Difference between revisions of "User talk:Aschlafly"

Revision as of 05:28, July 31, 2025 (view source) RobSmith (Talk | contribs) (→‎Eric Kaufmann is an anti-conservative bigot) ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:28, July 31, 2025 (view source) RobSmith (Talk | contribs) (edit summary removed) Newer edit →
Line 1,152:		Line 1,152:
	==Andy, are you seriously going to allow...==		==Andy, are you seriously going to allow...==
−	[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_America%27s_sewage_system_is_better_than_Russia%27s_TERRIBLE_sewage_system&curid=182529&diff=2147239&oldid=2120034 this idiot crap on this website, especially in the present international environment?] How can anyone take [[Conservapedia]] seriously? Or yuorself? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:28, July 31, 2025 (EDT)	+	[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_America%27s_sewage_system_is_better_than_Russia%27s_TERRIBLE_sewage_system&curid=182529&diff=2147239&oldid=2120034 this idiot crap on this website, especially in the present international environment?] How can anyone take [[Conservapedia]] seriously? Or yourself? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:28, July 31, 2025 (EDT)

---

Revision as of 05:28, July 31, 2025

None of this trolling garbage is encyclopedic

• Essay: July 2, 2011: The day the atheism movement died on the information superhighway
• Essay: Internet atheism was still moving down the information superhighway and then the pandemic hit it

It is using the Conservapedia educational resource by a Conservapedia editor to make ad hominems against his personal enemies. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:41, June 7, 2025 (EDT)

Neither is this:

• Essay: Russia is not a conservative country
• Essay: Russia's HIV/AIDS epidemic
• Essay: 21st century Christianity and sexual normalcy in the world. Africa will be far more influential than Russia

See also: UN predicts half the teenagers in Africa will die of AIDS.

Andy, read his "International politics/relations" essays. They are nothing more than recycled Social Darwinism and survival of the fittest screeds, topics that Conservapedia, led by yourself & User:Conservative, built its reputation by refuting. Now he is hell bent on destroying that anti-Darwinist reputation solely motivated by a personal vendetta against me for calling him out as a know-nothing on the topic of international relations. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 00:35, June 12, 2025 (EDT)

Here's more of his non-encyclopedic trolling that has wasted hours and hours of other editor's productive editing. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 13:56, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

More: Category:Speedy deletion candidates. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:29, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

None of this content in the examples linked above was created to add to a knowledge base. It was all created to dilute search terms, inconvenience, hamper, and troll other Conservapedia editors.

• "Andy does not want near duplicates. wants original essay"'

All these entries are "near duplicates" copy paste spam which dominate search engines, negatively effecting and burying other editors' contributions. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:51, June 29, 2025 (EDT)

Here User: Conservative even acknowledges his spam & trolling Essays are "Unencylcopedic" in context. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:15, June 29, 2025 (EDT)L

You too, Andy, apparently acknowledge the same. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 19:11, June 29, 2025 (EDT)

It is 7AM my time

Andy, I am being harassed and trolled again with specious, redundant arguments (see Conservapedia blockable offenses) preventing me from productive editing. [2] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 09:50, June 9, 2025 (EDT)

RobSmith's Main page talk was droning on and on about the "defeat of the West". And yet, China's many economic woes (Property crisis, high youth unemployment, deflation) and Russia's many economic woes (High inflation, slowing economy, labor shortages, brain drain, etc.) were absent on the page. In short, it did not reflect reality and was a distortion of reality.

RobSmith's monopolization of main page talk in terms of its control via illegitimate means and his talk, talk, talk on main page talk is not good for Conservapedia. Conservative (talk) 10:36, June 9, 2025 (EDT)

Talk talk talk? You began spamming the page before I woke up to hide the facts that

• You praised Al Qaeda support for Trump;
• You accused Trump of Russia collusion.

Not to mention a few other things, like trying to hide Trump's desire for a weak dollar to spur US exports.

This is a redundant pattern with Ken, spamming talk pages & email lists to obscure idiotic statements of his so no one has the patience to read through to the crux of the matter.RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:45, June 9, 2025 (EDT)

"Defeat of the West" - another lie and mischaracterization

I posted verbatim from HIS qualified source Emmanual Todd he recently posted to his algorithm page that he uses to promote his own contributions and suppress other editor's Google results. It's not my own words. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:02, June 9, 2025 (EDT)

Update: Emmanuel Todd: Nihilism could explain Israel's behaviour in Gaza and Iran. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:30, June 17, 2025 (EDT)

Even more judgment is nigh on a much weakened Russia as early as early this week. Put away your Russian cheerleader pom poms and be ready to purchase a coffin for your hyper Russiaphilia. The Trump sanctions will likely be announced early this week and they could be secondary sanctions. And remember these words which I said earlier. You should have done your due diligence before falling in love with Russia. And of course, remember the classic words, "I told you so!". Why didn't you do your due diligence and fall in love with an up-and-coming country? Falling in love with a country in steep decline due to its own foolish actions was a bad move - a very bad move. Conservative (talk) 12:16, July 13, 2025 (EDT)

2028 election

President Trump has already declined to endorse J.D. Vance as his successor (at least right away) and expressed openness to endorse someone else. Meanwhile, Trump's public falling out with Elon Musk could be a deciding factor in his endorsement due to Vance's close ties to Musk and to Big Tech in general. With that in mind, I'm requesting permission to create a 2028 election page.--Geopolitician (talk) 12:50, June 10, 2025 (EDT)

You don't need to ask permission. Just go ahead and do it.

By the way, maybe this will be of some help: https://electionbettingodds.com/ Conservative (talk) 12:58, June 10, 2025 (EDT)

Nevermind. I will do it for you. See: 2028 United States presidential election. Conservative (talk) 13:01, June 10, 2025 (EDT)

Thanks!--Geopolitician (talk) 18:30, June 10, 2025 (EDT)

Your welcome. Conservative (talk) 10:08, June 11, 2025 (EDT)

Trump's war

If you want to shield readers and students from Trump's war, why don't you delete all this liberal fascist claptrap? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:18, June 10, 2025 (EDT)

Yes, its not Trump's war. Putin violated Just War Theory when he invaded Ukraine in February of 2022. The war is Putin's war and Joe Biden's war. Trump is trying to cause a peaceful settlement. If Trump was elected in 2020, the war in Ukraine would have never happened. Conservative (talk) 19:54, June 11, 2025 (EDT)

Waging war against the Russian population cause rural Russians in cold climates don't have flush toilets is not justified by Just War Theory. Neither is the existence of gay bath houses or an AIDS epidemic, which is your only justification for war, in addition to divorce & alcoholism rates. You're a sick man.

Following your logic, replacing those economic developmental & societal maladies with LBGT rights is your justification for war. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 22:10, June 11, 2025 (EDT)

He's spamming talk pages again

and refusing to engage in rational, civil discussion. [3]

I encourage Andy to look at my essay at: Essay: 21st century Christianity and sexual normalcy in the world. Africa will be far more influential than Russia

In addition, I encourage him to look at my rebuttals to your complaints on the essay's talk page.

Also, great power status is built on population size, economic power and military power. Russia has a demographic crisis (falling population and one of the lowest fertility rates in the world that is accompanied by labor shortages), a struggling economy with high inflation that is slowing down and potentially facing stagflation[4] and a military power that is corrupt, has many weaknesses and is making very, very slow territorial gains in Ukraine despite facing a country with a much smaller population size (See: Russian military). Conservative (talk) 19:26, June 11, 2025 (EDT)

"rebuttals to your complaints" - there are none of "my complaints".

I merely posted a link from Dr. Fauci's NIH without comment (which you never addressed) and you went on another of your world-famous spam sprees of thousands of bytes with off-topic liberal claptrap from Google trends.

Elswhere, you posted BS about Russia not being a "Christian" nation because of the AIDS epidemic - a dubious claim. Here you've posted thousands of bytes about Google search results while never addressing the underlying NIH & UN claim.

If Google has a monopoly on truth, God help us all. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 19:38, June 11, 2025 (EDT)

Negative trends concerning Russia and Trump disparaging Putin

RobSmith, Andy is aware of various negative trends relative to Russia and that Trump said that Putin has "gone absolutely CRAZY". Conservative (talk) 19:51, June 11, 2025 (EDT)

Seesh, you never cease to amaze with your ignorance of ongoing events. Trump's claim of Putin going crazy revealed Trump was uninformed about the assassination attempt on Putin by NATO and that Trump is not in control of the US intelligence community. See Talk:Main_Page#Zelenksy_made_Trump_look_like_a_fool. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 20:04, June 11, 2025 (EDT)

User:Conservative: When did you become such an ardent advocate and promoter of Google shadow banning? Google shadowing banning of terms related to Russia has been in place for more than 10 years, about the same time Google started shadow banning Conservapedia to limit our traffic. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:48, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

Now he wants to edit war in his warmongering hysteria

[5] and spams more liberal claptrap about falling oil prices when indeed they are rising. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:33, June 11, 2025 (EDT)

Elite warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers

Politico: DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "Elite warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers...It's up to us, the people, to speak up and demand an end to this madness".

User:Conservative will not stop his anti-Trump trolling and doing the biding of anti-Trump warmongers. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:53, June 12, 2025 (EDT)

He will not stop his anti-Trump warmongering.

Do you believe Israeli's military has done much better in Iran than Russia's military has done in Ukraine?

Have you noticed that Israeli's military has done much better in Iran than Russia's military has done in Ukraine?

Take a look at: Russian war advances slower than WWI despite Ukraine being a flat open land. Russia's economy is a big mess

Also, this is still one of my favorite military related videos: Why the IDF is the world’s most effective military | War on Tape | Daily Mail. Conservative (talk) 12:28, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

Iran retaliated with a relentless wave of strikes on Israel’s critical infrastructure, targeting 18+ high-value assets to cripple military, economic, and technological capabilities. These were the key confirmed hits: [6]

Military

• Al-Jalil base
• Tel Nof airbase
• Nevatim airbase
• Ovda airbase
• Kiryah base
• Unit 8200 Cyber intelligence HQ
• Mossad HQ
• Rafael Co.

Result: Crippled F-35 operations, cyber warfare, and northern command hubs in cascading failures.

Energy

• Haifa refinery
• Haifa power plant
• Hadar power plant

Result: Refinery fires halted fuel supply, dual power plant hits collapsed grids across Israel.

Research Centers

• Kiryat Gat chip-making hub
• Weizmann Institute
• Negev nuclear center

Result: Research facilities and semiconductors have been proven to be vulnerable.

Logistics

• Haifa port
• Ben Gurion airport

Result: Critical import/export channels and air transit paralyzed.

He's spamming user talk pages again

[7] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:42, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

User:Conservative is like Lindsey Graham: he thinks war and killing is a game. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:32, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

User:Conservative simply doesn't understand, nor has any interest in, issues surrounding modern war. For example, a rush to use AI drone technology to make decisions to kill people. Instead, he goes on and on about gay bath houses and flush toilets as cause under Just War Theory to fund wars. Worse, he spams this senseless and divisive rhetoric to disinterested user talk pages to create divisiveness in the Conservapedia community.

Spamming usertalk pages is intimidating to editors who do not want to get involved in his personal problems. This can be seen by their lack of response, and their editing dropping off after these spam attacks until the smoke has cleared. They don't want to "take sides" in the silly fights he provokes.

I have tried for many many years to have rational and intelligent discussions with User:Conservative, but it is a hopeless task. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 17:51, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

User:Conservative repeatedly, hundreds & hundreds of times spams this line, and even in the most inappropriate places:

Russia is a declining power and it will only get weaker with time. Russia has a declining population, very low church attendance; an AIDS epidemic, a high level of alcoholism, crumbling infrastructure and 20% of Russia doesn't have indoor plumbing.

That, is Social Darwinism. Read it. Read the line. Then read the Conservapedia Social Darwinism article.

"Social Darwinism states that the strongest or fittest should survive and flourish in society, while the weak and unfit should be allowed to die."

Then we have this (and several other entries):

Essay: The United States (the strongest and fittest) will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future.

while the weakest which will "only get weaker with time" with a declining population, very low church attendance; an AIDS epidemic, a high level of alcoholism, crumbling infrastructure and 20% of Russia doesn't have indoor plumbing."

Being "allowed to die" and funding a proxy war to kill them off because they are weak likewise are profoundly two different moral questions.

