Anarcho-tyranny

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Anarcho-tyranny is a when the government suppresses the innocent (tyranny) yet refuses to take any action whatsoever against people who are actually guilty (anarchy). A good example of anarcho-tyranny would be Kyle Rittenhouse's arrest and trial. Samuel T. Francis described it as the following,

This condition, which in some of my columns I have called "anarcho-tyranny," is essentially a kind of Hegelian synthesis of what appear to be dialectical opposites: the combination of oppressive government power against the innocent and the law-abiding and, simultaneously, a grotesque paralysis of the ability or the will to use that power to carry out basic public duties such as protection or public safety. And, it is characteristic of anarcho-tyranny that it not only fails to punish criminals and enforce legitimate order but also criminalizes the innocent.[1]

The term "anarcho-tyranny" is frequently used to describe the regimes of various left-wing national and subnational heads of government. The UK under socialist ruler Keir Starmer, who occupied 10 Downing Street in July 2024, has been described as "anarcho-tyranny" owing to the Starmer regime's two tier response to policing "far-right" civil unrest (see 2024 Starmer riots).[2] California governor Gavin Newsom's vision for America has also been described by The Heritage Foundation as "anarcho-tyranny", wherein he is willing to let violent criminals walk free but utilise government power to oppress ordinary, working-class and law-respecting Americans.[3]

References

  1. https://seekingalpha.com/instablog/131469-david-pinsen/5573521-anarcho-tyranny
  2. Is Britain falling apart?
  3. DeSantis, Newsom, and the Debate for America

External links

Anarcho-Tyranny, U.S.A.