Difference between revisions of "Conservative"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by DeMyerLikesAtheism (talk) to last revision by Capitalist.Chile)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{cpmothball}}{{cplinks|Conservative}}{{conservapedia}}
+
A '''conservative''' is someone who promotes [[moral]] and [[economic]] values beneficial to all. A conservative is willing to learn and advocate the insights of [[economics]] and the logic of the [[Bible]] for the benefit of everyone else.  A conservative favors conserving value by not giving handouts to anyone who does not really need them.  Conservatives are often innovative, such as [[supply-side economics]] and [[Romanticism]].
{{cquote|He's demonic.|||Fellow Conservapedia <s>sysop</s> <s>ex-sysop</s> sysop [[RobSmith]] on User:Conservative.<ref>[http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F&diff=prev&oldid=838017] User:Conservative is an unforgiving and vindictive person; [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:RobSmith/Archive_04#How_do_you_feel_about_Ken.3F he told Rob Smith] [http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RobSmith&diff=prev&oldid=858767 by phone] he was plotting and capable of carrying out denial of service and googlebomb attacks against a Rationalwiki founder's private business, and that he had prayed to God on several occasions to cast a member out of the church he attended.</ref>}}
+
  
'''Conservative''' (aka Peter Moore, Kdbuffalo, RuyLopez, David Jensen, Kenny Baby, Kenny Boy, Kendoll, The Kenster, VacuousPoet, heavyduty3737, [[User:Newton]], [[User:GiuocoPiano]], and over a hundred other account names used by his sockpuppets on this very website that rival the patheticness, unoriginality, and size of [[Mikemikev]]'s sock army), is a search engine optimization magnate, spelling bee champion,<ref><capture>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=prev&oldid=1031928M</capture></ref> and international man of mystery. He is also a pretty good dancer.<ref><capture>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=prev&oldid=1035253</capture></ref> By his own admission Ken did actually hold a job at one time as a debt collector.<ref>[conservapedia:186] Rats looking for Conservative, Conservative to group, 8/3/10.</ref>Among his many endeavors, Conservative is a [[Conservapedia]] sysop who rules the "[[Conservapedia:Evolution|Evolution]]", "[[Conservapedia:Atheism|Atheism]]" and all homosexuality-related articles while they slowly climb the ranks at popular search engines beginning with 'G', much to the chagrin of atheists and homosexuals the world over.
+
A conservative typically adheres to principles of personal [[responsibility]], moral values, and [[limited government]], agreeing with [[George Washington]]'s [[Farewell Address]] that "[[religion]] and [[morality]] are indispensable supports" to political prosperity.<ref>[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/49.htm United States Department of State] George Washington, farewell address, 1796</ref><ref>[[Merriam-Webster]]'s Online Dictionary has the following definition of conservative: "tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions : TRADITIONAL"[http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/conservative]  Therefore, a conservative Christian would be one that tends to adhere to the morally sound doctrines of the early Christianity and [[Judeo-Christian]] values.</ref>
  
After being thrown out of Wikipedia for fragrantly<!-- deliberate typo-->  breaking the sock-puppet rules (as he did on a number of forums<ref name=FR>[http://www.freeratio.org/showthread.php?p=4014051#post4014051 Freethought & Rationalism]</ref>), he came to Conservapedia, where he and his poor writing skills (as demonstrated by his use of poorly strung together copy+pasting of [[Quote mining|quote-mines]] and outdated statistics, and his proclivity towards using "in regards to..." or "regarding..." to begin each sentence<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality 101 "regards/ing" in this article alone]</ref>) led to his near-whole-hearted embrace by the CP community. He immediately put his new-found blocking rights to good use by blocking himself for vandalism, almost nipping his career in the bud;<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Conservative&page=User%3AConservative&year=2007&month=5</ref> but unfortunately, another sysop was able to reverse his suicide. He now spends his days writing articles such as "Atheism and _____", "Richard Dawkins and ______" , "Homosexuality and _____" , "Liberalism and _____", or "Liberal Christianity and _____" (fill in the blank with random words of your choosing; atheism and rape, obesity, Alzheimer's Disease{{shock}}, suicide, bestiality, uncharitableness and cowardice, are particularly enlightening examples, as is their Gallery of Obese Atheists, consisting solely of pictures of allegedly overweight heretics- why is he so obsessed with them?), looking up his articles on Google, <capture>[http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Conservapedia_obsessive_compulsive_disorder&curid=107083&diff=829728&oldid=829727 making utterly pointless edits]</capture> and leaving not very well hidden messages to RationalWiki. He's still not as block-ready as [[TK]] was, however.
+
Religious conservatism is a big driver of [[social conservatism]]. Religious conservatism is growing in the world and it is affecting politics (see: [[Religious conservatism and politics]]).  
  
His "work" is notable for consisting almost entirely of other people's words or pictures. It is believed that the last original sound to come out of Conservative’s mouth was the cry when the midwife slapped his rear end to start him breathing.
+
[[Phil Crane]], the leading conservative congressman in the [[House]] from 1969 to 2005, urged people to make the world a better place than where they found it, and quoted frequently from the [[Bible]] in pursuit of that goal.<ref>http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-phil-crane-obituary-20141109-story.html</ref>
  
He is somewhat out of step with the other editors at Conservapedia. He imagines that atheism is dead on the Information Superhighway and evolution will soon die there also.  Others at Conservapedia however talk about the (imagined) need to battle the terrible liberal bias at [[Wikipedia]] which is run by atheists and evolutionists, as well as the (also imagined) need to fight the "[[militant atheism|militant atheists]]" who are "destroying [[America]]". They can't both be right. Now, little Conservative, just because you want something to happen doesn't make it happen.
+
Former President [[Ronald Reagan]] said, "The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom."<ref>http://www.reason.com/news/show/29318.html</ref>
 +
[[File:460px-Calvin Coolidge photo portrait head and shoulders.jpg|200px|thumb|[[Calvin Coolidge]], the 30th President of the United States, was a conservative who said, "Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong."]]
  
==Let's Godwin yourself! (or, the Godwin singularity)==
+
==Goals and principles==
[[Image:AdolfHitlerEmoting.jpg|right|thumb|150px|<big><span style="color:red">INVISIBLE RED TELEPHONE</span></big>]]
+
{{main|Modern conservatism}}
According to [[Godwin's Law]], as an internet debate goes on, the probability that someone will bring up [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] or the [[Nazi]]s rises to certainty. Going very fast to Godwin's point (let's say, at your third intervention) is considered to be a sign of aggressiveness, particulary if there are few people in the debate. However, Conservative is the only person able to reach a Godwin's point at the [https://web.archive.org/web/20081211054557/http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Richard_Dawkins&diff=next&oldid=549447 first paragraph] of a [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Richard_Dawkins&action=history monologue].
+
  
But that's good because "Godwin" includes "God" and "win". So, when you post a picture of Hitler in front of an article, you can say "In the name of '''God''', I '''win''' the argument." '''Godwin''''s point.
+
Specifically, conservatives seek or support:
  
==Alter ego==
+
* Support for [[Natural Law]], [[unalienable rights]], [[republicanism]], and [[Americanism]]
Ken DeMyer is also an extremely bad sock puppeteer and troll; people can usually spot him in seconds generally because he never changes his tried and failed debating style.<ref name=FR/><ref>[http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/showpost.php?p=1437859&postcount=22 Here someone catches one of Ken's socks]</ref>
+
* [[Limited government]] and balanced budgets
 +
* [[Capitalism]] and [[free market|free markets]]
 +
* [[Classroom prayer]]
 +
* Respect for human life and prohibition of [[abortion]]
 +
* [[Abstinence]] education
 +
* Traditional [[marriage]], not [[same-sex "marriage"]]
 +
* The concept of retribution for crimes, including the [[death penalty]] for heinous murders proven beyond reasonable doubt
 +
* [[Family values]], including traditional relationships and division of labor within the household
 +
* Respect for differences between men and women, boys and girls
 +
* Laws against [[pornography]]
 +
* [[First Amendment]] rights to [[free speech]] and [[religious freedom]]
 +
* The [[Second Amendment]] right to keep and bear arms
 +
* Economic allocative efficiency (as opposed to popular equity)
 +
* Parental control of education ([[parental rights]])
 +
* Private medical care and retirement plans
 +
* Canceling failed social support programs
 +
* Opposition to [[globalism]], [[one-world government]], and the [[War on Sovereignty]]
 +
* [[Economic nationalism]] over globalist [[free trade|"free" trade]]
 +
* Valuing [[patriotism]], [[self-governance]], and [[sovereignty]]
 +
* [[Border wall|Border security]] and enforcement of strong [[immigration]] laws, opposition to mass migration and [[open borders]]
 +
* Respect for our military, both past and present
 +
* Rejection of [[junk science]] such as [[evolution]] and [[global warming]]
 +
* Minimal taxation
 +
* [[Federalism]] (Separation of powers among the National, State and Local governments)
 +
* Favoring [[states' rights]] over federal power, while accepting the Constitutional role of the federal government, and favoring [[subsidiarity]]
 +
* Opposition to [[big government]] and the [[Nanny State]]
 +
* A strong national defense
 +
* An [[Originalism|Originalist]] and [[Textualism|Textualist]] interpretation of the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]], and strongly oppose [[judicial activism]]
 +
* A dedication to the truth, and an ability to seek it
 +
* Ending [[entitlement]] programs
 +
* Voluntary charity to those in genuine need
 +
__TOC__ <!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing-->
  
Conservative, prior to his arrival & elevation on Conservapedia, was much in evidence on Wikipedia. As "[[wp:user:kdbuffalo|Kdbuffalo]]", '''K'''en '''D'''eMeyer of '''Buffalo''' NY,<ref>[http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nils_Heribert-Nilsson&diff=next&oldid=306795 Ken leaves his UserID at the University of NY, Buffalo] in his reference http://www.jstor.org/view/00335770/dm994628/99p0820w/0?frame=noframe&userID=80cd7358@buffalo.edu/01cc99331400501c9318c&dpi=3&config=jstor </ref> he created quite a stir. Among others [[wp:Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Kdbuffalo_2|here]] and [[wp:Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-10-16_Deletions_by_user_Kdbuffalo|here]] (there's more if you look) where he had been following his usual charming tactics: ignoring everyone else, quote mining and quoting other like-minded idiots. Nothing changes!
+
==List of prominent conservatives==
 +
===Movement===
 +
[[Movement conservatives]] are those who accept the logic of conservatism across-the-board, and stand up for its powerful principles despite [[liberal]] ridicule. Movement conservative activists in the U.S. include:
 +
*[[Phyllis Schlafly]], defeated the [[ERA]]
 +
*[[Larry McDonald]], Congressman, on board [[KAL 007]] when shot down by the Soviets near [[Moneron Island]].
 +
*[[Jesse Helms]], Senator, specialist in foreign policy
 +
*[[Alan Keyes]], ambassador and commentator
 +
*[[Jim Jordan]], [[Thomas Massie]], [[Steve King]], [[Tom Tancredo]], and [[Dave Brat]], Congressmen
 +
*[[Pat Buchanan]], commentator and presidential candidate
 +
*[[Thomas Sowell]], economist and commentator
 +
*[[Jerry Falwell]], religion
 +
*[[Tucker Carlson]], commentator
 +
*[[Ann Coulter]], commentator
 +
*[[Michelle Malkin]], blogger and columnist
 +
*[[Roy Moore]], judge
 +
*[[Rand Paul]], Senator
 +
*[[Josh Hawley]], Senator
 +
*[[Kris Kobach]], state official
 +
*[[Michele Bachmann]], Congresswoman
 +
*[[Ron DeSantis]], Governor of Florida
 +
*[[George S. Patton]], Four-Star WWII General
  
For a while Ken also participated at RationalWiki, under the name [[User:Newton|Newton]]. The name Ken DeMyer is now protected by Conservapedia's spam filter.
+
===Presidents===
 +
Periodically a conservative has been elected [[President of the United States of America|President of the United States]]. The most prominent conservative presidents include:
 +
*[[George Washington]] (1789–1797)
 +
*[[James Monroe]] (1817–1825)
 +
*[[Grover Cleveland]] (1885–1889, 1893–1897)
 +
*[[Warren G. Harding]] (1921–1923)
 +
*[[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923–1929)
 +
*[[Dwight D Eisenhower]] (1953-1961)
 +
*[[Ronald Reagan]] (1981–1989)
 +
*[[Donald Trump]] (2017–)
  
===Other known (or suspected) aliases===
+
The most prominent conservative Congresses have been:
*[[wp:user:kdbuffalo|kdbuffalo]] (WP and [http://www.freeratio.org/thearchives/showthread.php?t=190177 Freethought and Rationalism Discussion Board])
+
*[[wp:user:VacuousPoet|VacuousPoet]]<ref group=note>Ken is adamant this is not him, a check user on Wikipedia found that both kdbuffalo and VacuousPoet were editing from the same IP range which belonged to a large university. The case hinged on the fact they had similar writing styles.</ref> and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Kdbuffalo other sockpuppets](WP)
+
*[[cp:user:Freedom777|Freedom777]]<ref group=note>Freedom777 wrote Conservapedia's article on [[cp:Intelligent Design]] and was made a sysop. However, he only ever corresponded with Ken and has not made any further edits. The writing style is unlike Ken's convoluted prose and required fewer edits to post than a single sentence of Ken's. It is believed that the article was written by someone else offline and Freedom777 was a proxy for Ken to uploading the article. Note that Ken's Skype name for his SEO services is '''creation333777'''. </ref> (CP)
+
*[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/User:Ruylopez Ruylopez]<ref>[http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Image:Ken_and_ruylopez.png <s>After this exposure at CP, Ken burned his usertalk page</s>] [http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Ruylopez&diff=16868&oldid=16412 Ruy Lopez obliquely admits to authoring the Gentlemen series, providing more concrete evidence that he is Ken]</ref> ([[A Storehouse of Knowledge]]) - while Ruy Lopez and Conservative occasionally disavow each other when queried directly, all anecdotal evidence suggests they are one and the same, including Ruy Lopez answering to "Ken," his consistent and identical defense of Ken's pet sharticles (aren't everyone's bowels at least a little gay?), Ken's distinctive editing pattern and apparent admission that he is the author of the Gentlemen red telephones, constant reference to ___ on the internet, and consistent use of "in regards to" and other distinctive rhetorical flourishes.
+
*[http://www.freeratio.org/showthread.php?p=4833963#post4833963 jonathondickenson] (Internet Infidels forum<ref>[http://iidb.infidels.org/vbb/archive/index.php/t-221596.html Ken as jonathondickenson]</ref> and [http://www.freeratio.org/search.php?searchid=2471498 Freethought & Rationalism Discussion Board], [http://www.freeratio.org/showpost.php?p=4848424&postcount=490 blocked for spamming])
+
*Mark Davidson ([http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/05/16/jimmy-swaggart-ministries-v-california-1990.htm About.com - Atheism])
+
*David Beber ([http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/04/17/godless-moral-values-can-godless-atheists-have-moral-values.htm About.com - Atheism])
+
*Creationist ([http://creationwiki.org/User:Creationist CreationWiki])
+
*Ingersoll ([http://richarddawkins.net/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=21987&sid=ae4fcfee90406dfbf5e82f65bb53cbd2 RichardDawkins.net])
+
*David Jensen ([http://blog.case.edu/singham/2008/06/19/the_language_of_god9_an_appeal_to_the_scientifically_minded Mano Singham's Web Journal])
+
*Markg ([http://www.atheist.ie/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1882 Irish Atheists Forum])
+
*Mark Goodson (CP linkspam at [http://www.ravishingbeasts.com/museums/2009/3/4/teaching-evolution-at-the-natural-history-museum-london.html Ravishingbeasts.com])
+
*Dlmurray ([http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Dlmurray Sourcewatch] - spammed links to atheism, evolution & homosexuality.)
+
*Peter Moore on [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/11/once_more_into_the_haeckelian.php Pharyngula] and [http://www.evolutionfairytale.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=1462 Evolution Fairy Tale], where he outs himself by saying, "I created most the Conservapedia atheism article located here: <nowiki>http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism</nowiki>", as well as [http://www.christianforums.net/christian-apologist-jp-holding-and-conservapedia%CA%B9s-atheism-t30040.html-sid=220bd224eed8dd77e489c6d32bab56a2 Christian forums.]
+
* Derek Johnson [http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008696.html on this blog], [http://abittasty.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/conservapedia/#comment-2777 this one] and an e-mail address used to post to [[TZB]].<ref>[[TZB]]: 780/63eaafdaa8adfcfd.html</ref>
+
*  creation333777 at [http://alfin2100.blogspot.com/2008/09/leftists-arrayed-against-evolution.html#4132127118637600429 Al Fin blog]
+
  