Personally, I have moral qualms about you asking User:Conservative, a guy who tries to justify war and killing over no indoor plumbing in the Arctic climate, to write on Christianity and the Bible. This is beyond foolhardy. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:22, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

Ever since Moses murdered the Egyptian and hid his body in the sand and had second thoughts about, one of the main themes of the Bible is to teach us how to live together on this planet without killing each other. Given User:Conservative's habitual false pride and warmongering, I don't think God has given him the light to see and understand this basic teaching yet. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:20, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

spamming a discussion on a profound moral question

"For to all those who have, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from those who have nothing, even what they have will be taken away." (Matthew 25:29)

Israel is an ally of the USA and is quite victorious so far in the Israeli-Iran conflict. Iran and Russia maintain a close strategic partnership and Iran is getting its butt kicked by the Israelis! First Syria and now this! Russia is merely a regional power and no longer a great power. Conservative (talk) 21:40, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

It's a bit pre-mature to call Israel "victorious". This war you and Lindsey Graham want so bad has no end in sight. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:59, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

Update: Iranian ballistic missiles reportedly on the way to Israeli nuclear facility in the Negev. [8]

His "quite victorious" comment is a manifestation of his inability to see the forest from the trees in war reporting and war propaganda.

Update: Information war has started: IDF, like the Kyiv regime, forbids citizens from uploading images and videos of missile strikes to avoid sharing damage assessment with the enemy.

This was evident yesterday already, when Israeli citizens reported 300 Iranian missiles launched and the IDF made the claim of only 100, with supposedly all shot down (except for those that hit the Ministry of Defense, financial district, etc). Today Iran says 150 hit their targets. Do the math. Deja vu. It's the Ghost of Kiev all over again. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:28, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

Go back and reread Emmanuel Todd & Alastair Crooke's comments about denial of reality and wishful thinking.

The American public, like the German public in WWII, were kept in the dark by wartime censorship. It was quite a shock when the Red Army showed up on their doorstep one spring day in 1945 to have the taxpayers answer for the horrific crimes their government committed in the Ukrainian SSR.

‘UNPROVOKED’ attack on Iran by Israel ‘gross violation of UN charter’ — Russia’s UN rep - he is referring to Article 51. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:55, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

Personal remark removed Conservative (talk) 01:12, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

If you want to become a serious student of foreign relations, you need to give up that simplemindedness. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:36, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

Matthew effect

"For to all those who have, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from those who have nothing, even what they have will be taken away." (Matthew 25:29)

Um, not to get into a theological discussion, but I don't believe the scripture from Matthew refers to material substance or wealth. In my understanding, it refers to those who partake or have the spirit of God (i.e. the Holy Spirit. See spirit with measure vs. spirit without measure or abundance of spirit). RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 22:12, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

Permission

Hello, I'm going to start a video game wiki. It's not about politics whatsoever but it will have no content license like this wiki. Would it be alright if I reuse some pages like Conservapedia:Copyrights and the site structure for the wiki I'm making? Thank you! Patriotic Gamer (talk) 12:46, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

PatriotGamer, Conservapedia has generous use rights. I don't see Andy having a problem with your request. I would just go ahead and do it.

Also, Andy is anti-video games. So if he is slow in getting back to you or doesn't get back to you, that is probably the reason why.Conservative (talk) 19:20, June 13, 2025 (EDT)

Is he? He allowed me to make some gaming articles here. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 13:41, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

Growing Hungarian audience

Got your email about Hungary.

As far as growing the Hungararian audience, please take a look at this Wikipedia article: Religion in Hungary.

If you look at the pie chart in the upper right portion of the article you will see a pie chart where 40% of the "What religion are you" issue is people not being willing to answer a survey. That's a very high unknown. Maybe Conservapedia could do a better job when it comes to researching this important issue and writing a better article.

One of the reasons this is an important issue is the low fertility rate of Hungary which is 1.52 births per woman (2022). A replacement level of births is 2.1 births per woman. And religious families that have conservative religion have a higher birth rate.

Maybe an article on Christian evangelism in Hungary might fill in the information gap that Wikipedia has. Conservative (talk) 18:47, June 14, 2025 (EDT)

Russia's strategic partner Iran vs. American ally Israel

• Iran’s air defense failure sends shockwaves to Russia:

"Despite these differences in scale and sophistication, the outcomes have exposed similar weaknesses in Russian and Iranian air defense architecture—much of which is rooted in shared design principles and legacy platforms...Defense analysts in Moscow are reportedly acknowledging that Iranian systems—some modeled on or directly derived from Russian technologies—were unable to provide any sustained resistance even during the second day of Israeli airstrikes. One recurring assessment circulating in Russian defense circles states, “Absolutely powerless air defense, when what we see in the crosshairs is all we’ve got...

While Russia has repeatedly touted the effectiveness of systems like the S-400 in deterring Western aircraft and missiles, combat experience in Ukraine has shown otherwise. The persistent effectiveness of Ukrainian HIMARS strikes and drone attacks—some conducted with relatively low-cost platforms—has led to growing skepticism about Russia’s claim to field a fully layered and resilient air defense network."

• The Ayatollah’s survival was no accident — it was Israel’s choice, and a wise one, The Hill, 2025

Video: Putin abandons Iran as Israeli strikes threaten to cripple Iran and collapse its regime, Times Radio, 2025

For more information, please see: Excellent arguments that Russia is no longer a great power. Conservative (talk) 07:55, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

Andy, he's copy pasting this spam all over the wiki - a violation of Conservapedia Guidelines. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 09:27, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

Personal remark removed See: Russia is too weak to save its strategic partner Iran. Once again, America's ally of Israel is triumphant. Conservative (talk) 11:30, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

• ABC News: Trump: Putin could mediate peace talks between Israel and Iran. [9]

RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:48, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

RobSmith's page linked above indicates: "Oops! Page unavailable." It looks like his link is as unreliable as Iranian/Russian air defenses! LOL. Conservative (talk) 11:52, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

Sorry [10] "In an interview with ABC News' Rachel Scott, Trump said he's open to Russian President Vladimir Putin serving as a mediator in the conflict" RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:53, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

So, the day after Trump proposes Putin to mediate, the US cuts off its ability to ask him to do so.

• US cancels bilateral talks with Russia. [11]

Updates

Additionally, although unconfirmed, it appears Israel is using "stand off" targeting over Iraq (with German refuelers) and have not penetrated Iranian airspace. The explanation would be simple enough: under conditions of the sale, the Russian S-400 can only be used to defend inside Iranian airspace. While Israel has some success in hitting ground launchers, Iran switched some time ago to mobile missile defense launchers, which of course don't have the range as ground launchers. The reporting of "Israel has command over Iran skies" is fake news. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:38, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

Update: Approx 30 USAF Tankers are now Airborne. This suggests round the clock bombing. Still think the US isn't involved? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:46, June 15, 2025 (EDT)

So, there are two types of missile launchers, (1) missile defense launchers against incoming attacks, and (2) offensive long range ballistic missiles. Both can be mobile (mobile defensive launchers have limited range cause they also need radar & a power source which is a dead giveaway to their location). Long range mobile ballistic launchers engage in hit n run tactics. It should be noted that now it has been revealed that the United States had a ZERO success rate in locating Saddam's mobile Scuds during the months long operation in the 1991 Gulf War (round the clock bombing for the next week isn't likely to reduce Iran's long range missile capability). Yes, they can hit some above ground production sites, but most production has been moved below ground a long time ago.

Here, in real time, you see war propaganda played out; if Israel is having such success, why are they already screaming for help? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 00:01, June 16, 2025 (EDT)

• It seems Israel has control of Iranian skies, it is possible that not all over / not over all of them -100%. Desperately Iranian regime asks for deal now (per Trump 6.16.25). I don't believe you want Israel to failLaMarina (talk)

There is no evidence Israel or the US has control of Iranian skies. [12] Rather, it appears to be a propaganda ploy to make it appear that Israel has done all the basic groundwork and all the US needs to do is finish the job quickly with a bunker buster.

Actually, Israel doesn't even have air superiority over Teheran, the one area they do boast about it. Israel just lost a $10 million Hermes spy drone.

Meanwhile, the IDF chief of staff said prepare for a long war. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:05, June 21, 2025 (EDT)

As to the hits on offensive ground launchers & missile defense systems - it is estimated that 70% are decoys.

I think stubborn war seeking Iran ran out of time for deals.Telling (talk) 03:40, June 17, 2025 (EDT)

“	The reports about Israel establishing air dominance over Iran by the second day of the war were vastly over-hyped. If that were the case, Iran would not have been able to continuously launch deadly missiles at the Jewish state. And this much is also true: The West’s military-industrial complex cannot keep up with that of Russia-China-North Korea when it comes to churning out munitions. They can do it faster and cheaper. Translation: the longer the war dragged on, the greater the chances that the advantage was going to shift from Israel to Iran. You can’t win a war strictly on air power, and Israel knows this. At some point, you will have to send in troops. And the West simply doesn’t have the troops or the ability to restock its munitions right now to carry on a protracted war with Russia-China-Iran. Given these facts, it would behoove Mr. Trump to pursue a foreign policy based more on respect for national sovereignty that is less given to intrigue and emotional outbursts. These outbursts, whether warranted or not, give the perception of an unstable leader who cannot make up his mind from one day to the next what he wants to do. This is not good for America or the world.	”
—Leo Hohmann, Trump the dealmaker emerges from Israel-Iran war looking more powerful than ever

Tucker Carlson's Morning Notes

Good evening, I just subscribed to Tucker Carlson's website so I can see his "Morning Notes." Each time he posts a "Morning Note" he ends it with a "What's Next" section. Since Israel began striking Iran on Friday, he has been focusing his What's Next" sections on the escalating crisis, and his words are compelling to say the least.

I believe it is in our interests to have these sections posted here on Conservapedia (perhaps on their own article), as they are currently hidden behind a paywall and I just spent $9 to unlock access to them. However, I also don't want to deprive Tucker of income as a consequence. Let me know what you think.--Geopolitician (talk) 00:24, June 17, 2025 (EDT)

Tucker has a copyright in his notes and the right to charge people a small amount to see them. I appreciate your suggestion but let's not post publicly his pay-to-view comments here. Thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 01:23, June 17, 2025 (EDT)

Okay, thank you.--Geopolitician (talk) 11:32, June 17, 2025 (EDT)

Minority at Maga, Tucker-gang fake Anti war, pro warmongers mullahs Iran genocidal nukes: lost Trump.LaMarina (talk) 03:26, June 17, 2025 (EDT)

1. Iran started its wars. In 1979 against the US which it called big Satan.
2. And in 1991 when it began working toward nukes while threatening Israel (which it calls little satan) with annihilation.
3. Then creating fatal proxies toward that goal too.Telling (talk) 03:38, June 17, 2025 (EDT)

Hey, I'm the guy who sticks to encyclopedic edits...

User:Conservative is the troll who spams no toilets as justification for war to user pages. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:09, June 18, 2025 (EDT)

Additionally, regarding YouTube as a viable source for information: User:Conservative has created dozens, if not well into hundreds of "full articles" devoid of text and solely linked to YouTube playlists created by Mark Miller as the only information source. Is this our standard for encyclopedic and educational research? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:42, June 21, 2025 (EDT)

Andy, When are you going to delete some of this non-encyclopedic rot? A lack of flush toilets in Arctic regions is not justification for war under St. Thomas Aquinas Just War Theory no matter HOW many times User:Conservative spams it to talk pages over how many years. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 00:09, June 25, 2025 (EDT)

He's trolling, spamming, and edit warring again

[13] There was never any confirmed ceasefire agreed to, a violation of Conservapedia:Commandments #1 - Everything you post must be true and correct. He had plenty of time to verify the false information he posted and edit warred over. His latest post is an off topic ad hominem. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 20:50, June 23, 2025 (EDT)

Dealing with your favorite troll

Due to the hours wasted daily dealing with your favorite troll, I nearly missed headlining Ken Paxton's SCOTUS victory. [14] Neither Breitbart [15] nor The Federalist [16] mention Paxton or give him credit. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:46, June 28, 2025 (EDT)

We seriously need a Topic Ban on the subject of foreign policy

[17]

User:Conservative has no understanding of law or respect for the rights of other human beings;

User:Conservative continues spamming his Nazi and fascist ideology of "might makes right".

