Difference between revisions of "United Nations"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Undo revision 2180836 by Telling (talk))
Line 477: Line 477:
 
"The university's decision to cut ties with Albanese was a significant move in holding an international legal figure accountable for antisemitic behavior."<ref>[https://www.foxnews.com/us/fox-news-antisemitism-exposed-newsletter-un-bigot-out-georgetown UN bigot out at Georgetown], Fox News Staff. December 25, 2025.</ref>[https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-881294 Georgetown University severs ties with UN’s Francesca Albanese over antisemitic remarks]. Shoshanna Baker, JPost, December 25, 2025.
 
"The university's decision to cut ties with Albanese was a significant move in holding an international legal figure accountable for antisemitic behavior."<ref>[https://www.foxnews.com/us/fox-news-antisemitism-exposed-newsletter-un-bigot-out-georgetown UN bigot out at Georgetown], Fox News Staff. December 25, 2025.</ref>[https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-881294 Georgetown University severs ties with UN’s Francesca Albanese over antisemitic remarks]. Shoshanna Baker, JPost, December 25, 2025.
 
<blockquote><small>
 
<blockquote><small>
−
"Georgetown University has removed Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur, following her antisemitic remarks, including justifying the October 7 attacks, after a campaign by UN Watch.</snall></blockquote></ref>
+
"Georgetown University has removed Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur, following her antisemitic remarks, including justifying the October 7 attacks, after a campaign by UN Watch.</small></blockquote></ref>
  
 
== U.N. Commissions==
 
== U.N. Commissions==

Revision as of 03:40, January 2, 2026

United Nations

الأمم المتحدة
联合国
Organisation des Nations unies
Организация Объединённых Наций
Organización de las Naciones Unidas

United Nations flag.png

Headquarters International Territory, within New York City, New York.[1]
Official Languages Arabic Chinese English French Russian Spanish
Membership 193 Member countries, as of Nov. 2017
Leaders
  • Secretary General = António Guterres
  • General Assembly President = Miroslav Lajčák
  • Security Council President = Elbio Rosselli

United Nations Charter signed 26 June 1945

Entry into force of Charter 24 October 1945

The United Nations is a globalist organization of countries all over the world, originally created to facilitate cooperation in international law, international security, the 2030 Agenda, economic development, and human rights. It was founded in 1945 at the signing of the United Nations Charter by 51 countries, replacing the League of Nations, founded in 1919. The UN currently has 193 members, including almost all the countries in the world. Non-members include Taiwan and Vatican City. Switzerland joined in 2002, being the last country to join the UN until now.[2] The United Nations typically supports liberal, environmentalist, socialist and communist ideals.[3][4][5][6]

History

The term "United Nations" was widely used during World War II to denote the allied powers making war against Germany and Japan, but the actual UN was created in 1945. It was designed by the U.S. State Department. President Franklin D. Roosevelt envisaged "four policemen", Britain, United States, Soviet Union, and Republic of China to be the major forces on what later became the UN Security Council to enforce the peace worldwide. This was deemed at the time as a modern approach to replace the old spheres of influence as they were called during the age of Imperialism.

US Secretary of State Cordell Hull said at the time while selling the idea to Congress, "there will no longer be need for spheres of influence, for alliances, for balance of power, or any other of the separate alliances through which in the unhappy past the nations strove to safeguard their security or promote their interest."

After the Second World War many idealists favored the notion of "outlawing" war. For example, Gen. Douglas MacArthur actually wrote in a provision outlawing war in the Japanese constitution. On the international plane however, such a broad-based exercise in idealism was more difficult to sell among nation states. Provisions and concepts such as "war of aggression" and "territorial integrity" were crafted and written in to the Charter. By 1999, with the US-backed Kosovo war that tore out land from Serbia to create a NATO base, and the 2001 "Coalition of the willing" to violate the UN Charter and international law dispensed with the Charter. The United States' "rules based order" began supplanting the UN Charter in the "unipolar moment". Weaponization of the dollar and multilateral economic sanctions that were not authorized or confirmed by the UN, as per its Charter of member states, further made a mockery of the notion of "international law".

American enthusiasm for the UN soured after the Soviet Union vetoed most resolutions of the Security Council. However, the Soviets boycotted the UN in 1950, allowing the UN to officially sponsor the Korean War. However, North Dakota Congressman Usher L. Burdick in a January 17, 1957 speech titled "The Russians are and will continue to be on the inside of any military action taken by the Security Council of the United Nations" strongly implied that the Soviets nevertheless had indirect influence on the United Nations during the Korean War via its Security Council Secretary due to how it was structured, and that this was ultimately the reason why General MacArthur was unable to fully liberate Korea from Communism during the Korean War.[7] In practice, the U.S. made all the decisions for the UN regarding that war. When the Soviets returned in 1951, they caused UN decisionmaking to stalemate, and the UN played a minor role in the Cold War.

The western military alliance of NATO began in 1949 and played a much greater role in US foreign policy commitments and decisions during the Cold War than the UN ever did. The one exception was the Korean War, which was fought under UN auspices since the Soviet Union was boycotting the UN in 1950.

Originally designed to institutionalize the military alliance that emerged as victors in World War II, the U.N. has shown no inclination to reform itself. It's governing Security Council is controlled by the victorious powers of 1945 and bares scant resemblance to the demographic changes of the 21st century. For example, (in the pre-Brexit era) the European Union had two votes, while India and the Muslim world remain unrepresented. Its supposed democratic underpinnings take no account of cultural differences; Shariah law for example, forbids the two billion Muslims of the planet from forging alliances with non-believers or participating in legislative councils. In the Koranic system, all law comes from Allah, and man made law, such as the United Nations Charter, is strictly forbidden.

Record of the Secretary-Generals

When the first UN secretary-general, Trygve Lie of Norway, a Stalinist sympathizer, was the Minister of Justice in Norway, he told Lenin's former right-hand man Leon Trotsky not to criticize Stalin or else he would be imprisoned and or kicked out of Norway; Lie eventually put him in prison, but later according to Stalin's wishes exiled him to Mexico where one of Stalin's hit men assassinated him by hitting his head with a pickax in 1940.[8] As secretary-general, he failed to maintain peace in the 1947 Kashmir conflict, the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict, and the Korean War from 1950-1953.

The second secretary-general, Dag Hammarskjold of Sweden, former head of the Bank of Sweden, the oldest central bank in the world, even older than the Bank of England, used UN troops in 1961 to crush the Katanga province of Zaire when it tried to get its independence from the Marxist government.[9]

Kurt Waldheim

The third secretary-general, U Thant of Burma, was a Marxist whose mentor was Burmese prime minister U Nu, who said in a 1948 speech, “If we now look back in history, we find that Stalin followed the right path”;[10] together, they abolished private property in Burma and U Thant choose a former KGB officer to be his personal assistant. U Thant was known for admiring Vladimir Lenin.”[11] So it should not be surprising that U Thant was very well liked by Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev, and did nothing to help John F. Kennedy and Khrushchev negotiate the Cuban Missile Crisis. He failed to maintain peace in 1967 after the Six-Day Arab-Israeli War between Israel and its neighbors.

The fourth secretary-general, Kurt Waldheim, the future president of Austria, was a former Nazi infantry lieutenant who fought to help Adolf Hitler take over all of Europe, and he did not care who ruled the world, whether it be Nazi Germany or the UN, it did not matter to him so long as there was a one-world government. He believed that mass murder was merely a means to a better socialist end. So it should not be surprising that he sat down and did nothing to prevent from 1975-79 Cambodia’s Pol Pot from conducting his mass murders; Waldheim actually sent the UNICEF to send supplies to Hanoi, Vietnam, which in turn was sent to Pol Pot so he can conduct the “killing fields”.[12][13]

The fifth secretary-general, Javier Perez de Queller of Peru, who insisted on protecting the murderous regime of Pol Pot,[14] did nothing to make peace during the Iraq-Iran War. After leaving his job, when he ran for president of Peru in the spring of 1995, he was surrounded by well-known communists who were running his campaign, even though his country was facing a Maoist insurgency.

The sixth secretary-general, Boutros Boutros-Ghali of Egypt, the former vice-president of Socialist International and former member of the Arab Socialist Union, along with Undersecretary-general for Peacekeeping Operations Kofi Annan, aided the Rwandan genocide. Kofi Annan would not allow Canadian general Romeo Dallaire to get his troops to seize Hutu weapons and thwart an extermination plan. Annan at one time ordered UN troops to withdraw from a school that held Tutsi refugees causing them to get murdered by the Hutu mobs. In his June 1992 report An Agenda for Peace, he wrote, “The time of absolute and exclusive sovereignty . . . has passed.”[15]                                   

After Kofi Annan of Ghana became the seventh secretary-general, he did nothing to prevent the 2000s genocide in Sudan and sent UN troops to make peace in the Zaire, but instead, they were raping women as young as 11. During the ceremonies surrounding his acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize in 2001, Annan said, “The sovereignty of nations must no longer be used as a shield for gross violations of human rights.”[16] In his opening address to the fifty-third annual DPI/NGO (Department of Public Information/Non-Governmental Organization) Conference in 2006, Annan also said, “It has been said that arguing against globalization is like arguing against the laws of gravity.”[17]

Gen. Sec. Ban Ki-Moon with transgender singer Conchita Wurst.

