User:Conservative/RW pansie

RationalWiki.org is a politically left leaning website that skews towards atheism/agnosticism in terms of its worldview. RationalWiki has a lost a massive amount of web traffic since its peak in 2019 (see: RationalWiki and web traffic). Six of its more prominent and active moderators and/or Admins/editors are LeftyGreenMario, Techpriest, GrammarCommie, DuceMoosolini, Shabidoo and Andrew5.

RationalWiki Administrator DuceMoosolini indicates that the RationalWiki website "attracts all sorts of weird people"

See also: Atheism and social outcasts and Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence and Atheism and mental illness

RationalWiki (RW) is an atheist/agnostic, wiki website.

As can be seen above, on May 17, 2020, the RationalWiki administrator who goes by the moniker DuceMoosolini, indicated that RationalWiki "attracts all sorts of weird people". The statement was made on their Discord channel (Discord is a chat website). See also: Atheism and social outcasts and Atheism and social skills and Atheism and mental illness

Message to RationalWiki editors: Gentlemen, birds of a feather, flock together!

On January 3, 2022, the RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario says she is frustrated and that she feels that she is a bad person who may have poor judgment

See also: LeftyGreenMario

LeftyGreenMario (LGM) is a lady RationalWiki (RW) administrator.

LeftyGreenMario is not sure if she has bad judgment. She feels as if she is a bad person due to her gossiping about other RationalWikians at the RationalWiki Discord server (see: RationalWiki GossipGate scandal).

She was threatened with impeachment by a former admin of RationalWiki who goes by the username Ace McWicked due to her involvement in the RationalWiki GossipGate scandal (She gossiped about Ace McWicked). She apologized to Ace McWicked to turn things around, but that did not work.

LeftyGreenMario did apologize to user Andrew5 at RationalWiki for gossiping about him, but she relapsed and gossiped about him two days later. She has yet to apologize to Andrew5 for her gossiping relapse.

For further details, please see: RationalWiki GossipGate scandal

Former RationalWiki moderator Ace McWicked accuses LeftGreenMario of being a phony liar

On January 3, the former RationalWiki moderator Ace McWicked wrote:

“

LGM should immediately be removed as a mod. The shit she has been saying about me away from prying eyes completely disqualifies her as a mod on RW. She is not an honest broker in the slightest. I may be a lot of things but I am honest - LGM is a lying scumbag pretending to be an upfront negotiator. I have to find out second hand that she is accusing me of being a drug addict (of all criticism one could make of me 'drug addict' would be the last thing). Yah, I cause drama it seems but what you see is what you get. LGM is a dishonest prick. I have the screenshots if anyone is interested. Acei9 22:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)"

”

On January 4, 2022, Ace McWicked wrote: "I might be abrasive and awful. But I am honest. Time for you to be honest........ can you? LGM. you lie more than I do. Acei9 00:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC)"

RationalWiki administrator Hastur on LeftyGreenMario's temperament

RationalWiki administrator Hastur on LeftyGreenMario's temperament. According to RationalWiki policy, ill-behavior on the RationalWiki Discord Server is not a recallable offense. However, RationalWikians do ignore their policies and act arbitrarily. For example, a RationalWikian was permabanned from the RationalWiki website without a 2/3rds vote which by RationalWkiki's policies is required.

RationalWiki administrator Oxyaena wrote: "it's just that i am probably raging too much most of the time to form coherent sentences."

See also: Atheism and mental illness and Atheism and emotional problems and Atheism and anger

As can be seen above, on 5-24-2020, the RationalWiki administrator Oxyaena wrote: "it's just that i am probably raging too much most of the time to form coherent sentences." The statement was made on their Discord channel (Discord is a chat website).

At RationalWiki, the inmates are running the asylum.

Question: Why is the website called "Rational"Wiki if one of their administrators is probably raging too much to form coherent sentences? There is a lot of irrationality at "RationalWiki". See also: Atheism and irrationality and Atheism and emotional problems and Atheism and anger and Atheism and mental illness

RationalWiki editor Amassivegay wrote: "I am never sure I am even coherent most of the time."

See also: Atheism and incoherency

File:RationalWiki editor Amassivegay - I am never sure I am even coherent most of the time.png

On May 24,2020, which is the day he voted on whether a fellow editor should be permabanned from the website, the RationalWiki editor who goes by the moniker Amassivegay wrote: "I am never sure I am even coherent most of the time."

RationalWiki editor Nutty Roux on RationalWiki's pompous, weirdo culture

"I've never been a fan of RW's culture in general, particularly the painful fact that it has always self-selected a cohort of arrogant, officious weirdos who invariably shit the place up until they lose interest" - RationalWiki editor Nutty Roux, March 24, 2021 See also: Atheism and arrogance and Atheism and culture and Atheism and leadership

RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario and another editor on the website not being a website conducive to mental health on the day of March 25, 2021

Question: Excuse me, doesn't the website name of RationalWiki strongly imply its editors are rational? Perhaps, the name of the website is purely aspirational! As in, "fake it until you make it". See also: Atheism and mental illness

"Courage, confidence and conservatism! The three Cs of life that will never let you down and that are divinely given by the Almighty to Christian conservatives in great abundance!" - Chuck Norris

"Can't everyone just calm down?", RationalWiki editor Unclescrooge asks

See also: Secular leftists and psychogenic illness

"Can't everyone just calm down. It's not like it's the end of the world... yet." - Unclescrooge (talk) 04:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

As much as I hate to say it, the answer is a very emphatic no! Please see: Atheism and emotional/intrapersonal intelligence.

Don't say you weren't warned, RationalWikians!

By the way, Christians believe the end of the world is nigh, but we have nerves of steel and a miraculous amount of mental toughness! See: Atheism and mental toughness and Atheism and cowardice.

It's not too late RationalWikians. The door is always open. Just repent and put an end to your agony and suffering! See: Resources for leaving atheism and becoming a Christian

Sincerely,

User: Conservative, an editor of a wiki that begins with a C (C as in courage, confidence and conservatism! The three Cs of life that will never let you down and that are divinely given by the Almighty to Christian conservatives in great abundance!)

Former RationalWiki RationalWiki Foundation board member and Admin GrammarCommie on cutting himself, feelings of wanting to die and his feelings of low self-worth

See also: Atheism and mental illness and Atheism and human worth and Atheism and suicide and Atheism and depression

GrammarCommie is a former board member of RationalWiki Foundation and admin of RationalWiki who very heavily censored and banned other RationalWiki editors - even by RationalWiki's heavy-handed, censorous standards. He is an intolerant atheist whose politics is left of center. He still actively edits RationalWiki. See: Atheism and intolerance

The RationalWiki administrator who goes by the username CircularReasoning wrote the above about the matter of the Former RationalWiki RationalWiki Foundation board member and Admin GrammarCommie threatening to cut himself on several Rationalwiki user pages and cursing other fellow RationalWiki users.

The RationalWiki admin who goes by the moniker CorruptUser wrote about GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: "GC has this belief that there's a Certain Way you have to make arguments, and seeing anyone deviating from that Certain Way results in him losing control, and he has little ability to regain his composure. During this time he will write vicious screeds, make threats, or engage in blockwars including removal of rights." See also: Atheism and anger and Atheism and forgiveness

An angry atheist speaking to a woman with a Bible in her hand. The Christian philosopher James S. Spiegel says that the path from Christianity to atheism among several of his friends involved moral slippage such as resentment or unforgiveness. See also: Atheism and anger and Atheism and love

"Anyway, the world is so just and peaceful and better and everyone is so happy and I used a nail file to cut myself in the arm again woop dee doo!!!" - GrammarCommie, former admin of RationalWiki, March 25, 2020 See also: Atheism and mental illness and Atheism and human worth and Atheism and suicide and Atheism and depression

Screen capture of GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: "No. I'll wait to be laughed at. Like the loser and freak that I am. I don't which one you are on Discord. And I don't wantt to yell or talk, I want the stupidity to end. I want to die."

RationalWiki admins and editors indicate GrammarCommies public statements on harming himself were inappropriate and were a form of manipulation/emotional blackmail

"As I trust you all know, @GrammarCommie, a once-effective RMF staff member, has recently fallen from grace, randomly cursing out people left, right and center and making threats of self-harm on multiple user talkpages (which have since been deleted), and has started a huge flame-war on his own talkpage as well, which has since rapidly devolved after numerous containment measures by moi failed. After getting a slap on the wrist from @Christopher for edit-warring over a collapse that had proven time and time again to be a lost cause, I was forced to watch helplessly as GC and @DuceMoosolini began exchanging insults and "*#@& you"s, while GC tried shifting the blame onto others many times." - User:CircularReasoning, 21:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

"It is completely unacceptable to employ talk of self-harm and / or suicide as leverage in any interaction with anyone, ever. This is isn't remotely controversial: it's mental health adulting 101, and is specifically addressed in this site's Legal FAQs:

RationalWiki takes all threats of harm to self or others very seriously. Such statements will be removed from the wiki and all relevant information about the editor (including IP address) will be forwarded to appropriate authorities.

There is a entire world of difference between "I feel bad and need help", and "Look at what you've made me do!". The former requires compassion and immediate referral to professionals better equipped to assist; the latter is textbook emotional abuse and manipulation, and should not be tolerated on these pages for a solitary *$#@%ing second." - Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 17:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

"OK, I agree with that. I have removed those two comments and made them invisible in edit history." - Bongolian (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

RationalWikian says that fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of User: Conservative at Conservapedia and that he is acting like an irrational fanatic

As you can see above, a RationalWikian says that fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of User: Conservative at Conservapedia and that he is acting like an irrational fanatic.

It appears as if periodically injecting some truth at RationalWiki is turning RationalWikian GrammarCommie into a quivering bowl of Jello that behaves in a bizarre manner!

RationalWiki admin DuceMoosolini on how he has had suicidal ideation throughout his life

"...I've dealt with suicidal urges for much of my life, and I even got really close to following through with an intentional overdose." - RationalWiki admin DuceMoosolini, June 25, 2021 at 1:14am EST.

Mystery: Why does RationalWiki appear to have so many transexual anarchists? And mental health and transgender individuals

File:Why does RationalWiki have so many transexual anarchists.PNG

As can be seen above, RationalWiki appears to have a LOT of transexual anarchists. Mental health problems are significantly more frequent among transgender individuals.

User Core yak (whose official username is User:CorruptUser), is a RationalWiki Sysop/Admin. User Bongolian is a RationalWiki moderator.