Imperialist Russia is engaged in war in 4 nations and spends 6% of its GNP on the military (3 wars in Africa and 1 war in Ukraine). America is fighting zero wars. In 2025, the United States is projected to spend roughly 2.9% of its GDP on defense. Conservative (talk) 12:10, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

Liberal claptrap.

The point is, as linked above, User:Conservative does not understand the first semester of international law or foreign relations, and his non-cooperative, pretentious, narcissistic nonsense and spam is hurting Conservapedia and the conservative movement. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:20, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

My response

Andy, many people prefer sweet fantasies to sour truth. But you have to eat your veggies before desert.

Russia's economy is in sad shape and headed for a train wreck

12% of Russian credit card holders have defaulted on their cards and much more defaults are expected to happen[18] Russian mortgage rates are at 25% and Russia has very high inflation. Russia economy meltdown as mortgage rates soar to 25% and pensioners 'struggle to survive', Express, June 2025

Potential Russian banking crisis before June 2026:

• Russian Banks Fear Debt Crisis Is Coming as War Strains Economy, Bloomberg News, June 2025 "Russian banking officials warn of a credible risk of a systemic banking crisis in the next 12 months due to a growing number of corporate and retail clients failing to make loan payments."
• BANKING COLLAPSE IN RUSSIA: NO CASH, ATM RESTRICTIONS, Anna From Ukraine, June 2025, Video
• Russia’s Banks Are Collapsing—And Fast, video, Jason Jay Smart video, June 2025

• User:Conservative's latest spam about food riots in June by Russians wearing winter clothing from a Turkish website narrated by a woman with a British accent isn't even worth going into.

Andy, please do something about this tiresome, relentless troll. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:04, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

It's an undeniable fact that NATO has expanded and that Europe has amped up their defense spending. It's also a fact that Europe has promised Trump to spend 5% of their GNP on defense by 2035

And it's a fact that NATO has expanded (Finland and Sweden joined NATO. Germany has greatly amped up their defense spending) and Trump got Europe to commit to 5% of of their GNP for defense. And Europe's defense spending has amped up as a whole.

• User:Conservative and I discussed NATO spending on the phone, and User:Conservative seemed to agree with me. Now he reverts to spamming liberal claptrap all over again.

I made the point that for Europe to increase defense spending and reduce dependence on the United States, they needed to scare European taxpayers with the Russian bogeyman. Ken agreed with me. Spamming this crap here is off-topic to my point about a topic ban. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:15, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

Slowness of Russian advances in Ukraine at a very high cost. Ukraine is a flat open land

See also: Russian war advances slower than WWI despite Ukraine being a flat open land. Russia's economy is a big mess

• Russia’s Battlefield Woes in Ukraine, CSIS, June 3, 2025

• Report: Russian Advances SLOWER Than WW1!!! , video, 2025

• Russia making ‘steady but slow’ advances on Ukraine, 2025

• What has Russia's invasion of Ukraine cost in blood and money?, 2025

• Russia’s Military Collapse in 2025: 1 Million Casualties & 3,000 Tanks Lost, Video, Jason Smart, 2025

• Still Think Russia is Winning? WATCH THIS Before You Speak Again, Video, Military Show, 2025

Russian air defense weaknesses:

• Russia’s ‘Unbreakable Air Defense Wall’ Just Fell – Ukraine’s Drones Did the Impossible, Military Show
• Iran’s air defense failure sends shockwaves to Russia, 2025
• Iran’s Air Defense FAILED – Russia’s Will FALL Even Faster, Military Show, 2025

• There's no use in sharing information with User:Conservative to "debate" any of his points. He does not absorb the information in your response. Heck, he doesn't even absorb the information in his own "sources", and when questioned, he only doubles down and responds with more spam. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:08, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

Key summary point

Key point: RobSmith needs to eat his veggies and stop eating so much Russian propaganda junk food. I will talk to you this weekend. Conservative (talk) 10:48, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

User:Conservative is not interested in discussion, debate, or collaboration. He only wants to spar with his "enemies" who hurt his "feelings"

And the crap Andy allows him to upload damages Conservapedia and other editors who take the project seriously. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:12, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

Whatsa matta, Ken? You need a live person on the other end to make yourself feel alive?

My narcissism & incivility

I correctly forecasted the Russian/Chinese economies souring and RobSmith got it wrong. I also correctly forecasted Russia's pyrrhic "victory" in Ukraine. RobSmith needs to bow his head, humbly apologize and impose an international relations topic ban on himself. Conservative (talk) 12:21, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

You got it wrong - I made no such forecasts. Only in your paranoid, demented imagination.

Andy, I need a new sparring partner concerning Russia. RobSmith does not produce counter essays. He weakly reverts criticisms of Russia on main page talk that he cannot refute. I could carve out of a banana a tougher sparring partner

Andy, I need a new sparring partner concerning Russia. RobSmith does not produce counter essays. He weakly reverts criticisms of Russia on main page talk that he cannot refute. I could carve out of a banana a tougher sparring partner.

In short, RobSmith lacks machismo! Conservative (talk) 23:19, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

• There's no use in sharing information with User:Conservative to "debate" any of his points. He does not absorb the information in your response. Heck, he doesn't even absorb the information in his own "sources", and when questioned, he only doubles down and responds with more spam. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:08, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

It is not my job to refute fake news; it IS your job to properly qualify sources before vomiting it 30 times all over the wiki.

Vomit? Look at the fake news you just vomited a few days ago, 10 YEARS after Conservapedia refuted it: [19]

“	when Trump's real estate empire was in trouble, Russian loan money helped bail him out	”
—User:Conservative, June 9, 2025.

Who is your source for this? Hillary Clinton? James Comey? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 01:41, June 28, 2025 (EDT)

Lara Logan interview with Hans Mahncke, June 20, 2025: [20]

User:Conservative relies on old liberal claptrap from the MSM in the back of mind to shape his views and thinking.

Andy, how about a page, Why is User:Conservative such an idiot? I bet it could make the Top 10. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:23, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

Postscript: Tell RobSmith that former debt collectors aren't like the sissy boy Russian generals and soldiers who gain land at a snail's pace and at a steep price in casualties. Russia has slower territorial advances in Ukraine than the armies in WWI! They are not like George Patton! Conservative (talk) 23:26, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

Andy, you have allowed a vicious troll, a retarded adult with an axe to grind against the whole planet cause God created him that way, to destroy your website and conservative community. Why you did this, I can only speculate because you had no one else to turn to with some internet skills. Okay. But to salvage the project - it is time to wake up. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:33, June 27, 2025 (EDT)

Want to talk to you about Holy Spirit article

I want to talk to you about the Holy Spirit article. Please call me. Conservative (talk) 14:14, June 29, 2025 (EDT)

Huntington

Before you restore "encyclopedic" information unrelated to the specific article topic, you should look where Samuel P. Huntington and the Clash of Civilizations has been used by the same editor in other pages. The result now is a contradictory mish mash of gibberish, anything but "encyclopedic". RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:30, June 29, 2025 (EDT)

Simply because an editor neatly formats citations unrelated to the article content doesn't make the contribution "encyclopedic".

L. Todd Wood & CD Media

Two worthwhile clips from this prominent and influential conservative voice:

• Decline Of The Christian West (20 mins)
• MAGA angry over Iran strikes (17 mins)

Question: Do we bury our heads in the sand again, or do we align ourselves with the warmongers, neocons, and Russia hoaxers again? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 00:53, June 30, 2025 (EDT)

This should have been Moved to Essay space and not Deleted

[21] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 13:59, July 1, 2025 (EDT)

It even has the author name tag on it, unlike the controversial Essays you have been asked dozens of times to identify as such. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:01, July 1, 2025 (EDT)

It wasn't originally titled as an essay, and it included some text that appeared to be overly sarcastic or a parody.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 20:30, July 1, 2025 (EDT)

Oh yah? Like what? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!}

I saw nothing about Russian gay bathhouses or flush toilets spammed 46 times to mainspace pages or 15 user talk pages? That's hardly sarcastic, parody, or non-encyclopedic. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:11, July 1, 2025 (EDT)

When are you going to start Deleting this trite crap?

It is getting nearly impossible to find anything using CP's internal search engine. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 20:57, July 1, 2025 (EDT)

Or this? It clogs up CP's internal search engine, which apparently is the editor's intent. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:07, July 1, 2025 (EDT)

He's trolling again 3

on a subject that he has no interest or understanding of [22][23]

He does it to impede other editors' productive editing.

RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:56, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Now he's edit warring over his spam, trolling, personal attacks and inclusion of poorly researched, non-encyclopedic claptrap, impeding other editor's productive editing time. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:11, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

I have wasted one hour already with his spam trolling, and non-encyclopedic claptrap already. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:18, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Simple solution: Require User:Conservative to put the {{Essay By}} tag on his non-encyclopedic trolling and parody Essays. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:23, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Looks like he's been compromised

While he's driven down CP viewership to less than 5,000 daily, he boasts of bringing in millions of hits for globalist, neocon, and Ukrainian nazi websites in his work outside Conservapedia. [24] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:32, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Now he is threatening to bring on one of the original Russia hoaxers to a podcast that he produces to trash Trump foreign policy if I don't stop trying to "censor" his non-cyclopedic content. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 17:18, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

It's pretty clear: Donald Trump stands with Vladimir Putin against the false Russia hoax charges made and funded by Bill Browder. Yet now User:Conservative is threatening more Russia hoaxing if I don't stop trying to "censor" his non-encyclopedic parody content. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 17:42, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Andy, tell RobSmith to stop playing Russian roulette when it comes to motivating me to help Russia's/Putin's critics get tons of free publicity and to cease his censorship efforts. Because I can do it. I book people for a leading podcast which is among the top 1% of podcasts in terms of audience size.

Recently, RobSmith motivated me via his censorship to help a website get some material that is critical of Russia to be on web pages that collectively get 530,000 page views a month. If he keeps it up, within a short time, I will double it and it will be over 1,000,000 page views a month.

Right now, I am a sleeping dog when it comes to material critical of Russia and planned to stay that way. But if RobSmith persists in his censorship, the sleeping dog will be transformed into a dragon. Conservative (talk) 17:55, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:03, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

By the way, recently I helped a SEO client rank high for high volume searches that collectively receive about 1,750,000 searches a month. I suggest RobSmith stop playing his game of trying to censor User: Conservative Russian roulette. Because I am literally unstoppable. It doesn't make sense to stop a few page views via censorship at Conservapedia when the net result is material critical of Russia on other websites gets millions of page views a month. It's easy for me to do this. Conservative (talk) 18:15, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Transparency is not censorship. Signing your parody Essays is transparency. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:19, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Again, Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast.

narcissistic spamming

I have decided to move forward. Enter the dragon!

By the way, Momentum Is Slipping... Russia’s Summer Offensive Is COLLAPSING. Russia's gaining additional territory in Ukraine at a glacial speed. During the war in Ukraine Russia has gained additional territory at a WWI combatants rate which is very slow and with very high casualties. And Ukraine has about 1/3 the population of Russia! Conservative (talk) 18:27, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Again, Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast.

John Brennan v Donald Trump talking points

More context: Obama CIA chief John Brennan called President Trump "a traitor" after this press conference was televised. Sen. Rand Paul called for Brennan and other's security clearance's to be revoked, being that Brennan was calling for the death penalty (penalty for treason) for the sitting, legitimate, democratically elected president. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:32, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

And RobSmith, if Russia gets more sanctions or if anti-Russian imperialism public sentiment rises, it may be because you awakened the web marketing, publicity and thought leadership dragon. Conservative (talk) 18:35, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Again, Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:47, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

By the way, I have done book marketing work for 2 clients. Next time a new book critical of Putin comes up, I can certainly approach the author- especially if they are a debut author that does not have a publishing house doing their book marketing. I can also book that author on that leading podcast that is among the top 1% of podcasts in terms of its audience. 18:44, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Again, Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast.

More context: Browder, a US citizen, fled the US and gave up his US citizenship for refuge in the UK for non-payment of taxes on his ill-gotten gain in Russia. He returned to the US with his stolen funds and bribed Sen. John McCain & President Obama to pass and sign the Magnitsky Act.

