Difference between revisions of "Michael McFaul"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Color Revolution)
(Color Revolution)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
==Color Revolution==
 
==Color Revolution==
In the early 2000s, McFaul studied the so-called color revolutions in the former states of the [[Soviet Union]]. McFaul identified the seven elements of successful [[revolution]]s in these countries.<ref>https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/transitions-from-postcommunism/</ref>
+
In the early 2000s, McFaul studied the so-called color revolutions in the former states of the [[Soviet Union]]. McFaul identified the seven elements of successful [[revolution]]s in these countries.<ref>https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/transitions-from-postcommunism/</ref>  Reporting from [[far left]] ''[[The Atlantic]]'' and ''[[The New York Times]]'' fits into step number seven. Both publications ran stories highlighting racial, gender, and sexual orientation divisions in the military in early September 2020.<ref>https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2020/09/womens-military-friendships-are-unique-and-special/615991/<ref><ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/31/us/politics/marines-race-general.html</ref>
  
The first element of a successful color revolution, according to McFaul, is a semi-autocratic rather than fully-autocratic regime. This narrative about [[President Trump]] has been pervasive in the [[liberal media]] and echoed by prominent [[Democrat]]s since before he was elected. Despite all evidence to the contrary, President Trump is consistently painted as walking the line between [[constitutional]] order and [[authoritarianism]].  Over the Summer of 2020, Democrats and the [[fake news]] media resurfaced the narrative that President Trump will not accept the [[2020 presidential election]] results if [[Joe Biden]] wins.<ref>https://theintercept.com/2020/08/11/trump-november-2020-election/</ref>  They assert that he will refuse to concede and will have to be forced out of the [[White House]] if he loses the election.  
+
The first element of a successful color revolution, according to McFaul, is a semi-autocratic rather than fully-autocratic regime. This narrative about [[President Trump]] has been pervasive in the [[liberal media]] and echoed by prominent [[Democrat]]s since before he was elected. Despite all evidence to the contrary, President Trump is consistently painted as walking the line between [[constitutional]] order and [[authoritarianism]].  Over the Summer of 2020, Democrats and the [[fake news]] media resurfaced the narrative that President Trump will not accept the [[2020 presidential election]] results if [[Joe Biden]] wins.<ref>https://theintercept.com/2020/08/11/trump-november-2020-election/</ref><ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/07/27/heres-how-prepare-trump-rejecting-election-results-november/</ref>  They assert that he will refuse to concede and will have to be forced out of the [[White House]] if he loses the election.  
  
 
According to McFaul, the second requirement is 'an unpopular incumbent'. [[The left]] uses [[identity politics]] to try and make President Trump unpopular with specific constituencies. "Peaceful Protests" are used to create an illusion there are hordes of citizens who oppose President Trump. The fake new [[mainstream media]] and Democrats try to frame the riots as “Trump’s America,” despite all the evidence the [[riot]]s are supported by Democrats in power and even financially supported by members of the [[2020 Biden campaign]].<ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/us-minneapolis-police-biden-bail/biden-staff-donate-to-group-that-pays-bail-in-riot-torn-minneapolis-idUSKBN2360SZ</ref>
 
According to McFaul, the second requirement is 'an unpopular incumbent'. [[The left]] uses [[identity politics]] to try and make President Trump unpopular with specific constituencies. "Peaceful Protests" are used to create an illusion there are hordes of citizens who oppose President Trump. The fake new [[mainstream media]] and Democrats try to frame the riots as “Trump’s America,” despite all the evidence the [[riot]]s are supported by Democrats in power and even financially supported by members of the [[2020 Biden campaign]].<ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/us-minneapolis-police-biden-bail/biden-staff-donate-to-group-that-pays-bail-in-riot-torn-minneapolis-idUSKBN2360SZ</ref>

Revision as of 18:02, September 9, 2020

Natalia Veselnitskaya waiting behind U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul to give Senate testimony about Bill Browder. Browder, who renounced his U.S. citizenship to avoid taxes, convinced Sen. John McCain to sponsor the Russia sanctions bill to recover his wealth. Obama signed the bill. Veselnitskaya, who doesn't understand the U.S. political system, says she was asking Donald Trump, Jr. for help because people were trying to prevent her from testifying. Veselnitskaya wanted to tell Senators that Browder scammed the Russian treasury, and Browder scammed the Congress with false allegations about Sergei Magnitsky. In the end, Veselnitskaya's testimony was scuttled.

Michael McFaul is a key strategist of the U.S. Color Revolution and Biden Putsch. McFaul was appointed U.S. Ambasador to Russia by President Obama and served between 2012 and 2014, during the Maidan Revolt and passage of the Magnitsky Act.

Color Revolution

In the early 2000s, McFaul studied the so-called color revolutions in the former states of the Soviet Union. McFaul identified the seven elements of successful revolutions in these countries.[1] Reporting from far left The Atlantic and The New York Times fits into step number seven. Both publications ran stories highlighting racial, gender, and sexual orientation divisions in the military in early September 2020.Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag

The first element of a successful color revolution, according to McFaul, is a semi-autocratic rather than fully-autocratic regime. This narrative about President Trump has been pervasive in the liberal media and echoed by prominent Democrats since before he was elected. Despite all evidence to the contrary, President Trump is consistently painted as walking the line between constitutional order and authoritarianism. Over the Summer of 2020, Democrats and the fake news media resurfaced the narrative that President Trump will not accept the 2020 presidential election results if Joe Biden wins.[2][3] They assert that he will refuse to concede and will have to be forced out of the White House if he loses the election.

According to McFaul, the second requirement is 'an unpopular incumbent'. The left uses identity politics to try and make President Trump unpopular with specific constituencies. "Peaceful Protests" are used to create an illusion there are hordes of citizens who oppose President Trump. The fake new mainstream media and Democrats try to frame the riots as “Trump’s America,” despite all the evidence the riots are supported by Democrats in power and even financially supported by members of the 2020 Biden campaign.[4]

A third requirement, according to McFaul, is a united and organized opposition. The opposition has a name. The NeverTrump Resistance started shortly after the 2016 presidential election. Using the hashtag or the phrase is a way to signal you are on the team. Any group can join the broader movement and oppose the president on their own terms. Poorly weighted polls were pushed out by corporate media outlets after the conventions that either oversample specific populations or survey all adults rather than likely voters or registered voters.

McFaul says the fourth ingredient in a successful color revolution is an ability to quickly drive home the point that voting results were falsified. Democrats are setting up 2020 so that either side can make this claim. It has been reported that between 2012 and 2018, at least one in five mail-in ballots went missing in elections nationwide.[5] Democrats are counting on this, and it is why they are pushing so hard for it. When a large number of mail-in votes are missing or thrown out for technical reasons, Democrats will scream disenfranchisement. Yet, Democrats are the ones who set up their own voters to be disenfranchised by pushing COVID-19 panic porn.

This chaos impacts the way elections typically proceeds as required by law. Local election results will be challenged in court nationwide, and it will make the Florida Recount controversy in Bush v. Gore look like child’s play. Results will be delayed for weeks and threaten the deadlines to confirm results at the state level. According to one analysis in The Wall Street Journal, entire states could be disenfranchised.[6] Democrats and their allies in the media are willing to destroy faith in a safe and fair election that leads to the peaceful transfer of power the United States has relied on for more than two centuries. These are the lengths they will go to in order to gain power. They pushed mail-in voting despite health experts saying in-person voting is safe.

See also

References