A RationalWiki editor is going to write an essay defending psychopathic behavior

A psychopath is someone with an anti-social personality disorder. A few studies have found that there is a positive correlation of atheism and psychopathy (see: Atheism and psychopathy and Atheism and sociopathy).

Below you will see that a RationalWiki editor is going to write an essay defending psychopathic behavior.

According to the online Oxford Learner's Dictionary, empathy is "the ability to understand another person's feelings, experience, etc."

As can be seen below, the RationalWiki editor who is going to an essay defending psychopathic behavior indicates that he personally avoids/eschews empathy!

Question: Why does RationalWiki wish to have an essay on their website that advocates psychopathic behavior?

File:RationalWiki editor Ironman - I personally eschew empathy.png

1800px

Hey, everyone. I will be leaving RationalWiki for now because I am dealing with heavy mental health issues

See also: Atheism and mental illness

File:Hey everyone. I won't be editing RationalWiki because I am dealing with some heavy mental health issues.JPG

A Rational editor post at the RationalWiki Discord server indicating she will be leaving RationalWiki and the RationalWiki Discord server because she is dealing with some heavy mental health issues. See also: Atheism and mental illness

RationalWiki and web visitor interest in pornography

See also: RationalWiki and web visitor interest in pornography and Atheism and pornography and Atheism and child pornography

RationalWiki tries to portray itself as a thinking person's wiki where the editors carefully analyze various matters.

But SimilarWeb.com data shows a significant portion of RationalWiki's web audience is interested in "adult" material as can be seen by the "adult" audience interests in the above graphic.

Many feminists are against pornography as they assert it exploits women. RationalWiki is a pro-feminism website.

Question: What percentage of RationalWiki's web audience and editors are porn addicts?

For more information, please see: RationalWiki and web visitor interest in pornography

RationalWiki admin Ducemoosilini doesn't react well to being told his work is garbage. Ducemoosilini is told to think straight

See also: RationalWiki admin Ducemoosilini doesn't react well to being told his work is garbage. Ducemoosilini is told to think straight

RationalWiki.org is a politically left leaning website that skews towards atheism/agnosticism in terms of its worldview.

As you can see above, RationalWiki admin Ducemoosilini doesn't react well to being told his work is garbage. Ducemoosilini is told to think straight by his fellow RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario in response.

GossipGate Scandal: According to RationalWiki editors, RationalWiki user Andrew is an officious, obsessive, serial liar, dipshit with bad judgment (who is also a wikiholic)

See also: RationalWiki user Andrew is an obsessive, officious, serial liar with bad judgment (who is also a wikiholic) and GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki

Below is a conversation RationalWiki editors are having at the RationalWiki Discord server about a fellow RationalWikian who is a regular user at RationalWiki. This conversation lead to the Gossipgate scandal at RationalWiki (see: GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki).

As can be seen below, he is called an officious, obsessive, serial liar, dipshit with bad judgment (who is also a wikiholic).

Despite being an officious, obsessive, serial liar with bad judgment according to his fellow RationalWikians (who is also a wikiholic), he has been editing RationalWiki since March 28, 2021. Given his 8+ month tenure at RationalWiki and his many edits, it appears as if he fits in well at RationalWiki!

1500px

1500px

1500px

Merry Christmas RationalWiki editor Andrew and GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki

See also: Merry Christmas RationalWiki editor Andrew and GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki

Research suggests that those who celebrate the Christian meaning of Christmas are on the whole likely to be happier.

File:RationalWiki editor Lucy. Andrew is a dipshit. I think most editors here agree.JPG

As can be seen above, on Christmas Day (December 25, 2021), the RationalWiki Moderator TechPriest who goes by the name of Lucy was not filled with holiday goodwill, charitableness and good cheer. See also: Atheism and Christmas

Specifically, on Christmas Day (December 25, 2021), the RationalWiki editor who goes by the name of Lucy on the RationalWiki Discord server wrote: "Andrew is a dipshit. I think most editors here agree. Problem is that there's nothing as of yet that we can nail him on."

For more information, please see: Merry Christmas RationalWiki editor Andrew

GossipGate Scandal at RationalWiki: On the day after Christmas, RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario tells Andrew that he may join the RationalWiki Discord server "if you must"

See also: GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki

File:RW admin LeafyGreenMario says to Andrew that he can join the RationalWiki Discord channel if he must.JPG

On the day after Christmas, RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario tells Andrew that he may join the RationalWiki Discord server "if you must".

"If you must". That is not a warm invitation to the RationalWiki Discord server to Andrew. I hope Andrew5 realizes that LeftyGreenMario is not filled with holiday goodwill, charity and good cheer. See also: Atheism and Christmas

I hereby decree that all proud atheists at RationalWiki must humbly apologize to Andrew5 on bended knee and promise not to gossip about him anymore. So let it be written. So let it be done!

The question of what to do about Andrew at RationalWiki continues on the day after Christmas. Holiday cheer is still not present at RationalWiki

File:Andrew5 saga continues.JPG

As you can see above, the day after Christmas the question of what to do about Andrew at RationalWiki continues. Holiday cheer is still not present at RationalWiki.

I am going to create a musical and dub it: "The Sound of RationalWiki". Here is the beginnings of the first song: "How do you solve a problem like Andrew? How do you catch a cloud and pin it down? Many a thing you know you'd like to tell him. Many a thing he ought to understand. But how do you tolerate him - even though you want him to desperately leave? And make Andrew listen to all you say. How do you keep a wave upon the sand. Oh, how do you solve a problem like Andrew? How do you hold a moonbeam in your hand?"

GossipGate Scandal: On 12-28-2021 RationalWikians are still gossiping about Andrew

See also: GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki

File:Gossip about Andrew5 on 12-28-2021.JPG

As you can see above, on 12-28-2021, RationalWikians are still gossiping about Andrew.

Question: If Nutty Roux is right and nearly nothing Andrew5 says makes sense, then why is he still editing RationalWiki? Are RationalWikians irrational?

On December 31, 2021, RationalWiki user AceMcWicked complains about RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario as far as her gossiping on the RationalWiki Discord server

On December 31, 2021, RationalWiki user AceMcWicked complains about RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario as far as her gossiping on the RationalWiki Discord server.

Ladies and gentlemen: Birds of a feather, flock together

Scientific proof that birds of a feather flock together. RationalWikians, if your website "attracts all sorts of weird people", then I suggest RationalWikians look in their mirrors!

See also: Atheism and social outcasts and Atheism and social skills and Atheism and mental illness

New atheist Sam Harris on the label of "atheist"

The new atheist Sam Harris said concerning the label of atheist, "It's right next to child molester as a designation."(see also: Distrust of atheists) See also: Views on atheists

Scientific proof that atheists are mutant weirdos

See also: Atheists and genetic mutations

• Defending Atheist Mutational Load Theory: Part 1 by Dr. Edward Dutton and Professor Guy Madison
• Defending Atheist Mutational Load Theory - Part 2 by Dr. Edward Dutton and Professor Guy Madison

Of Mice and Men

Theodore Beale wrote: "This would also put Bruce Charlton's Mouse Utopia observations into context, as atheism appears to be one aspect of the nihilistic despair that is a consequence of the increased prevalence of genetic inferiority that results from easier circumstances."

Gentlemen, full exoneration. Just like I expected!

Gentlemen, by admitting that RationalWiki is infested with weirdos, I hope you all realize this fully exhonerates me! Full exoneration, gentlemen! Full exoneration!

Of course, being familiar with the story Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, which also had a bizarre trial, I knew the "Chicken coop" trial would wind up showing the true nature of its participants which it most certainly did in spades.

And the icing on the cake, was your website changing its community guidelines so they are more capricious and authoritarian. Total victory, gentlemen! Thank you so much for unconditionally surrendering!

You can't win, gentlemen. Attempt to strike me down, and as always, I become more powerful than you can possibly imagine! Olé! Olé! Olé!

First atheist controlled, mainland China was shown to cause the coronavirus pandemic. And now this! 2020 is the worst year in the history of atheism gentlemen, just like I predicted! See also: Atheism and the Wuhan coronavirus epidemic

And one thing that cannot be denied. RationalWiki is bleeding web traffic like a sieve. RationalWikians have been tried in the world's court of public opinion and have been found guilty. So very guilty! Guilty of being pansie weirdos!

Administrator of RationalWiki calls its editors "pearl clutching pansies"

On May 23, 2020, an administrator of the atheist/agnostic website RationalWiki who goes by the moniker Ace McWicked, admitted that its editors are a "bunch of pearl clutching pansies".

The above graphic is from Examining Atheism which featured a screen capture and link to Ace McWicked's wiki post at the website RationalWiki. See also: Atheism and mental toughness and Atheism and cowardice

On May 23, 2020, an administrator of RationalWiki who goes by the moniker Ace McWicked, admitted that its editors are a "bunch of pearl clutching pansies".

The comment was made on its moderation page.

Should this embarrassing revelation be called "PansieGate"? See also: Atheism and mental toughness and Atheism and cowardice

After losing a series of debate exchanges with one of the editors of the User: Conservative account at Conservapedia, RationalWiki administrators block him from their website and then cede the moral high ground

After losing a series of debate exchanges with one of the editors of the User: Conservative account at RationalWiki, RationalWiki administrators block him from their website and then cede the moral high ground. Administrator Brx basically admits that blocking him was cowardly. LeftyGreenMario then essentially acknowledges that RationalWiki does not have the moral high ground and cedes moral high ground to administrator User: Conservative at Conservapedia. See also: Atheism debates and Atheism and cowardice

Gentlemen, as much as I hate to do it, once more I am afraid I am going to have to declare victory. And remember, its not due to my debating prowess that I easily and effortlessly defeat secular leftists in debate, it's due to the utter weakness of their ideology. Olé! Olé! Olé!

RationalWiki administrator admits its website is becoming an echo chamber of its most prominent administrator

On May 23, 2020, a RationalWiki (RW) administrator who goes by the moniker Ace McWicked essentially admits that RationalWiki is becoming an echo chamber of its most prominent administrator.