An American traitor bribed our government to destroy US-Russia relations and bring us to the brink of WWIII with 1 million dead already. And this guy is User:Conservative's hero. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RobSmith (talk)

Again, Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:46, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

One last thing, when Browder promotes his 2023 book Freezing Order: A True Story of Money Laundering, Murder, and Surviving Vladimir Putin's Wrath on that leading podcast, it was because RobSmith turned me from being a sleeping dog to a promoter dragon. I have the email of Browder's booking agent already. Conservative (talk) 18:49, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Again, Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:50, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

When he's on your show, first question: "Why did you give up your US citizenship?"

C'mon, Mr. Patriot. Next question to you: Why do you think it's fair for foreigners to bribe Congress & the President to line their own pocket? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:55, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

If Sir Bill Browder gets additional sanctions placed on Russia, think of all the Russian lives saved due to the war shutting down sooner. Russia is very well-known for its human wave and meat grinder tactics in war and this tradition continues to this day. Conservative (talk) 19:05, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

He bought the title "Sir". Browder is the Jeffrey Epstein of global finance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RobSmith (talk)

I already know all the various weaknesses of Russia. Now more of the world is going to know about them via off Conservapedia web pages that get an absolute ton of page views a month. In addition, book authors who publish books critical of Russia/Putin can be booked on a leading podcast as I book authors/filmmakers for such a podcast.

I hereby dub this new campaign, Operation Afterburner III. Conservative (talk) 19:15, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

And I will remind you, in information war there is no substitute for victory. And you are very much outmatched RobSmith! "In war there is no substitute for victory." - General Douglas MacArthur

And there is nothing you can do to stop this off Conservapedia campaign, RobSmith. "The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting." - Sun Tzu. Conservative (talk) 19:29, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Andy, Did you see this? User:Conservative just called me "an enemy" again, in violation of Conservapedia rules of civility. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 19:55, July 5, 2025 (EDT)

I woke up today with the though not creating or promoting any content that is critical of Russia anymore. I was a total sleeping dog in this respect. But after seeing RobSmith post to one of the talk pages of my essays, I thought of just replying to this matter and then going into hibernation concerning this matter. And then after repeatedly warning RobSmith to cease his censorship of my content about Russia at Conservapedia or there will be consequences, I launched Operation Afternburner III.

RobSmith, if you think that too many people know about the fact that 20% of Russian do not have indoor toilets and you can hinder the dissemination of this information, you have another thing coming! Thousands and thousands of more people will soon know this interesting factoid thanks to Operation Afterburner III. Every time you see your toilet in your residence, remember this! And it was all because you couldn't let a proverbial hibernating bear lie. Conservative (talk) 20:09, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

After thinking about it, I decided to give you one last chance, RobSmith. If you don't take it, I gave you fair warning. Conservative (talk) 20:21, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Ok. Have it your way. You were warned. Don't complain to me though that too many people have negative perceptions of Russia and that this is increasing. Within six weeks, I will double the monthly page views of my content that is critical of Russia and I will accomplish this feat with great speed. Beware the Ides of August. By August 15, 2025, my content critical of Russia will be receiving over 1,000,000 page views a month on web pages that have information critical of Russia. And month after month of 1,000,000 page views adds up quickly.

I estimate that within the next 20 years, the web pages that have my content critical of Russia will have received over 240,0000,000 page views. That is quite a legacy you created for yourself RobSmith. If you had heeded my warning and let sleeping dogs lie, I wouldn't have created any more content critical of Russia. Conservative (talk) 20:43, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

Again, Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 20:52, July 2, 2025 (EDT)

As far as my off Conservapedia web content on material critical of Russia/Putin as a part of my Operation Afterburner III that are on web pages that collectively receive over 1,000,000 page views a month, I achieved this in a few days. This was way before the August 15, 2025 goal I set for myself. User: Karajou can attest to me hitting this goal.

I haven't booked anti-Putin and anti-Russian imperialism guests on that podcast I book guests for yet (The one that is among the top 1% of all podcasts as far as it audience size). I was waiting to see if RobSmith persisted in attempting to censor my Conservapedia content. It looks like he did this today. If he persists, there will definitely be consequences. If Russia gets hit with secondary sanctions, RobSmith might be able to take some of the credit should he persist in his censorous behavior. Conservative (talk) 15:54, July 5, 2025 (EDT)

bla bla bla more off-point narcissistic trolling. "Hey everybody, look at me!" RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:11, July 5, 2025 (EDT)

See also: Dunning-Kruger. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:13, July 5, 2025 (EDT)

P.S.: Adding the {{Essay By|Conservative}} [25][26] is not "censorship". Quite the opposite. It is transparency. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:38, July 5, 2025 (EDT)

The Kyiv Independent website gets substantially more SEO-related Google traffic than the Kyiv Post website does. After some initial SEO analysis using SEMRush.com and Builtwith.com, I believe I know why. We are talking about around 600,000 monthly page views that the Kyiv Post could be getting. If RobSmith continues his censorship of my essays at Conservapedia, he shouldn't be surprised if I surreptitiously take the Kyiv Post on as an SEO client and as a result their web traffic goes up by 600,000 page views. There are lot of things I could do to help Ukraine and hurt Russia in their current information war using my web marketing skills.

RobSmith is playing with fire if he continues his censorious activity at Conservapedia in relation to my essays. Conservative (talk) 16:55, July 5, 2025 (EDT)

You already know who the Kyiv Independent is. You're just spamming so Andy doesn't have the time to read through to the crux of the matter.RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:38, July 5, 2025 (EDT)

I see that RobSmith still wants to engage in censorious behavior. Unfortunately, for RobSmith there are going to be additional consequences that will adversely affect Russia/Putin.

I successfully helped rebrand how people perceive atheism, Richard Dawkins and PZ Myers. Now the web traffic that goes to Richard Dawkins' and PZ Myers' websites are a small faction of what they were before. And I helped Christendom kill off the atheist movement.

I can certainly amp up anti-Russian imperialism and anti-Putin public sentiment. As a result of RobSmith's bad behavior, I have already started significantly doing this in a much more powerful way and now my off Conservapedia content that is unflattering to Russia/Putin is on web pages that are collectively receiving over 1,000,000 page views a month (And User: Karajou has seen this). It certainly makes no sense for RobSmith to motivate me to engage in off Conservapedia web marketing that hurts Russia/Putin and helps Ukraine given my level of web marketing skills. If Russia gets hit by secondary sanctions or more greatly loses the information war in other ways, some of the blame may reside on RobSmith. I have some significant web marketing skills and I know others who also do. So it makes no sense for RobSmith to stir up this hornet's nest given the amount of stings that Russia and Putin may receive as a result of this. Conservative (talk) 18:57, July 5, 2025 (EDT)

Andy, Do you understand what he is saying here? He is using the Conservapedia platform to do uplinks to neocon, globalist, and USAID-funded think tanks and media organizations to boost their search rankings. [27][28][29][30]

This also has the effect of diluting and suppressing Conservapedia's anti-globalist and anti-neocon content.

IMO, this is a blatant betrayal of trust of the important job you have given him. And he did it to settle a personal score with one of his "enemies" - and not to the benefit or advantage of Conservapedia. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:29, July 7, 2025 (EDT)

Musk v Browder

An interesting contrast illustrating the danger of globalists' big money in politics.

• Musk is a foreigner who doesn't understand the American political system or how it operates.

• Browder is an American traitor who gave up his citizenship to cheat the US Government & the American people out of taxes justly owed on his riches that he plundered from the corpse of the Soviet Union, and used the money to bribe the Uniparty (a bill sponsored by John McCain & signed by Barack Obama) to promote Russophobia & warmongering in order to better line the pockets of shareholders of the military industrial complex. Browder clearly understands the American political system and how to manipulaqte it much better than Elon.

RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 09:32, July 7, 2025 (EDT)

Andy, he is again impeding the productive editing of users with his nonsensical threats & spamming

See above. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 19:16, July 5, 2025 (EDT)

A problem that is easily solved

I think what we have here is a failure to communicate.

If RobSmith continues to engage in censorious activity in relation to my essays the following can be done by someone with a proven track record of amping website traffic upwards who works with other web marketing professionals - namely myself.

1. Various web pages which have information critical of Russia/Putin on the internet that are not on Conservapedia will be amped up in their effectiveness and reach. I already started doing this, but I could certainly stop. As of now, these web pages are receiving over 1,000,000 page views a month.

2. Various pro-Ukraine websites may have their web traffic increased.

3. NATO has some weaknesses in its web marketing and these weaknesses are fixable (See: Information related to NATO's web marketing). Someone with a high level of web marketing expertise just needs to explain things to NATO's web marketing director and these problems could be fixed. I have expertise in outreach to individuals. Previously, I worked for a sales training company and contacted company presidents and VPs. It would be easy for someone like myself to contact NATO's web marketing director.

Of course, RobSmith could stop this new information war effort to be launched against Russia. All he has to do is stop censoring my essays. Conservative (talk) 21:09, July 5, 2025 (EDT)

Asking you to put your name on your Essays IS NOT censorship. It is transparency, which any responsible person understands. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:20, July 6, 2025 (EDT)

First, Andy already ruled on the inserting of templates into someone's essays and altering the text of someone's essays (which you did with one of the essays). He ruled that it is not allowed.

Using very large fonts does not make your commentary more compelling. Often people substitute volume for substance. And it's frequently the loudest people who are the most unreasonable and the least able to control their emotions. Conservative (talk) 10:51, July 6, 2025 (EDT)

You do not need Andy's permission to put your name on your Essays. You can do it yourself out of common respect and decency. What, are you ashamed of your work? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:57, July 6, 2025 (EDT)

I am not putting ugly templates in my essays that are unneeded and an ugly distraction. From the very earliest days of Conservapedia Andy has been against "template pollution". Conservative (talk) 11:00, July 6, 2025 (EDT)

You're a coward who fails to take responsibility for your words and actions. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:04, July 6, 2025 (EDT)

Personal attacks such as "coward" are a logical fallacy - namely the ad hominem fallacy. It is common for people who use very big fonts or all caps to be very overly emotional and to behave illogically. Conservative (talk) 11:07, July 6, 2025 (EDT)

Why don't you grow a pair and stop hiding behind mommie's skirts (Andy says this and Andy says that) to justify your behavior. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 13:16, July 6, 2025 (EDT)

DeSantis clip: He did call for a constitutional convention, although the original poster denied it.

I saw the clip of DeSantis. He suggested a constitutional amendment. He did not call for a constitutional convention. [N.B. to avoid misleading: DeSantis did call for an Article V constitutional convention in that video clip - a call that was subsequently repeated by others.]

I just looked online. Here is a clip: DeSantis not keen on Musk's new political party, has another idea for disrupting DC. Conservative (talk) 14:22, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

He also suggested term limits. Conservative (talk) 14:24, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

I viewed the clip at your link. DeSantis is calling for an Article V Convention, which is a Con Con, to change the U.S. Constitution. He's asking to bypass Congress and a Con Con is only the process, which Justice Scalia called a "horrible idea," for doing that.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 17:59, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

DeSantis merely talked about getting the requisite number of states to vote for a balanced budget amendment. No mention of a Con Con convention was mentioned. And neither does your AOL source mention such a convention. He also mentioned term limits. Conservative (talk) 18:04, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

I just watched the video a second time. He doesn't even use the word "convention". You are just plain wrong about this. Conservative (talk) 18:10, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

Please listen again to the clip at your own link at 2:44-3:00, and read our entries on an Article V Convention and Con Con. That is what DeSantis is endorsing: amending the Constitution through use of Article V, which is for convening a constitutional convention when 34 states apply for one. The number "34" would never come up if DeSantis were talking about Congress-initiated amendments.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 18:14, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

Ok. Fair enough. Personally, I think more pain and/or more education is going to be required before the American public tackles the national deficit. That or more baby boomers dying.

Two quotes come to mind: "The greatness of America lies not in being more enlightened than any other nation, but rather in her ability to repair her faults." - Alexis de Tocqueville. “Americans can always be trusted to do the right thing, once all other possibilities have been exhausted.” - Winston Churchill.

Ross Perot and his charts/graphs speeches educated people about the national debt and spending. It's too bad that Elon Musk doesn't use Twitter to do a Ross Perot type sales pitch on paying off the national debt and to cut back on government spending. Conservative (talk) 18:25, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

It's too bad more people don't understand the link between warmongering and defense spending & the national debt and inflation.

