Difference between revisions of "Coronavirus studies"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(a start)
(No difference)

Revision as of 00:26, May 26, 2020

See also Flawed coronavirus studies.

Numerous coronavirus studies demonstrate the prophylactic and early use of hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19, which are being ignored or downplayed for political reasons.

Here is a sampling of the growing list of valid studies confirming the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19:

Minnesota data mining study

The incidence rate and mortality from COVID-19 was found to be lower in patients on chronic hydroxychloroquine therapy, in a large Minnesota healthcare system.

Between April 1, 2019 and March 31, 2020, the database contained 1,271,014 unique patient encounters, including a total of 2945 COVID-19 tests, of which 125 (4.24%) were positive.

Among the tests performed, 124 (4.35%) were positive for COVID-19 while not having taken hydroxychloroquine, while 96 tests were performed in patients with existing hydroxychloroquine prescriptions and only one (1.04%) was positive.

Two COVID-19 patients not on hydroxychloroquine died, while no COVID-19 patients not on hydroxychloroquine died.

Hydroxychloroquine appears to be effective against COVID-19 both as a prophylaxis and as early treatment.[1]

References