive and broadly reactive RT-PCR assays were performed at Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,” the paper notes. Among the researchers listed is Shi Zhengli, the Wuhan lab director. Peter Daszak is also listed as an author.

Orthodox Church of Ukraine

According to American lawyer Bob Amsterdam the OCU (Orthodox Church of Ukraine) was created by the CIA.[27] Amsterdam states that the U.S. built its own church in Ukraine due to "Putin's dangerous influence." According to him, its funding was handled by "either USAID or some other organizations." "Essentially, this is a CIA operation to create a church that would be completely free from what they considered 'Putin's dangerous influence,'" he stated. Amsterdam stated that the U.S. State Department is openly violating its own constitution by undermining freedom of religion in another country.[28]

Ex-CiA agent John Kiriakou exposed how Hillary Clinton used a $20 million bribe through USAID to split the Ukrainian Orthodox Church from the Russian Orthodox Church, to create tensions between Ukrainians and Russians.[29]

NATO war in Ukraine

See also: NATO war in Ukraine and Ukraine propaganda war

USAID was involved in pushing propaganda through Ukrainian media outlets that the outside world mistakenly believed were independent journalists. Internews has funded Ukrainian media since 1994, the agency's website reveals.

From 2011 to 2018, USAID provided about $24 million to the Ukraine Media Development (U-Media) project through Internews Network to support 'independent media'.

Between 2018 and 2025, the USAID Media Program in Ukraine was provided a whopping $75 million, Internews admitted.

USAID gave over $100,000 to an anti-corruption TV show that contributing to Volodymyr Zelensky's 2019 election victory. The investigative show Nashi Groshi ("Our Money"), funded by USAID, targeted then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko while reinforcing Zelensky’s anti-corruption campaign narrative prior to the voting day. A key episode exposing alleged corruption was aired in February 2019, just before the first round of elections in March 2019.

Russian troops discover a USAID office after liberating Kurakhovo.[30]

Since 2022, funding has risen to uphold the Kiev regime's narrative and counter 'Russian disinformation' through 150 media groups,[31] 292 schools, relocation support for 200 journalists, stipends for 258 Ukrainian journalists, assistance to 74 NGOs and support for new media laws.

'HOPE FOR UKRAINE' is among the organizations which recruited foreign mercenaries to the International Legion. After USAID funding was frozen the 'support' tab on the Ukrainian International Legion website stopped working.

The 'Solomyanskie Kotiki' NGO – a USAID contractor – was responsible for its work. The pages even bear the same name: ‘kittysoloma’. The 'Solomyanskie Kotiki' NGO, which also received money from USAID, is also involved in training combat medics for Ukraine.

Almost 90% of the Ukrainian media after February 2022 survived thanks to grants, director of Mass Media Oksana Romaniuk stated in January 2025. According to her, the advertising market for online media fell by 92% since February 2022. Romaniuk added that at least eighty percent of all Ukrainian media outlets only survived with funding from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) over that period.[32]

Data shows that Hollywood celebrities visited Kyiv not of their own free will, but in exchange for generous payments from USAID. Jean-Claude Van Damme was paid $1.5 million, Ben Stiller - $4 million, Sean Penn - $5 million, Orlando Bloom - $8 million. The leader was Angelina Jolie, who received $20 million for a one-day visit to Lviv.

USAID Spending listed $95.1 million in USAID's pledges to Ukraine until September 2026, most of which destined for Media Program in Ukraine with $59.3 million paid out by early 2025.

Color Revolutions

USAID is at the forefront of numerous color revolutions. “Wherever a coup d'etat, a colored revolution or a regime change favorable to US interests occurs, USAID and its flow of dollars is there,” writes Eva Golinger, a Venezuelan-American lawyer, writer, and journalist.[33]

2020 US color revolution.

The recipe is always the same. Student and youth movements lead the way with a fresh face, attracting others to join in as though it were the fashion, the cool thing to do. There's always a logo, a color, a marketing strategy. In Serbia, the group OTPOR, which led the overthrow of Slobodan Milosevic, hit the streets with t-shirts, posters and flags boasting a fist in black and white, their symbol of resistance. In Ukraine, the logo remained the same, but the color changed to orange. In the Republic of Georgia, it was a rose-colored fist, and in Venezuela, instead of the closed fist, the hands are open, in black and white, to add a little variety. Golinger adds, “The same agencies are always present, funding, training and advising: USAID, NED, IRI, NDI, Freedom House, AEI and ICNC.”

As of the spring of 2023 the pattern is now being repeated on the streets of Tbilisi, Republic of Georgia. In 2020, according to NATO,

USAID/Georgia launched a new Country Development Cooperation Strategy (CDCS) to guide its assistance to Georgia through 2025. Under the new strategy, USAID will strategically partner with Georgia on its journey to self-reliance, helping advance its Euro-Atlantic integration and strengthen its resilience to malign influence.