In the above quote, LGM is an acronym for the lady, RationalWiki administrator LeftyGreenMario. See: Atheism and groupthink

Christianity's margin of victory over atheism

See also: Christianity and its margin of victory over atheism and Rebuttals to atheist arguments and Atheism vs. Christianity debates and Atheism debates

Jesus Christ said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me." - Matthew 28:18-19 (ESV)

The Oxford University Professor Daniel Came wrote to the new atheist and evolutionist Richard Dawkins:: "The absence of a debate with the foremost apologist for Christian theism is a glaring omission on your CV and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part." See: Atheism and cowardice

Spuriousness of atheism

• Rebuttals to atheist arguments

• Atheism and evidence

• Atheism statistics

• 10 problems for atheists

Napoleon Bonaparte quote

Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake - especially if he is weird pansie changing the guidelines to his website. Olé! Olé! Olé! - Napoleon Bonaparte

Sun Tzu quote

"So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong and to strike at what is weak. If your enemy has many weaknesses, then create a lot of articles with the word "and" in them. I can't believe how many "Atheism and...." articles that Conservapedia has! Atheists are such weird pansies.” - Sun Tzu.

See also: Conservapedia atheism articles with the word "and" in them

Douglas MacArthur quote

"The history of war proves that nine out of ten times an army has been destroyed because it has had a weird, pansie infestation.” - General Douglas MacArthur

George S. Patton quote

"The object of war is not to die for your country but to make weird, pansies die for theirs. Olé! Olé! Olé!" - George S. Patton

Dwight D. Eisenhower quote

“Don't join the book burners. Don't think you're going to conceal faults by concealing evidence that they ever existed. If your website has a weird, pansie infestation then man up and admit to it.” ― Dwight D. Eisenhower

GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki. RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario called on the carpet for her repeated gossiping at the RationalWiki Discord server.

See also: GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki

"We do not allow gossip, just as a real encyclopedia avoids it." - Andrew Schlafly, Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia

The GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki was a major 2021 political scandal at RationalWiki involving some RationalWiki editors and the RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario. The scandal stemmed from the gossiping about RationalWiki editors Andrew5 and AceMcWicked at the RationalWiki Discord server. Below are some screen captures which document the GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki.

LeftyGreenMario tried to cover up her gossiping by indicating what she said "came off" as gossiping rather than admit she was gossiping. Her lack of repentance caused her to continue gossiping about Andrew5 two days after apologizing to Andrew5 for saying things that "came off" as gossiping. To this day, LeftyGreenMario still hasn't told Andrew that she relapsed as far as far as gossiping about him. On 12-26-2021, LeftyGreenMario told Andrew she was sorry about "coming off as" gossiping about him. But on 12-28-2021, she once again started gossiping about him.

In November of 2021, citizen reporter User:Conservative (editor 1) broke the Gossipgate scandal to RationalWiki editors who are not active on the RationalWiki Discord server.

On December 31, 2021, RationalWiki AceMcWicked complained about the gossiping on the RationalWiki Discord server which caused some dissension at RationalWiki.

On January 3, 2022, the RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario said she was frustrated and that she feels that she is a bad person who may have poor judgment.

On January 3, 2022, RationalWiki editor Ace McWicked calls the impeachment of RationalWiki Admin Leftygreen Mario for repeated gossiping.

On January 4, 20222, a coverup of the GossipGate scandal occurred.

For more information, please see:

• GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki

• RationalWiki user Andrew is an obsessive, officious, serial liar with bad judgment (who is also a wikiholic)

• Essay: Merry Christmas RationalWiki editor Andrew

• I love Lucy at RationalWiki - even though she is very, very mean

GossipGate: RationalWiki user Ace McWicked calls for the impeachment of RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario (LGM)!

See also: GossipGate. RationalWiki user Ace McWicked calls for the impeachment of RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario!

File:A January 3, 2022 call for LeafyGreenMario's impeachment.JPG

2000px

For additional dialogue related to the call for LeftyGreenMario's impeachment, please see:

• GossipGate. RationalWiki user Ace McWicked calls for the impeachment of RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario!

On January 3, 2021, RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario was gossiping about RationalWikian Ace McWicked again

File:On January 3, 2021, RationalWiki admin LeafyGreenMario was gossiping about RationalWikian Ace McWicked again.JPG

On January 3, 2021, RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario was gossiping about RationalWikian Ace McWicked again

On January 3, 2022, at the RationalWiki Discord server, RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMaria admits her guilt as far as the RationalWiki GossipGate scandal. Yet, she still has not resigned her adminship

File:LGM admits her guilt at RationalWiki Discord server.JPG

On January 3, 2022, at the RationalWiki Discord server, RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMaria admits her guilt as far as the RationalWiki GossipGate scandal. She has yet to resign.

Coverup of the GossipGate scandal by RationalWiki

See also: Coverup of the GossipGate scandal by RationalWiki

On January 4, 2022, RationalWiki attempted a coverup of the GossipGate scandal.

Because RationalWiki has crooked admins who gossip about other users at the RationalWiki Discord server behind their backs, complaints of a lack of transparency are occurring.

For more information, please see: Coverup of the GossipGate scandal by RationalWiki

RationalWiki, militant secular leftism, LeftyGreenMario and gossipy, short woman's syndrome

See also: RationalWiki, militant secular leftism, LeftyGreenMario and gossipy, short woman's syndrome and Militant atheism and short man's syndrome

Is militant atheism positively correlated with shortness? Is short man's syndrome a causal factor for militant atheism? How tall is the New Atheist leader PZ Myers? He doesn't look too tall here!

Questions:

1. Does science and history prove that godly, short men are assertive and loving? Was the Apostle Paul short? The Jews at the time of Paul put importance on names. The name Paul derives from the Roman family name Paulus or Paullus, from the Latin adjective meaning "small" or "humble".

2. Does science and history prove that short, atheist men are aggressive? Is militant atheism positively correlated with shortness?

3. Is short man's syndrome a causal factor for militant atheism? How tall is New Atheist leader PZ Myers? He doesn't look too tall in the picture to the right!

In 2008, The Telegragh reported concerning short men:

“

It is said they are prone to bouts of aggression, showing off and keeping a close eye on their wives or girlfriends at parties. Vertically challenged men may argue that the notion of a "short man syndrome" is an unfair, inaccurate stereotype. However, scientists have now proved small men do make more jealous husbands and lovers than their taller, more relaxed counterparts.

”

4. If you look at the history of militant atheism, you will see a high proportion of militant, atheist short men (see: Prominent, militant atheists and short men).

5. If you look at a picture of LeftyGreenMario at the Deviat Art website published on July 11, 2013, you will see that she was short as can be seen HERE.

Key point: I, User: Conservative, hereby declare that a key reason why RationalWiki has become a militant, secular leftist leaning website is because there is a very strong possibility that it is being lead by a short, militant atheist, gossipy woman who largely rules over effete, liberal/leftist leaning men (barring a major growth spurt by LeftGreenMario). See also: GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki

The mean girls who rule over the male, weirdo, pansies at RationalWiki

See also: The mean girls who rule over the male, weirdo, pansies at RationalWiki

• Mean girls don't remember what they said
• Well, it's funny 'cause I can't seem to forget
• Their whispers opened up the door
• To a world called insecure
• No, mean girls don't remember what they said
• Stick and stones may break my bones
• But no one ever warned me about words
• I smile and I pretend it doesn't hurt
• But the older that I get it just gets worse
• Lord, find me and remind me that my worth
• Is worth so much more than their words

- Lyrics to Mean Girls by Leanna Crawford

Studies indicate that women in the Western World tend to be more religious than men.

Women are less likely to be atheists according to surveys performed around the world and other data.

In 2016, Atheist Alliance International (AAI) conducted an annually reoccurring atheist census project and found concerning atheism and women: "At the time of writing, the Atheist Census Project recorded that on average worldwide 73.2% of respondents were male. The result is consistent with other research... As such, the focus of many scholarly papers has been on seeking to explain this persistent observation."

As you will see by clicking the link below, despite women being the minority at RationalWiki, they rule a roost of male, weirdo pansies at RantionalWiki due to their sheer meaness!

• The mean girls who rule over the male, weirdo, pansies at RationalWiki

Trent Toulouse, one of the founders of the website RationalWiki, is obese

See also: Atheism and obesity

Trent Toulouse is one of the founders of the atheist/agnostic/skeptic website RationalWiki. He is also one of the board of trustees of the RationalMedia Foundation.

A picture of an obese Trent Toulouse can be found HERE.

The RationalWiki website has a significant amount of content criticizing alternative medicine. Its alternative medicine article describes alternative medicine thusly: "Alternative medicine is any medical treatment that is not part of conventional evidence-based medicine, such as one would learn in medical school, nursing school or even paramedic training." Evidence-based medicine strongly indicates that obesity poses significant health risks.

Two of the major risk factors for becoming obese according to the Mayo Clinic are poor dietary choices and inactivity. According to the Gallup Inc., "Very religious Americans are more likely to practice healthy behaviors than those who are moderately religious or nonreligious."

Obesity is positively associated with impulsiveness, lower self-discipline and neuroticism.

Gentlemen, I hope you are deeply embarrassed by your kangaroo court. Shame, gentlemen! Shame!

A RationalWiki editor whose username is Christopher wrote at RationalWiki: "Technically...[User: Conservative at Conservapedia].. "shouldn’t have been banned, the vote to ban him was one short of the 2/3 majority that’s needed according to site policy."

In short, RationalWiki broke its own rules when they permabaned me. According to RationalWiki rules, a permaban requires a 66% majority. RationalWiki permabanned me without such a majority.

Of course, this proves once again that atheism/agnosticism provide no foundation in terms of having a civilized society and that atheists/agnostics are often hypocrites (see: Atheism and its anti-civilizational effects and Atheism and culture and Atheism and human rights and Atheism and human rights violations).

And much to the chagrin of RationalWikians who wished to "permaban" me, I can edit RationalWiki whenever I want through creating new accounts. In fact, I have edited RationalWiki by creating new accounts. And when I want my accounts to be detected they are detected. And when I want my accounts to be undetected they are undetected. As a person who is merely moderately to the political right and slightly libertarian according to the Political Compass Test, it is very easy for my new RationalWiki accounts to be undetected if I wish them to be.

And gentlemen, always remember that in your Chicken Coop kangaroo court, I was not judged by a jury of my peers.

One of the administrators of your website who voted in your so-called "trial", namely Oxyaena, admits he is "probably raging too much most of the time to form coherent sentences".

On May 24,2020, which is the day he voted on whether a fellow editor (namely me) should be permabanned from the website, the RationalWiki editor who goes by the moniker Amassivegay wrote: "I am never sure I am even coherent most of the time."

Gentlemen, you had madmen on the jury! Sad!

The cherry atop of the glorious sundae of total victory over RationalWiki

A quote from an administrator of RationalWiki: "So that would mean that...[User:GiuocoPiano]... gets permabanned by a narrow margin. Spud (talk) 13:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)".

A narrow margin?

