Essay:Orwellian Word Games at CDC On The Word "Vaccine"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Orwellian Word Games at CDC On The Word "Vaccine"
By Nancy Thorner

The two statements below most likely will come as a surprise to most readers:

David Martin, Ph.D., a former assistant Professor at the University of Virginia’s School of Medicine, noted at that SARS was created in 2003, Patent 7279327 – meaning Covid is not novel, and was also a Fauci creation. Review Martin’s claim here.

The current mRNA “vaccine” is NOT a vaccine - which comes from the Latin vaccinus, the word for cows, illustrating the first vaccine from Edward Jenner ~1800 used a small amount of cowpox virus to inoculate others.

But wait!

In line with the Orwellian rule of co-opting of language first and foremost, Merriam-Webster came out and changed the definition of ‘vaccine’ so Covid ‘vaccines’ can be defined as such. The (b) definition matches perfectly with the Pfizer and Moderna versions of the Covid vaccines.

According to the dictionary, a vaccine is “a preparation of genetic material (such as a strand of synthesized messenger RNA) that is used by the cells of the body to produce an antigenic substance (such as a fragment of virus spike protein).”

The CDC website has a conspicuously similar way of describing the vaccines: “COVID-19 mRNA vaccines give instructions for our cells to make a harmless piece of what is called the “spike protein.” The spike protein is found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19.”

Gene therapy

Dr. Joseph Mercola, who has a full discussion on the gene therapy nature of the Moderna and Pfizer shots, also says the Moderna and Pfizer shots “… are gene therapies. They fulfill all the definitions of gene therapy and none of the definitions for a vaccine." This matters, as you cannot mandate a gene therapy against COVID-19 any more than you can force entire populations to undergo gene therapy for a cancer they do not have and may never be at risk for….SARS-CoV-2 has not even been proven to be the cause of COVID-19. So, a gene therapy that instructs your body to produce a SARS-CoV-2 antigen — the viral spike protein — cannot be said to be preventive against COVID-19, as the two have not been shown to be causally linked.”

In fact, Mercola notes, "Since mRNA therapies do not render the immunized person immune, and do not inhibit transmission of the virus, they cannot qualify as a public health measure capable of providing collective benefit that supersedes individual risk, and therefore cannot be mandated.

In other words, they won't keep you from getting sick with SARS-CoV-2; they are only supposed to lessen your infection symptoms if or when you do get infected. So, getting vaccinated protects no one but yourself. Since you're the only one who will reap a benefit (less severe COVID-19 symptoms upon infection), the justification to accept the risks of the therapy "for the greater good" of your community is blatantly irrational.”

Dr. David Martin has gone on record, as well, also stating this is not a vaccine but a medical device. Martin is corroborated by the Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks, himself stating this jab changes your genetic code, as was uncovered here by some enterprising sleuth at a TEDx Beacon Street talk from 2017. He also says we are “hacking the software of life.”

Gene Therapy further explained

In flogging this gene-therapy-not-a-vaccine horse a little further, Moderna itself describes their mRNA jab as “gene therapy technology” in its own SEC filing, while BioNTech’s SEC filing also states in the U.S. and Europe, mRNA therapies are classified as “gene therapy medicinal products.”

The shot is not supposed to alter one’s DNA permanently, but some experts wonder whether mRNA injections might be able to reverse-transcribe into your genome and in fact alter your DNA on a more permanent basis.

A study by MIT and Harvard scientists illustrated that segments of RNA from SARS-CoV-2 are reverse-transcribing into the human genome, likely becoming a permanent fixture in human DNA. This has been thought impossible for the same reasons used to assure us that vaccine RNA cannot alter DNA.

In the U.S. and Europe, mRNA therapies, as a group, are generally classified as "gene therapy medicinal products." The crux here, is that supposedly mRNA therapy does not cause permanent DNA alterations. Unless reverse transcriptase is a reality, that is.

Shots damage lymph nodes and white blood cells

Lymph Nodes and White Blood Cells Fight Infection. Covid Shots damage them to cause Lymphadenopathy.

Lymphadenopathy refers to the enlargement of one or more lymph nodes, the bean-shaped glands found in the neck, armpits, chest, groin, and abdomen. Lymphadenopathy may occur in just one part of the body, in which case it is referred to as “localized” or it may be present in two or more body areas, in which case it is referred to as “generalized.” The condition most commonly affects nodes in the neck (cervical lymph nodes).