The eighth secretary-general, Ban Ki-Moon of South Korea, like Kofi Annan, is a global warming alarmist and has criticized Dutch politician Geert Wilders for condemning Islam. He is also a sponsor of UN Agenda 21, a green socialist agenda for the 21st century meant to abolish private property.

The ninth and current secretary-general, Antonio Guterres, the former prime minister of Portugal and former president of Socialist International as well as former secretary-general of the Portuguese Socialist Party, supported bringing in “refugees” from the Syrian War into Europe, even though the supermajority of them were soldiers of ISIS, as even the UN reported that 75% of them were young males.[18] He also blamed Russia for the Ukranian attack on the Nova Kakhovka Dam which flooded the area in and around Kherson during the NATO War in Ukraine.[19]

Organization

The main deliberative organ is the General Assembly which usually meets annually in September with representation by all member states. The General Assembly votes on the annual budget of the United Nations, elects members to other UN organs and committees and makes non-binding recommendations to member states through resolutions.

The Security Council handles matters relating to international peace and stability. It consists of five permanent members (USA, UK, France, Russia and PR China), and ten temporary members, which are elected by the General Assembly for two-year terms. The Security Council decides by vote. On substantive issues, nine members must support the proposal, including all five permanent members, giving each permanent member an effective veto power. The chair of the Security Council rotates each month among its members, in alphabetic order.

International Court of Justice

The International Court of Justice, based in The Hague, was founded to settle conflicts and disputes over questions arising from the interpretation of treaties among member states. It only may entertain [20] cases where all parties to the case in question have agreed to recognize the jurisdiction of the Court. The Court also advices other organs and agencies of the United Nations on questions of the interpretation of treaties.

Report: The Arab - Nawaf Salam, head of World Court condemned Israel 210 times as Lebanon’s UN Rep, sided with regimes in Iran, Syria, Belarus, Cuba. He is to release another "accusation" he composed on Israel for July 18, 2024.[21] (The bigot has inserted the "cleansing" term too. Abusing again his cloak at ICJ).

UN Charter

Sovereign equality

Article 2(1): "The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members."

Prohibitions on threats and use of force

Article 2(4), prohibits the “threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence” of a member state

Non-intervention in sovereign state affairs

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2625, Declaration on Principles of International Law, concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States, adopted on October 24, 1970, states:

"No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State."[22]

Mediation of disputes

Chapter VI of the U.N. Charter says in Article 33(1):

"The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall, first of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice."

Authorization for sanctions and use of force

Under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, the Security Council is the only legal body in the world authorized by international law to impose multilateral economic sanctions.[23]

Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter gives the UN a right to use military force against targeted nations, while also strictly limiting the circumstances in which this right can be invoked. This right has been exercised four times: the 1950-1953 Korean War,[24] the 1991 Gulf War, the 2001-2021 Afghan war and the 2011 Libyan color revolution.[25]

Article 39: Acts of aggression

Pursuant to Article 39 of the UN Charter, the Security Council "shall determine" the existence of an "act of aggression".[26]

Article 51: Right of collective defense

In February 2022 Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin set forth a claim under the doctrine of 'anticipatory collective self-defense', devised originally by the Clinton administration and NATO in regard to the 1998 Kosovo conflict,[27] as it applies to Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.[28] The unilateral declarations of independence by the Donbas republics are completely legal and precedented by the West's successful demands for Kosovo to be recognized as independent from Serbia, and adjudicated as such by the International Courts.[29]

Article 53 & 107: Enforcement actions

Charter UN members from World War II may take enforcement action against any state that had been an enemy during World War II; renewal of aggressive action against a former enemy state from World War II does not require UN Security Council approval.[30]

Article 97 states, "The Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council."

Other Sections

The United Nations Economic and Social Council is a deliberative and advisory organ dedicated to promoting international economic and social cooperation and development. It cooperates with the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank Group and similar international agencies.

The United Nations Secretariat is responsible for the day-to-day administration of the UN system. The head of the Secretariat is the Secretary-General, who is nominated by the Security Council and appointed by the General Assembly for renewable five-year terms. The current Secretary-General is Ban Ki-moon, the former Foreign Minister of the Republic of Korea. It is customary to let the position rotate among the different world regions.

Criticism

The U.N. has at various times in its history been accused of inefficiency and waste, which some critics have attributed to its cumbersome and excessive bureaucracy. Probably the most controversial issue with the United Nations is the Oil-for-Food scandal.

As a meeting place for many different nations, the UN can only act as a mechanism for international consensus. The UN has been unable to act in a clear and decisive way when confronted crises in which this consensus is not present. Recent examples include the Iranian nuclear program and the genocides in Darfur, Sudan and Rwanda. Because each of the five permanent members of the Security Council has a veto, and because they often disagree, many times no action can be agreed upon. Typically but not always this division includes the United States on one side with either China, Russia or both on the other. Other times the Security Council has been able to agree but lacks the will or means to enforce its resolutions. A recent example is the 2006 Israel-Lebanon Crisis, where no action has been taken to enforce the provisions of Resolution 1559 and Resolution 1701 to disarm terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah. There usually are no consequences for violating a Security Council resolution.

Alex Jones, a paleoconservative believes that the United Nations is plotting to take over the world along with the Bilderberg organization. Some believe the United Nations will be the one-world government mentioned in Revelation.

Inclusion on the old United Nations Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) of nations such as Sudan and Libya, whose leaderships have dubious records on human rights, and Libya's chairmanship of this Commission, has been a highly controversial issue.

The UN headquarters, on the east side of Manhattan, opened its doors on January 10th, 1951.

The U.N. has been accused of hypocritical conduct and double standards. The U.N. condemns Israel for its conduct toward the Palestinians, yet it refuses to condemn China for its conduct toward the Tibetans,[31] as well as hypocrisy across the board,[32] for decades.[33] The United Nations has on many occasions ignored the plight of people across the world, especially in parts of Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. Current examples include the UN's inaction toward the Sudanese government in Darfur, the Chinese government's ethnic cleansing in Tibet, and the Israel-Arab conflict.[34]

During the Rwandan genocide, the UN did not authorize UNAMIR to intervene or use force to prevent or halt the killing.

It was also criticized as being a Communist front, with evidence including Alger Hiss, who was infamously exposed as being a Soviet agent, being one of the key founders of the United Nations, several key founders of the UN being Soviet spies or otherwise enablers, the UN's own charter being a direct copy of the Soviet constitution, and former Communist leader Joseph Z. Kornfelder's own testimony that the people who founded the UN intended for it to be a Trojan horse to implement Communism in America.[35][36][37]

The UN has supported left-wing pet agenda items. In his 2018 New Year proclamation, Secretary-General António Guterres issued a "red alert for our world" to fight against "nationalism," "xenophobia," and "climate change."[38] The UN is supportive of open borders and mass migration.[39] On Easter 2018, a UN agency made a tweet claiming that mass migration is "inevitable," "necessary," and even "desirable."[40] In May 2018, the UN's Migration Agency Director-General William Lacy Swing attacked conservative immigration policies and claimed that mass migration was in the "national interest."[41] In September 2018, Filippo Grandi, the UN High Commissioner in charge of refugee matters, downplayed the seriousness of the European migrant crisis and labeled migration in general as "a source of progress and prosperity."[42] The UN has challenged President Trump's immigration actions in court,[43] and it aided illegal immigration to the United States.[44] Additionally, the UNICEF's director stated that the West must be forced to allow mass migration.[45] Even for issues ostensibly unrelated to international relations, the UN promotes globalism as the solution to problems.[46][47]

Conservatives and proponents of Judeo-Christian values have criticized the UN's education programs for instilling left-wing and Marxist values into children in the countries where they are implemented.[48] The organization has promoted social engineering in other ways, including by demanding gender quotas on the UK Army during an operation in Africa in 2019.[49]

In 2018, the United Nations Human Rights Council effectively called for making nationalist-populism illegal and cracking down on those who voice conservative and Christian beliefs.[50] In 2019, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres announced in a speech that the UN would target so-called "hate speech."[51] Additionally, the UN regularly elects authoritarian rights-abusing dictatorships to the Human Rights Council. It has promoted Iran as a human rights-friendly country despite the opposite being true.[52]

The UN has also been criticized for promoting left-wing environmentalism and exaggerating reports on environmental damage.[53]

Totalitarian China's influence in the UN has been increasing.[54][55]

The UN takes a left-wing stance on capital punishment, condemning the conservative Trump administration's decision to restore the federal death penalty for serious crimes as "rolling back progress."[56]

Promoting abortion

The Committee for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) pushes countries to promote abortion. [57] The UN played a role in passing a radical 2019 New York abortion law that allowed abortion up to the very moment of birth.[58]

Chinese Communist infiltration

China has gained significant influence within the United Nations, and Chinese law dictates that they remain loyal to Beijing in their service.[Citation Needed]

A report from a coalition of human rights groups, led by Amnesty International Canada, says that China is increasingly using “threats, bullying and harassment” to intimidate activists around democracy, civil rights, and those who speak out against human rights abuses of Uyghurs, Tibetans, and Falun Gong practitioners.[Citation Needed]

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a long-range plan that very much includes the U.N.[Citation Needed] The regime even opened a “School of Global Governance” at the Beijing Foreign Studies University (BFSU) to train armies of future diplomats and spies to work in international organizations.[Citation Needed] In 2018, Chinese leader Xi Jinping said Beijing would take “an active part in leading the reform of the global governance system.”[Citation Needed] Former U.N. investigator-turned-whistleblower Peter Gallo said,[Citation Needed]

“the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights was caught handing over names of Chinese human rights activists to the Chinese government, so the Chinese police and security agencies could go and intimidate their relatives in China, all to ensure that nobody spoke out against China being elected to the Human Rights Council.”