Amazingly Ken thinks that no-one can see through his masterful disguises and persists in hiding behind the curtain.<ref>[http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Image:KenDeNial.jpg&oldid=276118 Gentlemen-it-seems-as-if-internet-evolutionists-are-a-paranoid-lot]</ref>
+
*The 80th Congress (elected in 1946)
 +
*The 104th Congress (elected in 1994)
  
====An interesting relationship====
+
===Key leaders===
 +
*[[Robert Taft]] — U.S. Senator, leader of the [[Conservative Coalition]], and unsuccessful 1948 presidential candidate
 +
*[[Barry Goldwater]] — 1964 Republican candidate, lost to liberal Democrat [[Lyndon Johnson]] but revived the conservative movement inside the GOP
 +
*[[Russell Kirk]] — Theorist & intellectual
 +
*[[Robert Bork]] — legal scholar, government official, and unsuccessful Supreme Court nominee
 +
*[[Margaret Thatcher]] — British prime minister between 1979 and 1990, held views similar to Reagan's
 +
*[[Milton Friedman]] — Chicago-school [[libertarian]] [[economist]], influential during Reagan administration; leader of the [[Chicago School of Economics]]
 +
*[[Clarence Thomas]] — Supreme Court justice
 +
*[[James C. Ho]] — Federal judge, thought leader for judicial originalism
  
While it may not (yet) be confirmed if Conservapedia's User:Conservative really ''is'' popular Christian [[YouTube]]r [[Shockofgod]] (aka Rich Allen), the two seem to have a close relationship. Many articles that Shock mentions in his videos have been almost entirely written by Conservative, including the page "ShockOfGod" on Conservapedia.<ref>{{cpl|Shockofgod|The CP article on Shock}}</ref>
+
===Hall of Fame===
 +
Conservative scholar Clinton Rossiter<ref>Rossiter, "The Giants of American Conservatism," ''American Heritage'' 1955 6(6): 56-59, 94-96, online in [[EBSCO]]</ref> names [[Alexander Hamilton]], [[John Adams]], [[John Marshall]], [[Daniel Webster]], [[John C. Calhoun]], [[Elihu Root]], and [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to the "Conservative's Hall of Fame,"'' with John Adams as the greatest of American conservatives—a dubious choice since President Adams was an ardent opponent of [[free speech]] to criticize government.
  
In this [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSJoww79-Os you-tube video], Shock takes personal offense at Penn Jillette calling Conservative "a troll", as if he was the one Penn was talking about.
+
==U.S. voters==
 +
In America, most conservatives support the [[Republican Party]], but not exclusively so. In the 2008 election, 35% of the voters identified themselves as conservatives. Of them, 78% voted for [[John McCain]] and 20% for [[Barack Hussein Obama]], with the 20% accounting for Obama's margin of victory. Only 22% of the voters were liberal; they favored Obama 89%-10%. In the middle were 44% who called themselves moderates. They split for Obama by 60%-39%. (Minor candidates won 2% of the vote.)<ref>See [https://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1 Presidential 2008 Exit Poll]</ref>
 +
[[File:Russell Kirk.jpg|thumbnail|300px|[[Russell Kirk]] was an American political theorist, conservative intellectual, historian of ideas, social critic, and man of letters, who is best known for his role in the American conservative movement. ]]
 +
Conservatives generally understand liberals better than liberals understand conservatives.<ref>[https://theindependentwhig.com/haidt-passages/haidt/conservatives-understand-liberals-better-than-liberals-understand-conservatives/ Haidt: Conservatives Understand Liberals Better Than Liberals Understand Conservatives]. ''The Independent Whig''. Retrieved November 13, 2019.</ref>
  
In addition, they both appear to have very similar styles: They both have morbid preoccupations with [[atheism]], [[homosexuality]] and obesity, they both fantasize constantly about atheism and evolutionism dying, they are both terrible debaters (and have [[Conservapedia:Debating_Kendoll|an eerily similar debating style]]), and they both use [[Ad_hominem|childlike and immature tactics]] when debating atheists.
+
===Religious differences between political conservatives and political liberals===
 +
The Barna poll conducted in November  2008 shows significant differences between the 32% of Americans who called themselves as “mostly conservative” on social and political matters; and the 17% who called themselves “mostly liberal” on social and political matters. The others—50%--were moderates with positions somewhere in-between.<ref>See [http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/13-culture/258-survey-shows-how-liberals-and-conservatives-differ-on-matters-of-faith on line results]</ref>
  
Either the two are one and the same, or they both edit Conservapedia, using the same user.
+
Some findings:
 +
Political liberals are less than half as likely as political conservatives to firmly believe that the Bible is totally accurate in all of the principles it teaches (27% versus 63%, respectively); to strongly believe that [[Satan]] is real (17% versus 36%); and to firmly contend that they have a personal responsibility to share their religious beliefs with others (23% versus 48%).  
  
=="Publications" by Ken DeMyer==
+
[Note: "Liberal" and "conservative" in this survey are based on politics]
In one of his many shout-outs, Ken DeMyer implied that he had academic aspirations, which he may or may not be fulfilling, and that in early 2011 he was to be a paid writer for some unknown publication. This does seem somewhat strange as his arguments are usually backed up with "evidence" in the form of [[quote mining|quote mine]]s, which are frowned upon as the quotes are usually out of context and in most cases are an example of the logical fallacy of [[argument from authority]]. As there are no publications to his name that are readily found, we can only judge his intellectual rigour by his many postings at forums across the internet.
+
  
Using his actual name(!) he was pwned [http://users.adam.com.au/bstett/BTyreDeMyer111.htm here] and [http://users.adam.com.au/bstett/ReligEarthUniverseAge106.htm here].
+
Liberals are also far less likely than conservatives to strongly believe each of the following:
 +
*their religious faith is very important in their life (54% of liberals vs. 82% of conservatives);
 +
*a person cannot earn their way into [[Heaven]] by doing good deeds or being a good person (23% vs. 37%);
 +
*their faith is becoming an increasingly important moral guide in their life (38% vs. 70%);
 +
*the church they currently attend is very important in helping them find direction and fulfillment in life (37% vs. 62%);
 +
*their primary purpose in life is to love God with all their heart, mind, strength and soul (43% vs. 76%);
  
He was also a participant on TheologyWeb. His works are the usual topics; [http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/showthread.php?t=75206 quote mine about evolutionist lies], [http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/showthread.php?t=20828 quote mine on why people that are skeptical about the Bible are wrong], [http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/showthread.php?t=74359 quote mine on why non-creationist biology is wrong] and [http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/showthread.php?t=68693 quote mine on why fossil record disagrees with evolution]. He penned this [http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/showthread.php?t=35528 long essay] about dating Exodus where he copped pwnings such as [http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/showthread.php?p=1458985 this]. A full collection of Ken DeMyer's quote mines can be found [http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/search.php?searchid=2135407 here] (after registering and logging in).
+
political conservatives were more likely than liberals to:
 +
*read the Bible, other than at church events, during the past week (57% vs. 33%, respectively)
 +
*attend a religious service during the past week (62% vs. 35%)
 +
*[[pray]] to God, other than at a religious service, during the past week (91% vs. 76%)
 +
*share their religious beliefs with others, during the past year (56% vs. 39%, among the born again Christians interviewed from each segment)
 +
*have ever participated in a short-term missions trip, either within the U.S. or in another country (12% vs. 6%)  
  
As Kdbuffalo he posted on Internet Infidels where he tried once again to prove a point by quote mining on the failure of [http://iidb.infidels.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=190177 non-creationist astronomy], again when people are allowed to reply he cops a pwning.
+
*2% of conservatives and 11% of liberals were [[Atheism|atheist]] or [[agnostic]]
 +
*15% of conservatives and 2% of liberals were [[Evangelical Christians|Christian evangelicals]]
 +
*conservatives were twice as likely as liberals to be categorized as [[born again]], based on their theological views about salvation (63% vs. 32%)
 +
*21% of conservatives were associated with the [[Roman Catholic Church]], compared to 30% among the liberals.
  
It appears that throughout his internet forum "debating" career Ken DeMyer uses the same weak quotemining tactic - which seems to get him accused of dishonesty for some reason - loses the argument badly, and then starts another thread all the while believing he is destroying atheism and evolution on the internet. His retreat to Conservapedia is simply that for once he controls the ground rules. His articles are the kind of quote-mining seen before, he ignores any comments on talkpages, and locks his articles, userpage and shout-outs, so that he can shut down any debate from ever occurring. Pages and their histories are routinely memory holed to cover his tracks.
+
== Conservative organizations ==
 +
{{See also|Major conservative organizations}}
 +
Several organizations exist that promote consistently conservative values.
  
[http://www.talkreason.org/Forum.cfm?MESSAGEID=305 This] is particularly hilarious as DeMyer is trying to convince someone that rabbit and hares "chew the cud" (that is they are pre-gut fermentors, animals which regurgitate their food and before consuming it again, like cows and camels) as it says in Leviticus, when it is a well established fact that rabbits and hares are hind gut fermentors (animals that re-eat their faeces to redigest the food). Simply cut a rabbit up and you would not see the multiple stomach arrangement you find in cows that even makes this possible. As always, he quotes a few guys he agrees with and fails epically in the face of actual evidence.
+
=== Conservative news ===
 +
{{See also|Conservative news websites}}
 +
Some of the more notable news organizations which tend to be more conservative are [[WorldNetDaily]] and [[NewsMax]]. [[Fox News]], though often called conservative, tends to be more [[neoconservative]] than conservative.
  
==Conservative style, Conservapedia obsessive-compulsive disorder, and delusions==
+
=== Conservative magazines and blogs ===
[[Image:Ken-buggy.jpg|thumb|400px|right|''The Buffalo News'', July 2008]]
+
{{See also|Conservative media}}
Conservative style usually includes the following characteristics:
+
Well known conservative magazines in the United States include ''[[National Review]]'', ''[[Policy Review]]'', ''[[The Weekly Standard]]'' and others.
[[file:Kenathon.png|left|30px|thumb|30 hours]]
+
*Taking several edits to make even the smallest changes to an article.
+
*Deleting and recreating pages (Ken has deleted and recreated his userpage over 180 times)
+
*Not using the "preview" function to view his edits before saving.
+
*Forgetting to insert a space between his edit and signature on talkpages.
+
*Heavy reliance on quotes, almost to the exclusion of other text.
+
*Excessive use of double line breaks to space sentences apart.
+
*Tacking sources as links at the end of his sentences.
+
*Borrowing material from creationist blogs and other dubious sources, and attributing quotes inaccurately or out of context.
+
*Use of irrelevant pictures with inane captions, and pointless links to YouTube clips.
+
*When said pictures are added, forgetting to resize them to a smaller size, allowing browsers to be able to scroll left.
+
*Morbid preoccupations with homosexuality, atheism, evolution, obesity, suicide, and Hitler.
+
*Obsession with search results on a certain search engine starting with G, and predictions about them.
+
*Excessive adverbial use of the word "likely" when making these predictions.
+
*Poor sentence structure and repetitive use of the same words (especially "however").
+
*A penchant for beginning sentences with his signature catchphrase, "In regards to".
+
*Spamming the Main Page and other sysops' talk pages with "news" in regards to [[Argumentum ad populum|search engine results]], pictures of Hitler and poorly disguised messages to RationalWiki users - sometimes by name.
+
*Apparent indifference to ridicule.<ref group=note>When he is being ridiculed he will often trot out the phrase, "appeal to ridicule is a logical fallacy". This appears to be the only logical fallacy he is aware of, as he fails to notice at least 12 different forms of logical fallacies in his [[Conservapedia:Evolution|evolution]] article.</ref>
+
*Announcing "[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&diff=prev&oldid=424564 exciting] [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&diff=next&oldid=440116 new developments"], “operations” or [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template%3AMainpageright&diff=554867&oldid=554866 "major developments"] expected in regards to to his pet articles.<ref group=note>However, no operations or developments of any kind, either exciting or major, have happened to Conservapedia in a loooooooooooong time.</ref>
+
*Finishing a sentence with [[Law of exclamation|more than one exclamation mark]], repeated use of the internet abbreviation “LOL!” or a smiley emoticon, the sure sign of a diseased mind.<ref group=note>And by the way, he’s 45-50 years old.</ref>
+
*Appealing to authority when his shabby "[[Bullshit|scholarship]]" is exposed (my expert published 500 more papers than yours, gay bowel syndrome is real!1!! :)  )
+
*On 13th and 14th June 2009, Ken engaged in a marathon 30-hour edit spree. (See image on left.)
+
*On 11th to 13th October 2014, he broke his previous records with a 39-hour editing marathon.
+
*Frequent deletion of own user discussion page.<ref>https://conservapedia.com/Special:Log?type=delete&page=User_talk:Conservative&limit=500</ref> When linking any discussion there, make sure to back it up on web archives, or else it will be memory-holed.
+
  
===An example of his editing pattern===
+
Some notable [[Conservative blogs|conservative political blogs]] include the [[Heritage Foundation]]'s Policy Weblog, ''[[Human Events]]'', [[Michelle Malkin]], Newsbusters, Townhall.com and others.
There are many instances where one will see Ken taking several edits to make even the smallest changes to a page. However, one must often be quick to view them, as he has been known to delete and recreate pages, which, as a result, hides the original history of the page from view. Serving as an example that shows how he takes many edits to perform even the slightest task, the following describes a series of 21 consecutive edits made by Ken to his userpage in July of 2010:
+
  