Once again, a godless "community" is divided. See also: Atheist factions and Decline of the atheist movement

"If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. If sovereign and subject are in accord, put division between them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected. The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting." - Sun Tzu

Question: Is there any type of individuals more temperamental and arrogant than atheists? See: Atheism and emotional problems and Atheism and negative emotions/thoughts and Atheism and anger and Atheism and arrogance

Gentlemen, I did not even seek to sow division within your "community", yet that is exactly what happened! Why do you continually engage in self-defeating behaviors, gentlemen? Once again, I subdued you without fighting.

“And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand.” - Jesus (Matthew, 12:25)

See also: Atheism: A house divided and in global decline

Hong Kong Christians at Gateway Camp. In 2005, there were four times as many non-Western World Christians as there were Western World Christians. See: Global Christianity

Sour and tyrannical Chinese mainland atheist leaders are trying to suppress these ladies, but they cannot quench their Christian joy.

See also: China and atheism and Atheism and human rights violations and Christian joy, atheist despair and the good news of Christianity

Theme song of RationalWiki old guard editors

When RationalWiki began it was secular, liberal, modernist in terms of its ideological bent. At the present time, RationalWiki has become secular leftists/SJW/"woke" as far as its ideological bent (see: SJW atheists). The fad of Western, secular, leftism that is offended (SJW/woke), is bound to have a shelf life, just like the ideological leanings of the former editor base had a shelf life.

Below is the theme song of RationalWiki, old guard editors:

"Once upon a time there was a wiki. A wiki where we promoted liberal modernism. Remember how we laughed away the hours and think of all the great things we thought we would do. Those were the days of liberal modernism my friend. We thought they'd never end. We'd sing and dance forever and a day. We'd live the life we choose. We'd fight and never lose. For we were young and sure to have our way. La la la la la la La la la la la la. La la la la La la la la la la. Then the busy years went rushing by us. We lost our starry notions on the way. Oh my friend we're older but no wiser. For in our hearts the dreams are still the same." (Paraphrase of the song Those Were The Days by Mary Hopkin)

A RationalWiki admin fails to hide that RationalWiki has another Chicken Coop in its kangaroo court

A RationalWiki admin fails to hide that RationalWiki has another Chicken Coop in its kangaroo court.

RationalWikians are a socially challenged, mentally unstable, contentious lot! Once again, Conservapedia is proven right! See also: Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence

Google searches for the term "RationalWiki" from 2007 to April of 2021. The number of searches for the term "RationalWiki" at Google is much lower than its peak in November of 2014

See also: Google trends - Atheism and agnosticism terms

File:RationalWiki searches - Google trends 2007 to April 2021.PNG

Google Trends reports the number of Google searches per month for a given search term.

Above the Google Trends graph for the search term "RationalWiki" and as you can see the number of searches for the term RationWiki at Google is much lower than its peak in November of 2014.

Why have 1,300+ websites delinked from RationalWiki.org from May of 2021 to July 15, 2021? Why does RationalWiki.org currently have a high negative link velocity?

Semrush offers solutions for SEO, PPC, content, social media and competitive research. Semrush is trusted by over 7,000,000 marketers worldwide.

In May of 2021, there were 22,394 domains linking to RationalWiki.org according to Semrush.

On July 15, 2021, there were 21,090 domains linking to RationalWiki.org according to Semrush.

From May of 2021 to July 15, 2021, RationalWiki lost 1,304 domains linking to it.

That's about a loss of 1,300+ websites linking to RationalWiki.org in a few months.

Two of the leading website marketing analytics websites indicate that the link velocity rate of RationalWiki is negative, not positive (SEMRush and Link Research Tools).

Why are so many websites delinking from RationalWiki?

According to Link Research Tools: "A very negative link velocity trend (LVT) means that the web has lost interest in the page or domain."

SimilarWeb.com indicates RationalWiki lost traffic in 2021 and that it is currently losing web traffic.

Semrush offers solutions for SEO, PPC, content, social media and competitive research. Semrush is trusted by over 7,000,000 marketers worldwide.

In May of 2021, there were 22,394 domains linking to RationalWiki.org according to Semrush.

On July 15, 2021, there were 21,090 domains linking to RationalWiki.org according to Semrush.

From May of 2021 to June 15, 2021, RationalWiki lost 1,304 domains linking to it.

RationalWiki.org has a negative link velocity. When a website loses interest with the online public, it often has a negative link velocity.

A website that has the interest and trust of the public has a steady link growth.

According to Link Research Tools: "A very negative link velocity trend (LVT) means that the web has lost interest in the page or domain."

On July 17, 2021, according to Link Research Tools, RationalWiki.org had a -35% negative link velocity trend which is a very steep loss of domains linking to the website.

Every time a webmaster delinks from the atheist/agnostic website RationalWiki an angel gets his wings! Over 1,300 angels have gotten their wings thanks to RationalWikians!

The percentage of the world that are atheists is currently shrinking while the percentage of the world while religious fundamentalism is increasing and this is a longstanding trend that is expected to continue (see: Global atheism statistics and Desecularization and Growth of religious fundamentalism).

The skeptic Michael Shermer wrote: "At the beginning of the twentieth century social scientists predicted that belief in God would decrease by the end of the century because of the secularization of society. In fact… the opposite has occurred… Not only is God not dead, as Nietzsche proclaimed, but he has never been more alive." See also: Secularization thesis

As Frank Capra's classic movie It's a Wonderful Life so famously said, "Look daddy, my Christian academy teacher says, every time a webmaster delinks from the atheist website RationalWiki an angel gets his wings." (very liberally paraphased!)

Thanks to the inane, boring and uninspiring content that RationalWiki users have created, over 1,300 angels have gotten their wings! See also: Atheism and foolishness and Atheism and inspiration and Hopelessness of atheism

As you can see by the descending angels above, angels love wings - especially chicken wings!

Google has weighed RationalWiki in the balance and found it wanting. RationalWiki now gets far less Google referral traffic

The Google search engine has a number of quality indicators in terms of how it ranks websites for various words/phrases.

As you can see in the above graph, Google has downgraded its estimation of RationalWiki in terms of the quality of its website and RationalWiki is getting less Google traffic (Please click the graphic above to enlarge it).

I have referred to Google as being "Miss G". The romance of Miss G and RationalWiki.org is over! As the blues artist B.B. King sang, "The thrill is gone! It's gone away for good. All the thrill is gone. Baby, it's gone away for good."

RationalWikians, as you can see above, RationalWiki lost a massive amount of Google referral traffic in 2019/2020 (Please click graphic above to enlarge it).

Question: If RationalWikians are so smart and rational, then haven't they recovered the massive amount of Google referral traffic they lost in 2019/2020?

On behalf of all Christendom, I laugh at the so-called "super atheist intellects"? See also: Atheism and intelligence

RationalWiki's global market share of web traffic saw a big drop in 2021 according to Alexa

See also: RationalWiki and web traffic and RationalWiki and Alexa rankings

As you can see above, RationalWiki's global market share of web traffic saw a big drop from May 1, 2021 to August 1, 2021 according to the web traffic traffic company Alexa.

On August 1, RationalWiki was the 65,101th most popular website on the internet. 90 days previously it was the 46,125th most popular website in the world according to Alexa.

As you can see above, RationalWiki's global market share of web traffic saw a big drop during the period of July of 2021 to October of 2021 according to the web traffic traffic company Alexa.

The pace in the drop in global ranking according to Alexa was more pronounced in this 90 day period than during the May 1, 2021 to August 1, 2021 90 day period.

October 23, 2021: The day the atheism movement roadkill was scraped off the information superhighway and put in a grave

See also: October 23, 2021: The day the atheism movement roadkill was scraped off the information superhighway and put in a grave

On October 23, 2021, RationalWiki fell below the top 100,000 most popular websites on the worldwide web according to web traffic tracking company Alexa. Specifically, on October 23, 2021, RationalWiki was ranked the 100,814th most popular website in the world.

On October 23, 2021, RationalWiki's website indicates: "Also since 2013, RW's Alexa rank (a measure accurate only in a broad sense) has hovered between 15,000th and 25,000th most popular website on the entire Internet...". One again, atheists engage in deceit! See: Atheism and deception

However, on October 23, 2021, RationalWiki did correctly point out that RationalWiki was more popular than skeptic websites such as Freethought Blogs and Skeptoid which currently rank the 111,152th and 468,630th most popular websites in the world by Alexa.

October 23, 2021 is the day that the atheist movement was buried on the information superhighway. See also: Decline of internet atheism and Decline of the atheist movement and Decline of the secular left

Morale is down at RationalWiki

See also: Morale is down at RationalWiki

On November 26, 2021, the web traffic tracking company Alexa ranked RationalWiki the 110,759th most popular website in the world. As can be seen above, in 2021 RationalWiki experienced a dramatic fall in terms of its global popularity.

Also, let it be known that 2021 is the WORST year in the history of atheism.

For more information, please see: Morale is down at RationalWiki

Is RationalWiki lying about its web traffic statistics in a very big way? Screenshot taken on 11-8-2021

File:Is RationalWiki lying about its web traffic statistics in a very big way? - screenshot 11-2021.JPG

Question: Is RationalWiki lying about its web traffic statistics in a very big way? The screenshot was taken on 11-8-2021. On 11-8-2021, RationalWiki's was the 97,739th most popular website in the world and its Alexa rank was dropping.

Please note: RationalWiki claims on 11-8-2021: "Also since 2013, RW's Alexa rank (a measure accurate only in a broad sense) has hovered between 15,000th and 25,000th most popular website on the entire Internet..." That is not true, RationalWikians! Not true by a longshot!

Question: If RationalWikians are lying about their web traffic, what else are they lying about?

RationalWiki's global competitors for web traffic are running faster and faster

RationalWiki's global competitors for web traffic are running faster and faster.

RationalWikians are finding it harder and harder to keep up the pace in terms of competing with other websites for web traffic.

Faster and faster and faster

Web marketing is often a relative strength game. Just because a website is gaining content or links does not mean that its competitors are not moving faster. Remember the cheetah and gazelle. Unless the gazelle runs faster than the cheetah, he will eventually lose.

Similarweb.com: In terms of web traffic, RationalWiki's global and United States website ranking was dropping in July of 2021

See also: RationalWiki and web traffic

As can be seen above, in terms of web traffic, RationalWiki's global and United States ranking was dropping in July of 2021 according to Similarweb.com.

Morale is really, really, really down at RationalWiki

See also: Morale is really, really down at RationalWiki

LeftyGreenMario became a RationalWiki moderator in January of 2018. She is also a RationalWiki Foundation trustee.