Unlike individuals from most nations, and contrary to U.N. employment policies, Chinese officials openly retain their loyalty to the Communist Party above all else, which is hardly a secret. When the Chinese Communist regime arrested then-Interpol chief Meng Hongwei in 2018, it publicly accused him of failing to obey Communist Party orders,[59] among other supposed crimes.[Citation Needed]

Communist China agents run four of 15 specialized U.N. agencies, including the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), the Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), and the U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). By comparison, just one American holds a top post in a U.N. specialized agency.

Most of those leadership positions for Communist Chinese agents were secured during the Obama administration. Numerous other top spots for Chinese agents also occurred during the Obama administration: Xue Hanqin’s selection to the International Court of Justice, Tao Zhang’s appointment as deputy chief of the International Monetary Fund in August of 2016, and Yi Xiaozhun’s 2013 appointment as deputy leader of the World Trade Organization, among many others.

In 2019, using bribery and threats,[Citation Needed] Beijing managed to seize control of the powerful U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), despite Trump administration efforts to block that. Years earlier, though, Americans working within and around the U.N. agency warned about Chinese “trust funds” within FAO, as well as that Beijing would be running a candidate to take over the agency.

In 2019, Beijing was working to install Andy Tsang as head of the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime, while plenty of other Chinese operatives also were being groomed for senior posts across the U.N. Beijing’s agents lead key U.N. conferences as well, with CCP propaganda organs boasting that Beijing played a “crucial role” in the U.N. Agenda 2030 sustainability plan for humanity.[60]

By the end of 2020, China had become the largest provider of peacekeepers among the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council.[61]

UN failure at serious war crimes and torture en masse

Despite massive evidence of perpetrating crimes against humanity and war crimes, the Syrian regime seems to be in a state of impunity when it comes to international justice.[62]

Arab-Israel record/dispute

B'nai B'rith magazine gives a Jewish view of the UN, winter 2009 online

A General Assembly resolution led to the partition of Palestine in 1947, but the UN was useless in preventing armed Arab aggression against the new State of Israel in 1948. Increasingly the General Assembly became a forum for Arab attacks on Israel. Ahmed Shukairy, the first chairman of the Palestinian Liberation Organization terror group, was a Syrian delegate from 1949 to 1951 and later Saudi ambassador to the UN from 1957 to 1962. Shukairy was a Nazi collaborator[63] who "spread Nazi-style hatred of Jews, even in the United Nations." [64]

The UN has taken a one-sided approach to issues relating to the Israel-Arab conflict. Israel has consistently been singled out by the UN for uniquely critical treatment. In 1975 the General Assembly passed a resolution declaring that "Zionism is racism",[65] and UN-sponsored meetings supposedly opposing racism have criticized Israel (which grants equal political and religious rights to Arabs) while suppressing all criticism of those Arab countries (where non-Muslims are second-class citizens and anti-Semitism enjoys state support).

Unlike other refugee groups, the Palestinian Arabs have their own agency within the United Nations, and are beneficiaries of special events such as an "International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People."[66] Israel was excluded from membership in any of the UN's regional groups until 2000. In effect, this meant Israel was forbidden from serving on UN bodies such as the Security Council. Israel's recent permission to participate more fully within the UN as a member of the Western European and Others regional group is temporary and subject to renewal. Israel is allowed to participate only in the New York operations of the UN and is excluded from the UN offices in Geneva, Nairobi, Rome, and Vienna which handle such issues as human rights and arms control. Censure of Israel has apparently been instituted as a routine agenda item for various UN bodies such as the Human Rights Council. The 1975 Resolution 3379 qualified Zionism as a form of racism (later revoked with Resolution 4686).

On December 23, 2016, due to the leftist Obama Administration's abstention from a vote which broke over 35 years of American policy, a blatantly anti-Israel resolution was passed in the U.N.[67][68] In response to the anti-Israel UN vote, Israel cut $6 million in its annual dues to the leftist organization on January 6, 2017.[69]

In March 2017, the UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia authored a destructive and anti-Semitic[70][71] report against Israel. The report and agency were strongly criticized by the United States and UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, and the executive director of the commission resigned in response.[72][73]

In 2019, the United Nations Economic and Social Council – comprised of Islamic and otherwise totalitarian countries with records of disrespecting women, such as Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Turkey, Pakistan, Yemen, Iran, and China – voted to condemn Israel for allegedly violating women's rights.[74][75]

UN vs Israel

The UN’s History of the ‘Question of Palestine’ Omits Every Palestinian Attack on Jews.[76] It says, “1936/1939 — Palestinian rebellion against the British Mandate and Jewish immigration.” But not that Arabs murdered Jews, just that it was a "rebellion."


There are many factors in UN's war against Israel since the 1970s, including the Arab oil lobby,[77] the Arab huge market as an economic power, Islamic bigotry by religious zealots influencing its politicians represemting Muslim countries, radical liberal agenda pushers (including extremists inside Israel, those making much noise who don't pass the Lynch test) and plain old racists.[78]

The OIC, which controls the UN, hours after Hamas atrocities Oct-7, condemned rather Israel. Called the savages "martyrs."

Islamic lobby: Islamic countries bloc of over 50 countries dictates much of UN decisions and appointments, including 'deals', we will vote for your candidate if you vote for ours.

This effects at ICC (International Criminal Court) and ICJ (International Court of Justice)..

Indeed, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has 57 members, 56 of which are also member states of the United Nations, with 48 countries being Muslim majority countries.


From a critic of Israel, judge Richard Goldstone:[79]

I insisted on changing the original mandate adopted by the Human Rights Council, which was skewed against Israel. I have always been clear that Israel, like any other sovereign nation, has the right and obligation to defend itself and its citizens against attacks from abroad and within. Something that has not been recognized often enough is the fact that our report marked the first time illegal acts of terrorism from Hamas were being investigated and condemned by the United Nations. I had hoped that our inquiry into all aspects of the Gaza conflict would begin a new era of evenhandedness at the U.N. Human Rights Council, whose history of bias against Israel cannot be doubted.

Among highlighted actions in UN's war against Israel [published in 2021]:[80]

  • UN’s ECOSOC Singles Out Israel for “Violating Women’s Rights”.

Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Belarus were among member states of the UN’s 54-nation Economic and Social Council that voted to single out Israel as the only country in the world to be rebuked this year for allegedly violating women’s rights.

  • World Health Assembly Deviates From Coronavirus to Condemn Israel.
  • UN’s Virtual Palestinian Exhibit Distorts Facts..
  • UN Refers To Jerusalem’s Temple Mount Solely by Its Muslim Name.
  • UN Censors UN Watch Submissions on Palestinian Abuse of Child Rights.
  • Despite Pandemic, UN Human Rights Council Holds Three Anti-Israel Sessions Under Infamous Agenda Item 7.
  • UN Special Rapporteur on Palestinian Human Rights Michael Lynk Turns Blind Eye to Hamas & PA Abuses.
  • UN General Assembly Condemns Israel in 17 Resolutions, 6 on Rest of the World Combined.
  • UN Releases Anti-Israel Blacklist, Fueling BDS.

At UN's silence while Libertad protesters were crushed in oppressive Cuba in 2021, activist noted:[81]

There are real crimes of oppression, violence and killing of civilians around the world around the world. This is happening right now in Cuba, in South Africa and even in the Palestinian Authority. But the UN Human Rights Council, the International Criminal Court in The Hague and even the US administration are silent and continue to engage only in Israel.

In the aftermath of Guardian of Walls, all three panelists set up by the UN so called "human rights" have a history of activism and inflammatory rhetoric against Israel. [82] Shocker.[83]

When infamous virulently anti-Israel Navi Pillay, jumped on the opportunity to smear Israel under a mask of "investigating"[84][85] (and Miloon Kothari Who lied for example on Al Jazeera in 2011[85]) Her "report" was condemned by 22 nations.[86] Some black South Africans who were victims of the original, South-African brand of apartheid were incensed at her charge and that 'Nelson Mandela Would Not Approve' on the smear "report."[87]

In addition, during that very report work, what was exposed was the real apartheid - that on the Arab Palestinian side:[88]

The report documents how the Palestinian Authority enforces a system of apartheid to ensure that every inch of territory under its control is strictly judenrein (free of Jews) by punishing Palestinian land sales to Jews with the death penalty, and by inciting the murder of Jews through financial rewards to terrorists.


More on Navi Pillay: June/2024: 'Navi Pillay sits a top of the UN pantheon of Jew-hatred. This latest "report", replete with malicious falsehoods & gross distortions of truth, is tantamount to a full antisemitic blood libel. That it was released on Shavuot, only further underscores the authors disdain for Jews.'[89]


At the Iran/Hamas/PIJ Oct 2023 barbarity attack

At the barbarian Iran/Hamas/PIJ onslaught Oct 2023 which led to Swords of Iron, the US demanded condemnation of Hamas at UN meeting, but Security Council taook no immediate action.[90]

The B'nai B'rith sent a letter to the editor of the Washington Post:

“

B'nai B’m'rith International CEO Dan Mariaschin and AJIRI-BBI Chair Richard P. Schifter sent a letter to the Washington Post regarding its recent, misleading article about UNRWA (“What is UNRWA, the U.N. agency in Gaza struggling to help Palestinians?” Washington Post, October 16).