This morning President Trump accused BRICS of "trying to destroy the dollar". He's dead wrong. We did it ourselves. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:43, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

And DeSantis is a textbook example in favor of Scalia's argument. If DeSantis were placed in charge of an Article V convention, he would enshrine neocon tyranny into the Constitution and destroy what remains of the Republic. Honestly, I don't understand why the DOJ isn't going after him. He deserves to be put in the Aligator Alcatraz he built in vain hoping it would make us forget his crimes.--Geopolitician (talk) 22:35, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

Geo, your comment seems overly harsh, but I do completely oppose DeSantis's push for a Con Con.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 22:39, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

As do I. Now, I don't know if you followed Laura Loomer during the 2024 campaign, or the whistleblowers who came out during the "Trump Act" state legislative battle. I followed both, and I believe both. And if their allegations are true, which again I believe they are, then my comment may not have been harsh enough.--Geopolitician (talk) 23:29, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

off-topic spam 2

The USD is the world's reserve currency - not the Russian ruble, Chinese yuan or Euro. Once the bulk of the trade negotiations end that will have some upward pressure on the value of the dollar. Historically, trade negotiations have suppressed the value of the dollar. Conservative (talk) 18:52, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

Oh yah? You gonna pick up a gun to defend the world's reserve currency? Better yet, you willing to go to war to force people to use it? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 19:27, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

The two biggest opponents of the USA dollar - China and Russia - have economies and demographics that are going to Hell in a handbasket. And military power rests on economic power. And Europe as a whole has some big economic problems (See: Europe's economic apocalypse). Since currency trading is significantly about the relative strength of currencies, the US dollar looks like it is going to stay the world's reserve currency for a significant amount of time. Conservative (talk) 19:47, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

Okay. Nuff said. I knew better than to begin a conversation with an idiot. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 19:50, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

To be fair, Mr. Freedom Lover, answer this question Yes or No:

Do you think it is fair to force two countries doing business with each other to do it dollars? Yes or No. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 19:56, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

If you want an expert on trying to force people to do things, you should ask Vladimir Putin whose country is involved in 4 wars and is expected to spend about 7.5% of their GNP on the military in 2025.[31] His country also has had a number of people who are opponents of Putin that "jump out of windows".

"All those who share our values and above all our institutions are part of the West and it's the strongest voluntary sphere of influence that has ever existed in world history." - the historian Stephen Kotkin.[32] Conservative (talk) 20:14, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

No spamming. Yes or No: Is blackmailing sovereign nations to force them to use the US Dollar in their international trade with threats of tariffs and economic sanctions a good idea? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 08:48, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

And as far as Trump, BRICS and the dollar, Trump is free to use tariffs to persuade people. Selling in the USA's market is a privilege and not a right. Conservative (talk) 20:36, July 8, 2025 (EDT)

You do not understand the issue or the question. If you had created the SWIFT network article two years ago when I asked you to do so you wouldn't look like such a dunce right now. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 08:56, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Setting aside the issue of my intelligence (Which I am very confident about due to my high college entrance exam score on my ACT exam, my high school class ranking and my high chess ELO score) and whether you are right about this issue, wiki projects are volunteer projects where people write about what they want to write about. You are not the Grand Poobah of Conservapedia as evidenced by you being the only member of Team CP while the CP Civility Association has 9 members. Conservative (talk) 09:06, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Okay, we understand. You are impressed with yourself. Now quit spamming. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:08, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Also, I will continue to love freedom and capitalism and there is nothing you can do about this matter. Conservative (talk) 09:10, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Can't answer a simple yes or no question. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 09:17, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Bottomline: Trump will not be able to dictate to the world how they conduct their international trade with each other OUTSIDE the United States, not without starting World War III. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 09:31, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Trump is not a dictator. The USA is a constitutional republic. Also, despite being merely 4.2% of the world's population, in 2025, the United States' Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is projected to be approximately 26.11% of the world's GDP.[33] The USA will continue to have a significant influence in the world - at least for the foreseeable future.[34]

The USA has had about 25% or more of global GDP since 1880 (See: The world in flux and Trump’s role in a new equilibrium - Stephen Kotkin Lecture - April 25, 2025). And world orders often tend to change slowly because cultures often change slowly.Conservative (talk) 09:57, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Zerohedge: FBI concludes Jeffrey Epstein had no clients, didn't blackmail anyone, and definitely killed himself. [35] Ignorance is bliss. Once again, User:Conservative focused on everything except the current issues. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:40, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

David Stockman: [36]

"Washington’s surfeit of dollars and debts" = "the US highly leveraged bubble economy". RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:30, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

China is the central pillar of BRICS and China's highly leveraged bubble economy began to significantly pop around December 2021 (Evergrande liquidation, Chinese stock market losing 7 trillion dollars, etc. See: It's time to be very bearish about China's economy). China has been experiencing a prolonged period of deflation, with factory-gate prices (PPI) falling for 33 consecutive months.[37] And if China keeps declining that is going to hurt Russia since China is its biggest oil customer (Russia is the R in BRICS).

Russia is one of the key members of BRICS and this July 2025 video is particularly eye-opening: Shocking BRUTAL Statistics Reveal Why Russia WON'T SURVIVE. In terms of the 21st century, there are good reasons for not being bullish on Russia (See: Russian power in decline).

I hope that strong Christian evangelism/revival occurs in China/Russia, but without such miraculous intervention, things look bleak for the future of these countries. Conservative (talk) 11:12, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

You can hope all you want. But when your hopes are based on false premises, they aren't likely to come of much. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:18, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

LOL, "China's highly leveraged bubble economy" LOL. Are you talking about China or the US? LOL. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:22, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Here's a problem for Conservapedia as I see it: Ken takes these buzz phrases from globalist websites, has no idea what it means or what the authors are talking about, and spams it throughout the wiki to obscure discussions and impede other editors' productive editing. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:26, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

When the USA had its 2007/2008 financial crisis (which I correctly forecasted), its national debt to GDP ratio was about 63%.[38] China's local/national debt is over 300%.[39]

Apples and oranges: US debt to GDP from nearly 20 years ago to a controversial estimate of China's ratio today. That in itself is a big question: Nobody trusts China's accounting and estimates. Furthermore, the 2008 bailouts INCREASED US debt to GDP to over 100%, which is a key factor in WHY BRICS was founded (the US tried to sluff off its monetary expansion and inflation on the rest of the planet to benefit itself and bail itself out.) RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:18, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

When you combine China's deflation and its debt bubble bursting with its authoritarian, godless, government's often foolish decisions and its severe demographic crisis, betting on China is not a good economic gamble. Conservative (talk) 11:36, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Once again, China's debt ratio is not a concern. As FDR said, "We owe it to ourselves". It is not held by Wall Street or the City of London. User:Conservative has no understanding of foreign debt, and makes these apples and oranges arguments. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:00, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

So let's return to the core question again, Mr. Freedom Lover:

Do you believe it is fair for the United States to threaten & blackmail sovereign nations, with tariffs & sanctions, to force them to use the US Dollar in their international trade relations with each other OUTSIDE the United States? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:41, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Tariffs, non-tariff trade barriers/regulations and punitive trade policies are widespread in the world economy. And as I noted above, selling in the USA's market is a privilege and not a right. Many countries have had unfair trade surpluses with the USA and Trump is looking to rebalance this and increase the practice of reshoring US manufacturing. Given China's severe demographic crisis, reshoring American factories is a prudent measure.

Also, as I noted above, Putin is a very coercive individual in his country and on the world stage and since you are a fan of Putin, you certainly don't have the moral high ground when it comes to the topic of the use of coercion on the world stage. Conservative (talk) 11:59, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

And as I noted above, you are an idiot.

If China needs to pay off its domestic oligarchs to lower its debt-to-GDP ratio, all it needs to do is start dumping its holdings of US Treasury obligations it bought to bail out the US in 2008.

The US is a debtor nation - China is a surplus nation. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:12, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

What's your explanation concerning why so many people fleeing China and so many people flocking to the USA - including millionaires?[40] And why does the USA have a MUCH HIGHER GDP per capita (PPP) than China?[41]

At the same time, if you want to move from the USA and live in China, I have no problem with that. Godspeed! Conservative (talk) 12:25, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Citing yourself and Wikipedia - now that's authoritive. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:30, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Every single one of the BRICS countries that make up the letters BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) experienced millionaire migration (And also brain drain) in 2024 (Visual capitalist website: Millionaire migration in 2024). In 2024, the USA had a net gain of millionaires due to the emigration of 2,400 millionaires.[42] The USA is still a land of opportunity! And with the Trump visa program for high net worth individuals, we might see millionaire migration increase during his term.

Putting one's trust in BRICS to substantially change the world order is like putting your trust in a lame leg. Conservative (talk) 12:48, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

lemme 'splain what being a debtor nation means: Any gain in the "land of opportunity" redounds to the benefit of China to pay off the US foreign debt. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:54, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

off-topic spam 3

Litmus test: Are you moving to China or choosing to stay in the land of liberty, capitalism and plenty in the USA? USA! USA! USA!

It ain't the land of plenty if it's a debtor nation owing its future to the Chinese Communist Party. Oh, and baby boomers dying off won't resolve that problem. The only "plenty" the US seems capable of manufacturing today is Petrodollars to flood the planet with, giving them IOUs for their wealth, resources, consumer and manufactured goods.

There is something seriously wrong with your brain, the way it receives and processes information; discussing multipolarism, cancer, or the US foreign debt owed to China does not mean the person raising the issue is pro-multipolar, pro-cancer, or pro-US foreign debt owed to China.

A person avoiding discussion of these serious matters can be said to be in liberal denial.

With that being said, I am going to bow out of this discussion and watch my favorite movie (not dealing with Bible) which is the movie Miracle (2004). It's a sports movie about the USA's 1980 Olympic Hockey team beating the Soviet team. Conservative (talk) 13:07, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

What does that have to do with anything?

You seem very obsessed with my brain. I recently took some tests that significantly correlate to intelligence and passed them with flying colors. I suggest you find something else to obsess about - quickly! Conservative (talk) 14:32, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Did you pay money to flatter yourself?

I don't accept you challenges to an IQ test cause its unfair dueling with an unarmed man.

You're obviously engaging in denialism. You know that the per capita income of the USA is much higher than China and yet you quibble about sourcing. It's not honest debate. To get that I will have to go to someone other than you.

And the truth is the per capita income in the USA is much higher than it is in China: "Yes, the United States has a significantly higher per capita income than China. In 2024, the US per capita GDP was around $86,600, while China's was approximately $13,445, according to China Briefing. This means that, on average, individuals in the US earn substantially more than those in China."[43] Also, in November of 2024 in was reported: "The per capita income of the United States is 6.68 and 3.29 times higher than that of China in nominal and PPP terms, respectively."[44] Conservative (talk) 15:23, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

OK Mr. Brilliant Genius, you refuse to answer the question why the United States denies sovereign nations the freedom to conduct international trade among themselves in national currencies.

Now answer this: Why was President Trump impeached in 2019?

24 hrs. No response.

Conclusion: The man doesn't have a clue about anything he talks about in his spam. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 20:29, July 10, 2025 (EDT)

Rob, let's return to encyclopedic editing. Thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 20:49, July 10, 2025 (EDT)

I've tried, but your refusal to do something about Ken's targeted trolling inhibits it. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 20:58, July 10, 2025 (EDT)

I don't think essay-writing against Russia is trolling. But any over-the-top ranting in essays is non-encyclopedic and can be reined in on that basis. Thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:02, July 10, 2025 (EDT)

Andy, all of these, [45][46][47][48] are internal CP algorithm pages intended to obscure any encyclopedic content I add. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:12, July 10, 2025 (EDT)

What these internal CP algorithm pages do is, help redirect in Google results back to neocon & globalist websites search terms that I introduce into Conservapedia (for example, "multipolarism"). If by chance a reader makes it to Conservapedia, they are bombarded with User:Conservative's nonsensical trolling screeds.

This is what User:Conservative is saying about helping off-wiki sites score 1,000,000 million hits per month. He adds to those algorithm pages immediately to rebut and obscure any content I add, every time I add encyclopedic content with certain new words and phrases. It's a form of shadow banning. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 22:51, July 10, 2025 (EDT)

For this reason, I don't even want to get into explaining what "foreign debt" is, cause Ken will just spam the bejeezus out of dozens of Conservapedia mainspaces with errant nonsense to further shadow ban my contributions. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 01:33, July 11, 2025 (EDT)

The United States is a debtor nation. China is a surplus nation. The two are not in the same league.

