Difference between revisions of "Coronavirus studies"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(A compilation of coronavirus studies demonstrates the effectiveness of early treatment by hydroxychloroquine.)
(A small Greek study indicates that HCQ is effective because it inhibits a hyperinflammatory reaction progression, if given in early stages of the disease.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<center>''See also: [[Flawed coronavirus studies]], [[Hydroxychloroquine denial]]''</center>
 
<center>''See also: [[Flawed coronavirus studies]], [[Hydroxychloroquine denial]]''</center>
−
Numerous '''coronavirus studies''' demonstrate the prophylactic and early use of [[hydroxychloroquine]] against [[COVID-19]], which are being ignored or downplayed for political reasons.
+
Numerous '''coronavirus studies''' demonstrate the prophylactic and early use of [[hydroxychloroquine]] (HCQ) against [[COVID-19]], which are being ignored or downplayed for political reasons.
  
 
Here is a sampling of the growing list of valid studies confirming the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19:
 
Here is a sampling of the growing list of valid studies confirming the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19:
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
A compilation of coronavirus studies demonstrates the effectiveness of early treatment by hydroxychloroquine.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344103059_Hydroxychloroquine_is_Effective_and_Safe_for_the_Treatment_of_COVID-19_and_May_be_Universally_Effective_When_Used_Early_Before_Hospitalization_A_Systematic_Review</ref>
 
A compilation of coronavirus studies demonstrates the effectiveness of early treatment by hydroxychloroquine.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344103059_Hydroxychloroquine_is_Effective_and_Safe_for_the_Treatment_of_COVID-19_and_May_be_Universally_Effective_When_Used_Early_Before_Hospitalization_A_Systematic_Review</ref>
 +
 +
== Greek study suggests why HCQ is effective ==
 +
 +
A small Greek study indicates that HCQ is effective because it inhibits a hyperinflammatory reaction progression, if given in early stages of the disease.<ref>https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.05.20184655v1</ref>
 +
 
== Minnesota data mining study ==
 
== Minnesota data mining study ==
  

Revision as of 01:29, September 9, 2020

See also: Flawed coronavirus studies, Hydroxychloroquine denial

Numerous coronavirus studies demonstrate the prophylactic and early use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) against COVID-19, which are being ignored or downplayed for political reasons.

Here is a sampling of the growing list of valid studies confirming the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19:

Compilation

A compilation of coronavirus studies demonstrates the effectiveness of early treatment by hydroxychloroquine.[1]

Greek study suggests why HCQ is effective

A small Greek study indicates that HCQ is effective because it inhibits a hyperinflammatory reaction progression, if given in early stages of the disease.[2]

Minnesota data mining study

The incidence rate and mortality from COVID-19 was found to be lower in patients on chronic hydroxychloroquine therapy, in a large Minnesota healthcare system.

Between April 1, 2019 and March 31, 2020, the database contained 1,271,014 unique patient encounters, including a total of 2945 COVID-19 tests, of which 125 (4.24%) were positive.

Among the tests performed, 124 (4.35%) were positive for COVID-19 while not having taken hydroxychloroquine, while 96 tests were performed in patients with existing hydroxychloroquine prescriptions and only one (1.04%) was positive.

Two COVID-19 patients not on hydroxychloroquine died, while no COVID-19 patients not on hydroxychloroquine died.

Hydroxychloroquine appears to be effective against COVID-19 both as a prophylaxis and as early treatment.[3]

French study

In a study of 3,737 COVID-19 patients, the researchers found that "Treatment with HCQ-AZ was associated with a decreased risk of transfer to ICU or death (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.18 0.11–0.27), decreased risk of hospitalization ≥10 days and shorter duration of viral shedding."[4]

References

  1. ↑ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344103059_Hydroxychloroquine_is_Effective_and_Safe_for_the_Treatment_of_COVID-19_and_May_be_Universally_Effective_When_Used_Early_Before_Hospitalization_A_Systematic_Review
  2. ↑ https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.05.20184655v1
  3. ↑ https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40267-020-00741-x.pdf
  4. ↑ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893920302817
v • d • e
Coronavirus
Topics
Azithromycin • Biden border crisis • Blue Plague • Breakthrough case • CARES Act • CCP propaganda war • Censorship of vaccine criticism • Contact tracing • Contagious coronavirus • Coronavirus • Coronavirus civil rights • Coronavirus coverup • Coronavirus Survival Guide • Coronavirus studies • Coronavirus bailout • coronavirus incubation period • coronavirus mortality • coronavirus testing • Coronavirus treatments • COVID-19 • Covid claptrap• Covid in children • Covid lockdown • COVID OSHA rules • Covid vaccine • Cytokine storm • Delta variant • Democide • Faucism • Flawed coronavirus studies • Freedom Convoy • FTX scandal • Gain of function • Globalism • Global Wuhan coronavirus pandemic • herd immunity • Hospitals blocking hydroxychloroquine • Hydroxychloroquine denial • Liberal misinformation about coronavirus • Long Covid • Media coverage of coronavirus • New Cold War • Nuremberg Code • Omicron variant • Operation Gridlock • Pfizer COVID vaccine • Quinine • Religious exemptions • SARS-CoVid-1 • Scientism • Stay-at-home orders • State restrictions on hydroxychloroquine • Systemic racism • Vaccine passports • Vaccine police • VAERS • War on science • Wolf warrior diplomacy • Wuhan coronavirus - Chinese Communist Party response • Wuhan epidemic coverup • 2020 election fraud
Most successful treatments
Expensive unproven treatments
Profiteers, hucksters and gain-of-function proponents
Public officials
Organizations
Countries
Mandates
Essays and Books
Pfizer Vaccine Approval Gambit by FDA • Vaxxed Higher Risk of Covid than Unvaxxed • When Government Mandates Become Arbiters of Truth • Ivermectin Given A Fair Hearing to Treat Covid • Vaccine Damage And Deaths Are Becoming Widespread • Monoclonal-Antibody Treatment for COVID-19 • 1905 Supreme Court Ruling Used to Justify Forced Vax • Children as victims of Fauci's Covid restrictions • What the Covid Shot Does to Your Blood: 4 M.D.s speak • Natural Immunity And How It Works • Reminiscent of Nazi Germany: The Disturbing Truth Behind the Vax and Fetal Cell Lines • Dr. Fauci's Cruel Animal Experimentation Revealed: But Is There More? • Orwellian Word Games at CDC On The Word "Vaccine" • Pandemic of the Unvaccinated? • What you should know about (1) Abbott's Home PCR Test Kits and (2) Jabs Causing Attacks Against The Heart • Professor Mattias Desmer Tackles “Mass Formation” (aka Mass Psychosis), Regarding Covid • After Two Years of Fauci Medical Fascism • The Real Anthony Fauci • COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey • Prime Minister Trudeau Compared to Nicolae Ceaușescu • Insurance Companies Register Highest Death Rates Ever • Covid Vaccines for Children Deemed Unnecessary by Experts
Court cases
Heroes
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Coronavirus_studies&oldid=1684186"