From Daniel S. Mariaschin, B’nai B’rith International CEO and Richard P. Schifter, AJIRI-BBI Chair:

The Washington Post unfortunately misses a crucial and central point in its article about the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) (“What is UNRWA, the U.N. agency in Gaza struggling to help Palestinians?” Washington Post, October 16). Far from being an agency acting merely “to protect and support civilians,” it is an extremely problematic entity that for 75 years has exacerbated the Palestinian problem and symbolized the failure to solve it.

As the article itself casually states, UNRWA is “unique…in terms of its long-standing commitment to one group of refugees.” UNRWA is, in fact, an outrageous anomaly (all other refugees in the world are covered by UNHCR—the U.N. refugee agency) that has perpetuated the Arab-Israeli conflict and has thus cost many thousands of lives, including the lives of over 1,300 innocent Israelis massacred on October 7 by Hamas terrorists claiming the phony grievances—of “dispossession”—that are pushed by UNRWA.

The refugees from 1948 (refugees from a war initiated by Arab states against the new State of Israel, the aim of which was to destroy the latter) should have been resettled long ago, as have been millions of refugees from other conflicts all over the world. They were purposely kept as “refugees” by the Arab governments and by UNRWA to whip up hatred against Israel.

Although there are believed to be only some 30,000 living Palestinian refugees from 1948, UNRWA incredibly recognizes over 5.9 million descendants of these refugees, as eligible for its services. UNRWA schools, far from teaching Palestinian children to become “confident, innovative, questioning, thoughtful, and open-minded, to uphold human values and tolerance,” as the article falsely claims, inculcate generation after generation with hatred of and resentment against Israel and with the false fantasy that they will one day “return” to their homes.

As pointed out in Einat Wilf and Adi Schwartz’s excellent book, “The War of Return,” numerous terrorists (including at least one of the surviving Munich Olympic massacre perpetrators) were direct products of UNRWA schools. UNRWA is simply not a neutral humanitarian institution. It is a malign actor that exacerbates the problems and suffering of the Palestinian people. [91]

”
Matthias Schmale

The 2021's head of the UN Palestinian refugee agency’s mission (UNRWA) in Gaza Matthias Schmale, who was always anti Israel, after the operation Guardian of the Walls, only as much as agreed during an interview with an Israeli news channel that IDF airstrikes in Gaza were 'precise,' "Palestinians" protested against him and he had to leave the post.[92]

Sarah Muscroft

UN senior official official who dared to criticize Palestinian Islamic Jihad for its indiscriminate rocket attacks which triggers IDF response, lost job after BDS and pro Jihad "Palestinian" pressure.[92] From reaction to UN conduct: "Every time I think the UN and its people have hit rock bottom, they prove that you can go lower. Shocking!."[93]

Francesca Albanese
Francesca Albanese - Hamas cheered (Graphic, a meme)

Watchdog, who among activists, raised alarm ahead of her appointment, that whe was not supposed to get her position in the first place for her Israelophobia and even antisemitic record, showed, were proven right with her propaganda "report" in 2022.[94] This infamous anti-Israel F Albanese, got cheers from the terror org. Hamas, naturally, after she ignored Israelis' rights to human rights in her so-called "report." Not one word about incitement or glorification of terror in Palestinian media and schools. In fact, in a two year period when more Israeli civilians are being murdered than at any time since 2008, their deaths are utterly absent.  There is not even a pretense of impartiality - no paragraph buried inside the so-called "report" saying, oh by the way, armed militias are popping up in Jenin and Nablus and Hebron, or a reform? declaration that Israel has the right to defend itself. Nothing. (July/2023). [95]


Already in 2014, Fascist Francesca Albanese promoted the Pallyweid "genocide" thing.[96]


In addition, in 2014, the "non lawyer" Francesca Albanese wrote about "15,000 Hamas militiamen who resist" Also, she wrote about Palestinians who defend themselves with "silly, deranged missiles" ("missili squinternati" in Italian).[97]


In Nov 2023, Francesca Albanese, faced accusations amid controversy. "Despite the expectation of impartiality for UN special rapporteurs, Albanese’s statements have consistently reflected a pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli stance. The special rapporteur, in fact, has a history of making inflammatory remarks, such as accusing the “Jewish lobby” of controlling the United States of America, comparing Israel to the Nazis, and referring to Israel as a settler-colonial enterprise." A trip to Australia, sponsored by Palestinian lobbying groups, violates Article 3 of the UN code of conduct. Already in 2022 it was raised that she failed to disclose that her husband, Massimiliano Calì, had worked for the Ministry of Economy of the Palestinian Authority. And Italian journalist Antonino Monteleone has examined her claim to be a “lawyer”, after discrepancies emerged in her curriculum vitae.[98]


There were calls to fire her in Feb 2024, after she said that the Oct 7 2023 Hamas led atrocities on civilians were supposedly "not" antisemitic...[99]


As she went on in a PallyWeid accusation in March 2024, the US State Department denounced her anti-Semitic record and rejected her "genocide" false accusation.[100]


Report (2024): Francesca Albanese runs int'l network targeting Israel.[101] The report found that the network's members include some 100 people and NGOs, such as UN, UNRWA, Palestinian, and PLO officials, along with pro-Palestinian academics and activists.


Oct/2024:

Replied to infamous Francesca Albanese after sharing horrible post which included blaming Israel for 9/11, predicting death of US 'must read' accompanied with a vile image: "How do you have a job at the UN? The UN has an anti-Semitism problem."[102]


Oct/2024:


UN Watch calls for sanctions against Francesca Albanese over antisemitism and terrorism support. UN Watch report exposes Francesca Albanese's antisemitism, support for terrorism, and financial misconduct. A report by United Nations Watch on Wednesday is urging democratic nations to impose sanctions on Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on Palestinian human rights, accusing her of promoting antisemitism, supporting terrorism, and spreading misinformation. Titled "Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: Why Democracies Should Sanction UN Rapporteur Francesca Albanese," the report was presented to the UN Human Rights Council on October 23, 2024. The report calls for Albanese's removal, citing a series of statements and actions that violate UN impartiality standards and promote hatred against Israel and the Jewish people. UN Watch, a Geneva-based human rights group, demands swift action to terminate her mandate. The report identifies numerous instances in which Albanese has been accused of using antisemitic rhetoric. In a 2014 Facebook post, Albanese claimed, “America is subjugated by the Jewish Lobby,” a classic antisemitic trope suggesting Jewish control of governments. In another incident from February 2024, she downplayed the atrocities of the October 7 Hamas massacre, dismissing it as a “reaction to Israel’s oppression,” even after Hamas targeted Jewish civilians in the deadliest attack against Jews since the Holocaust. France called her remarks "scandalous" and "a disgrace," while Germany condemned them as "appalling." The report also cites Albanese’s frequent comparisons of Israel to Nazi Germany. In July 2024, she reportedly compared Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Adolf Hitler. In another instance, she described Gaza as “the largest and most shameful concentration camp of the 21st century,” which UN Watch notes is a textbook case of antisemitism under the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition. US Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield condemned Albanese, declaring, “It is clear she is not fit for this or any position at the UN.” The US Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism, Ambassador Deborah Lipstadt, also called out her statements as “blatant antisemitic rhetoric.” In addition to her antisemitic rhetoric, Albanese has openly supported terrorism, the report states. At a 2022 Hamas conference, she told the audience, “You have a right to resist,” an endorsement of violent resistance, according to the report. She has repeatedly justified Hamas rocket attacks against Israeli civilians, framing them as legitimate responses to Israel’s actions. Albanese is quoted in the report as saying, “The Palestinians have no other room for dissent than violence.”[103]


2025:


Human rights expert said she is the "21st-century Joseph Goebbels,"[104] and that she uses Nazi textbook to produce Oct. 7 denial.[105] In July 2025, the US sanctioned the bigot.[106][107]

When Italy turned on Fascista Francesca

In Nov 2025, Francesca Albanese, seemed to justify an attack on Italian journalists La Stampa by anti-Israel Arab gang. Albanese's comment was seen as a warning to the press to change its coverage of the Gaza conflict.[108]

As it was reported: "Italy turns on UN's Francesca Albanese for comments excusing violence against journalists and Israel."[109]

For years, her voice has been prominent on every platform critical of Israel, especially over the past two years during the war in Gaza. Francesca Albanese, the Italian special rapporteur for the UN Human Rights Council on the Palestinian territories, has become one of the most aggressive and visible faces of Italy’s anti-Israel left.

She rarely misses a chance to level harsh accusations at Israel and to encourage rhetoric that critics say borders on incitement. Israel and the United States, along with many figures in Italy’s Jewish community and politicians on the right, have accused her of antisemitism.