#Adds a section titled "Great works of art on atheism" to his userpage. Consists only of a bunch of blank lines, and a random period at  the end.
+
== Neoconservatives ==
#Adds additional blank lines to the section.
+
#Adds additional blank lines to the section ''again'', along with another random period.
+
#Adds additional blank lines to the section ''yet again'', for the ''third time in a row''.
+
#Blanks the section, for a reason unknown.
+
#Re-adds a bunch of spaces and this time just one period, which he removed ''just less than a minute ago''.
+
#Replaces the random period with a pointless template that has no effect.
+
#Blanks the section, for the ''second'' time.
+
#Removes the section header itself.
+
#Re-adds the section in a new location (still blank).
+
#Adds an ''additional'' section titled "Great and inspiring art by atheist on atheism" (basically the same thing), this one containing a tumbleweed animation aligned to the center. At this point, he has two sections for exactly the same thing: one blank, one not.
+
#Adjusts the alignment of the animation to the right.
+
#Removes the alignment parameter altogether.
+
#Re-adds the original alignment parameter, aligning it to the center once again (three consecutive edits just to get back to where he started).
+
#Adds a new section titled "Proof and evidence that atheism is valid" right below the last one, with this one's content consisting of a second tumbleweed animation.
+
#Places a link to [[cp:Essay: Proof and evidence that atheism is true|Essay: Proof and evidence that atheism is true]] at the bottom of his userpage.
+
#Removes the two sections consisting of the animations. Note that he still has the blank section on his userpage.
+
#Re-adds the sections that he had just removed at the bottom of his userpage, replacing the link to the previously-mentioned essay.
+
#Reduces the size of a tumbleweed animation; however, it doesn't work. Proof that he doesn't preview before saving.
+
#Undoes his mistake.
+
#Increases the size of the second animation to 700px, making it look horrendous, since its original size is very small.
+
  
After making 21 consecutive edits to his userpage, Ken had added three sections, one of which was blank, and two of which contained nothing but two animations, one looking very ugly.
+
American commentators who ally themselves with the conservative movement but reject its religious or moral underpinnings are generally known as [[neoconservatives]].<ref>Jonah Goldberg, [http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZWMxNWNiNDJkY2JmNTExY2E1MzdkYWU3MWU1MTBiOGU= "What Is a 'Conservative'?"], [[National Review|National Review Online]], 11 May 2005</ref>
<br clear=all>
+
  
==Quote mine about Ken DeMyer==
+
In the United States, conservatives are generally characterized by the following beliefs:
In regards to DeMyer's [[quote mining]], Patchy of the [[Freethought]] and [[Rationalism]] Discussion Board wrote, “until such time as he can articulate and defend his own argument or question in his own words, he can be very safely ignored.”<ref>http://www.freeratio.org/showthread.php?s=d4e0a0b5fb3b960bf37a367b131be2e1&p=4013923#post4013923</ref>
+
  
To support this view, [[evolution|evolutionist]] [[PZ Myers]] from the University of [[Minnesota]] wrote the following regarding his constant need for attention:
+
# Support of [[limited government]].
{{cquote|This twit, calling himself Peter Moore (also known as Ken DeMyer, or Kdbuffalo, as he was known on [[Wikipedia]] before being banned there), is repeating himself over and over again, asking the same stupid question, never satisfied with any answer anyone gives him. Forty nine insipid comments in three days is enough.<ref>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/11/once_more_into_the_haeckelian.php</ref>}}
+
# A preference for freedom of opportunity over equality of result.
Furthermore, [[atheism|atheist]] Austin Cline wrote this with regards to his search engine optimization:
+
# [[Patriotism]], [[nationalism]], and support of a strong defense.
{{cquote|Your attempts at link-spamming will fail because search engines don’t index the comments here. Thanks for trying — it has been amusing, I won’t deny it, but all the time and effort you’ve spent on that has been wasted. So there is no need to find excuses to include links back to your own [[Conservapedia]] articles. It won’t help any more than trying to use passive-aggressive tactics to get me to link to your irrelevant and unimportant articles in the hopes of having them rise up in search engine rankings.<ref>http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/05/16/jimmy-swaggart-ministries-v-california-1990.htm</ref>}}
+
# Support of the institution of [[marriage]].
 +
# Emphasis on social values, like [[prayer]] and [[pro-life]] principles.
  
In regards to the question of his [[sexuality]], Ken himself put the matter to rest:
+
In contrast, neoconservatives generally support [[Big government|bigger government]] and [[globalism]], and tend to downplay the significance of social values.
{{cquote|I also notice they made no mention of refuting my [[homosexuality]].<ref><capture>[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RobSmith&diff=prev&oldid=782237 Yes, he really did say that!]</capture></ref>}}
+
  
==Essays==
+
== Paleoconservatives ==
[[File:OCD.png|right|thumb|75px|A fairly typical example of Ken's "essays"]]
+
Ken seems to have reached a perfect equilibrium with his "big three" articles. To keep himself busy he began creating a series of bizarre "essays" which Ken describes as "satire". The standard template for these pieces seems to be a quote, childish jabs at atheists and evolutionists, a series of pictures depicting clowns, bull-fights, [[Charles Darwin]], Hitler and/or Stalin followed by links to other "essays" of almost the exact same nature. All the talkpages for these essays redirect to either another essay or his atheism hit-piece. Some of the more unhinged essays are:<br>
+
*[https://conservapedia.com/Essay:_Conservapedia_obsessive_compulsive_disorder Conservapedia obsessive compulsive disorder]
+
*[https://conservapedia.com/Essay:_The_atheist_and_evolutionist_helpline The atheist and evolutionist helpline]
+
*[https://conservapedia.com/Essay:_Atheist_restaurant Atheist restaurant]
+
*[https://conservapedia.com/Essay:_The_transitional_animal_the_flying_kitty%3F The Flying Kitty page]
+
*[https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Ponies_vs._atheism_-_Ponies_win Ponies vs. atheism] (arguably Ken's most bizarre "essay")
+
*[https://conservapedia.com/Essay:_RationalWiki_admits_it_has_a_weirdo,_pansie_infestation RationalWiki admits it has a weirdo, pansie infestation]
+
A complete list can be found [http://conservapedia.com/Comedy_and_satires_concerning_atheism_and_evolution here.]
+
  
After pestering right-wing clogger [[Denyse O'Leary]] she wearily deigned to link to his [[cp:Atheism and obesity|Atheism and obesity]] rat's nest. However, the outcome was not as celebratory as he might have liked.
+
[[Paleoconservatives]] are conservatives who are more focused on social issues and American [[sovereignty]] and are suspicious of both big government and big business, along with [[globalism]] and [[multiculturalism]]. They also lean against foreign interventionism. Neoconservatives criticize this with the pejorative term of "[[isolationism]]," as they believe in promoting [[democracy]] worldwide, even where different religious or value systems are incompatible with democracy-induced changes in control.
  
==Reaction of his fellow sysops==
+
A notable paleoconservative was Democrat Congressman from Georgia, [[Larry McDonald]]. He was also second Chairman of the [[John Birch Society]], and President of Western Goals. McDonald was aboard [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] when it was shot down by the [[Soviet Union|Soviets]] near [[Moneron Island]] in 1983. Other paleoconservatives include [[Pat Buchanan]] and [[Tom Tancredo]].
In April 2009, Conservative informed his fellow sysops of yet another mysterious project, involving people known only to Conservative, who were going to do something at some point in time, that would send "tens of thousands of people" to Conservapedia. Or maybe not.
+
{{quotebox|There is a friend of mine who has some resources at his disposal relating to the internet and he is going to tell tens of thousands of people about Conservapedia. He is going to direct them to the Conservapedia evolution article. The people are not going to be
+
spammed as they have indicated they want to hear about such things.  
+
  
In addition, soon hundreds of thousands of people may be told about the Conservapedia evolution article but that is less certain as I have
+
==Fiscal Conservatism vs. Social Conservatism==
not asked the people who I have a good rapport with to mention the Conservapedia evolution article yet.
+
  
I think there may be some exciting things happening to the Conservapedia evolution article soon.<ref>[http://cp.noym.net/120fdda2cbde2b5b Tens of thousands of people are going to find out about conservapedia soon]</ref>}}
+
''For further details on the two related philosophies, see [[Fiscal conservatism]] and [[Social conservatism]]''
  
Fellow sysops [[TK]] and [[Ed Poor]] retreated to the ultra-secret Fab Five discussion group, to discuss (obviously!) Conservative's latest delusion.<ref>[http://cp.noym.net/76f712e5392033ff Tens of thousands of people are going to find out about conservapedia soon (Fab Five discussion)]</ref>
+
Recently, a division has been created between fiscal conservatism and social conservatism. Fiscal conservatism centers around a low and [[Balanced budget|balanced]] government [[budget]], and generally is opposed to programs such as [[Social Security]] and [[Medicare]]. Its primary goal is to reduce government spending significantly. Social Conservatism, on the other hand, focuses on the moral issues of conservatism. A social conservative will oppose [[same-sex marriage]], [[abortion]], and the teaching of [[evolution]] in schools. The majority of Conservatives (including most of the [[Republican Party]]) fall into both categories, however some fall into one or the other, but not both. Notably, [[Libertarians]] are strong fiscal conservatives but are not socially conservative. For instance, the [[Libertarian Party]] Platform <ref>[http://www.lp.org/platform]</ref> expresses support for the fiscally conservative principles of ending publicly funded [[welfare]] and [[healthcare]] programs as well as reducing government spending overall significantly. However, it also expresses support for [[same-sex marriage]] (with some libertarians leaning towards the ultimate goal of total [[marriage privatization]]) as well as maintaining the legal status of abortion.
  
TK:
+
Some Republicans and [[Democrat Party|Democrats]] also fit one category but not the other. Former [[New Mexico]] governor [[Gary Johnson]], who is seeking the Republican presidential nomination in 2012, was deemed "the most fiscally conservative governor" while he was in office (and probably earned that honor given all the spending cuts he made) but at the same time, he supports [[marriage privatization]] and [[abortion]] (though he believes ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' should be overturned on Constitutional grounds). Also, several Democrats have expressed opposition to same-sex marriage and/or abortion, but still support liberal fiscal programs such as Social Security. They would be the opposite of Johnson - socially conservative but fiscally liberal.
{{quotebox|Ok, he is really starting to scare me. This is just a robot-like repetition of his front page non-news items. If someone is going to do this, why are they always nameless?  Seems to me, someone directing tens of thousands to CP, isn't asking to remain anonymous...
+
  
Can't someone tell this guy that hyperbole isn't a sound basis to build anything? }}
+
=== Expected growth of social conservatism and religious conservatism ===
  
Ed Poor:
+
Due to the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] in traditional cultures and their influence on Western Christianity and the higher birth rate of [[Conservative Christianity|conservative Christians]] and religious conservatives, social conservatism is expected to rise.
{{quotebox|I think he needs the attention. So let's give him what he needs, so he'll stay enthused.}}
+
  
Well, needless to say, the promised masses never materialised, but Conservative stayed enthused - going on to offer such gems as [[cp:Atheism and obesity]] and [[cp:Atheism and bestiality]].
+
The Birkbeck College, University of London professor Eric Kaufman wrote in his 2010 book ''Shall the Righteous Inherit the Earth?'' concerning America:
 +
{{cquote|High evangelical fertility rates more than compensated for losses to liberal Protestant sects during the twentieth century. In recent decades, white secularism has surged, but Latino and Asian religious immigration has taken up the slack, keeping secularism at bay. Across denominations, the fertility advantage of religious fundamentalists of all colours is significant and growing. After 2020, their demographic weight will begin to tip the balance in the [[Culture War|culture wars]] towards the conservative side, ramping up pressure on hot-button issues such as [[abortion]]. By the end of the century, three quarters of America may be pro-life. Their activism will leap over the borders of the 'Redeemer Nation' to evangelize the world. Already, the rise of the World Congress of Families has launched a global religious right, its arms stretching across the bloody lines of the War on Terror to embrace the entire Abrahamic family.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/why-are-years-2012-and-2020-key-years.html Why are 2012 and 2020 key years for Christian creationists and pro-lifers?]</ref>}}
  
== The great debater ==
+
== Personal conservatism ==
:{{q|Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.|Anonymous}}
+
Because Conservatives often have strong political views, there can be a tendency to see conservatism as a purely political ideology. However, there is also a strong personal side to conservatism - being a conservative is as much about applying conservative values to one's everyday life as it is about campaigning and voting for conservative candidates. In general, conservatives can be characterized by a strong sense of personal [[morality]], a willingness to observe their culture's traditions and customs, and a desire to be respectable and to show due respect to other members of the community.
  
Ken fancies himself a great debater, and claims "RationalWikians have lost every single exchange we have ever had."
+
==History of American conservatism==
 +
===Textbook problems===
 +
{{See also|Textbook bias}}
 +
College-level teaching about conservatism has been distorted by a "liberal state paradigm"—that is, [[textbook]]s usually interpret recent American history in terms of the origins and successes of political liberalism—especially the [[New Deal]], the [[welfare state]], [[labor union]]s, and [[Civil Rights Movement|Civil Rights]] for blacks and [[equality]] for women. Conservative politics is usually defined as a reaction: as a [[free market]] reply to the growth of [[big government]]; as an expression of outrage against declining support for tradition and Christian morality.  Where the violent Wobblies ([[Industrial Workers of the World|IWW]]) and illegal sit down strikes of the 1930s are seen as heroic, exposing [[Communist]] subversion by [[Joe McCarthy]] is denounced as the nadir of political morality.<ref>See Leonard Moore, "Approaching Conservatism," ''OAH Magazine of History,'' 17 (January 2003) [http://www.oah.org/pubs/magazine/conservatism/moore.html online edition]</ref>
  
In January 2011, he challenged RWians to a formal debate. [[Conservapedia:Debating Kendoll|Lulz ensued when we accepted]].
+
===Loyalists===
 +
The [[Loyalists]] of the [[American Revolution]] were mostly political conservatives, some of whom produced political discourse of a high order, including lawyer [[Joseph Galloway]] and governor-historian [[Thomas Hutchinson]]. However, when the crisis came, they stood with the Crown as it tried to destroy American political liberties. After the war, the great majority remained in the U.S. and became citizens, but some leaders emigrated to other places in the British Empire. [[Samuel Seabury]] was a Loyalist who stayed and as the first American bishop played a major role in shaping the [[Episcopal]] religion, a stronghold of conservative social values.  While the Loyalist political tradition died out totally it the U.S., it survives in Canadian conservatism.
  