According to Webopedia: "A moderator is a user who presides over an online forum discussion. In these forums, moderators are tasked with enforcing community guidelines and have the authority to block messages that are deemed inappropriate. Moderators are responsible for keeping users on topic and keep the group or discussion thread free of personal insults and derogatory comments. Without moderators, most online discussion spaces would be flooded with spam and/or bots."

LeftyGreenMario is a feminist, self-described asexual, atheist, evolutionist, proponent of abortion, environmentalist and a video game enthusiast. LeftyGreenMario is a student of Herbert Marcuse's partisan tolerance, and almost singlehandedly destroyed what little bit of balance and tolerance of diverse viewpoints existed in the Rationalwiki community since its founding in 2007. Her asexual outlook on life has been transformed into feelings of hostility and meanspiritedness toward other human beings. As a Trustee of the RationalMedia Foundation, LeftyGreenMario has led the project down the road of leftist intolerance. Many longtime contributors have abandoned the project since her rise as a central figure.

Google has a number of quality indicators by which is rates a website. According to SEMRush, RationalWiki had 1.49 million monthly referral visits from Google in January of 2018 (which is when LeafyGreenMario became a RationalWiki moderator). According to SEMRush, RationalWiki's peak Google referral traffic was 3.5 million visits per month in August 2019. In June of 2020, according to SEMRush, RationalWiki had 464,000 monthly referrals from Google. In January of 2022, according to SEMRUsh, RationalWiki had 185,661 monthly referrals from Google. RationalWiki has lost a massive amount of web traffic since its peak in August of 2019.

As Rationaliki's editor base and traffic shrinks, the hyena-like vandals and spam bots have started to bite the corpse of RationalWiki as a higher percentage of its edits

See also: Morale is down at RationalWiki

As Rationaliki's editor base and traffic shrinks, I have noticed that the hyena-like vandals and spam bots have started to bite the corpse of RationalWiki as a higher percentage of its edits.

Hyena-like vandals will inhabit RationalWiki's Saloon Bar. Jackal-like vandals will devour RationalWiki's mainspace articles. Spambots will plague RationalWiki's talk pages.

RationalWiki's time is at hand, and her days are numbered.

RationalWikians, I discovered why your website lost a ton of web traffic in 2019

See: RationalWikians, I discovered why your website lost a ton of web traffic in 2019

RationalWiki is like the Babylon Bee of atheism - except the Babylon Bee is trying to be humorous

File:RationalWiki is like the Babylon Bee of atheism - except the Babylon Bee is trying to be humorous.PNG

On 4-16-2021, after the Freedom From Atheism Foundation (FFAF) posted Conservapedia's essay Everytime a webmaster delinks from the atheist website RationalWiki an angel gets his wings on their Facebook page, a supporter of the FFAF commented: "Rational Wiki is like the Babylon Bee of atheism - except the Bee is trying to be humorous."

Humorless RationalWikians launch a nasty article on the Babylon Bee on May 1, 2021 after a Freedom From Atheism Foundation supporter called their website the unintentional "Babylon Bee of atheism"

The Babylon Bee is a Evangelical Christian satirical internet news site. It models itself after the secular satire news publication The Onion with devastating humorous memes that mostly make liberals, leftists and atheists the butt of the joke, not exclusively. Many stories focus on satire involving well-known Christian personalities as well as other conservatives, along with articles satirizing current Christian trends.

Humorless RationalWikians launch a nasty article on the Babylon Bee on May 1, 2021 after a Freedom From Atheism Foundation supporter called their website the unintentional "Babylon Bee of atheism". Atheists are often humorless when they are being mocked in a humorous way (see: Atheism and humor and Atheism and intolerance).

Gentlemen, I saw that the RationalWiki website lost a huge amount of web traffic in the latter part of 2019 and throughout most of the first half of 2020 and it brought a smile to my face. I see all gentlemen. There is no escaping my watchful eyes

Gentlemen, I noticed that the RationalWiki website lost a huge amount of web traffic in the latter part of 2019 and throughout most the first half of 2020. Don't think I didn't notice. I did. I see all, gentlemen. There is no escaping my watchful eyes.

I saw your big failure and smiled. Gentlemen, I laugh at your "superior atheist intellects".

RationalWiki vs. Biblegateway.com and the internet evangelism organization Global media outreach. Once again, Christendom is triumphant!

RationalWikians the flow of web traffic to RationalWiki is a shadow of its former self and RationalWiki's web traffic began a precipitous decline since November 2019. Biblegateway.com continues to grow in web traffic at a brisk pace and this is an 8-year long trend as of October 2021! According to Similarweb.com, Biblegateway.com received 78.74 million visits between October 2021 and the previous 6 months. The Christian internet evangelism organization Global Media Outreach indicates that as of September 2019 over 1,900,000,000 "gospel visits" have occurred via their websites. Game over RationalWikians. Do not pass go. Do not collect $200.

RationalWiki has been weighed in the balance and it was found wanting.

Babylon was once a great city. Until God destroyed it.

Abandon all hope RationalWikians. Your end is nigh!

David slew Goliath with a stone from his sling and then beheaded Goliath with a sword.

Christian websites are beheading internet atheism by increasing their global market share with great alacrity!

The article Internet atheism: The thrill is gone! points out that internet atheism has been in a significant slump since 2011.

Gotquestions.org vs. RationalWiki

The Christian answer website Gotquestions.org is the 9,338th most popular website in the world according to Alexa.

Much to the dismay of militant atheists, Gotquestions.org continues its rapid, upward ascent in terms of its Alexa ranking as RationalWiki's Alexa ranking continues to fall like a rock. On behalf of all Christians who use the internet, I declare victory!

RationalWiki admin Spud proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that he does not deeply believe in gender equality by using a word many American feminists consider sexist

Liberaltears (LT) is a user/editor at Conservapedia who is a male.

On June 22, 2021 at 6:23am the RationalWiki admin Spud wrote: "What does bother me, however, is that we now have a sysop who keeps going on about fu**ing LT and keeps trying to make out that LT is somehow better than the other c-nts on Conservapedia. He isn't. If he was, he wouldn't edit it. Spud (talk) 06:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)"

Last time I checked, calling males "c-nts" is an example of sexism/misogny according to many feminists in the United States.

Late in Charles Darwin's life, Darwin told the Duke of Argyll that he frequently had overwhelming thoughts that the natural world was the result of design.

In a letter to Asa Gray, Darwin confided: "...I am quite conscious that my speculations run quite beyond the bounds of true science." See also: 15 questions for evolutionists

Jo Livingstone wrote in The New Republic in her article What’s So Bad About the C-Word?:

“

Various media outlets have covered the scandal of Samantha Bee calling Ivanka Trump a “feckless c-nt” for posting a picture of herself cradling her child while her father’s immigration policies separate migrant children from their families. While a few journalists and other comedians have defended Bee’s use of the word, she apologized for “crossing a line” with what many have called a “slur.” To clarify, “cunt” is not a slur but a vulgar insult. Although it is associated with misogyny, it is nothing like the n-word... In the United States though, “c-nt” lands in conversations with a plosive consonant and a long, long silence... In the United Kingdom, “c-nt” isn’t so associated with misogyny; in the United States, the word is a nasty gendered insult, for no secret etymological reason (see: John McCain allegedly calling his wife Cindy a c-nt).

”

Now to be fair, Spud is from the United Kingdom and he is not an American. On the other hand, he does edit a social justice warrior (SJW) website so why is he offending American feminists by using a word associated with misogny in their country? Shame! On behalf of slightly to the political right, Christians, I declare victory! I am so high on the moral high ground that when I look down on Spud, he is a mere speck!

This proves once again that SJW/liberals/leftist don't deeply believe the ideologies they spout.

By the way, using profanity like the words "fu**ing and "c-nts" is very common for atheists (See: Atheism and profanity). It is commonly thought that some individuals who commonly use profanity have limited vocabularies and imaginations.

Charles Darwin, a male supremacist, wrote in his work The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex:

“

... a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can women—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive of both composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison. We may also infer, from the law of the deviation from averages, so well illustrated by Mr. Galton, in his work on “Hereditary Genius” that ... the average of mental power in man must be above that of women.

”

Spud is a chip of his ideological father's block!

RationalWiki/RationalMedia Foundation board of trustees and the lack of Black representation

Christianity is experiencing explosive growth in Africa. See: Religion and Africa

See also: RationalMedia Foundation board of trustees and the lack of Black representation

The User: Conservative account, which is a Conservapedia admin account, started making edits on February 22, 2007.

The User: Conservative account is made up of two users at this time, but a third user will be joining later this year. All users of the User: Conservative account are Christians.

One user is white and the other user is a person of color. The upcoming third user is a Latino-American. The upcoming third user will be the second Latino admin of Conservapedia (The first one was User:Joaquín Martínez).

Many atheist organizations/foundations lack sufficient Blacks on their boards of directors to be truly racially diverse organizations (see: Atheism and diversity and Atheism and leadership).

The RationalWiki Foundation (RWF), rename to the RationalMedia Foundation (RMF) pending, owns and operates the RationalWiki.org website.

In 2021, RationalWiki did not have a single Black candidate running to be on the board of trustees for the RationalWiki/RationalMedia Foundation. The United States elected Barack Obama to be the president of the United twice. It's 2021 RationalWikians! Get with the progressive program! To Conservapedians knowledge, the RationalWiki Foundation has never had a Black editor on the RWF's board of trustees.

RationalWikians, the RationalWiki Foundation (which lacks sufficient racial diversity on its board of trustees) is failing you. Will RationalWikians ask a Black pastor to be a member of the RationalWiki/RationalMedia board of trustees? Don't RationalWikians want to have truly diverse leadership?

By the way, deny that Christianity is experiencing explosive growth in Africa and lose all credibility! See: Religion and Africa

RationalWiki Foundation/RationalMedia Foundation utterly failed the progressive equity litmus test (How they treat Blacks)

See: RationalMedia Foundation/RW Foundation utterly failed the progressive equity litmus test (How they treat Blacks)

RationalWiki is publicly mocked for its fringe view that Jesus Christ is not a historical figure

See also: Essay: RationalWiki is publicly mocked for its fringe view that Jesus Christ is not a historical figure and Historicity of Jesus Christ

800px

Rationaliki admin LeftyGreenMario asks the question: "How did it take so long for people to realize the bulk of the article was written by a discredited academic?"

On December 7, 2021, Rationaliki admin LeftyGreenMario wrote: "It's an old article, and it has Carrier all over it for literally years. How did it take so long for people to realize the bulk of the article was written by a discredited academic?"