“	the borrower is slave to the lender	”
—Proverbs 22:7

This is the inherent weakness of Keynesianism, whose mantra is "money is created by borrowing".

Andy, I would (at one time) loved to create content to expand on this, but your steadfast refusal to intervene and stop User:Conservative's targeted trolling has put a damper on that. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:38, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

---

Andy, the original poster used the word "not". Who is misleading who? You need to remove the pronoun "I" as well. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:53, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

General Rule

Everyone needs to abide by our 90/10 Rule against excessive talk page editing, and editors should not blocking each other. Thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 12:05, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Andy, it's hard to do productive editing with User:Conservative's targeted spam & trolling non-encyclopedic nonsense to impede other editors. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:15, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

Andy, this editor should be blocked for one hour for spamming - citing himself and Wikipedia. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:33, July 9, 2025 (EDT)

resistance is futile. Andy receives information about Russia's continual decline via email and via phone discussions. And Trump keeps criticizing Putin

Andy receives information about Russia's continual decline via email and via phone discussions. And Trump keeps criticizing Putin.

Resistance is futile. Personal remark removed Conservative (talk) 03:13, July 11, 2025 (EDT)

Patriots don't 'sieg heil' lies, but apparently you do. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!}

Hope and wishful thinking are not strategies. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:35, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

I knew this would be the next step

In an email to you, I showed that Putin was recreating Stalin's prison network the KBG had for Russia's modern security service the FSB (Russia's FSB security service to get its own pre-trial detention centres, deputy says, July 2025).

The next logical step to becoming more Stalin-like would be to have purges. Well, in 2025 Putin is having a very public purge: Russian Society is Completely Unravelling - Putin's VERY Public Purge, July 2025.

Putin's war is a failure as the casualty rate is high, but the territory gained is at a glacial WWI like speed. His economy is crumbling. The Russian people are frustrated, but it is hard for them to publicly protest. Polls are showing his popularity is waning. Russia has a history of "turncoating" once people in power fail so Putin is nervous. Like the former communists in power in the Soviet Union claimed they always hated communism once communism fell (Russia's EPIC Turncoating Showdown Begins!). Conservative (talk) 09:05, July 11, 2025 (EDT)

Looks like a bunch of CIA claptrap. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 22:09, July 11, 2025 (EDT)

You just don't want to recognize that Russia is declining/imploding faster. Putin's decision to invade Ukraine in February of 2022 (which was compounded by Russia not offering a legitimate peace offer in April of 2022) was a serious miscalculation caused by Putin's authoritarianism, corrupt nature and hubris. Now he is doubling down on the authoritarianism which will compound that mistake. Conservative (talk) 22:24, July 11, 2025 (EDT)

Trump 2.0 is turning into Biden 2.0. And it wasn't possible without Ken's help. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 22:36, July 11, 2025 (EDT)

Mearsheimer: [49]

User:Conservative is pulling Trump & Conservapedia on that direction, and has been do so for a long time. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:00, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

Having married Eastern Europeans Trump knows that borscht is best served hot. On a related note, starting next week, Trump may be turning up the heat under Putin! He says he plans on making a big statement in relation to Russia early next week.[50] Conservative (talk) 00:15, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

Vlad, don't play with Trump because you're playing with fire. Conservative (talk) 00:24, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

Putting your racist comment aside, you need to read today's Politico, "MAGA is whatever Trump says it is." RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:59, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

America first! Not Russia first. Conservative (talk) 12:01, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

No one ever said Russia first. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:04, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

America First. Not the deep state or corrupt CIA First which murdered an American president and wants to take us to war with Russia. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:07, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

RobSmith, wrote: "The Russians have made it unequivocally clear what they want. They view this as an existential threat that they're facing, and they have no intention of changing the terms that they are demanding. You might not like that, but that's what's going on here".

First of all, they want ice water in Hell. And if wishes were fishes we would all have a fry. Russia may want lots more Ukrainian land. Well, as Mick so eloquently said, "You can't always get what you want.".

Next, the Ukrainians with a much smaller population are not an existential threat to Russia who stubbornly does not want to end this war - despite the fact that it is greatly weakening Russia due to the weak and corrupt Russian military. And Russia has a demographic crisis and this war is making it worse. Plus, Russia is now financially struggling. Conservative (talk) 15:14, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

(a) RobSmith did not write that. RobSmith quoted User:Conservative's hero Prof. Mearsheimer.

(b) The NATO backed proxy force in Ukraine is an existential threat to Russia.

(c) duh. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:28, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

If Putin didn't launch his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine and his previous taking of Crimea, Russia would be selling oil/gas at a much higher profit margin to the Europeans, it would not be buried in sanctions and there would be more Russians living in Russia now. In addition, instead of foolishly spending money on this costly war, Russia could have invested that money to increase its labor productivity rate, diversity its economy and be financially stronger. This war has had a huge opportunity cost to Russia and with its aging population, time is running out as far as improving its human capital and economic diversification. Conservative (talk) 15:40, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

If the Obama/Biden regime hadn't illegally overthrown the legitimate democratically-elected government of Ukraine and installed a NATO puppet regime, we wouldn't be faced with World War III and now Trump's war, destroying his presidency. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:05, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

Good news regarding Harvard

Please see these articles:

• Harvard Considering Center for Conservative Scholarship Amid War With Trump, 2025.

• How conservatives are reacting to news that Harvard could start a conservative think tank

I accidentally came across this video: Harvard finally considers opening door to conservative voices in a surprising move

Trump's pressure on Harvard has started to pay off. Conservative (talk) 21:57, July 11, 2025 (EDT)

My "algorithm pages" which control Conservapedia and the internet. Abracadabra! Hocus pocus!

Please see: My "algorithm pages" which control Conservapedia and the internet. Abracadabra! Hocus pocus!

Madness! Madness!. Conservative (talk) 11:56, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

Why all the uplinks to neocon, globalist, and USAID-funded sites? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:01, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

Who are you to question me? Quiet, peon! I am the great and powerful User: Conservative who controls Conservapedia and the entire internet via my all-powerful "algorithm pages"! Now bow your head and beg for mercy! I am the invincible controller of "algorithm pages" who appears from nowhere and leaves no trace! Conservative (talk) 12:08, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

See also: Talk:Grandiose narcissism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RobSmith (talk)

Work my algorithm pages, make my algorithm pages. My algorithm pages make me stronger and stronger. Harder, better, faster, stronger! My vast army of AI minions are creating algorithm pages at an ever-increasing speed! Abandon all hope! Resistance is futile. You must assimilate! Wa, ha, ha, ha, ha! Conservative (talk) 12:28, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

Now you are in deep trouble. Please see: Cry havoc! And let loose the dog of "algorithm pages" war!. Conservative (talk) 12:43, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

Recall, you explained to us how algorithms work for Google results when you insisted religious discussion be moved from talk pages to a formal Debate page (where you called the Roman Catholic Church "a corrupt joke"). Why whole Mainspace pages with nothing but uplinks to neocon & globalist websites? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 17:41, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

He's spamming user talk pages again 5

[51] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:19, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

Here is a persistent problem with a Sr Admin's editing

As just one example, Trump extracts promises from NATO countries to increase spending to 5% of GDP by the year 2035, which hasn't happened yet and most experts agree is impossible. But User:Conservative then consistently spams and reports it as a done deal and accomplishment - implying they are now spending 5% of GDP.

That's just one example. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:50, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

I don't know who these so-called experts are. I hope that they're not the same type of people that said that men could not run miles in less than 4 minutes or who said that if men were meant to fly they would have been born with wings. Conservative (talk) 04:26, July 13, 2025 (EDT)

Key question: What is a Sr Admin? I am aware of who the active Admins are. However, I think the title Sr. Admin is a title that RobSmith made up to make him sound more important. He is such a narcissistic stuffed shirt! Conservative (talk) 09:10, July 13, 2025 (EDT)

Are you going to delete a Mainspace attack page with a username in it

[52] or can I go ahead and create User:Conservative is a malicious troll and idiot? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!}

It will be properly sourced and footnoted. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:59, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

A Sr Admin is now using a notorious anti-Semite and holocaust denier to spam personal attacks against me to other users on the Sysop email list

[53]RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:05, July 12, 2025 (EDT)

Andy, can we both agree that Bobby Fischer was an excellent chess player who was probably much smarter than RobSmith?

Your thoughts? Conservative (talk) 04:31, July 13, 2025 (EDT)

Yah. The guy is still an anti-Semite and holocaust denier. But I can see why a retarded adult admires another autistic retarded adult so much. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 09:23, July 26, 2025 (EDT)

Like User:Conservative, Bobby Fischer's disdain for other human beings & bigotry didn't come out until he was in his 50s & 60s RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 09:32, July 26, 2025 (EDT)

Question: How does being a champion chess player compensate for a having a hatred for humanity? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 09:45, July 26, 2025 (EDT)

Israel's women IDF soldiers vs. the elderly, Russian, grandpa "soldiers" fighting in Ukraine. Which group do you think is tougher?

Take a look at these videos:

• FEARLESS In The Face of Terror: Meet The Women of the IDF Defending Israel's Frontlines | TBN Israel, July 2025

• Russia Starts Sending GRANDPAS to the Front Lines, July 2025

Now if I consider the glacial territorial gains the Russians have made in Ukraine (Slower than WWI rate of armies) combined with all the wars Russia has lost in history and also consider all the glorious victories that Israeli armies have made in history, I am guessing the ladies in the Israel Defense Force are tougher than the elderly, Russian, grandpa "soldiers" fighting in Ukraine.

Your thoughts? Conservative (talk) 04:00, July 13, 2025 (EDT)

When propagandists think who will be dumb enough to swallow their crap, Ken immediately comes to mind. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:28, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

Did WWIII start in WWII like you claimed it did?

"Persoanlly, I believe NATO has been at war with Russia for 10 years, and WWIII started 2 years ago." - RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 23:07, June 18, 2024 (EDT)"

If WWIII started in 2022, then why did you claim that Trump could help start WWIII? One way or another, you were clueless about a big geopolitical matter. I pointed this out to other Conservapedians and they agree with me about your wrongheadedness related to this matter. Conservative (talk) 09:18, July 21, 2025 (EDT)

Donald Trump, elephants and Trump's major announcement today regarding arms to Ukraine that Europeans will pay for

Elephants are known to have nice dispositions. However, you don't want to get them mad. And when they go into rampages, you really don't want to be around them. Republicans are kind of like elephants - nice dispositions, but don't get them really mad.

The Republican Donald Trump is known to forgive opponents and work with them as allies later on. People who know him says Trump often has a nice disposition.

Vladimir Putin has gotten the proverbial elephant Donald Trump mad with his intense bombings of civilian areas which is a war crime.[54]

Donald Trump loves to win, he hates losing and he is an entrepreneur who is willing to take risks. It was a big mistake for Putin to get Trump mad and to use Russian state media to attack Trump and his wife (See: Russian State Media Turns on Trump After Putin Criticism and Russian state TV airs explicit photos of Melania Trump as they congratulate her husband on election victory).

Trump just made a big announcement: Trump, Rutte announce 'really big' NATO arms package amid new 50 day deadline to Putin

Trump used his salesmanship to get the Europeans to pay for this. America will be supplying the arms which includes both defensive and offensive weapons. Conservative (talk) 13:18, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

This additional new story may turn out to be even bigger news. Trump promises secondary sanctions too if peace deal isn't reached in 50 days!

• Trump threatens 'very severe' tariffs against Russia if no Ukraine deal within 50 days, BBC

• Live updates: Trump threatens 100% secondary tariffs on Russia if Ukraine ceasefire deal isn’t reached, July 14, 2025

Russia is in a lot of economic pain now:

• Russia’s economy boomed after the invasion of Ukraine—it’s now running out of steam, Fortune, June 2025

• The Russian potato shortage that shows Putin’s economy is on the brink, The Telegraph, June 2025

More sanctions, especially secondary sanctions, might bring Putin/Russia to their knees. See: Can Trump sanctions on Russia force Putin's hand?, 2025

Trump thinks sanctions are sometimes helpful for bargaining leverage, but should be taken off after a deal is struck and the deal starts being implemented (Good faith shown by the other party). Conservative (talk) 11:46, July 13, 2025 (EDT)

Why are MAGA supporters burning their MAGA hats? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 13:49, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

Are they burning their MAGA hats? Three-quarters of Trump voters support more sanctions on Russia: new poll, New York Post, July 2025. How Americans view Russia and Putin, Pew Research, 2025. Only 16% of Republicans or Republican leaning voters have a somewhat or very favorable view of Russia.[55] Conservative (talk) 14:06, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

One quarter of the MAGA coalition is enough to destroy the coalition and hand the House to Democrats in 2026.