===The 90-day editing sabbatical===
+
===Founding Fathers===
[[File:Kens-sabbatical-2011-2.png|thumb|right|a promising start (<span style="color:red"> block</span>  <span style="color:black"> delete</span>  <span style="color:gold">move</span>  <span style="color:green"> patrol (i.e., comment)</span>  <span style="color:pink"> protect</span>  <span style="color:blue"> upload</span>)]]On 30th January 2011, whilst emails were flying around between Conservative and some RationalWiki members about a possible debate, Conservative posted a Red Telephone [[:File:Capture_9e57df7bf3f19dd3834786276c696238d531003b.png|message]] claiming he had a full schedule in the following 90 days, and in an email to RationalWiki user [[User:Ace McWicked|Ace McWicked]] [[Conservapedia:Debating_Kendoll#And_then|"probably for the next few years or so"]] as well. In the Red Telephone message he stated he may "do a few cameo appearances in the next 90 days." He then continued his erratic editing pattern as normal, clocking up over 500 edits in the first week of February (and over 1,300 across the whole month) <ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?limit=1349&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Conservative&namespace=&year=2011&month=2 Conservative's edit log for February 2011]</ref> and somewhat ironically began working on an essay untouched for over a month entitled "Essay:The atheist and evolutionist helpline."<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_The_atheist_and_evolutionist_helpline Essay:The atheist and evolutionist helpline]</ref><ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay%3A_The_atheist_and_evolutionist_helpline&action=history&year=2011&month=2 Essay:The atheist and evolutionist helpline edit log] for February 2011</ref>
+
The [[Founding Fathers]] created the single most important set of political ideas in American history, known as [[Republicanism]], which all groups, liberal and conservative alike, have drawn from.  Two parties were named "Republican"—the one founded in 1794 by [[Thomas Jefferson]] and [[James Madison]] (it disappeared in the 1820s), and the modern GOP founded in 1854.  
  
==Kenny's mammoth subpage count==
+
During the [[First Party System]] (1790s–1820s) the [[Federalist Party]], led by [[Alexander Hamilton]], developed an important variation of republicanism that can be considered conservative. Rejecting [[monarchy]] and [[aristocracy]], they emphasized civic virtue as the core American value. The Federalists spoke for the propertied interests and the upper classes of the cities. They envisioned a modernizing land of banks and factories, with a strong army and navy. [[George Washington]] was their great hero.
===Userpage subpages===
+
Conservative
+
  
Conservative-Research-American-Atheists-organization
+
On many issues, American conservatism also derives from the republicanism of [[Thomas Jefferson]] and his followers, especially [[John Randolph of Roanoke]] and his "Old Republicans" or "[[Quids]]."  They idealized the [[yeoman]] farmer as the epitome of civic virtue, warned that banking and industry led to [[corruption]], that is to the illegitimate use of government power for private ends. Jefferson himself was a vehement opponent of what today is called [[judicial activism]].
 +
<ref>[http://etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeff1030.htm]</ref> The Jeffersonians stressed small government.
  
Conservative/Alexa
+
===Ante-Bellum: Calhoun and Webster===
 +
During the [[Second Party System]] (1830–54) the [[Whig Party]] attracted most conservatives, such as [[Daniel Webster]] of New England. [[Daniel Webster]] and other leaders of the [[Whig Party]], called it the conservative party in the late 1830s.<ref>The word was originally used in the [[French Revolution]]. The British used it after 1839 to describe a major party. The first American usage is by Whigs who called themselves "Conservatives" in the late 1830s. Hans Sperber and Travis Trittschuh, ''American Political terms: An Historical Dictionary'' (1962) 94-97.</ref>  [[John C. Calhoun]], a Democrat, articulated a sophisticated conservatism in his writings. [[Richard Hofstadter]] (1948) called him "The [[Karl Marx|Marx]] of the Master Class."  Calhoun argued that a conservative minority should be able to limit the power of a "majority dictatorship" because tradition represents the wisdom of past generations. (This argument echoes one made by [[Edmund Burke]], the founder of British conservatism, in ''Reflections on the Revolution in France'' (1790)). Calhoun is considered the father of the idea of minority rights, a position adopted by liberals in the 1960s in dealing with [[Civil Rights]].
  
Conservative/Causes-of-atheism
+
The conservatism of the antebellum period is contested territory; conservatives of the 21st century disagree over what comprises their heritage. Thus [[William J. Bennett]] (2006), a prominent conservative leader, warns conservatives to NOT honor Calhoun, [[Know nothing party|Know-Nothings]], [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperheads]] and 20th century [[isolationist]]s. Other conservatives disagree with Bennett.
  
Conservative/ChristianApologetics
+
===Lincoln to Cleveland===
 +
Since 1865 the [[Republican Party]] has identified itself with President [[Abraham Lincoln]], who was the ideological heir of the [[Whig Party|Whigs]] and of both [[Thomas Jefferson|Jefferson]] and [[Alexander Hamilton|Hamilton]]. As the [[Gettysburg Address]] shows, Lincoln cast himself as a second Jefferson bringing a second birth of freedom to the nation that had been born 86 years before in Jefferson's [[Declaration of Independence|Declaration]]. The [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperheads]] of the [[American Civil War|Civil War]] reflected a [[reactionary]] opposition to modernity of the sort repudiated by modern conservatives. A few libertarians have adopted a neo-Copperhead position, arguing Lincoln was a dictator who created an all-powerful government.
  
Conservative/Christianbusinesses
+
In the late 19th century the [[Bourbon Democrat]]s, led by President [[Grover Cleveland]], preached against corruption, high taxes (protective [[tariff]]s), and [[imperialism]], and supported the [[gold standard]] and business interests. They were overthrown by [[William Jennings Bryan]] in 1896, who moved the mainstream of the Democrat Party permanently to the left.
  
Conservative/Complaints
+
The 1896 presidential election was the first with a conservative versus liberal theme in the way in which these terms are now understood. Republican [[William McKinley]] won using the pro-business slogan "[[sound money]] and protection," while Bryan's anti-bank populism had a lasting effect on economic policies of the Democrat Party.
  
Conservative/Conservapedia-running-stats-2
+
[[William Graham Sumner]], [[Yale University|Yale]] professor (1872–1910) and polymath, vigorously promoted a libertarian conservative ethic. After dallying with [[Social Darwinism]] under the influence of [[Herbert Spencer]], he rejected [[evolution]] in his later works, and strongly opposed imperialism. He opposed monopoly and [[paternalism]] in theory as a threat to equality, democracy and middle class values, but was vague on what to do about it.<ref>Curtis, Bruce. "William Graham Sumner 'On the Concentration of Wealth.'" Journal of American History 1969 55(4): 823-832.</ref>
  
Conservative/Conservapedia-running-stats-3
+
===Early 20th century===
 +
In the [[Progressive Era]] (1890s-1932), regulation of industry expanded as conservatives led by Senator [[Nelson Aldrich]] of [[Rhode Island]] were put on the defensive. However, Aldrich's proposal for a strong national banking system was enacted as the [[Federal Reserve System]] in 1913. [[Theodore Roosevelt]], the dominant personality of the era, was both liberal and conservative by turns. As a liberal he took a tough [[Regulation|regulatory]] approach toward businesses and [[trust]]s, and (post-presidency) fought for social insurance for the elderly. As a conservative he led the fight to make the country a major naval power, and demanded entry into [[World War I]] to stop what he saw as the [[German Empire|German]] attacks on civilization. [[William Howard Taft]] promoted a strong federal judiciary that would overrule excessive legislation. Taft defeated Roosevelt on that issue in 1912, forcing Roosevelt out of the GOP and turning it to the right for decades. As president, Taft remade the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] with five appointments; he himself presided as chief justice in 1921–30, the only former president ever to do so.
 +
[[Image:Gop-plank.JPG|thumb|275px|1936 cartoon shows GOP building its platform from the conservative planks abandoned by the Democrats]]
 +
Pro-business Republicans returned to dominance in 1920 with the election of President [[Warren G. Harding]]. The presidency of [[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923–29) was a high water mark for conservatism, both politically and intellectually. Classic writing of the period includes ''Democracy and Leadership'' (1924) by Irving Babbitt and [[H.L. Mencken]]'s magazine ''American Mercury'' (1924–33). The [[Efficiency Movement]] attracted many conservatives such as [[Herbert Hoover]] with its pro-business, pro-engineer approach to solving social and economic problems. In the 1920s many American conservatives generally maintained anti-foreign attitudes and, as usual, were disinclined toward changes to the healthy economic climate of the age.
  
Conservative/Conservapedia-running-stats-4
+
During the [[Great Depression]], other conservatives participated in the taxpayers' revolt at the local level. From 1930 to 1933, Americans formed as many as 3,000 taxpayers' leagues to protest high [[property tax]]es. These groups endorsed measures to limit and rollback taxes, lowered penalties on tax delinquents, and cuts in government spending. A few also called for illegal resistance (or tax strikes). The best known of these was led by the Association of Real Estate Taxpayers in [[Chicago]] which, at its height, had 30,000 dues-paying members. 
  
Conservative/Conservapediarunningstats
+
An important intellectual movement, calling itself [[Southern Agrarians]] and based in Nashville, brought together like-minded novelists, poets and historians who argued that modern values undermined the traditions of American [[Republicanism]] and civic virtue.
  
Conservative/CreationistResources
+
The Depression brought [[liberal]]s to power under President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] (1933). Indeed, the term "liberal" now came to mean a supporter of the [[New Deal]] and Roosevelt's powerful [[New Deal Coalition]]. In 1934 [[Al Smith]] and pro-business Democrats formed the [[American Liberty League]] to fight the new liberalism, but failed to stop Roosevelt's shifting the Democrat Party to the left. In 1936 the Republicans rejected Hoover and tried the more liberal [[Alf Landon]], who carried only [[Maine]] and [[Vermont]]. When Roosevelt tried to pack the Supreme Court in 1937 the conservatives finally cooperated across party lines and defeated it with help from Vice President [[John Nance Garner]]. Roosevelt unsuccessfully tried to purge the conservative Democrats in the 1938 election. The conservatives in Congress then formed a bipartisan informal [[Conservative Coalition]] of Republicans and southern Democrats. It largely controlled Congress from 1937 to 1964. Its most prominent leaders were Senator [[Robert Taft]], a Republican of [[Ohio]], and Senator [[Richard Russell]], Democrat of [[Georgia]].
  
Conservative/Darwin-Hitler-pics
+
In the United States, the [[Old Right]], also called the Old Guard, was a group of [[libertarianism|libertarian]], free-market anti-interventionists, originally associated with Midwestern Republicans and Southern Democrats. The Republicans (but not the southern Democrats) were [[isolationist]]s in 1939–41, (see [[America First]]), and later opposed [[NATO]] and U.S. military intervention in the [[Korean War]].
  
Conservative/Dawkins
+
===Later 20th century: Goldwater and Buckley ===
 +
By 1950, [[American liberalism]] was so dominant in academia and journalism that liberal critic [[Lionel Trilling]] dismissed contemporary conservatism and anti-communism as "irritable mental gestures which seek to resemble ideas." <ref>Lapham 2004</ref>  But just as Trilling was writing a revival was underway. In the 1950s, principles for a conservative political movement were hashed out in books like [[Russell Kirk]]'s ''The Conservative Mind'' (1953) and in the highly influential new magazine ''[[National Review]]'', founded by [[William F. Buckley]] in 1955.
  
Conservative/English-Countries
+
Whereas Taft's [[Old Right]] had been [[isolationist]] the new conservatism favored American intervention overseas to oppose [[Communism]]. It looked to the [[Founding Fathers]] for historical inspiration as opposed to [[John C. Calhoun|Calhoun]] and the antebellum South.
  
Conservative/EvolutionAsSocialConstruct
+
The success of the [[Civil Rights movement]] came in the Civil Rights Act of 1957, the [[bi-partisan]] [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]] and the [[Voting Rights Act]] of 1965. Conservatives supported all, but [[Barry Goldwater]] bucked party leadership to win a few Southern states for the first time since Reconstruction.  Until then southern whites (both liberal and conservative) had been locked into the Democrat Party. That lock was now broken and some southern conservatives voted for Goldwater for president in 1964.  In 1968, southern Democrats ran their own candidate against Richard Nixon. The southern blacks now began to vote in large numbers, and buoyed by [[Great Society]] [[entitlement]]s became Democrats, moving that party in the south to the left. In 1972 fully one third of all Democrats joined Richard Nixon's Silent Majority coalition against the far left progressive Democrats. Democrats shifted their strategy to nominating Southerners for president, Jimmy Carter in 1976, Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996, and Al Gore in 2000. As the South became less racist, it became more Republican. By 2000, for the first time, all southern states had a conservative GOP and a liberal Democrat Party.  The region split in both federal and state contests.  In 2008 the [[Barack Hussein Obama|Obama]] campaign rebuilt the Clinton coalition in [[Florida]], [[Virginia]] and [[North Carolina]].
  
Conservative/Gentlemen-you-are-being-grossly-deficient-about-Conservapedia-reporting -again
+
Goldwater, a charismatic figure whose intense opposition to all [[New Deal]] programs angered liberals, was defeated in a landslide in 1964. Goldwater faded and his supporters regrouped under new leadership, especially that of [[Ronald Reagan]] in [[California]], and regained strength nationally in the 1966 elections. Conservatives voted for [[Richard Nixon]] in 1968, who narrowly defeated the New Deal champion [[Hubert Humphrey]], and southern demagogue [[George Wallace]]. Nixon had come to terms with both the Goldwater wing of the party and the still-influential Rockefeller Republicans (Republicans from the [[Northeast]] who supported many New Deal programs).
  
Conservative/JohnsHopkins
+
===Nixon, Reagan, and Bush===
  
Conservative/LearningADHDandOther
+
The Republican administrations of President [[Richard Nixon]] in the [[1970s]] were characterized more by their emphasis on ''[[realpolitik]]'', [[détente]], and socialist [[economic planning]] policies such as [[wage and price controls]], than by their adherence to conservative rhetoric and more liberal actions.
  
Conservative/Mail
+
In the eight years of [[Ronald Reagan]]'s presidency 1981-89 the American conservative movement achieved ascendancy. In 1980 the GOP took control of the Senate for the first time since 1954, and [[conservative principles]] dominated Reagan's economic and foreign policies, with [[supply side economics]] as well as a strict opposition to [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[Communism]]. The [[free trade]] movement was used as a means to promote [[capitalism]] in the [[Third World]] to counter [[Marxist]] [[national liberation movement]]s. Reagan promised to cut [[welfare]] spending but failed to do so.  He did cut taxes, but raised [[military spending]] and created large [[federal deficit]]s that turned out working to our advantage, because at that time, deficits didn't matter. It should be known that the Republicans also [[Balanced budget|balanced]] the [[budget]] in the late 1990s.
  
Conservative/Margaret Sanger
+
An icon of the American conservative movement, Reagan is credited by his supporters with transforming American politics, galvanizing the Republican Party, uniting a coalition of economic conservatives who supported his supply-side economic policies, known as "[[Reaganomics]]," foreign policy conservatives who favored his success in stopping and rolling back Communism, and social conservatives who identified with Reagan's conservative religious and social ideals.
  