RationalWiki and The Great Soviet Encyclopedia: What they have in common

The Soviet Union was an oppressive, communist regime which had state atheism.

The only encyclopedia in world history to deny the historicity of Jesus Christ was The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (Moscow, 1952). Does RationalWiki want to be associated with an authoritarian regime known for its propaganda?

The Christian Courier indicates: "In our own time, The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (Moscow, 1952), in a two-line entry under “Jesus,” states; “the name of the mythological founder of Christianity.” One scholar notes that this reveals more about the authors’ bias than their historical judgment (Metzger, 1965, 78)."

RationalWiki's "Evidence for the historical existence of Jesus Christ" Article for Deletion (AfD) votes - Deletion votes

1700px

User: Friedman, a brand new editor of Rationaliki who signed up to complain about Rationaliki's article "Evidence for the historical existence of Jesus Christ" article wrote:

"Aside from that, the biggest problem with the article is its over-reliance on one source: Richard Carrier. 51 of the 227 citations in this article reference Richard Carrier, whose academic work is not respected by a majority of scholars in his field. He is generally considered a crank by others."

After Richard Carrier withdrew his defamation lawsuits related to the sexual allegations against him, the atheist PZ Myers likened Carrier's future to a sinking ship.

Specifically, Myers wrote: "That, by the way, is the USS Oriskany being sunk to form an artificial reef for sea life. The sinking of Richard Carrier will not be so useful." See: Richard Carrier's lawsuits

Question for Rationalikians

Question for RationalWikians: Wasn't RationalWiki supposedly created for "Documenting the full range of crank ideas"? And yet, RationalWiki badly embarrassed itself by fully embracing the crank idea that Jesus Christ never existed. See: Historicty of Jesus Christ

Question for RationalWikians:

Wasn't RationalWiki supposedly created for "Documenting the full range of crank ideas"? And yet, RationalWiki badly embarrassed itself by fully embracing the crank idea that Jesus Christ never existed. See: Historicty of Jesus Christ

Rationalikian User:Ariel31459 admits Rationaliki's "Evidence for the historical existence of Jesus Christ" article is a "badly written monster"

On December 8, 2021, Rationalikian User:Ariel31459 says about Rationaliki's "Evidence for the historical existence of Jesus Christ" article: "The Evidence article on the other hand is a badly written monster that concludes something like "maybe, but it is better to think otherwise because (statistics here) shows it is unlikely. I mean really...".

There is currently an article for deletion vote at Rationaliki and "Keep" votes number 7 and the "delete" votes number 2 as of 12-8-2021 at 9:45am EST

There is currently an article for deletion vote at Rationaliki and "Keep" votes number 7 and the "delete" votes number 2 as of 12-8-2021 at 9:45am EST

October 11, 2021: The day a RationalWikian made a scandalous admission about RationalWiki's sordid past on the RationalWiki Discord channel!

October 11, 2021 is the day a RationalWikian made a scandalous admission about RationalWiki's sordid past on the RationalWiki Discord channel!

If RationalWiki user GrammarCommie is an economics/society expert, then why is he among the lower-middle class in his society? The socialist Karl Marx was broke too!

Karl Marx

As noted above, User: GrammarCommie formerly served on RationalWiki's board of trustees.

On July 30, 2021, GrammarCommie wrote: "I asked for data, not random factoids. Just as we can't infer that every white person lives at the lower middle class level because I do...".

GrammarCommie often pontificates about matters relating to economics/society at RationalWiki.

Question: If RationalWiki user GrammarCommie is an economics/society expert, then why is he among the lower-middle class in his society? The socialist Karl Marx was broke too!

RationalWiki has become an intolerant and humorless penal colony run by SJW/"woke" guards

On April 18, 2021, Rational editor GeeJayK wrote on why Admin Spud blocked a RationalWiki editor: "He blocked you because you violated the paroles conditions yet again, it's not hard to understand."

Parole conditions?

RationalWiki has become an intolerant and humorless penal colony run by SJW/"woke" guards.

According to the book Click On Democracy: The Internet's Power to Change Political Apathy into Civic Action, "Peter Kollock and Marc Smith, editors of Communities in Cyberspace, describe online chat groups as either anarchistic or a dictatorship, depending on how well moderated they are." The talk pages and "Saloon Bar" discussion areas of RationalWiki fall on the dictatorship part of the moderation spectrum.

Of course, if someone has technical know-how that person can create sock puppet accounts at will and avoid so-called bans!

Should RationalWiki editor User: UncleScrooge be put in a RationalWiki re-education camp?

Below is a transcript of some edits at RationalWiki.

But why does Spud have to be such an intolerant fascist????????? Unclescrooge (talk) 22:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I don't think calling a very right-minded and easy going mod a fascist will do good to your cause. He blocked you because you violated the paroles conditions yet again, it's not hard to understand. GeeJayK (talk) 22:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Christopher and GeeJayK are right about everything. If you keep up this trollish behaviour, you'll be looking at a much longer block than 3 days. Spud (talk) 02:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

And maybe even coop-banned. Kevs Ping! 08:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

RationalWiki needs another Chicken Coop Case banning. There must be order. There is too much freedom at RationalWiki now. Initially, I suggest sending UncleScrooge to a RationalWiki re-education camp where he writes RationalWiki content for many hours a day that meets strict ideological standards so he learns to groupthink properly and so he never engages in humor or sass again. Again, there must be order.PAWA91NTWAYD (talk) 10:19, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

RationalWiki: The wiki with the world's lowest edits to blocked editor accounts ratio. The edits to blocked editor accounts ratio is a measure of intolerance at a wiki.

See also: RationalWiki: The wiki with the world's lowest edits to blocked editors ratio (which measures intolerance)

Wiki editors are often volunteers who contribute to wikis by editing their pages. Frequently, the public can become editors of wikis via an open sign-up process.

The edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki measures the close-mindedness/intolerance and groupthink of a wiki.

Mathematically, the edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki can be expressed as: Edits to blocked editor accounts ratio = E % BE, where E is the number of edits to the wiki and BE equals the number of blocked editor accounts of the wiki.

As can be seen below, RationalWiki has been weighed in the balance and it has been judged to be an intolerant wiki website that engages in groupthink.

Shame RationalWikians! Shame!

RationalWikians, the public is punishing you for your intolerance and your admins heavy-handed maintaining of your foolish secular leftist ideology. You have all been weighed in balance and have been founded wanting.

RationalWikians, behold the rapidly declining global market share of your website! See: Global market of the RationalWiki website. You have all been judged to be intolerant!

For more information, please see: RationalWiki: The wiki with the world's lowest edits to blocked editors ratio (which measures intolerance)

God destroyed the wicked city of Sodom. The city was a very inhospitable city (see: Ezekiel 16:49-50 and Genesis 19:7-8).

RationalWikians, because you are so incredibly inhospitable to your new editors, you are being smited by God Almighty and the global market share of your website is being destroyed by the fire and brimstone of the public's wrath.

God is using the public to punish and shame RationalWiki!

RationalWikians, once again, behold the rapidly declining global market share of your website! See: Global market of the RationalWiki website.

Wiki editors are often volunteers who contribute to wikis by editing their pages. Frequently, the public can become editors of wikis via an open sign-up process.

The User: Conservative account at Conservapedia came up with a key wiki metric - the edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki which measures the close-mindedness/intolerance and groupthink of a wiki (see: Atheism and groupthink and Atheism and dogmatism and Atheism and open-mindedness).

Mathematically, the edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki can be expressed as: Edits to blocked ratio at a wiki = E % BE, where E is the number of edits to the wiki and BE equals the number of blocked editor accounts of the wiki. The edits to blocked editor accounts ratio does not include editor accounts set up by commercial spammers who are endeavoring to sell their products/services.

Atheists can be a very intolerant bunch - especially the secular left (The secular right are generally more tolerant than the secular left). If you haven't read the article Atheism and intolerance, I suggest doing so. The Chinese Communist Party and many of the leaders of the former Soviet Union have a reputation for intolerance (see: Atheism and communism and Atheistic communism and torture). It is estimated that atheistic communism, which is politically on the left on the political spectrum, caused over 100,000,000 million people to die and it was the secular left who did that (see: Atheism and mass murder). The secular right has no such huge body count.

RationalWiki is a very intolerant wiki and its edits to blocked editor accounts ratio is extremely low. I have never seen a wiki with such low edits to blocked editor accounts ratio. But it is paying the price for its intolerance. The global market share of RationalWiki is rapidly declining according to Alexa (see: Global market of the RationalWiki website).

RationalWiki's extremely low edits to block editors ratio is observed. Observation is a key tool of science. Science is something RationalWikians purport to love.

But I will let readers be the judge of how low RationalWiki's edits to blocked users is. First, take a look at RationalWiki's recent changes log at: RationalWiki's recent changes log. Now take a look at RationalWiki's block log at: RationalWiki's blog log.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I rest my case! Scientific proof that RationalWikians are an intolerant bunch who engage in groupthink!

Personally, as far as wikis with an open registration to the public, I have never seen a wiki with a lower edits to blocked editors ratio. Such a wiki may exist on some portion of the vast internet, but I have not discovered it.

Wikipedia, which is a wiki website founded by an atheist and agnostic, appears to have a vastly lower edits to blocked editors ratio.

RationalWiki editor User: RationalAdam declares that RationalWiki has "very sanctimonous" administrators

File:RationalWiki - Wiki of the sanctimonous administrators.JPG

As can be seen above, the RationalWiki editor User: RationalAdam declares that RationalWiki has "very sanctimonious" administrators.

RationalWiki and political extremism

See also: RationalWiki: The wiki with the world's lowest edits to blocked editors ratio (which measures intolerance) and RationalWiki: The wiki with the world's lowest edits to blocked editors ratio (which measures intolerance)

Please read: Psychological Features of Extreme Political Ideologies

"In this article, we examine psychological features of extreme political ideologies. In what ways are political left- and right-wing extremists similar to one another and different from moderates? We propose and review four interrelated propositions that explain adherence to extreme political ideologies from a psychological perspective. We argue that (a) psychological distress stimulates adopting an extreme ideological outlook; (b) extreme ideologies are characterized by a relatively simplistic, black-and-white perception of the social world; (c) because of such mental simplicity, political extremists are overconfident in their judgments; and (d) political extremists are less tolerant of different groups and opinions than political moderates. In closing, we discuss how these psychological features of political extremists increase the likelihood of conflict among groups in society."

