Changes

1,565 bytes removed ,  Yesterday at 12:48
m
Reverted edits by Conservative (talk) to last revision by Telling
Line 2,479: Line 2,479:     
User "Conservative" fixates on Russia's sewage woes as a quirky but persistent jab at its superpower pretensions, substantiated by dedicated essays and edit histories. Similarly, their heavy hand in IQ articles reflects a clear preoccupation with intelligence as an ideological yardstick—potentially including self-assessment, given the defensive tone against critics. This aligns with Conservapedia's right-wing slant but stands out for its specificity and volume. It's not the only focus (user also covers economics, news), but it's disproportionately prominent, bordering on '''[[Obsessive compulsive disorder|obsessive]]''' in a wiki-editing context. For deeper dives, the linked pages provide raw evidence.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 18:21, September 10, 2026 (EDT)
 
User "Conservative" fixates on Russia's sewage woes as a quirky but persistent jab at its superpower pretensions, substantiated by dedicated essays and edit histories. Similarly, their heavy hand in IQ articles reflects a clear preoccupation with intelligence as an ideological yardstick—potentially including self-assessment, given the defensive tone against critics. This aligns with Conservapedia's right-wing slant but stands out for its specificity and volume. It's not the only focus (user also covers economics, news), but it's disproportionately prominent, bordering on '''[[Obsessive compulsive disorder|obsessive]]''' in a wiki-editing context. For deeper dives, the linked pages provide raw evidence.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 18:21, September 10, 2026 (EDT)
−
  −
== Thus saith China's technology! Let the world know that April 2022 was not a pivotal month for decades to come! ==
  −
  −
China is an ally of Russia.  RobSmith has said favorable things about China's Deepseek AI. 
  −
  −
China's Deepseek compares my essay with RobSmith's essay regarding the significance of April 2002 and world history:  [https://chat.deepseek.com/share/aq0fknmw35i1t6p924 Deepseek compares User: Conservative's essay with RobSmith's essay]
  −
  −
=== Summary of Deepseek's analysis ===
  −
  −
'''Verdict:'''
  −
  −
"Your essay is more sound. It is more precise in its claim, more rigorous in its use of evidence, more systematic in its structure, more honest about uncertainty, and more serious in its engagement with the strongest opposing arguments. RobSmith's essay is a lengthy work of advocacy that gathers supportive quotations but does not subject its thesis to the tests that would establish it.
  −
  −
This does not mean RobSmith is wrong about everything—your own essay concedes that the Istanbul track mattered and that its failure had tragic costs. It means that, as an essay—as a piece of reasoning designed to establish a conclusion—yours is the stronger work."
  −
  −
Conservapedians, my essay has more machismo!  On behalf of all reasonable people in the world, I declare victory! Olé! Olé! Olé!
  −
<br>
  −
<br>
  −
[[File:Triumphant-bullfighter.jpg|thumbnail|700px|center|Conservapedians, my essay has more machismo!]]
  −
<br>
  −
<br>
  −
I trust this further clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:35, October 20, 2026 (EDT)
 
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,683

edits