Conservative/Nazism-professor-values-newspapers-church
+
=== Barack Obama and American Conservatism backlash ===
 +
In October 2009, Niles Gardiner reported in the [[Britain|British]] newspaper ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'':
 +
{{cquote|This week’s striking [[Gallup]] poll on political ideology is further confirmation that the United States is in essence a conservative nation, which has ironically become even more conservative under [[Barack Obama]]. According to Gallup, 40 percent of Americans describe their political views as conservative, 36 percent as moderate and 20 percent as liberal. This is the first time conservatives have outnumbered moderates in America since 2004.<ref>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100014891/barack-obama-has-failed-to-defeat-conservatism-in-america/</ref>}}
  
Conservative/Online Videos Regarding Atheism
+
"Forty percent of Americans now self-identify as conservatives — double the amount of self-professed liberals — largely because independents are beginning to take sides."<ref>http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/onprin/winter11/spalding.html</ref>
  
Conservative/Online Videos on the Theory of Evolution
+
Conservatives strongly criticized Obama for his far-left and negative policies and the negative impact of those policies.<ref>Scaliger, Charles (February 23, 2017). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/25433-barack-obama-s-legacy Barack Obama's Legacy]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 20, 2018.</ref><ref>Adelmann, Bob (January 20, 2017). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/25183-is-obama-worst-u-s-president Is Obama Worst U.S. President?] ''The New American''. Retrieved June 20, 2018.</ref><ref>Vargas, Mark (September 16, 2018). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-legacy-of-barack-obama-and-its-not-a-good-one The legacy of Barack Obama (and it's not a good one)]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 16, 2018.</ref> [[Dinesh D'Souza]] wrote, "Obama's legacy is to double the national debt & dramatically reduce US influence in the world."<ref>https://twitter.com/dineshdsouza/status/760447860638789632</ref> During Obama's 8 years in office, Democrats lost over 1,000 seats in the federal and state governments.<ref>[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/27/democrats-lost-over-1000-seats-under-obama.html?refresh=true Democrats lost over 1,000 seats under Obama]. ''Fox News''. December 27, 2016. Retrieved December 27, 2016.</ref>
  
Conservative/Planned Parenthood Conservative/PleaseClicktheLinkBelow
+
Compare [[Progressive liberalism]].
  
Conservative/R1
+
===Donald Trump===
 +
{{See also|Donald Trump achievements}}
 +
Despite heavy opposition from the political [[establishment]], businessman [[Donald Trump]] defeated sixteen other candidates in the Republican primaries and defeated the heavy favorite in the general election, Hillary Clinton. As president, Trump enacted strongly conservative policies in issues such as deregulation, trade, immigration, religious freedom, abortion, and judges.
  
Conservative/Reasonable explanations for the existence of evolutionary belief
+
==Conservatism outside the United States==
 +
===Conservatives in continental Europe===
 +
Conservatism in Europe is generally synonymous with [[Euroskepticism]] and [[right-wing populism]] – ideologies that support local control, [[self-governance]], [[patriotism]] and national identity, [[sovereignty]], less immigration, and a more limited government as opposed to an endless EU bureaucracy. While mainstream [[establishment]] parties in Europe are also occasionally labeled "conservative" by the media, they share many of the same policies as globalism and liberalism.
  
Conservative/ResurrectionRequest
+
Conservative parties in Europe include the [[Swiss People's Party]], [[Law and Justice]], [[Fidesz]], [[Lega Nord]], the [[Austrian Freedom Party]], [[Sweden Democrats]], [[Finns Party]], [[Conservative People's Party of Estonia]], [[Vox (Spain)|Vox]], and the [[Alternative for Germany]], among other parties. Prominent continental European conservatives include [[Viktor Orbán]], [[Václav Klaus]], [[Matteo Salvini]], [[Santiago Abascal]], [[Christoph Blocher]], [[Jarosław Kaczyński]], [[Santiago Abascal]], and [[Norbert Hofer]].
  
Conservative/abortionworkspace
+
Right-wing populism in Europe has grown since the [[Eurozone Crisis]] and [[European migrant crisis]].
  
Conservative/alexa
+
===Conservatives in Britain===
  
Conservative/atheismrelatedresearch
+
Conservatism has a strong tradition in the [[United Kingdom]], with figures such as [[John Locke]] and [[Edmund Burke]] laying its philosophical foundation. Most British conservatives belong to the [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]] – a [[big tent]] party that includes both consistent conservatives and liberal [[globalists]] – as well as the [[United Kingdom Independence Party]], [[Brexit Party]], and the [[Democratic Unionist Party]]. Some notable British conservatives include [[Winston Churchill]], [[Enoch Powell]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[Ian Paisley]], [[Nigel Farage]], [[Raheem Kassam]], and [[Jacob Rees-Mogg]].
  
Conservative/atheistswebtraffic
+
Up until the mid-19th century, the forerunner of the Conservative Party were known as [[Tory|Tories]], and the name has persisted as a common nickname both for the political party and those believed to be in agreement with it.  Since the mid-to-late 1970s, British conservatives have been defined by an advocacy of [[laissez-faire]] economics, privatization and lower taxation. In recent years the Conservative Party has moved away from the social conservatism which once characterized it, and the current party policy includes, for example, support for [[abortion]] on demand, gay [[civil partnership]], the [[Kyoto Treaty]] and to oppose [[capital punishment]] (although it should be noted that such policies have little support among the party's grassroots membership).<ref>John Charmley, ''A History of Conservative Politics Since 1830'', (2nd ed. 2008)</ref> In common with conservatives in many other countries, British Conservatives tend towards a patriotic rather than internationalist outlook, and are traditionally skeptical of the [[European Union]].
  
Conservative/awaymessage
+
[[Margaret Thatcher]] revitalized the British conservatives much like Reagan revitalized American conservatives. During her tenure as Prime Minister, she cut taxes, trimmed back at government waste, and exercised a strong national defense abroad (including the [[Falklands War]] of 1982).
  
Conservative/biaswikipedia
+
Levels of prayer and worship are much lower in [[England]] and [[Wales]] than in the U.S., and religious issues thereby play less of a role in public discourse.  However, religious issues remain a significant factor in [[Northern Ireland]] and in 2008 religious issues were significant during a special election in [[Scotland]].
  
Conservative/churchbloggingwebsite
+
The broadcast media (dominated by the [[BBC]]) is almost exclusively [[liberal]] in tone. The print media is slightly different with conservative-leaning newspapers like the ''[[Daily Mail]]'', ''[[Daily Express]]'' and ''[[Daily Telegraph]]'' selling more copies than their rivals.<ref>[http://www.mediauk.com/the_knowledge/i.muk/An_introduction_to_newspapers_in_the_UK Media UK; Introduction to newspapers in the UK]</ref> However, even the print media generally leans liberal.
  
Conservative/coding
+
===Conservatives in Canada===
 +
Many Canadian conservatives align with the [[Conservative Party of Canada]], though the party does not strongly adhere to conservative values. The [[Christian Heritage Party]] is an example of a smaller but more consistent conservative Canadian party.
  
Conservative/comingattraction
+
===Conservatives in Australia===
  
Conservative/contact
+
Australia was once more conservative than England but sweeping [[gun control]] laws pushed the nation leftward toward greater dependency on government in the last decade.  In 2009, opposition to government control based on alleged [[global warming]] galvanized conservatives there and they led the [[Liberal Party of Australia]] to a repudiation of an emissions trading scheme.<ref>http://www.smh.com.au/national/shock-result-as-abbott-wins-liberal-leadership-by-one-vote--ets-dead-20091201-k1uz.html</ref>  Conservatives also support smaller political parties such as the [[Family First Party]].
  
Conservative/documentaryhypothesis
+
=== Conservatives in Latin America ===
 +
In the early 21st century, [[Latin America]] has been shifting to the right,<ref>Multiple references:
 +
* https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/18/world/americas/chile-election-latin-america-politics.html
 +
*Martel, Frances (December 25, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/12/25/5-major-conservative-victories-latin-america-2017/ 5 Major Conservative Victories in Latin America in 2017]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved October 28, 2018.
 +
*Pearson, Samantha (April 8, 2018). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/brazil-turns-rightward-heralding-new-chapter-for-latin-america-1523216901 Brazil Turns Rightward, Heralding New Chapter for Latin America]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved October 28, 2018.
 +
*Pearson, Samantha; Magalhaes, Luciana (October 28, 2018). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/brazilians-head-to-polls-in-divisive-presidential-election-1540724400 Conservative’s Win Signals Sharp Rightward Turn in Brazil]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved October 28, 2018.
 +
*Kew, Ben (December 25, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2018/12/25/crash-of-the-pink-tide-latin-america-continues-shift-rightwards-in-2018/ Crash of the Pink Tide: Latin America Continues Shift Rightwards in 2018]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 1, 2019.
 +
*Forero, Juan; Luhnow, David (December 19, 2019). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-leftist-pink-tide-in-latin-america-is-receding-11576772757 The Leftist ‘Pink Tide’ in Latin America Is Receding ]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
 +
See also:
 +
*Martel, Frances (December 22, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/latin-america/2018/12/22/brazils-conservatives-turn-ambitions-towards-global-anti-socialist-alliance/ Brazil’s Conservatives Turn Ambitions Towards Global Anti-Socialist Alliance]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 1, 2019.</ref> and conservative [[evangelical Christians]] have been growing in political influence.<ref>Puglie, Frederic (February 19, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/19/latin-american-voters-turn-evangelicals-social-con/ Evangelicals' newfound political clout in Latin America unnerves politicians, Catholic Church]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved October 28, 2018.</ref><ref>Polimédio, Chayenne (January 24, 2018). [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/01/the-evangelical-takeover-of-brazilian-politics/551423/ The Rise of the Brazilian Evangelicals]. ''The Atlantic''. Retrieved October 28, 2018.</ref>
  
Conservative/e
+
Some notable Latin American conservatives include [[Jair Bolsonaro]] (Brazil), [[Eduardo Bolsonaro]] (Brazil), [[Ernesto Araújo]] (Brazil), [[Agustín Laje]] (Argentina), [[Nicolás Márquez]] (Argentina), [[José Antonio Kast]] (Chile), [[Hermógenes Pérez de Arce]] (Chile), [[Jimmy Morales]] (Guatemala), [[Fabricio Alvarado]] (Costa Rica),<ref>Cullinan Hoffman, Matthew (February 5, 2018). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/christian-minister-dominates-costa-rican-presidential-election-polls-after Christian minister takes lead in Costa Rican presidential election after vowing to stop gay agenda]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved October 28, 2018.</ref> [[Alberto Fujimori]] (Peru), [[Keiko Fujimori]] (Peru), [[Alvaro Uribe]] (Colombia) and [[Mario Abdo Benítez]] (Paraguay).
  
Conservative/evo
+
=== Conservatism and the French Revolution ===
  
Conservative/evolution-new-temp-file
+
Conservatism in France and the European continent generally arose in the after 1790 as a response to the radicalism of the [[French Revolution]].
  
Conservative/hitlerevolution
+
== Benefits of Conservatism ==
  
Conservative/homosexualityresearch2
+
Several facets of conservatism function in unison to make it an effective and powerful philosophy.  Conservatism emphasizes personal freedom, independence, and initiative; this allows the [[best of the public]] to rise to their natural level of achievement.  Conservatives recognize that [[big government]] fosters dependency and stifles individual achievement—and thus, weakens society as a whole. 
  
Conservative/intelligent design
+
At the same time, conservatives also recognize that with individual freedom comes [[individual responsibility]].  In the absence of a hand-holding [[nanny state]], it is imperative that each individual take responsibility for his own actions, and exercise his rights and freedoms wisely and with discretion.  Thus, [[social conservatism]] is also critical to a successful society, as it emphasizes the importance of [[morality]], duty, and responsibility to one's self and fellow men.
  
Conservative/internetusageandrelatedresearch
+
=== American conservatives and happiness ===
  
Conservative/list
+
''See also:'' [[American liberalism and 21st century political losses]] and [[Secular leftists and psychogenic illness]]
  
Conservative/lookupwebsiteinternetserviceprovider
+
''Time'' magazine reported: "In the "who's happier?" race, a whole body of research shows conservatives report being happier. [http://www.sciencemag.org/content/347/6227/1243 Four new studies] published in ''Science'' hint at a possible reason why.<ref>[http://time.com/3744433/liberals-conservatives-happiness/ Liberals are More Honest Than Conservatives When They Smile], Time Magazine, 2015</ref>
  
Conservative/m
+
{|align=right border=3 cellspacing=0 style="border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;"
 
+
| style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | [[Previous Breaking News/Conservatives|Previous Breaking News:<br>Conservatives]]
Conservative/mail
+
 
+
Conservative/marketshare
+
 
+
Conservative/microevolution-vs-macroevolution
+
 
+
Conservative/networking
+
 
+
Conservative/newresearch
+
 
+
Conservative/paleoanthropology-field
+
 
+
Conservative/picuploading
+
 
+
Conservative/research-liberalism-psychology
+
 
+
Conservative/resurrectionmiracles
+
 
+
Conservative/speedoflight
+
 
+
Conservative/temp
+
 
+
Conservative/temp1
+
 
+
Conservative/tempannouncementholdingarea
+
 
+
Conservative/testing
+
 
+
Conservative/vistors-location
+
 
+
===Talk subpages===
+
 
+
Conservative
+
 
+
Conservative-Research-American-Atheists-organization
+
Conservative/Archive1
+
 
+
Conservative/Archive2
+
 
+
Conservative/Archive 1
+
 
+
Conservative/Atheism and deceit
+
 
+
Conservative/Conservapedia-running-stats-2
+
 
+
Conservative/Conservapedia-running-stats-3
+
 
+
Conservative/Conservapediarunningstats
+
 
+
Conservative/Conservapediarunningstats2
+
 
+
Conservative/Dear-Evolutionist-Ladies-and-Gentlemen
+
 
+
Conservative/EVOLUTIONANDFRAUD
+
 
+
Conservative/Evolutionist-Ladies-and-Gentlemen
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentleman-Norseman-you-failed
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentleman-anti-regarding-paddleboat
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentleman-antifly-regarding-paddleboat
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentleman-your-taking-your-eye-off-the-ball-it-is-the-evolution-and-atheism-articles-that-are-the-key-to-operations-
+
grassroots-and-flying-fortresses
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-A-if-you-could-be-more-sensible-in-the-future-it-would-be-appreciated
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-Have-you-noticed-the-search-engine-rankings-for-the-evolution-article-lately?
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-I-hate-to-burst-your-bubble-but
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-It-appears-as-if-the-saying-is-true
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-Operation-Grassroots-has-started
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-Operation-Grassroots-has-started-for-the-evolution-article
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-a-question
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-almost-so-very-close-step-by-step-inch-by-inch-there-will-be-a-top-ranked-article-that-stabs-at-the-very-heart-of-liberalism-EVOLUTION
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-almost-so-very-close-step-by-step-inch-by-inch-there-will-be-a-top-ranked-article-that-stabs-at-the-very-heart-of-liberalism-EVOLUTIONISM
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-evolotion-grassroots-and-expansiveness
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-evolution-article-search-engine-rankings
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-evolution-grassroots-and-expansiveness
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-grassroots-and-expansiveness
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-if-you-could-be-more-sensible-in-the-future-it-would-be-appreciated
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-it-is-coming
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-it-seems-as-if-internet-evolutionists-are-a-paranoid-lot
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-please-read-number-20
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-regarding-the-main-page-of-Conservapedia-and-the-Hitler-and-Darwin pics
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-regarding-your-most-recent-offer
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-resistance-is-futile
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolution-D-Day-is-going-to-be-the-first-quarter-of-the-calendar-year-of-2009
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolution-D-Days-are-going-to-be-happening-the-first-quarter-of-the-calendar-year-of-2009
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolution-D-Days-are-going-to-be-the-first-quarter-of-the-calendar-year-of-2009
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolution-D-Days-on-the-internet-are-going-to-be-happening-the-first-quarter-of-the-calendar-year-of-
+
2009
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolution-D-Days-on-the-internet-are-likely-going-to-be-happening-the-first-quarter-of-the-calendar-year-of-2009
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolutionists-and-the-internet Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolutionists-are-going-to-hit-key-
+
places
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-evolution-article-now-ranks-number-11-at-a-very-popular-search-engine-that-begins-with-a-G-for-the-very-popular-search-evolution
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-evolution-article-now-ranks-number-12-at-a-very-popular-search-engine-that-begins-with-a-G-for-the-very-popular-search-evolution
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-this-is-merely-a-fraction-of-what-I-believe-operations-flying-fortresses-and-grassroots-will-produce
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-what-happened-to-atheism-is-going-to-happen-to-evolution
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-what-happened-to-atheism-on-the-internet-is-going-to-happen-to-evolution
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-what-short-memories-you-have
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-what-short-memories-you-have-or-crushing-evolution-on-the-internet-like-a-tin-can
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-you-are-taking-your-eye-off-the-ball-it-is-the-evolution-and-atheism-articles-that-are-the-key-to-operations-
+
grassroots-and-flying-fortresses
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-your-reports-of-conservapedia-dying-have-been-greatly-exaggerated
+
 
