Difference between revisions of "Anarcho-tyranny"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
[https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/anarcho-tyranny-u-s-a/ Anarcho-Tyranny, U.S.A.] | [https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/anarcho-tyranny-u-s-a/ Anarcho-Tyranny, U.S.A.] | ||
| + | {{communism}} | ||
| + | {{globalism}} | ||
| + | [[Category:Fascism]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Globalism]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Liberalism]] | ||
[[Category:Police State]] | [[Category:Police State]] | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 17:47, August 16, 2024
Anarcho-tyranny is a when the government suppresses the innocent (tyranny) yet refuses to take any action whatsoever against people who are actually guilty (anarchy). A good example of anarcho-tyranny would be Kyle Rittenhouse's arrest and trial. Samuel T. Francis described it as the following,
| “ | This condition, which in some of my columns I have called "anarcho-tyranny," is essentially a kind of Hegelian synthesis of what appear to be dialectical opposites: the combination of oppressive government power against the innocent and the law-abiding and, simultaneously, a grotesque paralysis of the ability or the will to use that power to carry out basic public duties such as protection or public safety. And, it is characteristic of anarcho-tyranny that it not only fails to punish criminals and enforce legitimate order but also criminalizes the innocent.[1] | ” |
The term "anarcho-tyranny" is frequently used to describe the regimes of various left-wing national and subnational heads of government. The UK under socialist ruler Keir Starmer, who occupied 10 Downing Street in July 2024, has been described as "anarcho-tyranny" owing to the Starmer regime's two tier response to policing "far-right" civil unrest (see 2024 Starmer riots).[2]
References
External links
| ||||||||||||||||||||