Anthony Fauci

From Conservapedia
(Redirected from Fauci)
Jump to: navigation, search
Fauci. "To attack me is to attack science"

Anthony Fauci, M.D. is the current head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health. He has held that position since 1983, and has been a federal employee since 1968. Fauci is perhaps the highest-paid employee in the entire federal government, earning $417,600 a year plus lavish benefits. Fauci has confused himself with science. Some of his actions towards his fellow doctors and belligerent behavior towards Donald Trump as well as his size indicates that he suffers from Short Man Syndrome.

Fauci knew by mid-February 2020 that covid -19 was a Chinese-manufactured bioweapon and, as the nation's top health advisor, misled the president of the United States and the American people.[1]

Fauci has promoted vaccination as an approach to disease, and has been criticized for favoring approaches advantageous to Big Pharma.[2]

Evidence has been coming out that Dr. Fauci had funded gain-of-function research on coronavirus at the Wuhan lab, which was also done illegally via the NIH and EcoHealth Alliance[3] due to Barack Obama banning such research in the United States, which made him directly responsible for the coronavirus outbreak, with Rand Paul calling him out on it.[4] In addition, leaked audio around 2017 had him telling President Trump with certainty that he'll be facing a pandemic.[5]

The liberal media and Wikipedia heap unjustified praise on Fauci. Such as claiming he helped end the AIDS outbreak by developing a vaccine despite not actually doing so (with the closest thing to a treatment to AIDS actually coming from the private sector after he failed to produce results). Critics charge that he uses erroneous models that he does not adequately check, and makes recommendations for "forever" lifestyle changes that any individual patient would naturally refuse. There is also evidence that Fauci at best had grossly exaggerated the AIDS pandemic, including conflating HIV with AIDS and strongly and falsely implying that even standard heterosexual couples were vulnerable to getting it (when in reality, AIDS was limited strictly to homosexual men and/or promiscuous people, and only would cross over to heterosexuals if a woman happened to sleep with a bisexual man). Some physicians have also been requesting for Fauci to be fired for incompetence since 2003, even going as far as to contact C-SPAN to request it.[6] In an especially appalling display of arrogance, he also replied to a memo explicitly warning him of how China was at best fudging the numbers of the death rate of COVID among the Chinese and at worst completely fabricated the numbers by saying "Too Long for Me to Read."[7]

Emails publicized by Wikileaks reveal Dr. Fauci as a gushing admirer of Hillary Clinton.

February 12, 2020: Fauci forwarded an email warning the coronavirus came from a laboratory.[8]


See also: Coronavirus and Peter Daszak

Fauci told Jake Tapper of CNN in February 2020 that fifteen to twenty percent of those who contracted the CCP virus would require hospitalization. In March 2020, he said: “There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask.” Kim Kardashian invited Fauci to address a private Zoom call of thirty-seven Hollywood celebrity friends so they could ask him about quarantine measures.[9] Fauci had a Google Alert set up to send news articles about himself directly to his government email address. Any news article that mentioned the words “Anthony Fauci” or “Tony Fauci” was delivered straight to Fauci’s inbox.[10] Fauci told President Trump that millions of Americans would die if the U.S. did not implement draconian lockdowns.[11]

Fauci repeatedly criticized the inexpensive hydroxychloroquine as a treatment or prophylaxis for COVID-19, despite numerous studies indicating its possible effectiveness. Instead, Fauci promoted expensive alternatives lacking in any proven significant benefits.

In the spring of 2020 Fauci dismissed evidence that the coronavirus came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology laboratory, only to reverse himself after the Biden junta seized power. The denial of factual evidence by alleged scientific experts has been cited as a contributing factor to the 2020 presidential election outcome.[12]


From 2014 to 2019, $826,277 was given to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for bat coronavirus research by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which was headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci.[13] In an April 15, 2020 email marked “high” importance, Principal Deputy Director of NIH Lawrence Tabak emailed Fauci, NIH Director Francis Collins, and other NIH officials with the subject line: “HEADS UP: Wuhan lab research.” Tabak provides details of the grant to Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, for a project titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.” Tabak continues, saying, “The 3.7M dollar figure is over 6 years to all sites which include (several in) China, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia and Myanmar. We estimate that approximately $826,300 has been spent at this site since the inception of the grant. Yearly costs appear to be about 80K/year. The grant is in year 6 of a total of 10 year.”[14]

A January 9, 2020, email exchange labeled “high” importance between NIAID Senior Scientific Advisor Dr. David Morens and Daszak details the relationship between the Fauci agency and the Wuhan Institute of Virology.[15]

On January 23, 2020, the day the Wuhan viral outbreak was announced to the world, a senior NIH official, Melinda Hoskins, forwarded a Daily Mail article to colleagues discussing NIH/NIAID funding of the bat virus research, and noting that Fauci would be briefing senators the following morning. Hoskins says, “Would you please confirm the exact nature of our support to the Wuhan Institute of Virology/Biosafety Lab.” [16]

On October 1, 2017, after receiving Daszak’s email related to his then-unpublished paper describing detailed research into a novel bat-born virus tied to Swine Acute Diarrheal Syndrome, Fauci forwards Daszak’s email and paper on to NIH official Greg Folkers, saying, “Confidential, but fyi for you.” Daszak says, “You should know that this work was supported by a NIAID ROl that [NIH’s] Erik Stemmy is the Program Officer for, and that I’m PI [principal investigator] on, with Zhengli Shi [the director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases of the Wuhan Institute of Virology] as co-PI.”[17]

HIV infection

In Bruce Nussbaum's 1990 book, Good Intentions: How Big Business And the Medical Establishment Are Corrupting the Fight Against AIDS, a large portion is about how Fauci, in the late 1980s, used the federal bureaucracy to block all research on the development of a drug to treat AIDS. Fauci pushed his patented Interleukin 2, a derivative of which became the highly toxic and controversial AZT.[18]

In Celia Farber's 1989 expose on the scandal surrounding AZT, Sins of Omission, newspapers across America banner headlined that AZT had been proven to be effective in antibody positive, asymptomatic patients even though one of the main concerns was that the drug should only be used as a last resort for critically ill AIDS patients because of the drugs extreme toxicity. Fauci, head of the National Institute of Health, was pushing to expand its use. The FDA's traditional concerns had been set aside. AZT was already being by an estimated 20,000 people in sixty countries. Not only had no new evidence dispelled the initial concerns regarding AZT's toxicity and safety, but the follow-up data that had been promised was ignored. The beneficial effects of the drug had been proven to be temporary. the toxicity however stayed the same.

AZT had been approved faster than any drug in FDA history, and activists considered it a victory. The price paid for the victory however was that almost all government trials focused on AZT, while over 100 other promising drugs were left uninvestigated. The pharmaceutical manufacturers' stock price went through the roof when the announcement was made. AZT was the most expensive drug ever marketed.

On August 17, 1989 the government announced that 1.4 million healthy antibody positive Americans could benefit from taking AZT even though they showed no symptoms of the disease. New studies have proven that AZT is effective in stopping the progression of autoimmune deficiency syndrome in asymptomatic and early cases.

See also



External links