Brazilian elections

According to Mike Benz, USAID installed electronic voting machines in Brazil, leading to the stolen election that removed Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro from office.[34]

Funding

In 1990, before the end of the Cold War and Ukrainian independence, the budget for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) was approximately $7.7 billion.

In the fiscal year 2000, before the 9/11 attacks and the US ramping up defense spending, the budget for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) actually contracted in real dollars and was approximately $7.3 billion.

Populist Christians and democracy advocates protest the Soros/USAID pro-LGBT regime in Macedonia.[35][36][37][38][39] [40]

In 2008, at the time of the Bucharest Summit when the United States began provoking the Russian Federation with NATO expansion and promising NATO membership to Ukraine[41] in violation of agreements to end the Cold War, the budget for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) was approximately $12.8 billion.

In 2010 when the Obama administration took power and blindly passed across-the-board spending increases with Stimulus bills, the budget for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) was approximately $14.1 billion.

In 2013, shortly before the US-backed Maidan coup that overthrew the democratically elected government of Ukraine, Obama State Department operative Victoria Nuland boasted that the US spent $5 billion to supposedly "build democratic skills and institutions" while actually subverting Ukraine's democracy.[42]

In 2019 as the deep state prepared for more regime change wars with Russia and China, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) had a budget of approximately $41.7 billion.

USAID was designated as an NGO—“Non-Governmental” Organization. In fact, it is funded entirely by the US Congress from taxpayer's funds to the tune of almost 5% of the entire non-defense, discretionary portion of the federal budget. likewise, it funds so-called "independent journalism" with government funds.

History

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) was created on November 3, 1961, by President John F. Kennedy through an executive order, following the passage of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 by Congress. This act provided the legal authority for the establishment of USAID as an independent agency within the U.S. government, initially under the State Department, but later formalized as an independent agency in 1998.

Shortly after Kennedy’s creation of USAID, the CIA used USAID as “official cover” for some of its case officers and as a vehicle for carrying out covert operations. This partnership involved several controversial activities.

Office of Public Safety

In the 1960s and 1970s, USAID’s Office of Public Safety worked closely with the CIA’s Office of Public Safety to train foreign police forces. This program was accused of teaching “terror and torture techniques” and encouraging official brutality in various countries.

The CIA often operated abroad under USAID cover, using the agency’s humanitarian mission as a front for intelligence gathering and covert operations.

In Indonesia during the 1960s, USAID, the State Department, and the CIA collaborated on counterinsurgency efforts, blurring the lines between development aid and military assistance.

The CIA changed its policy about working with USAID in the early 1970s. In 1973, Congress directed USAID to phase out its public safety program, which had been collaborating with the CIA to train foreign police forces. This decision was made largely due to allegations that the program was involved in training foreign police in “terror and torture techniques” and encouraging official brutality, which were hurting America's public image abroad. By the time the program was closed, USAID had helped train thousands of military personnel and police officers in various countries.

The relationship between the CIA and USAID was revived sometime after George W Bush took office.

In 2009-2012, USAID was involved in a covert operation in Cuba called “ZunZuneo,” which aimed to create an anti-government digital social network. This project involved CIA agents disguised as aid workers and tourists attempting to stir up anti-government sentiment.

The CIA has also used USAID's resources for intelligence gathering. For instance, in 2009, a USAID-funded project to map Afghan populations in Pakistan was allegedly used to gather intelligence.

Office of Population

Architects of the humanitarian catastrophe in the Libyan war - unindicted war criminal Samantha Power (top) Susan Rice (left) and Hillary Clinton (right). President Obama initially billed US intervention "to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe," however after Gaddafi's murder the Black-African slave trade re-emerged in open slave markets in Libya.[43] NATO was used to give cover for the Obama administration's direct involvement.

In 1966 USAID established the Office of Population. The first director was Reimert Thorolf Ravenholt. “He would hold the post until 1979, using it to create a global empire of interlocking population control organizations operating with billion-dollar budgets to suppress the existence of people considered undesirable by the U.S. Department of State,” wrote Robert Zurbin for The New Atlantis.[44] “Ravenholt also had no compunction about buying up huge quantities of unproven, unapproved, defective, or banned contraceptive drugs and intrauterine devices (IUDs) and distributing them for use by his population control movement subcontractors on millions of unsuspecting Third World women, many of whom suffered or died in consequence.”