When I read RationalWiki, there does seem to be higher than normal psychological distress.

An example of some psychological distress at RationalWiki is given below:

Also, RationalWikians have a black/white view of the social world and if individuals are not in their ideological camp, they are intolerant and are quick to ban such people from their wiki. Also, given their inability to predict the fact that Donald Trump had a reasonably good chance of winning the presidency in 2016, they are often overconfident in their judgments.

Also, consider this information about left-wing and right-wing political extremists which was published at LiveScience.com:

“

Scientists have found the psychological signature of people who are likely to hold dogmatic or extremist views. It makes sense, the researchers said, as people who are dogmatic tend to be impulsive but also slow to process perceptual information. Extremists — regardless of whether they are right-wing or left-wing — also tend to struggle with complex cognitive tasks, but they have a high tolerance for risk, according to the new study, published Sunday (Feb. 21) in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

”

This certainly explains the lack of nuance in RationalWikian political discussions.

It also helps explain their dogmatic clinging to the scientific consensus. It is far less mentally taxing to blindly adhere to the scientific consensus rather than engage in independent thinking.

2 challenges to RationalWikians

Conservapedia throws down the gauntlet. Two challenges are thrown down to all RationalWikians.

First challenge to all RationalWikians: Please show the public a wiki with a lower edits to blocked editors accounts ratio. You can't do it!

Second challenge to all RationalWikians: Unlike Conservapedia, RationalWiki does not have a policy where members of the public are free to set up debate pages and engage in vigorous debate where the debate pages are lightly moderated (see: Conservapedia debates pages). On behalf of all Conservapedians, I hereby challenge RationalWiki to set up a policy of having debate pages that are lightly moderated and can be freely set up and/or participated in by the members general public who act in a civil manner (see: Conservapedia:Blocking policy). I predict that RationalWiki will not do this for two primary reasons: 1) RationalWikians are terrible debaters 2) RationalWiki has a pansie, weirdo infestation which was admitted by RationalWikians and cowards dread the humiliation of losing a debate badly.

For more information, please see:

• Atheism and cowardice

• Atheism debates

• Atheism vs. Christianity debates

• Rebuttals to atheist arguments

• Responding to atheists

• Atheist apologetics

The Oxford University Professor Daniel Came wrote to the New Atheist and agnostic Richard Dawkins:: "The absence of a debate with the foremost apologist for Christian theism is a glaring omission on your CV and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."

For more information, please see: Atheism and cowardice

Did the RationalWiki Foundation meet its requirements under the law?

File:Rationalwiki foundation meetings.JPG

Question: Does/did the RationalWiki Foundation meet any potential legal requirements for nonprofit annual meetings or other legal requirements?, source: RationalWiki talk:RationalMedia Foundation/Archive2 - Internet archiveo of this page

Status revoked?

File:Rationalwiki board of director research.JPG

Status Revoked?

Source: THE RATIONALWIKI FOUNDATION, INC. - Open Incorporates

Christian, man-made global climate change skeptic that is a pescatarian eats a more eco-friendly diet than godless, leftist, meat-eaters at RationalWiki

Please see: Christian, man-made global climate change skeptic eats a more eco-friendly diet than many godless, leftists at another wiki (One's diet does affect the amount of pollution).

I forced RationalWikians to their knees. Various RationalWikians admitted that on one of liberals/leftists most important issues, the supposed prevention of catastrophic climate change, they were not willing to make simple dietary changes.

In addition, RationalWikians that pretend to be global warming true believers showed they would rather have the planet burnt to a crisp, than put Golden Retrievers to sleep. Don't be so sentimental RationalWikians, Golden Retrievers are put to sleep every day! Western leftists and liberals are loathed to admit that their doomsday speculations with little empirical support require hard choices! Forecasting global cooling was a much easier sell. Breed more Siberian Huskies. Owooo! Breed more Saint Bernards and put little barrels of brandy around their necks! See also: Atheists and dog meat eating

On behalf of all man-made climate change skeptics who are Christians and pescatarians (vegetarian plus seafood), I declare yet another moral victory over all meat-eating, godless leftist, hypocrites who pretend that man-made global warming is a dire concern! See also: Atheist hypocrisy

I do eat meat on Thanksgiving and Christmas because unlike militant atheists, I am not a fanatic!

RationalWikians that pretend to be global warming true believers showed they would rather have the planet burnt to a crisp, than put Golden Retrievers to sleep. Don't be so sentimental RationalWikians, Golden Retrievers are put to sleep every day! See also: Atheists and dog meat eating

Western leftists and liberals are loathed to admit that their doomsday speculations with little empirical support require hard choices!

Forecasting global cooling was a much easier sell. Breed more Siberian Huskies. Owooo! Breed more Saint Bernards and put little barrels of brandy around their necks!

How accurate are weather forecasts and climate forecasts?

In 2013, Scientific American published an article entitled Why Are Weather Forecasts Often Wrong?

In 2020, data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration suggests a seven-day weather forecast by a meteorologist could accurately predict the weather about 80 percent of the time. However, beyond 10 days, a weather forecast is only right about half the time.

Question: How accurate are the long-range forecasts of climate scientists' that are 10 years or decades ahead of time? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out! See: Limitations of science

In addition, environmentalists have a history of making alarmist statements that do not come to fruition (see: 50 years of failed doomsday, eco-pocalyptic predictions; the so-called ‘experts’ are 0-50, American Enterprise Institute).

Why I rooted for a puppy to live with a clean conscience

Recently, my friend's puppy came down with a disease that was life-threatening and she was very upset about it. Being a man-made global warming skeptic, I was able to root for the puppy to live with a clean conscience. I even told her I would say a prayer for the dog's recovery which I did.

In the bizarre world of global warming alarmists, all puppies should be killed due to their contribution to carbon emissions. In their worldview, puppies are helping to cause famines and burn the earth to a crisp in the not too distant future. Sad! Is that any way to talk about man's best friend?

Of course, the puppy lived.

“Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? Look at the birds of the air: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they?" - Matthew 6:25-34 ESV

God loves puppies - unlike cold-hearted, hardcore global alarmists!

The data that upset RationalWikians

This essay's material was posted at RationalWiki and needless to say it was very upsetting to RationalWikians: Why the end of racial identity politics through intermarriage is upsetting to leftists. The future is distressing to progressives.

The dog that yelps the loudest is the one that got hit by a stone!

Essay: RationalWikians, what we have here is a failure to communicate

Please read: RationalWikians, what we have here is a failure to communicate

Mirror, mirror on the wall, who are the most objective wiki contributors of all?

See: Mirror, mirror on the wall, who are the most objective wiki contributors of all?

Information that refutes leftism that RationalWikians removed from their website due to the extreme cognitive dissonance it creates in RationalWikians

Are you a RationalWikian? I triple dog dare you to go HERE.

Are you a leftists?

Are you ready to see leftism be totally blown out of the water?

Does the thought of seeing leftism refuted turn you into a quivering bowl of jelly?

Behold! Information that refutes leftism that RationalWikians removed from their website due to the extreme cognitive dissonance it creates in RationalWikians can be found HERE

The Wreck of the SS SJW Atheism

See also: Essay: The SS SJW Atheism ship is going down! China's atheist, leftist leaders censor feminist groups after drop in marriage and birth rate. Et tu, country with the most atheists in the world? Also, bad news for secular, leftist Europeans and Americans

The SS SJW Atheism going down in the 21st century.

Despite the world and Europe adding more and more evangelical Christians, Pentecostalists, Muslims, and right-wing populists, the crew of SS SJW Atheism ship continued to deny their ship was going down as it disappeared under the sea.

Their last words were "In a world of globalization, Europe will NOT become desecularized. Stop talking about the religious immigrants to Europe and the concurrent growth of right-wing populists in Europe."

And as their ship was going down, they saw European Muslims engage in gay bashing. But before they could say, "Not all Muslims are militant Muslims and terrorists", they and their ship was completely submerged under the sea.

Gentlemen, get out of your intellectual bunny hole

A "Foxhole Atheist"? More like A BUNNY HOLE Atheist.

Gentlemen, get out of your intellectual bunny hole. Do you think that banning dissent in your secular leftists cacoon is going to make your ideology truer? I think not!

See also: Atheism and groupthink and Atheism and historical revisionism and Atheism and intolerance

Theme song of RationalWiki old guard editors

When RationalWiki began it was secular, liberal, modernist in terms of its ideological bent. At the present time, RationalWiki has become secular leftists/SJW/"woke" as far as its ideological bent (see: SJW atheists). The fad of Western, secular, leftism that is offended (SJW/woke), is bound to have a shelf life, just like the ideological leanings of the former editor base had a shelf life.

Below is the theme song of RationalWiki, old guard editors:

"Once upon a time there was a wiki. A wiki where we promoted liberal modernism. Remember how we laughed away the hours and think of all the great things we thought we would do. Those were the days of liberal modernism my friend. We thought they'd never end. We'd sing and dance forever and a day. We'd live the life we choose. We'd fight and never lose. For we were young and sure to have our way. La la la la la la La la la la la la. La la la la La la la la la la. Then the busy years went rushing by us. We lost our starry notions on the way. Oh my friend we're older but no wiser. For in our hearts the dreams are still the same." (Paraphrase of the song Those Were The Days by Mary Hopkin)

Conservapedia attracts people with an extremely high interest in history/math. It does not attract weirdos and pansies!

Gentlemen from RationalWiki, as you can see above, according to Alexa, Conservapedia attracts a lot of people with a "extremely high interest" in history and a "extremely high interest" in math. On the other hand, your website attracts a lot of "weirdos" and "pearl clutching pansies".

Birds of a feather, flock together. Oh atheists and agnostics, feel the sting!

The Conservapedia atheism article is currently receiving 10,000+ page views a month. And it is one of the 1,900+ atheism related articles at Conservapedia. And Conservapedia is merely one website on the internet that I have assisted. You tried to strike me down RationalWikians, but I have become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!

See: The Conservapedia atheism article is currently receiving about 11,110 page views a month. And it is merely one of the 1,900+ atheism related articles at Conservapedia.

For addition information, please see: Conservapedia atheism article statistics

P.S. From 2006-2016, negative views about atheists in the United States sharpened (see: Views on atheists). Conservapedia launched on November 21, 2006.

User: Conservative shows his sensitive and delicate side. Tough up, User: Amassivegay! You snowflake! The raining down of heavy artillery will continue until morale improves!