+
Conservative/Gentlemen-your-taking-your-eye-off-the-ball-it-is-the-evolution-and-atheism-articles-that-are-the-key-to-operations-
+
grassroots-and-flying-fortresses
+
 
+
Conservative/Hoji
+
 
+
Conservative/Homosexuality and MRSA
+
 
+
Conservative/LearningADHDandOther
+
 
+
Conservative/Ms-Kels-you-can-say-you-were-wrong-now-as-far-as-the-new-title-of-the-evolution-article-sometimes-a-liberal-has-to-recognize-their-limitations
+
 
+
Conservative/Operation-flying-fortresses
+
 
+
Conservative/ResurrectionRequest
+
 
+
Conservative/atheism-and-cowardice-article
+
 
+
Conservative/atheismrelatedresearch
+
 
+
Conservative/awaymessage
+
 
+
Conservative/cpctraffic
+
 
+
Conservative/gentlemen-you protest entirely too much
+
 
+
Conservative/homosexualityresearch
+
 
+
Conservative/medical-science-doctors-vs-other-scientists
+
 
+
Conservative/mutationsnaturalselection
+
 
+
Conservative/running stats
+
 
+
Conservative/socialeffectevolution
+
 
+
Conservative/to-liberal-gentlemen-regarding-atheism-article
+
 
+
Conservative/transitionalforms
+
 
+
[[Image:Gents.jpg|thumb|200px|Ken may often be found hanging around public toilets.]]
+
And there '''were''' more:
+
 
+
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&dir=prev&offset=20080608231157&type=delete&user=Conservative&page=User%3AConservative&pattern=1 All deleted pages beginning with User:Conservative] - at time of count 526. 
+
 
+
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=Conservative&page=User_talk%3AConservative&pattern=1&year=&month=-1 All deleted pages beginning with User_talk:Conservative] - at time of count 61.
+
 
+
Some edited highlights of these lists:
+
*02:46, 26 October 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/letter" ‎ (content was: 'Holt Paperbacks Published: April 2006 ISBN 9780805078046 ISBN 0805078045 Trim: 5-1/2 x 8-1/4 inches 432 pages' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
+
* 23:17, 11 October 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/intelligent design" ‎ (content was: '&#101; &#110; &#90;&#101;&#119;&#101;&#100;&#103;&#101; &#89;&#107;&#110;&#67;&#92;&#104;&#103; &#85;&#107;&#110;&#67;&#92;&#104;&#103; &#65;&#...' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
+
*20:29, 25 September 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/Gentlemen-at-a-liberal-website-do-not-be-surprised-if-the-Hitler-and-Darwin-evolutionary-racism-pics-and-captions-return-to-the-main-page" ‎ (content was: 'Gentlemen, Do not be surprised if the Hitler/Darwin/Evolutionary/racism pics and captions return to the main page. 2009 sees the bicentenary of Darwin...' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
+
*18:57, 20 June 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/vb" ‎ (content was: '==Viral Buzz and Viral Marketing Links== Free: http://www.copyblogger.com/how-to-get-huge-viral-buzz-for-your-start-up/ http://buzzmarketingfortech.b...' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
+
*09:31, 4 May 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User talk:Conservative/douche" ‎ (content was: 'foajfowajdfoajw' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
+
* 23:38, 8 April 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/Gentleman-Palm-allopathic-white-coat" (content was: 'Gentleman-Palm-allopathic,I glanced at your blog. It seems you are especially note happy with a certain category of Conservapedia articles. :) 23:...' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
+
* 23:38, 8 April 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/IDES-OF-MARCH" (content was: '#REDIRECT User:Conservative/Ghost of Google Rankings for Atheism Yet to Come' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
+
* 01:34, 7 April 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/Ghost of Google Rankings for Atheism Yet to Come" (The eagle has landed!)
+
* 22:54, 29 March 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/IDES-OF-MARCH" (content was: 'Gentleman at another wiki,I believe something big is going to be happening in regards to the atheism article at Conservapedia that is occuring outsi...' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
+
* 19:02, 21 February 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/nffrf" (content before blanking was: 'http://www.mapelli.info/tools/supplemental-index-ratio-calculator/http://www.evancarmichael.com/SEO/1191/Search-Engine-Optimization-Careers.html')
+
*22:34, 30 August 2007 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/hatecrime" ‎ (content was: 'Please copy the pic of the protestors with signs: http://www.operationrescue.org/Illegal drug pic: http://www.dea.gov/photos/meth/powder_meth_foil.j...' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
+
 
+
===The extremely bizarre===
+
The most peculiar sub page ever was ''User:Conservative/Gentlemen-resistance-is-futile'', the contents was copied [[Conservapedia_Talk:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F/Ken_80k_LOL|here]], it a 80kb file consisting mainly of "LOL!" repeated over and over. In case you are wondering the evidence suggests he is in his mid 50's.
+
 
+
==Coverage of behaviour==
+
The coverage of Conservative's activities by RationalWiki have several times come under scrutiny by contributors following speculation on Ken's mental state. These comments usually follow an extended editing session by Ken lasting for several hours or more with little or no clear breaks - the most notable to date being a [[#Conservative_style.2C_obsessive-compulsive_disorder.2C_and_delusions|30-hour editing session]] in June 2009 - raising questions of ethics amongst RationalWiki contributors in its coverage of an individual displaying exceedingly erratic behaviour, as well as sometimes abusive comments made by individual editors toward Ken following particularly abhorrent or offensive statements made by him. As such, our coverage of Ken's behaviour has been justified in that as long as [[Andrew Schlafly]], founder, owner, and, for lack of a better word, "leader" of Conservapedia, continues to allow Conservative's editing on his website, RationalWiki is free to cover it. Despite the very bizarre nature of Ken's articles - or perhaps because of it - his articles have boosted Conservapedia in search engine rankings, and as such it is unlikely that Andy will ever offer Ken help for fear of losing the one contributor who puts his website on the radar, albeit for all the wrong reasons.
+
 
+
=== Explanation===
+
He's a '''"bot"''':
+
 
+
# 16:41, 10 September 2007 Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) changed group membership for User:Conservative from sysop to bot
+
 
+
OK, it was a ASchlafly slip of the finger, but still ...?
+
 
+
{{quotebox|[I]f I could find my javascript implementation, with a few tweaks I could almost certainly replace Ken with a very small shell script. --JeevesMkII}}
+
 
+
=Awards=
+
{|style="width:400px; height:200px; text-align:center" border="5px #0000BB solid" align="center"
+
|-
+
|
+
[[Image:Wm Dembski.jpg|center]]
+
This is to certify that
+
 
+
'''[[User:Conservative|Conservative]]'''
+
 
+
received the
+
 
+
'''<big>WILLIAM DEMBSKI INTELLIGENT DESIGN AWARD FOR AESTHETICALLY UNPLEASANT DESIGN</big>'''
+
 
+
From RationalW<!---->iki, on November 21, 2008
+
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
== See also ==
 +
*[[Modern conservatism]]
 +
*[[Conservative resources]]
 +
*[[Previous Breaking News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from previous "Breaking News"]]
 +
*[[More News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from "More News"]]
 +
*[[Conservative Links]]
 +
*[[Essay:Fair and balanced is not part of the Conservative platform]]
 +
*[[Conservative politicians]]
 +
*[[Liberal]]
 +
*[[Larry McDonald]]
  
{|style="width:400px; height:200px; text-align:center" border="5px #0000BB solid" align="center"
+
==Further reading==
|-
+
*  Critchlow, Donald T. ''The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Political History'' (2007)
|
+
* Filler, Louis. ''Dictionary of American Conservatism The First Complete Guide to Issues, People, Organizations and Events'' (1987), useful older encyclopedia
[[Image:Waa cry baby2.jpg|200px|center]]
+
* Frank, Thomas. ''What's the Matter with Kansas?: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America'' (2005), a liberal perspective [https://www.amazon.com/Whats-Matter-Kansas-Conservatives-America/dp/080507774X/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193685789&sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]
This is to certify that
+
* Frohnen, Bruce et al. eds. ''American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia'' (2006), the most detailed reference
 
+
* Judis, John B. ''William F. Buckley, Jr.: Patron Saint of the Conservatives'' (1988) [https://www.amazon.com/William-F-Buckley-Jr-Conservatives/dp/0743217977/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1207759425&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]
'''[[User:Conservative|Conservative]]'''
+
* Kirk, Russell. ''The Conservative Mind''. (7th ed. 2001). highly influential conservative history of ideas [http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books]
 
+
* Link, William A. ''Righteous warrior: Jesse Helms and the rise of modern conservatism'' (2008) 643 pages
received the
+
* Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. ''The Right Nation,'' (2004) influential survey [https://www.amazon.com/Right-Nation-Conservative-Power-America/dp/B000F71124/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1205919226&sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]
 
+
* Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. ''God Is Back: How the Global Revival of Faith Is Changing the World'' (2009)
'''<big>CRY BABY POO-PANTS AWARD FOR CHILDISHNESS</big>'''
+
* Nash, George. ''The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945'' (2006), excellent scholarly history. [https://www.amazon.com/Conservative-Intellectual-Movement-America-Since/dp/1933859121/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1241925238&sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]
 
+
*Pemberton, William E. ''Exit with Honor: The Life and Presidency of Ronald Reagan'' (1998) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/exit-with-honor-the-life-and-presidency-of-ronald-reagan-by-william-e-pemberton.jsp online edition]
From RationalW<!---->iki, on November 21, 2008
+
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus'' (2004) on 1964 [https://www.amazon.com/Before-Storm-Goldwater-Unmaking-Consensus/dp/0809028581/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193684721&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]
|}
+
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America'' (2008) [https://www.amazon.com/Nixonland-Rise-President-Fracturing-America/dp/074324303X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1241924189&sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]
 
+
* Schneider, Gregory L. ed. ''Conservatism in America Since 1930: A Reader'' (2003)
 
+
*Schoenwald; Jonathan. ''A Time for Choosing: The Rise of Modern American Conservatism'' (2002) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=104931191 online edition] also [http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books]
{{Debate:2009_Conservapedia_day_awards/Homophobia}}
+
* Schweizer, Peter, and Wynton C. Hall, eds. ''Landmark Speeches of the American Conservative Movement'' (2007) [https://www.amazon.com/Landmark-Speeches-American-Conservative-Movement/dp/1585445983/ref=sr_1_4/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1193685365&sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]
 
+
 
+
{{Debate:2009_Conservapedia_day_awards/Idiocy}}
+
 
+
 
+
{{Debate:2009_Conservapedia_day_awards/Inaesthetic}}
+
 
+
 
+
[[File:Light blue ribbon.svg|200px|center|thumb|'''3rd Grade Spelling Bee Champ'''<ref>[http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=113357&diff=1031928&oldid=1031726 Without performance enhancing drugs, too.]</ref>]]
+
<br clear=all>
+
 
+
==See also==
+
*[[:Image:Kensuserpage.png|A picture of Ken's User page on Conservapedia (resized for your convenience)]]
+
*[[DeMyer's Laws]]
+
*[[Danth's Law]]
+
*[[Fun:Argumentum ad Google ranking]]
+
*[[Fun:Ken Quote Generator]]
+
*[[Essay:Does Conservative have machismo?]]
+
*[[Conservapedia:Debating Kendoll]]
+
*[[User:BeardOfZeus/RationalWiki obsessive compulsive disorder]]
+
 
+
==Notes==
+
{{reflist|group=note|2}}
+
  
==References==
+
== References ==
{{reflist|2|80%}}
+
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}
  
{{DEFAULTSORT:Conservative}}
+
==External links==
 +
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/conservatives/ What Liberals Say - Category: Conservatives], [[Accuracy In Media]]
 +
*[https://www.youtube.com/user/rescueKAL007#p/a/FD3DE4F0642C350C/0/1c8v-kgLvhM Pat Buchanan's "Crossfire" interview with [[Larry McDonald]] 3 months before downing of [[KAL 007]], Ron Paul intro]
 +
*[http://www.conservativedirectory.com Directory of Conservative Websites - Category: Conservatives], [[Politics]]
 +
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnYUbkVWglc Coming Out in 2019], Neel Kolhatkar, Jan 22, 2019.
  
[[Category:Atheophobia]]
+
{{Conservatism}}
[[Category:Conservapedia]]
+
[[Category:Conservative]]
[[Category:Conservapedia sysops]]
+
[[Category:American History]]
[[Category:Conservapedia users banned from RationalWiki]]
+
[[Category:Reagan Era]]
[[Category:Living people]]
+
[[Category:1960s]]
[[Category:Pissed at us]]
+
[[Category:Trolls]]
+

Revision as of 20:20, January 7, 2022

A conservative is someone who promotes moral and economic values beneficial to all. A conservative is willing to learn and advocate the insights of economics and the logic of the Bible for the benefit of everyone else. A conservative favors conserving value by not giving handouts to anyone who does not really need them. Conservatives are often innovative, such as supply-side economics and Romanticism.

A conservative typically adheres to principles of personal responsibility, moral values, and limited government, agreeing with George Washington's Farewell Address that "religion and morality are indispensable supports" to political prosperity.[1][2]

Religious conservatism is a big driver of social conservatism. Religious conservatism is growing in the world and it is affecting politics (see: Religious conservatism and politics).

Phil Crane, the leading conservative congressman in the House from 1969 to 2005, urged people to make the world a better place than where they found it, and quoted frequently from the Bible in pursuit of that goal.[3]

Former President Ronald Reagan said, "The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom."[4]

Calvin Coolidge, the 30th President of the United States, was a conservative who said, "Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong."

Goals and principles

For a more detailed treatment, see Modern conservatism.

Specifically, conservatives seek or support:

List of prominent conservatives

Movement

Movement conservatives are those who accept the logic of conservatism across-the-board, and stand up for its powerful principles despite liberal ridicule. Movement conservative activists in the U.S. include:

Presidents

Periodically a conservative has been elected President of the United States. The most prominent conservative presidents include:

The most prominent conservative Congresses have been:

  • The 80th Congress (elected in 1946)
  • The 104th Congress (elected in 1994)

Key leaders

Hall of Fame

Conservative scholar Clinton Rossiter[5] names Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, John Marshall, Daniel Webster, John C. Calhoun, Elihu Root, and Theodore Roosevelt to the "Conservative's Hall of Fame," with John Adams as the greatest of American conservatives—a dubious choice since President Adams was an ardent opponent of free speech to criticize government.