Most people are multi-issue voters. And if only 16% of Republican voters have a somewhat or very favorable view of Russia then the bigger risk to Trump is having a Russia first policy rather than an America first policy. And the EU is a much bigger trading partner with the USA than Russia. In addition, the cultural ties between Americans and most European countries is bigger than their cultural ties to Russia. For example, the UK has a "special relationship" with the USA - Russia does not. The USA is a Western country and so are many European countries. Russia is not a part of the West.

On top of this, both Trump and JD Vance now have favorable feelings/thoughts towards NATO now that Trump has gotten European NATO countries to spend more on defense.[56] Conservative (talk) 14:29, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

The Elon Musk wing and Tulsi Gabbard wing of the MAGA coalition were alreeady being split off from the MAGA coalition before Trump's broken promises on Epstein & the Ukraine.

Why does this have to be spelled out to you? Most conservatives are not naive 'seig heilers' like yourself. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:42, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

The announcement looks like a distraction from the Epstein fiasco.

Again, Ken doesn't understand the difference between talk and action, words and promises verses bluster. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:13, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

BTW, quit spamming. Links are not "facts". RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:15, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

The effects of the tax cuts, deregulation, better trade agreements and deportations haven't fully kicked in yet. But already, the S & P began to soar since April 2025. Once the positive effects of these things fully kick in Trump's popularity could rise. Many people vote with their pocket books.

Also, Republicans, especially in PA, are being eager beavers and registering more and more Republicans.

Furthermore, JD Vance is similar to the T1000 as far as being a new and improved right-wing populist candidate. He is an articulate man from humble roots so he might become very popular. He is the leading candidate in 2028 according to the political betting markets. Conservative (talk) 14:57, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

Yah, well when I was actively trying to promote Sen. JD Vance to the vice presidency for opposing your favorite girl Sarah Ashton-Cirillo, you were shadow banning my contributions. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:32, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

In fact, the more you talk, the more you sound like Sarah Ashton-Cirillo. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:39, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

Reuters: Trump unlikely to enforce tariff threat on Russian oil. [57] Whenever propaganda BS or a psyop is announced, User:Conservative is always first out the gate, falling all over himself, to swallow it hook, line, and sinker. All he did here again is make Trump out to be a liar with his spamming.

I trust this clarifies matters. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:22, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

Reuters: US can squeeze Russia without ‘secondary tariffs’

On July 21, 2025, Reuters published the article US can squeeze Russia without ‘secondary tariffs’ which indicated:

“

Donald Trump does not need so-called secondary tariffs to crush Russia’s oil revenues, currently running at $160 billion a year. The U.S. president’s recent threat, opens new tab to sanction countries that buy oil from Moscow is full of pitfalls. He has a better way to cut the cash flow that fuels the Kremlin’s war against Ukraine. This would be to persuade India, Russia’s second biggest customer, to stop buying its oil while convincing Saudi Arabia to pump more.[1]

”

It's been discussed. It's not going to happen. Hypothetical BS with no connection to reality.

Here's a fact you don't seem to understand: just cause an admin source keeps bloviating to Reuters after India refuses to yield to US demands on sanctions, it doesn't mean anything. In such cases, it it's just the administration talking for domestic consumption to naive, uninformed idiots such as yourself.

Unfortunately, this whole incident goes over your head. Threats & blackmail, and misuse of economic sanctions is precisely why BRICS was created. That's the real story here. And BRICS will only be strengthened by it. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 07:16, July 26, 2025 (EDT)

May 12, 2025: With Extra Oil, Trump Already Has His Big Saudi Win

• With Extra Oil, Trump Already Has His Big Saudi Win, Center for Strategic and International Studies, May 12, 2025 Conservative (talk) 01:26, July 26, 2025 (EDT)

That would be a first - the US importing oil from Saudi Arabia. The US has always had a trade surplus with Saudi Arabia.

But here we go on a discussion that is way way over your head. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 07:03, July 26, 2025 (EDT)

This whole incident is just one more example of User:Conservative not being able, or refusing, to see the forest from the trees.

Whatever happens, the point is: STOP CREATING BS TROLLING PAGES AND MORE WORK FOR ANDY TO DELETE.

Will Trump Trigger WW3?

"So, bottom line: Ukraine should get partial replacement of its air defense with Euro Patriots to be replaced by new orders, Trump's "major announcement" is another tariff on Russia that doesn't do anything, and the war party in the Senate wants to blow up the international trading system with enormous tariffs on China, India, and the EU because they have the audacity to import fossil fuels."

RobSmith, in June of 2024, you said that WWIII started in 2022: "Persoanlly, I believe NATO has been at war with Russia for 10 years, and WWIII started 2 years ago." - RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 23:07, June 18, 2024 (EDT)"

So how could you possibly believe that Trump will trigger WWIII if you believe that WWIII started in 2022? Please explain this matter. Conservative (talk) 14:34, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

duh, you're an idiot. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:35, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

Have you changed your mind on whether WWIII has started? This appears to be the case. Is this one of those exceedingly rare cases of you admitting that you were wrong about a matter related to international affairs/politics? Conservative (talk) 14:40, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

Have you changed your mind about anything in all crap you've spammed over the past 3 years? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:47, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

My favorite is your "Russian neocons", which you PIDOOMA'd and is solid proof you do not understand a dang thing about US history, Russian history, or world history. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:49, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

Personal opinion of Commissar Baron von Münchausen on Trump's big announcement

"Nothing has effectively changed. The USA have been arming and aiding Ukraine since the war started, and Trump never really closed the pipeline, minus a couple of hiccups due to the twelve day war depleting a lot of US stockpile.

The big difference is that the costs of the materiel sent will be footed entirely by Europe from now on, so almost everyone is happy.

Trump is happy because (he thinks) that he can now say that this is no longer his war since he's no longer paying (at least until he follows through with his sanctions plan), the narkoman in Kiev is happy because he gets his weapons, and European leaders are happy because the Narkoman is getting his weapons.

The only ones who won't be happy are the inhabitants of Europe who'll have to endure cuts to welfare and healthcare, the Ukrainian mobiks sent to the slaughter, and the Russian soldiers who'll have to kill their brothers, all of this to support this insanity.

The fact that the European leaders (and by extension their countries) are the ones getting fleeced to pay for a war that Uncle Sam desperately wanted is of course flying way over their heads - at stratospheric heights.

And of course, propagandists and politicians in the west are already saying that this is a great victory."

"USA has been about 25% of global GDP since 1880. And the USA is about 50% of defense spending. Europe is 7% of the global population 14.7% global GDP and recently almost 50% of world social spending (Europeans could have high social spending due to the US security guarantees). The USA has a great innovation center in Silicon Valley and is an energy superpower." - The world in flux and Trump’s role in a new equilibrium - Stephen Kotkin Lecture - Apr 25, 2025

The Europeans spending 50% of the world's spending on social spending and taking long summer vacations (Such as Germany) was not sustainable - especially post Putin's invasion of Ukraine in February of 2022. Things that can't go on forever - usually do not. Sooner or later, the Americans were going to ask the European NATO members to spend more on defense. Conservative (talk) 15:17, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

That is the point: the people of Europe do not want war with Russia, their leaders do. And the European Union is not a democracy. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:25, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

A Sr Admin's childish trolling will not stop

[58] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:09, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

He just moved his spam Essays from user space to Mainspace to increase its algorithmic effect.

This also means the mainspace page can be edited by anyone. [59] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:46, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

Rob, please return to encyclopedic edits, and abide by the 90/10 Rule. THanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 18:55, July 14, 2025 (EDT)

I reverted edits by a psychotic troll

I reverted edits to this page by a a psychotic troll. Thanks. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:26, July 21, 2025 (EDT)

More traffic to the Conservapedia KJV-related Bible project that User: Karajou started.

A few suggestions about getting more traffic to the Conservapedia KJV-related Bible project that User: Karajou started:

1. Have internal links. For example, for this page Psalm 22 , I added an internal link to God. This will be helpful to the readers and increase internal traffic and time on the website. Also, people do click on the "What links here" button on the left sidebar that is on every page of Conservapedia. In addition, the search engines will see the pages being more unique which is good.

2. Have relevant pictures on the pages. This makes a big difference in terms of how appealing a web page is and it also increases credibility for a page as people do judge books by their covers so to speak. Key point: By having pictures on the page, it will make them more search engine friendly perhaps.

Vary the pictures if possible. And don't overdo using the same pictures/graphics. For example, having the same picture/graphic on pages related to God. Conservative (talk) 10:09, July 22, 2025 (EDT) An example of a page of the KJV related project page with a few graphics/pictures: Genesis, Chapter 1 Conservative (talk) 10:21, July 22, 2025 (EDT)

Not true. In fact, traffic has declined since User:Conservative "fixed the log in problem." RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:48, July 22, 2025 (EDT)

Editors do not want to participate because of User:Conservative's persistent personal attacks in Essay space and spammed to user talk pages. More importantly, your refusal to do anything about it has not been helpful.

When editors see how a Senior Admin is allowed to wage a personal jihad against other editors for years, their fear is that it can happen to them, as well. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:58, July 22, 2025 (EDT)

Just in case you read Conservapedia's main page right and are afraid that all of your nephews are going to be drafted for WWIII Personal remark removed

I hope things are going well for you.

Just in case you read main page right and are afraid that your nephews are going to be drafted for WWIII (which allegedly started in 2022 according to Conservapedia's self-declared international politics expert).

"Persoanlly, I believe NATO has been at war with Russia for 10 years, and WWIII started 2 years ago." - RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 23:07, June 18, 2024 (EDT)"

Are we headed towards WWIII? It's not likely - at least not yet

See also: Are we headed towards WWIII? It's not likely - at least not yet (Archive version)

• Some Clear Thinking on why World War III is NOT happening anytime soon
• Are We Heading For World War III? Texas A&M Experts Say It’s Unlikely: "While recent wars have sparked speculation about an ensuing global conflict, military scholars say comparisons to past world wars are largely overblown."
• Are we heading for World War Three? Experts give their verdicts
• We are not headed towards WW3 - at least not yet
• "If I remember correctly, the last anxiety about world war in international public opinion appeared during the Cold War in the 1960s and 1970s... It is both thought-provoking and alarming that talk of world war has become heated and part of official discourse once again after half a century. Looking around, however, it seems that no one is really making plans to start a such a war."[60]
• Reason why WWIII is not coming, Google AI (Other countries have seen the Russian bear financially/demographically hurt by the Ukrainian honey badger with Russia making slow territorial advances since January 2024)[61][62]

You will be able to celebrate your nephews birthdays this year. They will not be drafted for WWIII (which allegedly started in 2022 according to Conservapedia's self-appointed international politics expert). Conservative (talk) 11:23, July 22, 2025 (EDT)

Question: Why does Conservapedia Administration allow such ignorance, illiteracy, and personal attacks to continue for years? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:41, July 22, 2025 (EDT)

For the record

“	Almost six weeks into the war between Russia and Ukraine, I’m beginning to wonder if this conflict isn’t our first true world war — much more than World War I or World War II ever was.	”
—Thomas Friedman, NYT, April 3, 2022.[2]

“	There is a chain of conflicts affecting the whole world...In fact, World War III is already underway...We instinctively expect that the war will begin just like the Great War or the Second World War...The international order is breaking down...It was an unpleasant one, based on the fear of mutual destruction, but manageable...Wars in the Middle East have erupted before, but the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) and the United States of America (USA) intervened and extinguished them until the next conflict...And now I don’t see even a temporary settlement mechanism.	”
—Fyodor Lukyanov, Presidium-Chairman of the Council for Foreign and Defense Policy (SVOP), October 31, 2023.[3]

“	I think it’s a World War. It looks to me like the Thirty Years' War in the 17th century. For me, the modern age started at this time. So for me it’s now, philosophically speaking, the end of the modern era. The modern era started with the Thirty Years’ War, and it will take another Thirty Years’ War to end it.	”
—Alexei Arestovich, January 14, 2024.[4]

Note: Arestovich, the former Zelensky chief press spokesman & propagandist living in exile since being added to the Nazi kill list has announced his candidacy for President if and when Ukraine ever holds democratic elections again. [Ed.]