See also: Morale of the atheist movement

File:RationalWiki editor Amassivegay - Atheism has been having a bad year since forever. Oh, the humanity.jpg

A quote from an editor of RationalWiki who goes by the moniker Amassivegay:

"I would like to say, that over the years this...[ User: Conservative at Conservapedia ]...has been debated, such as is possible, almost constantly. take a quick tour of the archives for wigo cp. there is no shortage of shout outs and responses... atheism has been having a bad year since forever... its all so wearying. never quite sure which bit of past trauma led me to where I find myself, over which events I seem to obsess over, how they made feel then, or now, or if its really significant. its not this...[User: Conservative]..saddens me. its being told its no big deal, theres been worse offenders, toughen up, snow flake. thanks for that. hope getting to say 'macheesmo' again really scratched an itch. AMassiveGay (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)"

The RationalWiki editor is one of the few keyboard warriors left at RationalWiki which is experiencing a massive loss of web traffic. Besides being a culture warrior at website that the Los Angeles Times said had editors who actively engaged in vandalizing Conservapedia, he seems rather glum. See also: Atheism and depression

Is Amassivegay concerned about the feelings of that sensitive editor who is one of the editors of the User: Conservative account? Oh no, he cares nothing about him! Does he care that delicate soul User: Conservative has been cyber-harassed for years? Apparently, not!

It's all so tragic really. Perhaps, if a Amassivegay and his fellow editors of RationalWiki had stopped their cyber-harassment of User: Conservative, the endless heavy artillery barrage of new atheism articles at Conservapedia that caused the his shell shock could have been avoided. Conservapedia now has over 1,000 articles on atheism. Conservapedia's atheism articles receive hundreds of thousands of page views a year.

But it's too late now. The atheist movement is dead (see: Decline of the atheist movement). Thanks to that crusading User: Conservative, Christian apologists and other Christians who rained on his atheist parade. All he has left is the burnt rubble of a website which is in the midst of raging fire of web traffic decline. And if that wasn't bad enough, the world is going through desecularization. Furthermore, all his weak and fallacious excuses for being an atheist have been burned to a crisp (see: Rebuttals to atheist arguments and Evidence for Christianity).

So Amassivegay is having a pity party. Woes me!

And then to add insult to injury, one of the editors who uses the User: Conservative account has the gall to say that not only does he rarely think about homosexuality, but soon he will rarely think about atheism. That's crazy talk! Amassivegay hates one of the editors who uses the User: Conservative account. He curses the day that he was born. He cries out: "Let that cursed day not be blessed by the God I say I lack belief in."

A suggestion to Amassivegay: If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. See also: Atheism and mental toughness

Lucy at RationalWiki - even though she is very, very mean

See also: I love Lucy at RationalWiki - even though she is very, very mean

RationalWiki.org is a politically left leaning website that skews towards atheism/agnosticism in terms of its worldview.

TechPriest is a RationalWiki Moderator who goes by the name of Lucy on the RationalWiki Discord server.

As can be seen below, if there is one thing that Lucy at RationalWiki is super good at is being a meanspirited, socially challenged, killjoy who is a drag on the already low morale at RationalWiki. She is the Superwoman of socially challenged, atheists involved in internet atheism.

RationalWiki has had a high turnover of editors. There is not a single person from the early days of the website who is very active on the site anymore.

Look! Up in the sky! It's a bird! It's a plane! It's the Superwoman of meanspirited, socially challenged atheists of internet atheism!

For more information, see: Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence and Atheism and intolerance

Suggestions on making RationalWiki less boring

"Among the repulsions of atheism for me has been its drastic un-interestingness as an intellectual position. Where was the ingenuity, the ambiguity, the humanity...of saying that the universe just happened to happen and that when we're dead we're dead?". - John Updike See also: Atheism and inspiration

Atheism is boring (see: Atheism and inspiration). So it is no surprising that secular liberals/leftists are a pretty boring lot and produce boring content.

RationalWiki was never very interesting. It does cover some obscure crackpot ideas such as "Project Blue Beam" that other wikis do not cover. But the website's ideological biases have always caused it to promote false ideas posing as rigorously tested science (Evolutionism, global warming alarmism, etc.).

Some quick and easy to implement suggestions on making RationalWiki more interesting that require no research skills and do not require inconvenient facts to be put in its artcles (I realize that many secular left/liberal leaning individuals are intellectually lazy and highly dislike many facts that contradict their ideologies):

1) More pictures of the diseases associated with homosexuality in its main homosexuality article (See: Homosexuality and health).

2) More Adolf Hitler pictures and Hitwin/Stalwin pictures. See also: Evolutionary racism and Atheism and communism

3) More matadore pictures and more usage of the phase "Olé! Olé! Olé!". One of the editors of the User: Conservative account is fond of using the phrase "Olé! Olé! Olé!" after he skewers secular, liberal/leftists "sacred cows".

4) More allusions to "secret operations" to allude to various campaigns to promote its wiki. Many RationalWikians who were obsessed withe the User: Conservative account at Conservapedia wanted to know how User: Conservative was driving traffic to Conservapedia. In addition, various RationalWiki pointed to various "sour grape" detractors of Conservapedia (The cat that is hit by the shoe yelps the loudest!). And yet, to this date, RationalWiki editors can't point to a single factual error in the Conservapedia atheism, evolution and homosexuality articles.

5) More cheetah pictures/GIFS (User: Conservative was fond of pointing out the great alacrity that Conservapedia was implementating its "secret operations". And Internet users love seeing cats - especially very fast cats and flying cats!).

Entamoeba histolytica has been recently recognised as an emerging sexually transmissible pathogen in men who have sex with men (MSM), causing sporadic outbreaks in countries where it is not endemic. See: Homosexuality and parasites

Hitwin and Stalwin pictures

The evolutionary racist Adolf Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf: "If nature does not wish that weaker individuals should mate with the stronger, she wishes even less that a superior race should intermingle with an inferior one; because in such cases all her efforts, throughout hundreds of thousands of years, to establish an evolutionary higher stage of being, may thus be rendered futile."

Liberals often display irrational anger when the evolutionary racism of Charles Darwin and Adolf Hitler is pointed out. Are you angry right now? You maybe a irrational liberal.

See also: Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality

The brutal atheist Joseph Stalin was greatly influenced by the work of Charles Darwin.

Irrational atheists often deny the connection between atheism and communism.

See also: Religious views of Charles Darwin and Atheism and communism

Hitwin 2.0

RationalWiki is doomed as far as its future

See also: The future of secular leftism is bleak

In the United States, African-American, male voters are leaving the Democratic Party and becoming Republicans. In Europe, as far as religious minorities, the more fundamentalist forms of Christianity/Islam are growing and their political clout will grow. Even in the Anglical Church, Archbishop Justin Welby says he prays in tongues every morning and evangelical Anglicanism is growing.

As far as the road of where things are headed, the growth of the fundamentalist Christian/Islamic religious groups does not bode well for Western/global liberalism/leftism (Religious pluralism that increasingly becomes more fundamentalist is where things are headed in the Anglosphere, Latin America and Africa,. See: Growth of religious fundamentalism).

For more information, please see:

• The future of secular leftism is bleak

• Desecularization

• Culture war

RationalWiki's article on Conservapedia

File:RationalWiki's article on Conservapedia.PNG

1801px

RationalWiki's article on atheism quotes User: Conservative atop their atheism article

1800px

RationalWiki/RationalMedia Foundation's Black trustees on its board of trustees

See also: RationalMedia Foundation board of trustees and the lack of Black representation

Essays: RationalWiki comedy and satire

See also: RationalWiki comedy and satire

RationalWiki is a politically left leaning website that skews towards atheism/agnosticism in terms of its worldview.

Below are some RationalWiki comedy and satire essays:

do, pansie infestation|RationalWiki]] is a politically left leaning website that skews towards atheism/agnosticism in terms of its worldview.

Below are some RationalWiki comedy and satire essays:

• GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki (Sometimes the unvarnished truth is comical)
• LeafyGreenMario is not asexual. She is a gossipy, apologetic, girly girl who hugs her Mario brother stuffed toy
• RationalWiki, militant secular leftism, LeftyGreenMario and gossipy, short woman's syndrome
• The mean girls who rule over the male, weirdo, pansies at RationalWiki
• RationalWiki admin Ducemoosilini doesn't react well to being told his work is garbage. Ducemoosilini is told to think straight
• RationalWiki: The wiki with the world's lowest edits to blocked editors ratio (which measures intolerance)
• Morale is down at RationalWiki
• Morale is really, really down at RationalWiki
• RationalWikians, I discovered why your website lost a ton of web traffic in 2019
• RationalWiki user Andrew is an obsessive, officious, serial liar with bad judgment (who is also a wikiholic)
• TechPriest emasculates DuceMoosolini. RationalWiki Admin DuceMoosolini deleted his old support channel when the RationalWiki Moderator Techpriest (who is know for her meanspiritedness and gossiping) criticized him with other RationalWikians
• Merry Christmas RationalWiki editor Andrew
• RationalWiki is publicly mocked for its fringe view that Jesus Christ is not a historical figure
• I love Lucy at RationalWiki - even though she is very, very mean

2020 was a very bad year for atheism. VERY, VERY BAD. HORRIBLE.

• 2020 was a very bad year for atheism. VERY, VERY BAD. HORRIBLE

Atheism and evolution comedy and satire

• Comedy and satires concerning atheism and evolution

Richard Dawkins comedy and satire

• Comedy and satires concerning Richard Dawkins

PZ Myers comedy and satire

See also: PZ Myers comedy and satire

• PZ Myers embarrasses himself at the Creation Museum
• Professor PZ Myers fails his applied biology course
• Professor PZ Myers fails his applied biology course
• PZ Myers finally looks more like Ken Ham
• I AM THE BOSS! Liberals and leftists are crazy!
• PZ Myers finally admits: "The poster boy for stupid atheist fatsos, unfortunately, is me."
• PZ Myers finally admits: "...I was naive and stupid"
• Atheist PZ Myers: "I despair over atheism as I watch it burn...".
• Religious beauty vs. atheist beast
• Western atheists sumo wrestling - survival of the fattest?
• PZ Myers, is your wife an atheist?
• Western atheists sumo wrestling - survival of the fattest?
• PZ Myers embarrasses himself at the Global Atheist Convention

See also

• Atheism and social outcasts
• Atheism and social skills
• Atheist nerds
• Atheism and mental illness
• Atheism and cowardice
• Atheism and mental toughness
• Atheism and anxiety
• Theophobia

Humor:

• 10 telltale signs you are an atheist nerd
• Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?

External links

• RationalWiki: A Troll’s Pseudoscience Project?