U.S. voters

In America, most conservatives support the Republican Party, but not exclusively so. In the 2008 election, 35% of the voters identified themselves as conservatives. Of them, 78% voted for John McCain and 20% for Barack Hussein Obama, with the 20% accounting for Obama's margin of victory. Only 22% of the voters were liberal; they favored Obama 89%-10%. In the middle were 44% who called themselves moderates. They split for Obama by 60%-39%. (Minor candidates won 2% of the vote.)[6]

Russell Kirk was an American political theorist, conservative intellectual, historian of ideas, social critic, and man of letters, who is best known for his role in the American conservative movement.

Conservatives generally understand liberals better than liberals understand conservatives.[7]

Religious differences between political conservatives and political liberals

The Barna poll conducted in November 2008 shows significant differences between the 32% of Americans who called themselves as “mostly conservative” on social and political matters; and the 17% who called themselves “mostly liberal” on social and political matters. The others—50%--were moderates with positions somewhere in-between.[8]

Some findings: Political liberals are less than half as likely as political conservatives to firmly believe that the Bible is totally accurate in all of the principles it teaches (27% versus 63%, respectively); to strongly believe that Satan is real (17% versus 36%); and to firmly contend that they have a personal responsibility to share their religious beliefs with others (23% versus 48%).

[Note: "Liberal" and "conservative" in this survey are based on politics]

Liberals are also far less likely than conservatives to strongly believe each of the following:

  • their religious faith is very important in their life (54% of liberals vs. 82% of conservatives);
  • a person cannot earn their way into Heaven by doing good deeds or being a good person (23% vs. 37%);
  • their faith is becoming an increasingly important moral guide in their life (38% vs. 70%);
  • the church they currently attend is very important in helping them find direction and fulfillment in life (37% vs. 62%);
  • their primary purpose in life is to love God with all their heart, mind, strength and soul (43% vs. 76%);

political conservatives were more likely than liberals to:

  • read the Bible, other than at church events, during the past week (57% vs. 33%, respectively)
  • attend a religious service during the past week (62% vs. 35%)
  • pray to God, other than at a religious service, during the past week (91% vs. 76%)
  • share their religious beliefs with others, during the past year (56% vs. 39%, among the born again Christians interviewed from each segment)
  • have ever participated in a short-term missions trip, either within the U.S. or in another country (12% vs. 6%)
  • 2% of conservatives and 11% of liberals were atheist or agnostic
  • 15% of conservatives and 2% of liberals were Christian evangelicals
  • conservatives were twice as likely as liberals to be categorized as born again, based on their theological views about salvation (63% vs. 32%)
  • 21% of conservatives were associated with the Roman Catholic Church, compared to 30% among the liberals.

Conservative organizations

See also: Major conservative organizations

Several organizations exist that promote consistently conservative values.

Conservative news

See also: Conservative news websites

Some of the more notable news organizations which tend to be more conservative are WorldNetDaily and NewsMax. Fox News, though often called conservative, tends to be more neoconservative than conservative.

Conservative magazines and blogs

See also: Conservative media

Well known conservative magazines in the United States include National Review, Policy Review, The Weekly Standard and others.

Some notable conservative political blogs include the Heritage Foundation's Policy Weblog, Human Events, Michelle Malkin, Newsbusters, Townhall.com and others.

Neoconservatives

American commentators who ally themselves with the conservative movement but reject its religious or moral underpinnings are generally known as neoconservatives.[9]

In the United States, conservatives are generally characterized by the following beliefs:

  1. Support of limited government.
  2. A preference for freedom of opportunity over equality of result.
  3. Patriotism, nationalism, and support of a strong defense.
  4. Support of the institution of marriage.
  5. Emphasis on social values, like prayer and pro-life principles.

In contrast, neoconservatives generally support bigger government and globalism, and tend to downplay the significance of social values.

Paleoconservatives

Paleoconservatives are conservatives who are more focused on social issues and American sovereignty and are suspicious of both big government and big business, along with globalism and multiculturalism. They also lean against foreign interventionism. Neoconservatives criticize this with the pejorative term of "isolationism," as they believe in promoting democracy worldwide, even where different religious or value systems are incompatible with democracy-induced changes in control.

A notable paleoconservative was Democrat Congressman from Georgia, Larry McDonald. He was also second Chairman of the John Birch Society, and President of Western Goals. McDonald was aboard Korean Airlines Flight 007 when it was shot down by the Soviets near Moneron Island in 1983. Other paleoconservatives include Pat Buchanan and Tom Tancredo.

Fiscal Conservatism vs. Social Conservatism

For further details on the two related philosophies, see Fiscal conservatism and Social conservatism

Recently, a division has been created between fiscal conservatism and social conservatism. Fiscal conservatism centers around a low and balanced government budget, and generally is opposed to programs such as Social Security and Medicare. Its primary goal is to reduce government spending significantly. Social Conservatism, on the other hand, focuses on the moral issues of conservatism. A social conservative will oppose same-sex marriage, abortion, and the teaching of evolution in schools. The majority of Conservatives (including most of the Republican Party) fall into both categories, however some fall into one or the other, but not both. Notably, Libertarians are strong fiscal conservatives but are not socially conservative. For instance, the Libertarian Party Platform [10] expresses support for the fiscally conservative principles of ending publicly funded welfare and healthcare programs as well as reducing government spending overall significantly. However, it also expresses support for same-sex marriage (with some libertarians leaning towards the ultimate goal of total marriage privatization) as well as maintaining the legal status of abortion.

Some Republicans and Democrats also fit one category but not the other. Former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson, who is seeking the Republican presidential nomination in 2012, was deemed "the most fiscally conservative governor" while he was in office (and probably earned that honor given all the spending cuts he made) but at the same time, he supports marriage privatization and abortion (though he believes Roe v. Wade should be overturned on Constitutional grounds). Also, several Democrats have expressed opposition to same-sex marriage and/or abortion, but still support liberal fiscal programs such as Social Security. They would be the opposite of Johnson - socially conservative but fiscally liberal.

Expected growth of social conservatism and religious conservatism

Due to the explosive growth of global Christianity in traditional cultures and their influence on Western Christianity and the higher birth rate of conservative Christians and religious conservatives, social conservatism is expected to rise.

The Birkbeck College, University of London professor Eric Kaufman wrote in his 2010 book Shall the Righteous Inherit the Earth? concerning America:

High evangelical fertility rates more than compensated for losses to liberal Protestant sects during the twentieth century. In recent decades, white secularism has surged, but Latino and Asian religious immigration has taken up the slack, keeping secularism at bay. Across denominations, the fertility advantage of religious fundamentalists of all colours is significant and growing. After 2020, their demographic weight will begin to tip the balance in the culture wars towards the conservative side, ramping up pressure on hot-button issues such as abortion. By the end of the century, three quarters of America may be pro-life. Their activism will leap over the borders of the 'Redeemer Nation' to evangelize the world. Already, the rise of the World Congress of Families has launched a global religious right, its arms stretching across the bloody lines of the War on Terror to embrace the entire Abrahamic family.[11]

Personal conservatism

Because Conservatives often have strong political views, there can be a tendency to see conservatism as a purely political ideology. However, there is also a strong personal side to conservatism - being a conservative is as much about applying conservative values to one's everyday life as it is about campaigning and voting for conservative candidates. In general, conservatives can be characterized by a strong sense of personal morality, a willingness to observe their culture's traditions and customs, and a desire to be respectable and to show due respect to other members of the community.

History of American conservatism

Textbook problems

See also: Textbook bias

College-level teaching about conservatism has been distorted by a "liberal state paradigm"—that is, textbooks usually interpret recent American history in terms of the origins and successes of political liberalism—especially the New Deal, the welfare state, labor unions, and Civil Rights for blacks and equality for women. Conservative politics is usually defined as a reaction: as a free market reply to the growth of big government; as an expression of outrage against declining support for tradition and Christian morality. Where the violent Wobblies (IWW) and illegal sit down strikes of the 1930s are seen as heroic, exposing Communist subversion by Joe McCarthy is denounced as the nadir of political morality.[12]

Loyalists

The Loyalists of the American Revolution were mostly political conservatives, some of whom produced political discourse of a high order, including lawyer Joseph Galloway and governor-historian Thomas Hutchinson. However, when the crisis came, they stood with the Crown as it tried to destroy American political liberties. After the war, the great majority remained in the U.S. and became citizens, but some leaders emigrated to other places in the British Empire. Samuel Seabury was a Loyalist who stayed and as the first American bishop played a major role in shaping the Episcopal religion, a stronghold of conservative social values. While the Loyalist political tradition died out totally it the U.S., it survives in Canadian conservatism.

Founding Fathers

The Founding Fathers created the single most important set of political ideas in American history, known as Republicanism, which all groups, liberal and conservative alike, have drawn from. Two parties were named "Republican"—the one founded in 1794 by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison (it disappeared in the 1820s), and the modern GOP founded in 1854.

During the First Party System (1790s–1820s) the Federalist Party, led by Alexander Hamilton, developed an important variation of republicanism that can be considered conservative. Rejecting monarchy and aristocracy, they emphasized civic virtue as the core American value. The Federalists spoke for the propertied interests and the upper classes of the cities. They envisioned a modernizing land of banks and factories, with a strong army and navy. George Washington was their great hero.

On many issues, American conservatism also derives from the republicanism of Thomas Jefferson and his followers, especially John Randolph of Roanoke and his "Old Republicans" or "Quids." They idealized the yeoman farmer as the epitome of civic virtue, warned that banking and industry led to corruption, that is to the illegitimate use of government power for private ends. Jefferson himself was a vehement opponent of what today is called judicial activism. [13] The Jeffersonians stressed small government.

Ante-Bellum: Calhoun and Webster

During the Second Party System (1830–54) the Whig Party attracted most conservatives, such as Daniel Webster of New England. Daniel Webster and other leaders of the Whig Party, called it the conservative party in the late 1830s.[14] John C. Calhoun, a Democrat, articulated a sophisticated conservatism in his writings. Richard Hofstadter (1948) called him "The Marx of the Master Class." Calhoun argued that a conservative minority should be able to limit the power of a "majority dictatorship" because tradition represents the wisdom of past generations. (This argument echoes one made by Edmund Burke, the founder of British conservatism, in Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)). Calhoun is considered the father of the idea of minority rights, a position adopted by liberals in the 1960s in dealing with Civil Rights.

The conservatism of the antebellum period is contested territory; conservatives of the 21st century disagree over what comprises their heritage. Thus William J. Bennett (2006), a prominent conservative leader, warns conservatives to NOT honor Calhoun, Know-Nothings, Copperheads and 20th century isolationists. Other conservatives disagree with Bennett.

Lincoln to Cleveland

Since 1865 the Republican Party has identified itself with President Abraham Lincoln, who was the ideological heir of the Whigs and of both Jefferson and Hamilton. As the Gettysburg Address shows, Lincoln cast himself as a second Jefferson bringing a second birth of freedom to the nation that had been born 86 years before in Jefferson's Declaration. The Copperheads of the Civil War reflected a reactionary opposition to modernity of the sort repudiated by modern conservatives. A few libertarians have adopted a neo-Copperhead position, arguing Lincoln was a dictator who created an all-powerful government.

In the late 19th century the Bourbon Democrats, led by President Grover Cleveland, preached against corruption, high taxes (protective tariffs), and imperialism, and supported the gold standard and business interests. They were overthrown by William Jennings Bryan in 1896, who moved the mainstream of the Democrat Party permanently to the left.

The 1896 presidential election was the first with a conservative versus liberal theme in the way in which these terms are now understood. Republican William McKinley won using the pro-business slogan "sound money and protection," while Bryan's anti-bank populism had a lasting effect on economic policies of the Democrat Party.

William Graham Sumner, Yale professor (1872–1910) and polymath, vigorously promoted a libertarian conservative ethic. After dallying with Social Darwinism under the influence of Herbert Spencer, he rejected evolution in his later works, and strongly opposed imperialism. He opposed monopoly and paternalism in theory as a threat to equality, democracy and middle class values, but was vague on what to do about it.[15]

Early 20th century

In the Progressive Era (1890s-1932), regulation of industry expanded as conservatives led by Senator Nelson Aldrich of Rhode Island were put on the defensive. However, Aldrich's proposal for a strong national banking system was enacted as the Federal Reserve System in 1913. Theodore Roosevelt, the dominant personality of the era, was both liberal and conservative by turns. As a liberal he took a tough regulatory approach toward businesses and trusts, and (post-presidency) fought for social insurance for the elderly. As a conservative he led the fight to make the country a major naval power, and demanded entry into World War I to stop what he saw as the German attacks on civilization. William Howard Taft promoted a strong federal judiciary that would overrule excessive legislation. Taft defeated Roosevelt on that issue in 1912, forcing Roosevelt out of the GOP and turning it to the right for decades. As president, Taft remade the Supreme Court with five appointments; he himself presided as chief justice in 1921–30, the only former president ever to do so.

1936 cartoon shows GOP building its platform from the conservative planks abandoned by the Democrats

Pro-business Republicans returned to dominance in 1920 with the election of President Warren G. Harding. The presidency of Calvin Coolidge (1923–29) was a high water mark for conservatism, both politically and intellectually. Classic writing of the period includes Democracy and Leadership (1924) by Irving Babbitt and H.L. Mencken's magazine American Mercury (1924–33). The Efficiency Movement attracted many conservatives such as Herbert Hoover with its pro-business, pro-engineer approach to solving social and economic problems. In the 1920s many American conservatives generally maintained anti-foreign attitudes and, as usual, were disinclined toward changes to the healthy economic climate of the age.

During the Great Depression, other conservatives participated in the taxpayers' revolt at the local level. From 1930 to 1933, Americans formed as many as 3,000 taxpayers' leagues to protest high property taxes. These groups endorsed measures to limit and rollback taxes, lowered penalties on tax delinquents, and cuts in government spending. A few also called for illegal resistance (or tax strikes). The best known of these was led by the Association of Real Estate Taxpayers in Chicago which, at its height, had 30,000 dues-paying members.

An important intellectual movement, calling itself Southern Agrarians and based in Nashville, brought together like-minded novelists, poets and historians who argued that modern values undermined the traditions of American Republicanism and civic virtue.

The Depression brought liberals to power under President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933). Indeed, the term "liberal" now came to mean a supporter of the New Deal and Roosevelt's powerful New Deal Coalition. In 1934 Al Smith and pro-business Democrats formed the American Liberty League to fight the new liberalism, but failed to stop Roosevelt's shifting the Democrat Party to the left. In 1936 the Republicans rejected Hoover and tried the more liberal Alf Landon, who carried only Maine and Vermont. When Roosevelt tried to pack the Supreme Court in 1937 the conservatives finally cooperated across party lines and defeated it with help from Vice President John Nance Garner. Roosevelt unsuccessfully tried to purge the conservative Democrats in the 1938 election. The conservatives in Congress then formed a bipartisan informal Conservative Coalition of Republicans and southern Democrats. It largely controlled Congress from 1937 to 1964. Its most prominent leaders were Senator Robert Taft, a Republican of Ohio, and Senator Richard Russell, Democrat of Georgia.