Then, the UN spokesman refuted 'press freedom comment', without mentioning Albanese.[108]

Georgetown University Cuts Ties

In Dec 2025: "Georgetown University Cuts Ties with UN’s Francesca Albanese Over Antisemitic Remarks'. Georgetown University has severed ties with Francesca Albanese, following her controversial antisemitic remarks, which included justifying the October 7 attacks. This move came after UN Watch led a campaign to hold her accountable. Albanese had been listed on Georgetown’s Institute for the Study of International Migration’s "Other Affiliated Scholars" page, but her profile has now been removed entirely from the university's website. The decision has sparked praise for upholding academic integrity and condemning rhetoric that supports violence against civilians. Albanese, who faces U.S. sanctions, has been widely criticized for her alleged support for terrorism and antisemitism. As it was out; "The university's decision to cut ties with Albanese was a significant move in holding an international legal figure accountable for antisemitic behavior."[110]Georgetown University severs ties with UN’s Francesca Albanese over antisemitic remarks. Shoshanna Baker, JPost, December 25, 2025.

"Georgetown University has removed Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur, following her antisemitic remarks, including justifying the October 7 attacks, after a campaign by UN Watch.

</ref>

U.N. Commissions

One of the major reasons the United Nations is considered by some to be useless is the Security Council. Along with other countries elected for a term of years, the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, China, and France all have a permanent seat, along with the power to veto any decision made by the Security Council. When combined with the Security Council's role as voting on most major issues, including military intervention, and the tendency for most resolutions introduced to be vetoed by one or more nations, the Security Council and by extension the United Nations has become ineffective. The U.N. at times places member states in commissions or positions of importance which many believe they don't deserve. The following is a sample of some of those nations and the positions of importance they have been placed in (this list does not include members that are on those commissions and deserve their place).

The following programs expose the U.N.'s incompetence by placing unworthy member states in positions of importance;[111]

U.N. Human Rights Council

Mission: "…responsible for promoting universal respect for the protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all….”
Members: Saudi Arabia, China, Vice-Presidents: Cuba, Angola. Libya was kicked off in February.

U.N. Commission on the Status of Women

Mission: “…set global standards and formulate concrete policies to promote gender equality and advancement of women worldwide."
Members: The Democratic Republic of Congo, Iran

U.N. Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice

Mission: “…set…out global strategy to prevent crime and promote stable criminal justice systems...and improving the efficiency and fairness of criminal justice administration systems."
Members: Libya, Russia, Sudan, Iran, The Democratic Republic of Congo, Pakistan

U.N. Women

Mission: “…support, address and contribute to gender equality and the empowerment and the advancement of women…”
Members: Executive Board: Libya, Saudi Arabia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, China

U.N. Economic and Social Council

Mission: “…responsible for: promoting higher standards of living, full employment, and economic and social progress…encouraging universal respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms…"
Members: Saudi Arabia

Taliban fighter holding a group of women and children against a wall with a UN Sustainable Development poster, August 17, 2021.[112]

U.N. Commission on Sustainable Development

Mission: "...to promote dialogue and build partnerships for sustainable development with major groups include[ing] women, youth, indigenous peoples, non-governmental organizations, local authorities, workers and trade unions, business and industry, the scientific community, and farmers…"
Members: Angola, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia

U.N. Commission on Social Development

Mission: “….promoting full employment and decent work for all...Improving public sector effectiveness....National and international cooperation for social development..."
Members: Cuba, Egypt, Zimbabwe

U.N. Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations

Mission: “…The consideration of applications for consultative status [with the UN]…submitted by NGOs…”
Members: Sudan, Cuba, Pakistan, China

U.N. Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT)

Mission: “…promote socially and environmentally sustainable towns and cities with the goal of providing adequate shelter for all…security of tenure and equal access to economic resources for all, with a specific focus on gender equality.”
Members: Governing Council: Iran

U.N. Committee on Information

Mission: “To promote the establishment of a new, more just and more effective world information and communication order…based on the free circulation and wider and better-balanced dissemination of information…”
Members: China, Libya, Kazakhstan, Iran

U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF)

Mission: “….advocate for the protection of children's rights, to help meet their basic needs and to expand their opportunities to reach their full potential…”
Members: Executive Board: Sudan, China

U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees

Mission: “…safeguard the rights and well-being of refugees.”
Members: Executive Committee: Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan

U.N. World Food Programme

Mission: “advocate policies, strategies and operations that directly benefit the poor and hungry."
Members: Executive Board: Sudan

UN Peacekeepers Child Sexual Abuse

The United Nations since its founding has been enmeshed in various scandals.

In July 1997 the UN announced an investigation into United Nations Peacekeeping Forces in Cote d'Ivoire on charges of widespread sexual abuse with a large number of underage girls.[113] More than 300 members of UN peacekeeping missions around the world have been investigated for sexual exploitation and abuse since 2004, including some stationed in Congo, Cambodia and Haiti.[114]

Incidents

  • 1998 - Bosnia [115]
  • 2003 - Nepalese troops accused of sexual abuse while serving in DR Congo. Six are later jailed
  • 2004 - Two UN peacekeepers repatriated after being accused of abuse in Burundi
  • 2005 - UN troops accused of rape and sexual abuse in Sudan [116]
  • 2006 - UN personnel accused of rape and exploitation on missions is Haiti and Liberia
  • 2007 - UN launches probe into sexual abuse claims in Ivory Coast

Notable roles of U.S. Ambassadors to the U.N.

LOL: Islamic oppressive republic of Iran as UNGA "VP secretary"

Bitter joke. In 2023, the oppressive Islamic Republic of Iran was named vice president of UN General Assembly.

“

Following Iran—a country that executes its citizens for “blasphemous” social-media posts—gaining leadership over a U.N. forum based on promoting human rights through technology, the Islamic regime in Tehran has now gained another position of influence within the international body dedicated to fostering peace: vice president of the General Assembly...[117]

”

Naturally, angering the international community.[118] "The criminals who trample their own people, violate UN Security Council resolutions, arm Russia with 400 UAVs to bomb Ukrainian civilians, fail to cooperate with IAEA and foment terrorism at home and abroad are unfit to serve on a committee dealing with disarmament and international security,." [119]

Lebanon: so-called "peacekeepers" AKA Hezbollah terror enablers

On Sep 2023, [120] Lebanese Official: UNIFIL's presence in Lebanon is Pointless if it does not perform its duty but Rmrather serves Hizbullah.

Further reading

  • Pubantz, Jerry, ed. Encyclopedia of the United Nations (2nd ed. 2008), useful basic guide to all activities
  • Weiss, Thomas G., and Sam Daws, eds. The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations (2009), 848pp; articles by scholars excerpt and text search
  • Weiss, Thomas G. The United Nations and Changing World Politics (6th ed. 2009), 504pp; solid college textbook and text search

Other

See also

External links

Sites critical of the U.N.

