Difference between revisions of "Covid lockdown"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[File:Hypocritical Pelosi.jpeg|thumb|right|170px|Democrat [[Speaker Nancy Pelosi]] seen here entering a public hair salon without a face mask during lockdown.]]
 
 
'''Covid lockdown''' orders were decrees prohibiting the operation of businesses and forbidding people from leaving their homes during the 2020-2021 [[CCP global pandemic]]. Many of these lockdowns order were [[totalitarian]] decrees and violations of [[constitutional]]ly protected rights issued by [[Democratic party]] mayors and governors in the [[United States]]. [[Gretchen Whitmer]], [[Andrew Cuomo]], [[Gavin Newsom]], [[Phil Murphy]], [[Bill de Blasio]], and [[Lori Lightfoot]] were among the most notorious [[human rights]] abusers.
 
'''Covid lockdown''' orders were decrees prohibiting the operation of businesses and forbidding people from leaving their homes during the 2020-2021 [[CCP global pandemic]]. Many of these lockdowns order were [[totalitarian]] decrees and violations of [[constitutional]]ly protected rights issued by [[Democratic party]] mayors and governors in the [[United States]]. [[Gretchen Whitmer]], [[Andrew Cuomo]], [[Gavin Newsom]], [[Phil Murphy]], [[Bill de Blasio]], and [[Lori Lightfoot]] were among the most notorious [[human rights]] abusers.
  
 
==US==
 
==US==
 +
[[File:Hypocritical Pelosi.jpeg|thumb|right|170px|Democrat [[Speaker Nancy Pelosi]] seen here entering a public hair salon without a face mask during lockdown.]]
 
Stay-at-home orders were executive [[diktat]]s by governors or county officials commanding people to remain at home during a prolonged period of weeks or months, such as during an alleged public health emergency.  These orders have been used largely by [[liberal]]s in public office to attempt to illegally close churches and gun stores, in violation of both the [[First Amendment]] (covering the freedoms of religion and assembly) and the [[Second Amendment]] (covering the right to lawful gun ownership), as well as many stores, movie theatres, restaurants and schools, and usually have exemptions for [[abortion]] clinics<ref>[https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/490247-judge-blocks-texas-from-banning-abortion-as-part-of-coronavirus Judges block Texas, Ohio, Alabama from banning abortion as part of coronavirus response]</ref> and liquor stores.  These orders often have dubious constitutional or legal authority; in fact, the same liberal public officials who hand down those diktats against the public frequently disregard their own mandates to do whatever they please (such as dining out in public) due to them being the liberal [[elitist]]s that they are.
 
Stay-at-home orders were executive [[diktat]]s by governors or county officials commanding people to remain at home during a prolonged period of weeks or months, such as during an alleged public health emergency.  These orders have been used largely by [[liberal]]s in public office to attempt to illegally close churches and gun stores, in violation of both the [[First Amendment]] (covering the freedoms of religion and assembly) and the [[Second Amendment]] (covering the right to lawful gun ownership), as well as many stores, movie theatres, restaurants and schools, and usually have exemptions for [[abortion]] clinics<ref>[https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/490247-judge-blocks-texas-from-banning-abortion-as-part-of-coronavirus Judges block Texas, Ohio, Alabama from banning abortion as part of coronavirus response]</ref> and liquor stores.  These orders often have dubious constitutional or legal authority; in fact, the same liberal public officials who hand down those diktats against the public frequently disregard their own mandates to do whatever they please (such as dining out in public) due to them being the liberal [[elitist]]s that they are.
  

Revision as of 15:57, July 5, 2021

Covid lockdown orders were decrees prohibiting the operation of businesses and forbidding people from leaving their homes during the 2020-2021 CCP global pandemic. Many of these lockdowns order were totalitarian decrees and violations of constitutionally protected rights issued by Democratic party mayors and governors in the United States. Gretchen Whitmer, Andrew Cuomo, Gavin Newsom, Phil Murphy, Bill de Blasio, and Lori Lightfoot were among the most notorious human rights abusers.

US

Democrat Speaker Nancy Pelosi seen here entering a public hair salon without a face mask during lockdown.

Stay-at-home orders were executive diktats by governors or county officials commanding people to remain at home during a prolonged period of weeks or months, such as during an alleged public health emergency. These orders have been used largely by liberals in public office to attempt to illegally close churches and gun stores, in violation of both the First Amendment (covering the freedoms of religion and assembly) and the Second Amendment (covering the right to lawful gun ownership), as well as many stores, movie theatres, restaurants and schools, and usually have exemptions for abortion clinics[1] and liquor stores. These orders often have dubious constitutional or legal authority; in fact, the same liberal public officials who hand down those diktats against the public frequently disregard their own mandates to do whatever they please (such as dining out in public) due to them being the liberal elitists that they are.

As of April 5, 2020, only nine states had not issued stay-at-home orders: Arkansas, Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.

Penalties during the coronavirus crisis in 2020 were initially rare (so far), but have increased with the arrest of a pastor in Florida for holding a church service in alleged violation of a stay-at-home order issued by Hillsborough County,[2] even though he took numerous precautions against spreading the virus.

30 to 50 percent of heart attack patients did not receive treatment. 85 percent of live organ transplants were not performed. "We have been uniquely willing to sacrifice our children out of fear for adults," said Dr. Scott Atlas, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and former White House covid advisor.

Texas

While many of the worse shutdown orders have been by Democrat governors (most notoriously including New York's Andrew Cuomo and Michigan's Gretchen Whitmer), Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott has prohibited much necessary medical care to its residents as part of his lockdown, despite largely empty hospitals. Gov. Abbott, not really a conservative, is posturing for a presidential run in 2024.

UK

Some British scientists have admitted that their committee exploited fear in totalitarian and “unethical” ways to control people’s behavior throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. “Clearly, using fear as a means of control is not ethical,” said Gavin Morgan, a psychologist and member of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior (SPI-B). “Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It’s not an ethical stance for any modern government. By nature I am an optimistic person, but all this has given me a more pessimistic view of people.”

SPI-B, according to The Telegraph, is a subcommittee that advises the British government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE). In one damning example of their unethical use of fear, the subcommittee said in March 2020 that “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened” by COVID-19 and that British leaders needed to increase the population’s “perceived level of personal threat.”

“In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down,” one SPI-B member told Dodsworth. “There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear. The way we have used fear is dystopian.”[3]

References