“	Unfortunately, we are heading for a real world war, a full-blown war. The foundation of the old world system is bulging at the seams, and conflicts will break out. It is necessary to block the way leading to such a war … conflicts are already brewing and taking place in all areas.	”
—Sergei Karaganov, Honorary Chair of Russia’s Council for Foreign and Defense Policy, June 21, 2024.[5]

“	The United States confronts the most serious and the most challenging threats since the end of World War II. The United States could in short order be drawn into a war across multiple theaters with peer and near-peer adversaries, and it could lose.	”
—Commission on the National Defense Strategy Final Report, July 29, 2024.[6]

“	Look at what's happening in geopolitics. We're on the verge of World War III right now. We got a dementia patient sitting in the president's chair. You cannot trust the mainstream media or the political class or the big corporations out there because they've all got an agenda. Or more precisely, they're part of an aristocracy that is trying to bleed the peasants dry. And we're the peasants. You know, the US took centuries to accumulate $11 trillion of debt. Since 2020, we've taken on another $11 trillion. That is a death spiral. The financial system is ready to spin out of control. The experiment that began in 1971 when we went off the gold standard and gave everybody fiat currencies is ending. This is financial and economic history they're going to be writing textbooks about this for the next two centuries.	”
—John Robino, August 24, 2024.[7]

“	Something fundamental has changed in the course of the last two and a half years. History will go back and mark this as a significant moment of transformation in the world order that would be comparable to the post-World War II period with the creation of the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the United Nations, these other Western controlled institutions that have been the foundation for the existing international rules-based order.	”
—Larry Johnson, August 30, 2024.[8]

“	Remember 1940. In three weeks, Americans will not have a comparably reassuring choice when they select the president who will determine the nation’s conduct during World War III, which has begun.	”
—George Will, October 16, 2024.[9]

Note: Anti-Trump & deep state apologist George Will apparently now backs Donald Trump since "World War III has begun". [Ed.]

“	World War III has never been closer.	”
—Donald Trump, October 24, 2024.[10]

“	World War III has already begun.	”
—Jamie Dimon, October 24, 2024.[11]

“	I believe that in 2024 we can absolutely definitely consider that the third world war has begun.	”
—Valerii Zaluzhny, November 21, 2024.[12]

Note: Zaluzhny is the prime candidate of the globalist deep state to become the next puppet president of Ukraine once Zelensky is dumped. What? Are they crazy? The man things World War III has already begun. [Ed.]

“	US policymakers fail to learn the lessons of history and understand that great power alliances transformed two regional conflicts in Eastern Europe into unnecessary world wars that cost the lives of well over 100 million people and now US membership in NATO threatens to transform the war in Ukraine into a Third World War that could cost the lives of ten times more.	”
—David T. Pyne, November 21, 2024.[13]

“	The sudden collapse of Bashar al-Assad's despotic regime in Syria this weekend highlights the interconnectedness of a growing number of global conflicts, revealing a hard truth that most of us would rather not think about too deeply: World War III has already begun.	”
—Bryce Hoffman, December 8, 2024.[14]

“	World War 3 is already well underway, even though most don’t recognize it. Russia, China, and their allies want to transform the current US-led world order that has been in place since the end of World War 2 from unipolar to multipolar—giving themselves a bigger seat at the table in the process. The US and its allies want the unipolar status quo to prevail. World War 3 is unlikely to evolve into a direct kinetic war between the US, Russia, and China because that could invite nuclear Armageddon, where everyone loses. Instead, World War 3 is playing out on different levels—proxy wars, economic wars, financial wars, cyber wars, biological wars, deniable sabotage, and information wars. This is World War 3. It's happening right now and rapidly escalating.	”
—Nick Giambruno, January 21, 2025.[15]

“	World War III is already underway...We need to declare mobilisation...We need to prepare at least half a million people in advance...But realistically one million people.	”
—Major General Apti Alaudinov, June 13, 2025.[16]

“	We're in the early stages of the kinetic part of the Third World War right now...This is much more dangerous than the late 1930s. Much more dangerous.	”
—Steve Bannon, June 18, 2025.[17]

Note: Bannon is President Trump's former campaign manager and chief White House strategist. [Ed.]

He's spamming and trolling again 6

[63][64] And harassing editors by posting the same personal attacks on user talk pages. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 13:29, July 22, 2025 (EDT)

Reminder: We have a long-standing Guideline dating back to the TK era that prohibits editors from using user space to denigrate other editors or their opinions.

You still have at least 208 Speedy deletion attack pages to go

[65] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:54, July 23, 2025 (EDT)

Thanks for the reminder. I just deleted 10 more, and will work through this.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 13:31, July 23, 2025 (EDT)

Continued harassment & trolling

Andy,

I am attempting to work on DNI Tulsi Gabbard's Russiagate revelations - a project I've been working on for 10 years now - however I still encounter daily several hours of trolling & harassment from User:Conservative and User:Karajou.

If it is possible for you to do ANYTHING to restrain their obstructive & obnoxious behavior, it would be deeply appreciated. Thank you. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 01:13, July 24, 2025 (EDT)

How much content at Conservapedia has Andy written about Russia or about Vladimir Putin who Donald Trump recently called "crazy"?

I am getting the distinct impression that Andy does not care much about Russia - especially given its deteriorating economy and various social ills (Many of which are growing worse).

Andy's recent MPR post: 21:28, July 13, 2025‎ Aschlafly (Talk | contribs | block)‎ . . (92,861 bytes) (-111)‎ . . (removing headline and link with a pro-Putin bias. This site is America First here. Thanks.) (undo)

I trust this clarifies matters. Conservative (talk) 17:11, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

Andy didn't read it. You are not doing Andy any favors persuading him of your bigotry.

You are the only one who seems to care about Russia - and destroying conservative & Trump foreign policy. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 17:14, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

Although I was the first person to post a RT.com link to MPR (Which User: TerryH objected to) thank God I am the one who completely broke the back of hyper Russophilia at Conservapedia and the worship of the divorced "St. Putin" who appears to have sired several children out of wedlock, rarely attends church, robbed countless Russian treasure from the Russian public, killed his political opponents, and who has targeted attacks on civilian areas of Ukraine such as schools, nursing homes, etc.

Putin should focus more on having Russia have parity in terms of houses with indoor toilets with the USA and NATO countries and also shuttting down the gay clubs/bars and saunas in Moscow and St. Petersburg, Russia and he should focus less on Russian imperialism. Where are his priorities? Conservative (talk) 17:34, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

You posted an RT link to MPR? I'd be interested in seeing that. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:04, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

Second question: Why did you all allow TerryH to infect you with racism and anti-American values like censorship? Did you think before posting, or was it just another example of your confirmation bias and inability to qualify sources properly? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:06, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

Question: What is the ratio per capita of Russian gay bathhouses compared to the US, Germany, and the West? Duh, never thought of that, huh?

Does Putin have more power or less power in his country than Western leaders in their countries?

No answer. Ok.

If Putin can shut down his political opponents surely he can shut down the gay clubs/bars/saunas in Moscow and St. Peterburg! As Xi Jinping, the leader of China, who significantly controls the vassal state of Russia would say, "Chop! Chop!". Conservative (talk) 18:26, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

Putin can't shut down his political rivals anymore than the Clinton body count or Biden lawfare can. Quit spewing your racist propaganda.

Question: How many indoor flush toilets do the homeless in the United States have compared to the homeless in Russia?

Incidentally, homelessness is virtually unheard of or impossible in the polar regions of Russia where underground sewage systems don't exist.

You know, I don't have to take an IQ test - these idiot questions you are incapable of answering write themselves. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:35, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

Does the USA have more upward social mobility potential for people or less compared to Russia? Maybe we should ask the 20-30 million people of the Russian diaspora this question or the tons of people flocking to the USA this question. USA! USA! USA!

P.S. Grandiose narcissist with IQ between 80-120 shows that he definitely lacks machismo. Take my Mensa IQ test challenge or I will forever see you as the angry chihuaha of the internet whose sour "Debby downer" user page receives merely 20 page views a month while my positive, upbeat and informative user page receives 2,000 page views a month (See: User pages - page view counts). Conservative (talk) 18:44, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

Now I am going to attempt to explain to you what Intellectual Quotient is, one more time. Intellectual age/Chronological age. A 5-year-old who can do the academic work of 6-year-old has an IQ of 120. A 5-year-old who can do the academic work of an 8-year-old has an IQ of 160. A 10-year-old who can do the academic work of a 12-year-old has an IQ of 120. A 15-year-old who can do the academic work of a 30-year-old, which is impossible primarily because he lacks the life experience and in 99.9% of cases is not a parent, has an IQ of 200.

So, anyone who boasts of an IQ past the age of 15, or thinks or believes IQ has some meaning past the age of 15, is an uninformed, uneducated idiot. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:49, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

Oh, incidentally, I took one of those online "Mensa IQ" tests with all the circles, squares and triangles, and got 20 out of 20. I much prefer written essay and reading comprehension tests, which I know you'd fail. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 18:58, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

I don't believe you. Put up or shut up. Take my Mensa IQ test challenge or forever be seen by me as the angry, grandiose narcissist, chihuaha of the internet! See: Grandiose narcissist with IQ between 80-120 shows that he definitely lacks machismo. Conservative (talk) 19:10, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

screw you, liar.

See, here's where you prove you have neither intellectual sense nor the intelligence of an adult with life experience or spiritual sense; you should have said "I don't believe it", rather than call me a liar by saying "I don't believe you". RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 19:29, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

Russia's and China's war on food. Culinary inquisitions!

• Putin's MOST ABSURD New Law Allows Him to DECLARE WAR on 'Strange food'
• Xi Jinping’s War on Dinner Is Hurting China’s Economy

You will eat the food we want you to eat and you will enjoy it! Conservative (talk) 19:56, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

From one of User:Conservative's favorite anti-Trump hate rags: RFK Jr. Is Taking an Axe to America’s Dietary Guidelines. You vill eat the food we tell you to eat.

The GST & PST tax I paid in Ontario for a chicken fried steak is greater than the sales tax one would pay in Moscow on a taco.

Nice try Ken, but take your bigotry elsewhere. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 20:16, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

Italian and Japanese food is delicious. I am so glad that the USA doesn't put a surcharge on these types of food because they are "unpatriotic" - like Russia does!

No wonder Russia scores lower on innovation that the USA as it actively discourages adventurous food choices and so many other choices as well. No Italian tomato sauce for you comrade - unless you pay the unpatriotic food surcharge! Conservative (talk) 20:25, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

Innovation? Army Touting Grenade Dropping Drone Shows Just How Alarmingly Behind The Curve It Still Is. The U.S. Army asks "Have you ever seen a drone drop a GRENADE?" The answer is yes.

"A U.S. Army video meant to laud the service’s work on fielding small armed drones instead highlights just how much it and the rest of the U.S. military continue to lag behind global trends...."

Thailand and Cambodia are soon to pass up the United States in innovation. You don't seem to understand what innovation is or where it comes from. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 20:33, July 25, 2025 (EDT)

Massie update

• Thune & Johnson blocking Trump recess appointments. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:27, July 26, 2025 (EDT)

More non-encyclopedic edit warring and trolling

[66] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:27, July 29, 2025 (EDT)

Eric Kaufmann is an anti-conservative bigot

yet User:Conservative has misunderstood and misconstrued his writings and spammed them into over 300 mainspaces. [67] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:39, July 29, 2025 (EDT)

Here, for example (Why the fear of Islamization is driving populist right support – and what to do about it), Kaufman is warning against the "danger" of conservative populism, yet User:Conservative misconstrues it as some sort of a scholarly endorsement. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:47, July 29, 2025 (EDT)

Look at the first paragraph in the article:

That's just the Intro, but does that sound like an endorsement of conservative values?

It's been my longstanding observation that User:Conservative pays no attention to context, or even sources, but only seeks out Google search terms he, in his confused way, thinks he can use to attack his personal internet enemies with. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 17:02, July 29, 2025 (EDT)

This sort of confused rhetoric is now spammed into over 300 articles. And that's just one source he failed to qualify or identify properly for Conservapedia readers and students.

Andy, are you seriously going to allow...

this idiot crap on this website, especially in the present international environment? How can anyone take Conservapedia seriously? Or yourself? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 01:28, July 31, 2025 (EDT)