References

  1. ↑ There are some caveats; It is administered by the United Nations, and Subject only to International Law, but is still part of the United States.
  2. ↑ [1]
  3. ↑ Kincaid, Cliff. The Plan For Socialist World Government. Accuracy in Media. Retrieved on 2010-02-06.
  4. ↑ United Nations. Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved on 2010-02-06.
  5. ↑ Liberal equals socialist equals communitarian equals fabian society equals Agenda 21. middletownca.com. Retrieved on 2010-02-06.
  6. ↑ Paun, Carmen (May 30, 2019). UN secretary-general attacks populists in Charlemagne Prize speech. Politico. Retrieved May 30, 2019.
  7. ↑ [2]
    "The Russians are and will continue to be on the inside of any military action taken by the Security Council of the United Nations", Rep. Usher L. Burdick, North Dakota, January 17, 1957:
    "This means that since the Security Council was organized, the Russians, through the Secretary [of the Security Council], have had close touch with all military plans. The directives to MacArthur and the reports coming from him, passed through the hands of this Secretary. Now can you realize what MacArthur was up against in trying to win the Korean War?"
  8. ↑ https://www.un.org/apps/news/infocus/trygvie-lie.asp#.WVBpUoWcE2w
  9. ↑ https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/23064-socialist-in-chief-a-history-of-the-un-secretaries-general
  10. ↑ http://www.peacekey.com/1-1-a/UN_Web/1_UN_Book/The_Fearful_Master_10.htm
  11. ↑ https://www.ourrepubliconline.com/Author/138
  12. ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/books/98/12/06/specials/shawcross-mercy.html
  13. ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1979/11/18/the-politics-of-famine-in-cambodia/81f0849e-9d1a-493c-b92a-aa00a9d3b1db/?utm_term=.239d3e95fc5d
  14. ↑ https://www.upi.com/Archives/1985/01/28/UN-Secretary-General-Javier-Perez-de-Cuellar-took-his/4605475736400/
  15. ↑ http://web.archive.org/web/20081105143623/https://www.aim.org/wls/sovereignty-is-obsolete/
  16. ↑ http://web.archive.org/web/20081105131430/http://www.aim.org/wls/weakening-sovereignty-2/
  17. ↑ http://www.aim.org/wls/world-government/
  18. ↑ https://cnav.news/2015/10/14/news/world-news/a-very-syrious-matter/
  19. ↑ chttps://kurtnimmo.substack.com/p/blame-game-over-the-bombing-of-the
  20. ↑ International Court of Justice, How the Court works, retrieved 26 April 2007.
  21. ↑ UN Watch: Report: Head of World Court Condemned Israel 210 Times as Lebanon’s UN Rep, Sided With Regimes in Iran, Syria, Belarus, Cuba, Un Watch, July 18, 2024
  22. ↑ 2625 (XXV). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
  23. ↑ UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL. Sanctions. un.org
  24. ↑ The Soviet Union, a permanent member, did not veto the resolution to send "U.N troops" to the Korean Peninsula to fight Soviet-backed North Korean forces.
  25. ↑ Permanent members Russia and China abstained and did not veto the Resolutions, hence the Resolutions passed.
  26. ↑ "Crimes within the Court's Jurisdiction", ICC
  27. ↑ https://youtu.be/rsSB_2RShBQ
  28. ↑ https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/
  29. ↑ https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/141
  30. ↑ https://legal.un.org/repertory/art107/english/rep_supp9_vol6_art107.pdf
  31. ↑ The U.N.'s Hypocrisy in Tibet, Joseph Klein, Front Page Magazine, March 28, 2008
  32. ↑ Eugene Chudnovsky, The UN is a hypocrite on human rights, Washington Examiner, December 29, 2016
  33. ↑ The U.N. and Human Rights: the Double Standard, The Heritage Foundation, May 11, 1982
  34. ↑ IBD Editorial, U.N. Fiddles As China Torches Tibet, retrieved 30 March 2008.
  35. ↑ http://www.mycentraljersey.com/story/opinion/readers/2016/05/25/united-nations-communist-plot/84927828/
  36. ↑ http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0900comun.htm
  37. ↑ http://www.iahf.com/world/un-milit.html
  38. ↑ Starr, Penny (January 1, 2018). U.N. Chief Issues ‘Red Alert’ Against Nationalism, Xenophobia, Climate Change for 2018. Breitbart News. Retrieved January 5, 2018.
  39. ↑ Montgomery, Jack (January 12, 2018). New United Nations Boss Unveils Plan to Promote Global Mass Migration. Breitbart News. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  40. ↑ Williams, Thomas D. (April 3, 2018). UN Easter Message: Migration Is ‘Inevitable – Desirable – Necessary’. Breitbart News. Retrieved April 3, 2018.
  41. ↑ Montgomery, Jack (May 20, 2018). United Nations Migration Chief Attacks Trump, Claims Mass Migration in ‘National Interest’. Breitbart News. Retrieved May 20, 2018.
  42. ↑ Hale, Virginia (September 22, 2018). UN Refugee Chief Denies Migrant Crisis in Europe, Declares Mass Migration a ‘Source of Progress and Prosperity’. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  43. ↑ Munro, Neil (October 10, 2018). U.N. Official Says U.S. Judge Must Block Donald Trump’s Migration Reforms. Breitbart News. Retrieved October 10, 2018.
  44. ↑ Madden, Nate (April 25, 2019). The UN is directly assisting the erosion of our sovereignty at the border. Why are we still funding it? Conservative Review. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
  45. ↑ Rush, Nayla (July 10, 2019). UNICEF Chief: Developed World "Must" Welcome All Migrants Because "Migration Is Not a Choice". Center for Immigration Studies. Retrieved July 10, 2019.
  46. ↑ Starr, Penny (May 6, 2019). UN: Humans Could Cause Extinction of 1 Million Species, Globalism Will Fix. Breitbart News. Retrieved May 6, 2019.
  47. ↑ Worstall, Tim (May 6, 2019). A UN report is concerned about 1 million species going extinct, but its solutions are dead wrong. Washington Examiner. Retrieved May 6, 2019.
  48. ↑ Newman, Alex (February 6, 2019). Education’s Future: Globalization of Indoctrination. The New American. Retrieved February 6, 2019.
    See also:
  49. ↑ Kent, Simon (December 22, 2019). U.N. Imposes Strict Gender Quotas on British Army for Africa Jihadi Fight. Breitbart News. Retrieved December 22, 2019.
  50. ↑ Newman, Alex (November 12, 2018). UN Demands Ban on Trump-style “Nationalist Populism”. The New American. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  51. ↑ Ruse, Austin (March 11, 2019). United Nations secretary-general prepared to fight free speech worldwide. LifeSiteNews (from C-Fam). Retrieved March 11, 2019.
  52. ↑ Kraychik, Robert (November 8, 2019). U.N. Hosts Exhibit on Iran’s ‘Human Rights Achievements’. Breitbart News. Retrieved November 9, 2019.
  53. ↑ Richardson, Valerie (May 22, 2019). 'Authoritative propaganda': Skeptics blast U.N. warning of mass species extinction. The Washington Times. Retrieved May 23, 2019.
  54. ↑ Evansky, Ben; Shaw, Adam (July 13, 2019). Chinese influence surges at UN, as US warns of ‘concerted push’ to advance agenda. Fox News. Retrieved July 13, 2019.
  55. ↑ Newman, Alex (July 10, 2019). Using Bribery and Threats, China Seizes Another UN Agency. The New American. Retrieved July 13, 2019.
  56. ↑ Budryk, Zack (July 30, 2019). UN: Trump administration 'rolling back progress' with death penalty decision. The Hill. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
  57. ↑ United Nations Committee Pushes Countries to Promote Abortion in CEDAW Mtg, Samantha Singson, Life News, February 15, 2008
  58. ↑ Ruse, Austin (February 15, 2019). Pro-abortion UN helped pass New York abortion-till-birth law. LifeSiteNews (from C-Fam). Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  59. ↑ https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-45777681
  60. ↑ https://www.theepochtimes.com/is-trump-really-to-blame-for-chinas-rise-at-the-un-as-media-claim_3094695.html
  61. ↑ https://jamestown.org/program/chinas-discourse-and-interests-related-to-its-role-in-u-n-peacekeeping/
  62. ↑ Mohamad Kamal al-Labwani, The UN Process and the War Crimes of Assad, Washington Institute, Feb 11, 2021.

    After the UN's failures regarding Assad, Syrians need a more forceful option to restore their dignity and rights....

    Despite massive evidence of perpetrating crimes against humanity and war crimes, the Syrian regime seems to be in a state of impunity when it comes to international justice. At present, the UN peace efforts seem to be aiding Assad’s attempts to legitimize himself rather than punishing him for war crimes. The Syrian Civil Movement, a group of tens of thousands of Syrian activists and civilians who have suffered the atrocities of the ongoing dirty war in Syria, call on all those involved in finding peace for Syria to remember the truth of the war’s dynamics.

    The UN efforts to resolve the Syrian crisis in Vienna currently appear to be driven by a misdiagnosis of the situation in Syria as a conflict between pro- and anti-regime groups. In fact, the conflict remains an authoritarian regime’s heinous crackdown on its own civilians with a horrifying number of human casualties, massive civilian displacement, and extensive destruction. 

  63. ↑ Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the ..., Volume 107, Part 24, United States Congress 1961, p.5735:

    Warmongering in the U.N. Extension of Remarks Of Hon. Lester Holtzman Of New York. In the House of Representatives. Wednesday, July 26, 1961... Shukairy got his start in politics in the early 1930s when he belonged to a group of fanatical extremists led by the ex-Muftl... when Soviet Russia joined the Allies, Shukairy's group split with the Communists and went all out for Hitler.

  64. ↑ Looking Back: December 14, 2012, The Forward. December 5, 2012 50 Years Ago. 1962 More and more evidence is coming to light that a number of Arab countries are actively courting former Nazis and bringing them over... Ahmed Shukairy, Saudi Arabia's current representative to the U.N., was a close collaborator with the mufti. He continues to spread Nazi-style hatred of Jews, even in the United Nations.
  65. ↑ 16/12/1991, A/RES/46/86, Elimination of racism and racial discrimination/Zionism
  66. ↑ UN Web Site for International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, retrieved June 29, 2007
  67. ↑ Israel fears Obama will strike again. World Israel News. December 26, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2016.
  68. ↑ Berkowitz, Adam Eliyahu (December 26, 2016). Fed Up With United States Trickery, Netanyahu Takes Drastic Actions. Breaking Israel News. Retrieved December 26, 2016.
  69. ↑ Israel halts $6 million to UN to protest UN settlements vote. Fox News (from the Associated Press). January 6, 2017. Retrieved January 7, 2017.
  70. ↑ Tobin, Jonathan S. (March 17, 2017). More than Just Another Anti-Israel U.N. Farce. National Review. Retrieved March 18, 2017.
  71. ↑ Russell, George (March 17, 2017). Beyond 'apartheid'--U.N. commission pushes legal and propaganda offensive against Israel. Fox News. Retrieved March 18, 2017.
  72. ↑ Shaw, Adam (March 17, 2017). UN official resigns over nixed anti-Israel report after pressure from Haley. Fox News. Retrieved March 18, 2017.
  73. ↑ UN Official Quitting Over ‘Israel Apartheid’ Report. Breitbart News. March 17, 2017. Retrieved March 18, 2017.
  74. ↑ Murphy, James (July 27, 2019). UN Council Condemns Israel as Sole World Violator of Women’s Rights. The New American. Retrieved July 29, 2019.
  75. ↑ Danan, Deborah (July 29, 2019). UN Resolutions Smear Israel as ‘Obstacle’ to Women’s Rights, Ignore Actual Violators. Brietbart News. Retrieved July 29, 2019.
  76. ↑ The UN’s History of the ‘Question of Palestine’ Omits Every Palestinian Attack on Jews, Algemeiner, Aug 11, 2023.
  77. ↑ Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 146 (2000), Part 15 [Senate] [Pages 22562-22566] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov] MIDDLE EAST CRISIS A Country United] The Arab lobby at the United Nations always asks for the moon, in the hopes of passing a slightly less outrageous version...
  78. ↑ Racists cry racism at U.N. conference - WND, Sep 10, 2001
  79. ↑ Richard Goldstone, "Reconsidering the Goldstone Report on Israel and war crimes." April 1, 2011.
  80. ↑ The U.N.’s Top 10 Worst Anti-Israel Actions of 2020 UN Watch, January 13, 2021
  81. ↑ (@YosephHaddad) Tweeted: There are real crimes of oppression, violence and killing of civilians around the world around the world. This is happening right now in Cuba, in South Africa and even in the Palestinian Authority. But the UN Human Rights Council, the International Criminal Court in The Hague and even the US administration are silent and continue to engage only in Israel. July 16, 2021
  82. ↑ Lahav Harkov, "Israel critics comprise UNHRC’s permanent war-crimes probe." JPost, July 22, 2021. All three panelists have a history of activism and inflammatory rhetoric against Israel.
  83. ↑ Lahav Harkov (@LahavHarkov) Tweeted: I know this is really going to shock all 3 of you who thought Israel was going to get a fair shake, but the 3 members of the UNHRC’s permanent war-crimes probe against Israel all have a history of inflammatory anti-Israel statements and activism. https://t.co/Aw91xA17jO July 22, 2021
  84. ↑ Today Lazaroff, NGO: Pillay is biased against Israel, must be ousted from UNHRC probe, Jerusalem Post, Feb 14, 2022
  85. ↑ 85.0 85.1 Anti-Israel Bias and NGO Links of UNHRC’s Gaza Commission of Inquiry Members, Ngo Monitor, February 22, 2022.
  86. ↑ Utanar Eichner, U.S. condemns UN Human Rights Council over anti-Israel bias, Ynet, June 13, 2022.