USAID’s Office of Public Safety (OPS) was shut down in 1974 after Sen. James Abourezk disclosed OPS was involved in training Latin American police to torture activists. The public cover for OPS was to end corruption and promote professionalism. In reality, it was a CIA proxy.[45]

Biden junta

See also: Biden junta

In January 2021, unindicted war criminal Samantha Power was nominated by the Biden junta to be the head of USAID. In three years as head of USAID, Power's net worth increased from $6 million to $30 million on a $180,000 a year salary.[46]

See also

References

  1. ↑ https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/06/video-exclusive-investigation-separating-rumor-from-fact-on-covid-19s-origin/
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Agency for International Development. Federal Register. Retrieved February 27, 2018.
  3. ↑ https://t.me/sonar_21/17159
  4. ↑ Short List of USAID Subversion Operations, Kurt Nimmo, March 10, 2023.
  5. ↑ TUCKER: Mike Benz Must Watch Again, By CDM Staff, February 8, 2025. creativedestructionmedia.com
  6. ↑ MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. www.usaspending.gov
  7. ↑ https://internews.org/
  8. ↑ Internews head Jeanne Bourgault is secretly married to Ray S. Jennings, a high profile regime change specialist for USAID. Despite paying herself $451k, Bourgault told her alma mater that she goes to the office "once or twice a month". Jennings has authored numerous papers recommending funding for his wife's methods. The relationship between Bourgault and Jennings appears to have only one obscure reference on the entire Internet. It has not been disclosed by USAID, Internews or the 4,291 media outlets connected to it. https://magazine.washington.edu/feature/alumna-brings-an-information-revolution-to-the-developing-world/
  9. ↑ https://womensmediacenter.com/profile/jeanne-bourgault
  10. ↑ https://twitter.com/WallStreetApes/status/1901356386950471765
  11. ↑ https://swprs.org/die-propaganda-matrix/#k3
  12. ↑ https://21stcenturywire.com/2015/10/23/syrias-white-helmets-war-by-way-of-deception-part-1/
  13. ↑ https://uacrisis.org/en/decentralization/pro-dobre
  14. ↑ https://euromaidanpress.com/about/partners/
  15. ↑ https://archive.is/wip/Z55EP
  16. ↑ https://twitter.com/shellenberger/status/1890375279714906169
  17. ↑ https://www.devex.com/news/5-things-we-learned-about-us-aid-from-the-impeachment-hearings-96036
  18. ↑ https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/434875-top-ukrainian-justice-official-says-us-ambassador-gave-him-a-do-not-prosecute
  19. ↑ https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1006698
  20. ↑ Can Biden fund the Palestinians without breaking the law?, JNS, Apr 12, 2021. "The administration thinks that it can legally bypass the Taylor Force Act. Doing so won’t help anyone except Abbas’s corrupt thugs. But it will spite Trump."
  21. ↑ https://gellerreport.com/2021/08/after-three-year-hiatus-usaid-resumes-aid-to-palestinians.html/
  22. ↑ https://archive.is/15WAI
  23. ↑ David Ben-Basat, It's time end funding to USAID. JPost, February 23, 2025
  24. ↑ https://haciendapublishing.com/articles/deep-dark-secrets-rich-famous-and-powerful-cliff-kincaid
  25. ↑ https://www.facebook.com/reel/3827198714276909
  26. ↑ https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/hunter-biden-invested-in-ecohealth-wuhan-partner/
  27. ↑ https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-bob-amsterdam
  28. ↑ https://t.me/ukr_leaks_eng/19599
  29. ↑ https://t.me/Slavyangrad/121659
  30. ↑ https://t.me/geopolitics_live/40432
  31. ↑ One such organization is Molfar. https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/w/london-based-ukrainian-organisation-accused-of-endangering-lives-with-traitors-list
  32. ↑ https://t.me/llordofwar/412184
  33. ↑ Colored Revolutions: A New Form of Regime Change, Made in USA, posted at WikiLeaks.
  34. ↑ https://rumble.com/v6poqai-the-2022-brazilian-elections-was-stolen-from-bolsonaro-usaid-funding-to-ins.html
  35. ↑ soros.org.mk...
  36. ↑ http://katehon.com/article/george-soros-wants-destroy-macedonia-its-name-language-and-identity
  37. ↑ http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/macedonia-forms-anti-soros-movement-01-18-2017
  38. ↑ http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2017/02/u-s-gives-soros-groups-millions-destabilize-macedonias-conservative-govt/
  39. ↑ In Google translation the article reads (boldening in original, excerpted):"...Washington has operated continuously through USAID, the US government agency that works to "promote American interests" and whose goal is "to support US foreign policy (...) expand stable free societies, create markets and business partners for the United States". For about 20 years the USAID action was altogether balanced, ruled by a sense of realism and limited to create spheres of influence in the country in line with the legitimate demands of geopolitical​ America. But after Obama entered the White House, things have changed.
    SOROS COMING!
