Difference between revisions of "Covid lockdown"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Merge|Stay-at-home orders}} | {{Merge|Stay-at-home orders}} | ||
| − | [[File:Hypocritical Pelosi.jpeg|thumb|right|170px|Democrat [[Speaker Nancy Pelosi]] seen here entering a public hair salon | + | [[File:Hypocritical Pelosi.jpeg|thumb|right|170px|Democrat [[Speaker Nancy Pelosi]] seen here entering a public hair salon without a face mask during lockdown.]] |
'''Covid lockdown''' orders were decrees prohibiting the operation of businesses and forbidding people from leaving their homes during the 2020-2021 [[CCP global pandemic]]. Many of these lockdowns order were [[totalitarian]] decrees and violations of [[constitutional]]ly protected rights issued by [[Democratic party]] mayors and governors in the [[United States]]. [[Gretchen Whitmer]], [[Andrew Cuomo]], [[Gavin Newsom]], [[Phil Murphy]], [[Bill de Blasio]], and [[Lori Lightfoot]] were among the most notorious [[human rights]] abusers. | '''Covid lockdown''' orders were decrees prohibiting the operation of businesses and forbidding people from leaving their homes during the 2020-2021 [[CCP global pandemic]]. Many of these lockdowns order were [[totalitarian]] decrees and violations of [[constitutional]]ly protected rights issued by [[Democratic party]] mayors and governors in the [[United States]]. [[Gretchen Whitmer]], [[Andrew Cuomo]], [[Gavin Newsom]], [[Phil Murphy]], [[Bill de Blasio]], and [[Lori Lightfoot]] were among the most notorious [[human rights]] abusers. | ||
Revision as of 15:53, July 5, 2021
Covid lockdown orders were decrees prohibiting the operation of businesses and forbidding people from leaving their homes during the 2020-2021 CCP global pandemic. Many of these lockdowns order were totalitarian decrees and violations of constitutionally protected rights issued by Democratic party mayors and governors in the United States. Gretchen Whitmer, Andrew Cuomo, Gavin Newsom, Phil Murphy, Bill de Blasio, and Lori Lightfoot were among the most notorious human rights abusers.
US
30 to 50 percent of heart attack patients did not receive treatment. 85 percent of live organ transplants were not performed. "We have been uniquely willing to sacrifice our children out of fear for adults," said Dr. Scott Atlas, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and former White House covid advisor.
UK
Some British scientists have admitted that their committee exploited fear in totalitarian and “unethical” ways to control people’s behavior throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. “Clearly, using fear as a means of control is not ethical,” said Gavin Morgan, a psychologist and member of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior (SPI-B). “Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It’s not an ethical stance for any modern government. By nature I am an optimistic person, but all this has given me a more pessimistic view of people.”
SPI-B, according to The Telegraph, is a subcommittee that advises the British government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE). In one damning example of their unethical use of fear, the subcommittee said in March 2020 that “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened” by COVID-19 and that British leaders needed to increase the population’s “perceived level of personal threat.”
“In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down,” one SPI-B member told Dodsworth. “There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear. The way we have used fear is dystopian.”[1]