    Washington joined by 21 other countries in call to end disproportionate attention dedicated to Israel by humans rights body after release of report accusing Jerusalem of perpetuating conflict with Palestinians.

  87. ↑ Ben Cohen, ‘Nelson Mandela Would Not Approve’: South Africans Denounce UN Report on Palestinians, Algemeiner, June 10, 2022.

    A group of pro-Israel South Africans has invoked the figure of the late Nelson Mandela, the iconic leader of their country’s anti-apartheid struggle, in a forthright condemnation of the recent UN Human Rights Council’s Commission of Inquiry (COI) report that blamed Israel’s “perpetual occupation” for the ongoing conflict with the Palestinians.

  88. ↑ Palestinian Apartheid Exposed at U.N. Inquiry, UN Watch, March 10, 2022.
  89. ↑ Arsen Ostrovsky 🎗️ @Ostrov_A (Jun 12, 2024):

    Navi Pillay sits a top of the UN pantheon of Jew-hatred. This latest report, replete with malicious falsehoods & gross distortions of truth, is tantamount to a full antisemitic blood libel. That it was released on Shavuot, only further underscores the authors disdain for Jews. Jewish News Syndicate @JNS_org "A narrow-led political agenda against Israel.” says Israel's UN envoy in Geneva at the shocking and contentious report by UN panel with known anti-Israel bias.

    [3].

  90. ↑ Edith M. Lederer, US demands condemnation of Hamas at UN meeting, but Security Council takes no immediate action The AP via Newsmax, October 8, 2023.
  91. ↑ Letter Sent to the Editor: Washington Post misses central point about UNRWA, B'nai B'rith, October 23, 2023.
  92. ↑ 92.0 92.1 Jacob Magid, Senior UN official loses her post after tweet condemning PIJ rocket fire at Israel, TOI, 13 Aug 2022.

    Jerusalem-based Sarah Muscroft to be assigned new role, spokesman says, after her statement panning rockets that 'provoke Israeli retaliation' met strong backlash from Palestinians...

    Muscroft, who headed the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, said: "Relieved to see a ceasefire agreed ending hostilities impacting both Palestinians and Israeli civilians. Such indiscriminate rocket fire of Islamic Jihad provoking Israeli retaliation is condemned. The safety of all civilians is paramount — the ceasefire must be upheld." Muscroft, who had been based in East Jerusalem, came under massive criticism from pro-Palestinian activists who said she was blaming Palestinians for the latest round of violence and was failing to hold Israel responsible. The latest Gaza conflict began with several Israeli airstrikes against Islamic Jihad targets in response to what the army said was a concrete terror threat from a PIJ cell to fire anti-tank missiles across the border at Israeli troops or civilians. The strikes were followed by the firing of nearly 1000 rockets by PIJ as well as roughly 170 Israeli counterstrikes...

    The incident was somewhat reminiscent of Palestinian uproar after last year’s Gaza conflict, when the then-head of the UN Palestinian refugee agency’s mission in Gaza agreed during an interview with an Israeli news channel that IDF airstrikes in Gaza were precise...

    Asked by Channel 12 if he agreed with the statement, Matthias Schmale responded, "I’m not a military expert but I would not dispute that. I also have the impression that there is a huge sophistication in the way the Israeli military struck over the last 11 days."

  93. ↑ Arden: The decision to oust the UN envoy, Sarah Muscroft, because she condemned rocket fire - is a disgrace and a total surrender to the threats of the Palestinians, Rotter, Aug 14, 2022.

    The true face of the UN has been exposed again and there is no limit to hypocrisy.

    The UN envoy, Sara Muscroft, only tweeted praising the ceasefire and condemning the rocket fire by the Islamic Jihad terrorists. It was probably too much for her bosses at the UN and she was removed from her post. Every time I think the UN and its people have hit rock bottom, they prove that you can go lower. Shocking! This time it is a complete surrender to the threats of the Palestinians and we will fight against it.

    So this morning I contacted the UN Secretary General and made it clear that we will not accept such a double standard. Just two weeks ago, one of the "judges" in the commission of inquiry against Israel on behalf of the Human Rights Council, remained in his position even after expressing himself in a biased and even anti-Semitic manner. This is a disgrace and I will work so that the UN and the Secretary General understand the meaning of this despicable step.

  94. ↑ Legal Analysis of UN Palestine Rapporteur Francesc Report to UNHRC, UN Watch, July 4, 2023.

    UN Palestine rapporteur Francesca Albanese’s first report to the Human Rights Council proves exactly why she should never have been appointed to the position in the first place, as we warned the Council prior to her appointment in March 2022. Albanese is incapable of serving as a neutral and independent UN expert for anything involving the Palestinians, as UN rules require, and as she herself acknowledged prior to being picked for the job.

  95. ↑ Hamas loves UN Human Rights Council, EoZ, July 12, 2023.

    On Monday, Francesca Albanese, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, presented her latest anti-Israel report to the UN Human Rights Council.

    In the entire report, not one word was mentioned about Palestinian terror attacks. Not one word about incitement or glorification of terror in Palestinian media and schools. In fact, in a two year period when more Israeli civilians are being murdered than at any time since 2008, their deaths are utterly absent from Albanese's report. 

    There is not even a pretense of impartiality - no paragraph buried inside the report sayin, oh by the way, armed militias are popping up in Jenin and Nablus and Hebron, or a pro-forma declaration that Israel has the right to defend itself. Nothing, 

    Jews are simply not human to the UN Human Rights Council.

    So naturally, Hamas has heartily endorsed this report.

    Hamas issued a press release:

    We hail the speech of Francesca Albanese, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories at the UN Human Rights Council...

  96. ↑ Dismissing October 7 gang rape and comparing Israel to the Third Reich: Who is UN ‘Special Rapporteur’ Francesca Albanese? The JC, Nov 28, 2024.

    Her genocidal accusations against Israel can be traced to as early as 2014, when she shared an article entitled “Incremental genocide” on her X/Twitter.

  97. ↑ Riccardo Puglisi @ricpuglisi:

    Did you know that in 2014 the "non lawyer" Francesca Albanese (@FranceskAlbs) wrote about "15,000 Hamas militiamen who resist"? Also, she wrote about Palestinians who defend themselves with "silly, deranged missiles" ("missili squinternati" in Italian).

    cc @HillelNeuer @Osint613 @EFischberger @AsraNomani @USAmbUN @HamasAtrocities . [4] Jul 5, 2025

  98. ↑ Calls to oust U.N. official over Australian trip sponsored by Palestinian lobby groups, UN Watch, November 22, 2023.

    GENEVA, November 22, 2023 — An expensive Australian trip last week by a UN official who told Hamas they have “a right to resist” was sponsored by Palestinian lobby groups in breach of the UN’s own Code of Conduct, according to a watchdog group that today filed papers with the world body calling for her removal.

    In a letter sent today by UN Watch, an independent Swiss non-governmental watchdog group that holds special consultative status with the United Nations, Secretary-General Antonio Guterres is being asked to take action to remove Francesca Albanese from her post as the UN Human Rights Council’s special rapporteur tasked with investigating “Israel’s violations.”

    The full text of the letter follows below:

    22 November 2023. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres The United Nations New York, NY 10027 United States.