In the United States, the Old Right, also called the Old Guard, was a group of libertarian, free-market anti-interventionists, originally associated with Midwestern Republicans and Southern Democrats. The Republicans (but not the southern Democrats) were isolationists in 1939–41, (see America First), and later opposed NATO and U.S. military intervention in the Korean War.

Later 20th century: Goldwater and Buckley

By 1950, American liberalism was so dominant in academia and journalism that liberal critic Lionel Trilling dismissed contemporary conservatism and anti-communism as "irritable mental gestures which seek to resemble ideas." [16] But just as Trilling was writing a revival was underway. In the 1950s, principles for a conservative political movement were hashed out in books like Russell Kirk's The Conservative Mind (1953) and in the highly influential new magazine National Review, founded by William F. Buckley in 1955.

Whereas Taft's Old Right had been isolationist the new conservatism favored American intervention overseas to oppose Communism. It looked to the Founding Fathers for historical inspiration as opposed to Calhoun and the antebellum South.

The success of the Civil Rights movement came in the Civil Rights Act of 1957, the bi-partisan Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Conservatives supported all, but Barry Goldwater bucked party leadership to win a few Southern states for the first time since Reconstruction. Until then southern whites (both liberal and conservative) had been locked into the Democrat Party. That lock was now broken and some southern conservatives voted for Goldwater for president in 1964. In 1968, southern Democrats ran their own candidate against Richard Nixon. The southern blacks now began to vote in large numbers, and buoyed by Great Society entitlements became Democrats, moving that party in the south to the left. In 1972 fully one third of all Democrats joined Richard Nixon's Silent Majority coalition against the far left progressive Democrats. Democrats shifted their strategy to nominating Southerners for president, Jimmy Carter in 1976, Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996, and Al Gore in 2000. As the South became less racist, it became more Republican. By 2000, for the first time, all southern states had a conservative GOP and a liberal Democrat Party. The region split in both federal and state contests. In 2008 the Obama campaign rebuilt the Clinton coalition in Florida, Virginia and North Carolina.

Goldwater, a charismatic figure whose intense opposition to all New Deal programs angered liberals, was defeated in a landslide in 1964. Goldwater faded and his supporters regrouped under new leadership, especially that of Ronald Reagan in California, and regained strength nationally in the 1966 elections. Conservatives voted for Richard Nixon in 1968, who narrowly defeated the New Deal champion Hubert Humphrey, and southern demagogue George Wallace. Nixon had come to terms with both the Goldwater wing of the party and the still-influential Rockefeller Republicans (Republicans from the Northeast who supported many New Deal programs).

Nixon, Reagan, and Bush

The Republican administrations of President Richard Nixon in the 1970s were characterized more by their emphasis on realpolitik, détente, and socialist economic planning policies such as wage and price controls, than by their adherence to conservative rhetoric and more liberal actions.

In the eight years of Ronald Reagan's presidency 1981-89 the American conservative movement achieved ascendancy. In 1980 the GOP took control of the Senate for the first time since 1954, and conservative principles dominated Reagan's economic and foreign policies, with supply side economics as well as a strict opposition to Soviet Communism. The free trade movement was used as a means to promote capitalism in the Third World to counter Marxist national liberation movements. Reagan promised to cut welfare spending but failed to do so. He did cut taxes, but raised military spending and created large federal deficits that turned out working to our advantage, because at that time, deficits didn't matter. It should be known that the Republicans also balanced the budget in the late 1990s.

An icon of the American conservative movement, Reagan is credited by his supporters with transforming American politics, galvanizing the Republican Party, uniting a coalition of economic conservatives who supported his supply-side economic policies, known as "Reaganomics," foreign policy conservatives who favored his success in stopping and rolling back Communism, and social conservatives who identified with Reagan's conservative religious and social ideals.

Barack Obama and American Conservatism backlash

In October 2009, Niles Gardiner reported in the British newspaper The Daily Telegraph:

This week’s striking Gallup poll on political ideology is further confirmation that the United States is in essence a conservative nation, which has ironically become even more conservative under Barack Obama. According to Gallup, 40 percent of Americans describe their political views as conservative, 36 percent as moderate and 20 percent as liberal. This is the first time conservatives have outnumbered moderates in America since 2004.[17]

"Forty percent of Americans now self-identify as conservatives — double the amount of self-professed liberals — largely because independents are beginning to take sides."[18]

Conservatives strongly criticized Obama for his far-left and negative policies and the negative impact of those policies.[19][20][21] Dinesh D'Souza wrote, "Obama's legacy is to double the national debt & dramatically reduce US influence in the world."[22] During Obama's 8 years in office, Democrats lost over 1,000 seats in the federal and state governments.[23]

Compare Progressive liberalism.

Donald Trump

See also: Donald Trump achievements

Despite heavy opposition from the political establishment, businessman Donald Trump defeated sixteen other candidates in the Republican primaries and defeated the heavy favorite in the general election, Hillary Clinton. As president, Trump enacted strongly conservative policies in issues such as deregulation, trade, immigration, religious freedom, abortion, and judges.

Conservatism outside the United States

Conservatives in continental Europe

Conservatism in Europe is generally synonymous with Euroskepticism and right-wing populism – ideologies that support local control, self-governance, patriotism and national identity, sovereignty, less immigration, and a more limited government as opposed to an endless EU bureaucracy. While mainstream establishment parties in Europe are also occasionally labeled "conservative" by the media, they share many of the same policies as globalism and liberalism.

Conservative parties in Europe include the Swiss People's Party, Law and Justice, Fidesz, Lega Nord, the Austrian Freedom Party, Sweden Democrats, Finns Party, Conservative People's Party of Estonia, Vox, and the Alternative for Germany, among other parties. Prominent continental European conservatives include Viktor Orbán, Václav Klaus, Matteo Salvini, Santiago Abascal, Christoph Blocher, Jarosław Kaczyński, Santiago Abascal, and Norbert Hofer.

Right-wing populism in Europe has grown since the Eurozone Crisis and European migrant crisis.

Conservatives in Britain

Conservatism has a strong tradition in the United Kingdom, with figures such as John Locke and Edmund Burke laying its philosophical foundation. Most British conservatives belong to the Conservative Party – a big tent party that includes both consistent conservatives and liberal globalists – as well as the United Kingdom Independence Party, Brexit Party, and the Democratic Unionist Party. Some notable British conservatives include Winston Churchill, Enoch Powell, Margaret Thatcher, Ian Paisley, Nigel Farage, Raheem Kassam, and Jacob Rees-Mogg.

Up until the mid-19th century, the forerunner of the Conservative Party were known as Tories, and the name has persisted as a common nickname both for the political party and those believed to be in agreement with it. Since the mid-to-late 1970s, British conservatives have been defined by an advocacy of laissez-faire economics, privatization and lower taxation. In recent years the Conservative Party has moved away from the social conservatism which once characterized it, and the current party policy includes, for example, support for abortion on demand, gay civil partnership, the Kyoto Treaty and to oppose capital punishment (although it should be noted that such policies have little support among the party's grassroots membership).[24] In common with conservatives in many other countries, British Conservatives tend towards a patriotic rather than internationalist outlook, and are traditionally skeptical of the European Union.

Margaret Thatcher revitalized the British conservatives much like Reagan revitalized American conservatives. During her tenure as Prime Minister, she cut taxes, trimmed back at government waste, and exercised a strong national defense abroad (including the Falklands War of 1982).

Levels of prayer and worship are much lower in England and Wales than in the U.S., and religious issues thereby play less of a role in public discourse. However, religious issues remain a significant factor in Northern Ireland and in 2008 religious issues were significant during a special election in Scotland.

The broadcast media (dominated by the BBC) is almost exclusively liberal in tone. The print media is slightly different with conservative-leaning newspapers like the Daily Mail, Daily Express and Daily Telegraph selling more copies than their rivals.[25] However, even the print media generally leans liberal.

Conservatives in Canada

Many Canadian conservatives align with the Conservative Party of Canada, though the party does not strongly adhere to conservative values. The Christian Heritage Party is an example of a smaller but more consistent conservative Canadian party.

Conservatives in Australia

Australia was once more conservative than England but sweeping gun control laws pushed the nation leftward toward greater dependency on government in the last decade. In 2009, opposition to government control based on alleged global warming galvanized conservatives there and they led the Liberal Party of Australia to a repudiation of an emissions trading scheme.[26] Conservatives also support smaller political parties such as the Family First Party.

Conservatives in Latin America

In the early 21st century, Latin America has been shifting to the right,[27] and conservative evangelical Christians have been growing in political influence.[28][29]

Some notable Latin American conservatives include Jair Bolsonaro (Brazil), Eduardo Bolsonaro (Brazil), Ernesto Araújo (Brazil), Agustín Laje (Argentina), Nicolás Márquez (Argentina), José Antonio Kast (Chile), Hermógenes Pérez de Arce (Chile), Jimmy Morales (Guatemala), Fabricio Alvarado (Costa Rica),[30] Alberto Fujimori (Peru), Keiko Fujimori (Peru), Alvaro Uribe (Colombia) and Mario Abdo Benítez (Paraguay).

Conservatism and the French Revolution

Conservatism in France and the European continent generally arose in the after 1790 as a response to the radicalism of the French Revolution.

Benefits of Conservatism

Several facets of conservatism function in unison to make it an effective and powerful philosophy. Conservatism emphasizes personal freedom, independence, and initiative; this allows the best of the public to rise to their natural level of achievement. Conservatives recognize that big government fosters dependency and stifles individual achievement—and thus, weakens society as a whole.

At the same time, conservatives also recognize that with individual freedom comes individual responsibility. In the absence of a hand-holding nanny state, it is imperative that each individual take responsibility for his own actions, and exercise his rights and freedoms wisely and with discretion. Thus, social conservatism is also critical to a successful society, as it emphasizes the importance of morality, duty, and responsibility to one's self and fellow men.

American conservatives and happiness

See also: American liberalism and 21st century political losses and Secular leftists and psychogenic illness

Time magazine reported: "In the "who's happier?" race, a whole body of research shows conservatives report being happier. Four new studies published in Science hint at a possible reason why.[31]

Previous Breaking News:
Conservatives

See also

Further reading

  • Critchlow, Donald T. The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Political History (2007)
  • Filler, Louis. Dictionary of American Conservatism The First Complete Guide to Issues, People, Organizations and Events (1987), useful older encyclopedia
  • Frank, Thomas. What's the Matter with Kansas?: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America (2005), a liberal perspective excerpt and text search
  • Frohnen, Bruce et al. eds. American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia (2006), the most detailed reference
  • Judis, John B. William F. Buckley, Jr.: Patron Saint of the Conservatives (1988) excerpt and text search
  • Kirk, Russell. The Conservative Mind. (7th ed. 2001). highly influential conservative history of ideas online at ACLS e-books
  • Link, William A. Righteous warrior: Jesse Helms and the rise of modern conservatism (2008) 643 pages
  • Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. The Right Nation, (2004) influential survey excerpt and text search
  • Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. God Is Back: How the Global Revival of Faith Is Changing the World (2009)
  • Nash, George. The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945 (2006), excellent scholarly history. excerpt and text search
  • Pemberton, William E. Exit with Honor: The Life and Presidency of Ronald Reagan (1998) online edition
  • Perlstein, Rick. Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus (2004) on 1964 excerpt and text search
  • Perlstein, Rick. Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America (2008) excerpt and text search
  • Schneider, Gregory L. ed. Conservatism in America Since 1930: A Reader (2003)
  • Schoenwald; Jonathan. A Time for Choosing: The Rise of Modern American Conservatism (2002) online edition also online at ACLS e-books
  • Schweizer, Peter, and Wynton C. Hall, eds. Landmark Speeches of the American Conservative Movement (2007) excerpt and text search

References

  1. United States Department of State George Washington, farewell address, 1796
  2. Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary has the following definition of conservative: "tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions : TRADITIONAL"[1] Therefore, a conservative Christian would be one that tends to adhere to the morally sound doctrines of the early Christianity and Judeo-Christian values.
  3. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-phil-crane-obituary-20141109-story.html
  4. http://www.reason.com/news/show/29318.html
  5. Rossiter, "The Giants of American Conservatism," American Heritage 1955 6(6): 56-59, 94-96, online in EBSCO
  6. See Presidential 2008 Exit Poll
  7. Haidt: Conservatives Understand Liberals Better Than Liberals Understand Conservatives. The Independent Whig. Retrieved November 13, 2019.
  8. See on line results
  9. Jonah Goldberg, "What Is a 'Conservative'?", National Review Online, 11 May 2005
  10. [2]
  11. Why are 2012 and 2020 key years for Christian creationists and pro-lifers?
  12. See Leonard Moore, "Approaching Conservatism," OAH Magazine of History, 17 (January 2003) online edition
  13. [3]
  14. The word was originally used in the French Revolution. The British used it after 1839 to describe a major party. The first American usage is by Whigs who called themselves "Conservatives" in the late 1830s. Hans Sperber and Travis Trittschuh, American Political terms: An Historical Dictionary (1962) 94-97.
  15. Curtis, Bruce. "William Graham Sumner 'On the Concentration of Wealth.'" Journal of American History 1969 55(4): 823-832.
  16. Lapham 2004
  17. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100014891/barack-obama-has-failed-to-defeat-conservatism-in-america/
  18. http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/onprin/winter11/spalding.html
  19. Scaliger, Charles (February 23, 2017). Barack Obama's Legacy. The New American. Retrieved June 20, 2018.
  20. Adelmann, Bob (January 20, 2017). Is Obama Worst U.S. President? The New American. Retrieved June 20, 2018.
  21. Vargas, Mark (September 16, 2018). The legacy of Barack Obama (and it's not a good one). Washington Examiner. Retrieved September 16, 2018.
  22. https://twitter.com/dineshdsouza/status/760447860638789632
  23. Democrats lost over 1,000 seats under Obama. Fox News. December 27, 2016. Retrieved December 27, 2016.
  24. John Charmley, A History of Conservative Politics Since 1830, (2nd ed. 2008)
  25. Media UK; Introduction to newspapers in the UK
  26. http://www.smh.com.au/national/shock-result-as-abbott-wins-liberal-leadership-by-one-vote--ets-dead-20091201-k1uz.html
  27. Multiple references: See also:
  28. Puglie, Frederic (February 19, 2018). Evangelicals' newfound political clout in Latin America unnerves politicians, Catholic Church. The Washington Times. Retrieved October 28, 2018.
  29. Polimédio, Chayenne (January 24, 2018). The Rise of the Brazilian Evangelicals. The Atlantic. Retrieved October 28, 2018.
  30. Cullinan Hoffman, Matthew (February 5, 2018). Christian minister takes lead in Costa Rican presidential election after vowing to stop gay agenda. LifeSiteNews. Retrieved October 28, 2018.
  31. Liberals are More Honest Than Conservatives When They Smile, Time Magazine, 2015

External links