What about mRNA vaccines meeting the legal definition of “vaccine"?

As Dr. Mercola states on this topic: "referring to them as vaccines, and marketing them as such, is a deceptive practice that violates U.S. Code Section 41 of the Federal Trade Commission Act,10 the law that governs advertising of medical practices. The lack of completed human trials also puts these mRNA products at odds with 15 U.S. Code Section 41. Per this law, it is unlawful to advertise ‘that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made’."

The legal definition of a vaccine is clear as evidenced by the Iowa government code ( ARC 4096C): "Vaccine means a specially prepared antigen administered to a person for the purpose of providing immunity.”

See here the Washington code: “Vaccine means a preparation of a killed or attenuated living microorganism, or fraction thereof …” The statute also specifies that a vaccine “upon immunization stimulates immunity that protects us against disease ...”

None of this applies to the Moderna an Pfizer jabs

Making matters worse, both Pfizer and Moderna eliminated their control groups by offering the real vaccine to any and all placebo recipients who wanted it. Studies should have gone on for a full two years, but by eliminating the control group, determining effectiveness and risks is near impossible. As of early March, major problems with the AstraZeneca shot caused Italian officials to seize almost 400k doses of their shot, per ZeroHedge. They joined Iceland, Denmark, Ireland, Spain who have also suspended rollout - a grand total of 18 countries if you count them al!

A recent “bombshell report written by investigative journalist Paul Thacker in the peer-reviewed The BMJ, dated November 2, 2021, calls out Pfizer for poor practices and quality control during its COVID-19 vaccine trials. "Brook Jackson, a regional director at Ventavia Research Group, an organization tasked with testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas, reported to The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, was slow to follow up on adverse events, and was overwhelmed with quality control issues. Jackson filed a complaint to the FDA but was fired shortly after. Jackson has supplied The BMJ with documents that support her claim, including emails, photos, internal documents, and audio recordings.”

Red flag of concern

Within the internal emails, which you can read about here on Substack, the officials within the health industry knew they had a problem because their push to vaccinate everyone would not generate any immunity from the virus itself. Of course, immunity is defined as "Protection from an infectious disease," meaning that "If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected."

TechnoFog submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to see what was happening inside the CDC, as they discussed needing to change the definitions of “vaccine” and “vaccination” in order to get past the problematic issue of their supported products not actually providing immunity from the COVID-19 virus or any variant thereof.

Neither Moderna nor Pfizer claim their C0VID-19 vaccines will prevent a person from getting Covid. In fact, in their clinical trials, they specify that they will not even test for immunity. The sole purpose of these products is to lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus.

But not to worry about the shot not meeting the definition of a vaccine! Presto change, just like Orwell told us, an internal CDC email, obtained via a FOIA request, showed the CDC simply changed the definition of “vaccine” and what it means to be vaccinated.

Rather than deal with the problem of a non-effective vaccine, the officials discussed, modified and then eventually just changed the definition of what a vaccine is intended to do.

The prior CDC Definitions of Vaccine and Vaccination (August 26, 2021):

Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.

Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.

The CDC Definitions of Vaccine and Vaccination since September 1, 2021:

Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.

'Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.

People noticed. US Representative Thomas Massie was among the first to discuss the change, noting the definition went from “immunity” to “protection.”

Concluding thoughts

3 More Reports of Teen Deaths After Covid Jabs as Reported Injuries Exceed 850,000, plus VAERS data released today by the CDC (11/06/21), included a total of 856,919 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 18,078 deaths and 131,027 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Oct. 29, 2021.

WATCH here as Sen. Ron Johnson Gives Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine Victims the Chance to Share Their Heartbreaking Storie' ' Vermont, the state with the highest COVID-19 vaccination rate in the United States, matched a record for daily COVID-19 deaths set during a winter 2020 surge and reported a record 527 CCP virus cases on Nov. 4, according to state data tracked by Worldometers.

One Pfizer whistleblower came forward recently to expose the company hiding the fact that they use aborted fetal cells in COVID-19 jab.

Of course, Pfizer doesn’t want the public to know that ingredient. Religious exemptions would be through the roof!