    Dear Secretary-General Guterres,

    We are deeply concerned over gross violations of UN rules and basic professional ethics by Ms. Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on Palestinian human rights. Her recent trip to Australia as Special Rapporteur was sponsored by known Palestinian lobby groups in that country: The Australian Friends of Palestine Association and Australia Palestine Advocacy Network, as well as the Free Palestine Melbourne and Palestinian Christians in Australia. As part of this trip, Ms. Albanese delivered the annual Edward Said Memorial Lecture in Adelaide and made media appearances, including an address to the National Press Club, in which she repeatedly echoed the Hamas narrative, claiming Israel’s right to self-defence was “non-existent.”

    As you know, independence and impartiality are basic requirements for UNHRC Special Procedures under Article 3 of the Code of Conduct, which requires them to be “free from any kind of extraneous influence…either direct or indirect.” In addition, they may not “seek nor accept instructions” from any “non-governmental organization or pressure group whatsoever,” or accept any “favour, gift or remuneration” from any ”non-governmental source for activities carried out in pursuit of his/her mandate.”

    The lobbyists’ sponsorship of Ms. Albanese’s trip constitutes a blatantly prohibited form of favour, gift or remuneration under Article 3. The financial favour further subjects Albanese to prohibited direct or indirect influence. Indeed, these groups have urged her to sue an organization that called out­­­ her pro-Hamas remarks. All of this is on top of Ms. Albanese’s disgraceful antisemitism and support for terrorism.

    She has said that “America is subjugated by the Jewish Lobby.”

    Last year, she told a Hamas conference, “You have a right to resist.”

    Since October 7th, she has whitewashed Hamas’ atrocities. She routinely portrays Israelis as Nazis.

    In light of the above gross violations of UN rules and basic ethics, we urge you to take action to remove Ms. Albanese immediately from her position as Special Rapporteur.

    Sincerely, Hillel C. Neuer,

    Executive Director.

    UN Rapporteur Faces Accusations Amid Controversy, Bepi Pezzulli, TOI, blog, Nov 25, 2023.

    Francesca Albanese, the “Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967” for the United Nations, finds herself at the center of a growing controversy. Her alleged violations of the UN code of conduct, combined with her outspoken positions in the Israel-Hamas conflict, have coalesced into intensified scrutiny and raised new significant questions about her suitability for the role.

    Despite the expectation of impartiality for UN special rapporteurs, Albanese’s statements have consistently reflected a pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli stance. The special rapporteur, in fact, has a history of making inflammatory remarks, such as accusing the “Jewish lobby” of controlling the United States of America, comparing Israel to the Nazis, and referring to Israel as a settler-colonial enterprise.

    In 2022, a report titled “Mandate to discriminate” by UN Watch, an NGO monitoring UN activities, highlighted a significant omission in Albanese’s conflict of interest declaration signed as part of her UN application process. UN Watch alleges that she failed to disclose that her husband, Massimiliano Calì, had worked for the Ministry of Economy of the Palestinian Authority.

    This week, UN Watch has brought to light further concerns about Albanese’s independence and impartiality. They claim that her recent trip to Australia, sponsored by Palestinian lobbying groups, violates Article 3 of the UN code of conduct, which mandates independent action free from external influence. The organizations involved include the Australian Friends of Palestine Association, Australia Palestine Advocacy Network, Free Palestine Melbourne, and Palestinian Christians in Australia. Albanese delivered the annual Edward Said Memorial Lecture in Adelaide on November 11, accusing Israeli leaders of genocidal intent towards Gaza. During a subsequent event at the National Press Club, she faced controversy when asked by a journalist about her accusation of Israeli “dominance” and whether the term constituted a trope. Albanese, seemingly irritated by the question, invited the journalist to read the convention on racial discrimination, claiming that Israel legally operated as an “apartheid[sic] regime.”

    Hillel C. Neuer, the executive director of UN Watch, has formally requested UN Secretary-General António M. de Oliveira Guterres to remove Albanese from her role, citing the alleged violation of the UN code of conduct. Article 3, Neuer explains, specifically requires special rapporteurs to be free from any kind of extraneous influence and not seek or accept instructions from non-governmental organizations during their mandate.

    Adding to the controversy, questions have been raised about Albanese’s professional qualifications. Italian journalist Antonino Monteleone has examined her claim to be a “lawyer”, after discrepancies emerged in her curriculum vitae. Despite her later admission of not being registered with the Bar Council in Italy, she referred to herself as a “lawyer” multiple times in her UN application and did not correct others addressing her as “counsel” in the course of official hearings and on TV.

    In response to the challenges to her Bar credentials, Albanese defended herself on Facebook, explaining that she used the term ‘avvocato’ to style herself, translating it as ‘advocate’, and clarified her non-registration with the Bar Council. However, the incongruity in her self-designation as a “lawyer” in her UN application has drawn criticism from prominent figures, including Francesco Giubilei and Riccardo Puglisi. The latter, known for investigating false academic credentials, has called for Albanese’s removal from her post, in an op-ed on Il Riformista.

    As the controversy deepens, the credibility of the United Nations in addressing human rights issues in the Middle East hangs in the balance, emphasizing the organization’s lack of impartiality when appointing officers in such critical geopolitical roles.

  99. ↑ Simon Wiesenthal Center: 'Fire UN rapporteur who said Oct. 7 not antisemitic', Israel National News Feb 16, 2024
  100. ↑ Department Press Briefing - March 27, 2024 - United States Department of State.

    ...QUESTION: Yeah, so let me ask you – have you – did you see or read the report made by Francesca Albanese yesterday in Geneva...

    MR MILLER: I did see the report. Let me say a couple things about it. First, we have long – for longstanding – for a longstanding period of time opposed the mandate of this special rapporteur, which we believe is not productive. And when it comes to the individual who holds that position, I can’t help but note a history of antisemitic comments that she has made that have been reported. And —

    QUESTION: She has – she made antisemitic comments?

    MR MILLER: And – she has. And comments she made in December that appeared to justify the attacks of October 7th, so I think it’s important to take that into account. But with respect to the report itself, we have made clear that we believe that allegations of genocide are unfounded...

  101. ↑ Francesca Albanese runs int'l network targeting Israel, UN Watch charges, Jerusalem Post, June 13, 2024
  102. ↑ Gary Willig, Francesca Albanese calls post blaming Israel for 9/11, predicting death of US 'must read'. INN, Oct 20, 2024
  103. ↑ Staff, UN Watch calls for sanctions against Francesca Albanese over antisemitism and terrorism support, JPost, Oct 24, 2024
  104. ↑ Francesca Albanese is the 21st-century Joseph Goebbels. Human Rights Voices, Jan 13, 2025
  105. ↑ Gary Willig, Human Rights Expert: 'Francesca Albanese uses Nazi textbook to produce Oct. 7 denial'. Israel National News, Jul 9, 2025. Touro Institute on Human Rights head Prof. Anne Bayefsky tells Arutz Sheva that UN Rapporteur's attempt to downplay a new report documenting Hamas's sexual violence is reminiscent of Joseph Goebbels."
  106. ↑ US slams anti-Israel UN envoy in rare move. "Secretary of State Marco Rubio sanctions UN envoy who likened Israel to Nazis, downplayed Hamas rapes." Ynet, July 9, 2025.
  107. ↑ Rubio announces US sanctions on Francesca Albanese. "US Secretary of State announces sanctions on UN Special Rapporteur for her 'illegitimate and shameful efforts to prompt the International Criminal Court action against US and Israeli officials, companies, and executive.'" Israel National News, Jul 9, 2025
  108. ↑ 108.0 108.1 UN spokesman doesn’t name Albanese but refutes controversial comment on press freedom. “It is very clear that journalists should never come under any violence,” Stéphane Dujarric said, after the special rapporteur said that an attack on an Italian paper should be a “warning.” Mike Wagenheim. JNS, Dec. 3, 2025
  109. ↑ Italy turns on UN's Francesca Albanese for comments excusing violence against journalists and Israel. Albanese, long criticized in Israel for inflammatory accusations, faces backlash at home after appearing to justify a pro-Palestinian mob’s attack on a major newsroom, prompting mayors to reconsider honors. Daniel Bettini, YNet, Dec 4, 2025.
  110. ↑ UN bigot out at Georgetown, Fox News Staff. December 25, 2025.
  111. ↑ U.N. Hypocrisy On Full Display, Anne Bayefsky, Fox News, March 4, 2011
  112. ↑ https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1427625314935615502
  113. ↑ U.N. suspends peacekeepers amid sex abuse charges, CNN, July 21, 2007.
  114. ↑ UN probes 'abuse' in Ivory Coast, BBC, July 23, 2007.
  115. ↑ Teenagers 'used for sex by UN in Bosnia', By Stewart Payne, London Telegraph, 25/04/2002.
  116. ↑ UN staff accused of raping children in Sudan, By Kate Holt in Juba and Sarah Hughes, London Telegraph, 04/01/2007.
  117. ↑ Iran named vice president of UN General Assembly, JNS, June 5, 2023.
  118. ↑ Iran’s Appointment At UN Leadership Angers International Community, Iran Intl, 06/02/2023.
  119. ↑ Iran Elected to UN Committee on Disarmament and International Security, UN Watch, June 4, 2023.
  120. ↑ Lebanese Official: UNIFIL's Presence In Lebanon Is Pointless If It Does Not Perform Its Duty But Rather Serves Hizbullah, JNS, Sep 7, 2023.