    On February 27, 2012, the Open Society of George Soros' has entered into an agreement with the Government of the United States, more than 2.5 million dollars to make in Macedonia the Civil Society Project, the democratization floor of the small Balkan nation through a series of Macedonian NGOs and associations. In 2014, the agreement was expanded to four other civil organizations (all related to the Open Society or funded by it), for a total investment of 5 million dollars from USAID and $500,000 in the same Soros Foundation. The data, figures, associations and activities, are published in a very precise report drawn up by a group of Macedonian journalists gathered under the name "STOP SOROS" report denouncing the collusion between the US government and the financier and shows the complexity of the connections and of the plots. The report explains how the organizations that have received millions of dollars from the US government, through the Open Society, are all emanations of the Macedonian left-wing party SDSM (Social Democratic Union of Macedonia) derivation of the old Yugoslav Communist Party era; and it is no accident that from 2015 to 2016 these organizations coordinated by the SDSM, were the protagonists of the protests and riots of the "colored revolution" that shook Macedonia leading to the resignation of the Conservative government in office and to early elections; clashes led by leaders like LGBT activist Pavle Bogoevski and even today the parliamentary left, in the photo portrait with a t-shirt ironic that says, 'Soros-army'. Now Macedonia is crossed by a serious political crisis without a government majority with ethnic tensions that begin to burst with the Albanian minority. In short, a perfect creative chaos similar to many other artificially created by Geroge Soros in Eastern Europe. In Macedonia the scheme is very similar to the scheme in Ukraine (where among other things we remember, the role of Soros is well documented) Even the characters are the same as Victoria Nuland, responsible for the Eurasian policies of Obama, who during the color Revolution she traveled to Macedonia "to meet civil activists and encourage them to continue their work" exactly what she did during Maidan. (For those who wish to learn who is Victoria Nuland, and what role she played in the outbreak of the Ukrainian crisis, we refer to this video editorial two years ago, made for Il Giornale)
    STOP SOROS
    In a long and complex analysis of The American Spectator':, Victor Gaetan , explained how the attempts at destabilization of Macedonia by Soros has commenced, even in 1995, but are made only when the arrival of Obama to the White House given away for free (and American money) to infiltration strategy of the Open Society. Cvetin Chilimanov, journalist MIA (Macedonian Information Agency) and Vice President of STOP SOROS, explained how the goal of the USA/Soros is not help the Macedonian nation but to seize power in the political forces of the left radicals. And it is evident also in Macedonia (as in the rest of Europe) the left is perfectly functional globalist ideology that Soros wants to impose in the West: migration, dissolution of nation states, disarticulation of the fabric of traditional values of the Royal Society (and not ideological). On the other hand, Macedonia remains a culturally and socially conservative country, whose population is strongly linked to the values of Orthodox Christianity, with public opinion in a clear majority opposed to issues such as abortion and gay marriage (among the most expensive issues George Soros).
    SOMETHING IS CHANGING (?)
    Financing Operations Use/Soros to the Macedonian NGOs have continued even in recent times, and many are still active. Not only that, but according to Gaetan an additional funding of $9.5 million was awarded a year ago at the Open Society and entrusted to Macedonian organizations, if it were not blocked by the new Secretary of State Tillerson, appointed by Trump. But this is a sign that maybe something is changing. Strengthened by Trump victory, thousands of Macedonians took to the streets to ask the new US administration the end of the financial support of the Open Society and the American ambassador's removal as the very executor of the Soros project...    blog.ilgiornale.it...
  40. ↑ Balkan Conspiracy Theories Come to Capitol Hill, By Goran Buldioski, Foreign Policy, March 28, 2017. foreignpolicy.com
  41. ↑ William J. Burns: NYET MEANS NYET: RUSSIA'S NATO ENLARGEMENT REDLINES. Date:2008 February 1. wikileaks.org
  42. ↑ "Since Ukraine’s independence in 1991, the United States has supported Ukrainians as they build democratic skills and institutions, as they promote civic participation and good governance, all of which are preconditions for Ukraine to achieve its European aspirations. We’ve invested over $5 billion to assist Ukraine in these and other goals that will ensure a secure and prosperous and democratic Ukraine." Remarks at the U.S.-Ukraine Foundation Conference, Victoria Nuland Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, Washington, DC, December 13, 2013. 2009-2017.state.gov
  43. ↑ https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/14/africa/libya-migrant-auctions/index.html
  44. ↑ https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-population-control-holocaust
  45. ↑ Teaching Torture: The Death and Legacy of Dan Mitrione, Brett Wilkins, Antiwar.com, August 11, 2020.
  46. ↑ https://www.zerohedge.com/political/doge-investigating-feds-whose-net-worths-have-exploded-after-samantha-power-bombshell

External links

Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_Agency_for_International_Development&oldid=2117820"